Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

Hi Chris, Yes for sure I do ! However it is my role to come up with a few different suggestions that could fit to their context and goal. They have a interesting culture that is mix of hierarchy and autonomy, but lack experience with large group dialogue. Now what I have is a broader range of p

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

enthusiasm generated by the OS > sessions. But if someone else has tried this and would say it could work > better than having it all in one go per OS event, then why not try this > too.> > The convergence of ideas in the "action space" must involve the key > decision ma

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

> mmmp > > > > > Am 20.10.2017 um 01:25 schrieb Carmela Ariza: > > Hi Christine, Hi Michael > > > > I like the action space idea, the invite all who cares in addition to > > the hosts or who proposed an agenda. > > > > I am not sure if postponing

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

ater date will be > the best option as it may dampen the enthusiasm generated by the OS > sessions. But if someone else has tried this and would say it could work > better than having it all in one go per OS event, then why not try this > too. > > The convergence of ideas in

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

m not sure if postponing the action planning to a later date will be the best option as it may dampen the enthusiasm generated by the OS sessions. But if someone else has tried this and would say it could work better than having it all in one go per OS event, then why not try this too. The con

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

he organization to distill and carry forward as most significant change > initiatives. > > I would invite all who want to and can attend to a follow-up 3.5 hour > convergence session. > If I could I would ask for most important themes/topics to be discussed > and volunteer > leaders

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

carry forward as most significant change initiatives. I would invite all who want to and can attend to a follow-up 3.5 hour convergence session. If I could I would ask for most important themes/topics to be discussed and volunteer leaders to step-up and move the topics forward. I would next invit

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

someone else has tried this and would say it could work better than having it all in one go per OS event, then why not try this too.  The convergence of ideas in the "action space" must involve the key decision makers. The "must" might be a wrong word to use in OS as we always say

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

y are >>> already facing overload. They expect to have to prioritize the projects >>> that come out of the OS as they expect many projects and probably won't be >>> able to fund all of them. >>> They are aware they should invent a new model but right at t

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

tion Planning or as some > of us call it "Action Space". > > Convergence in the traditional way is more a detour into statistics, dots and > all than going the actionorienting route with passion and responsibility. > > In my experience and book it takes exactly 3.5

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

27;t be able >> to fund all of them. >> They are aware they should invent a new model but right at the moment they >> want to follow up everything, which, of course, shows that it's not easy to >> change the model. But I

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

ey >> want to follow up everything, which, of course, shows that it's not easy to >> change the model. But I am confident that with a few conversations they can >> consider other options. >> >> I suggested to organize one day convergence after those 3 events. &

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

t; to fund all of them. >> They are aware they should invent a new model but right at the moment they >> want to follow up everything, which, of course, shows that it's not easy to >> change the model. But I am confident that with a few conversations they can >> conside

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

Dear Christine, is it Action/Projects/Initiatives/etc. that the sponsor wants? If so, they should simply invite any and all for Action Planning or as some of us call it "Action Space". Convergence in the traditional way is more a detour into statistics, dots and all than

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

they > want to follow up everything, which, of course, shows that it's not easy to > change the model. But I am confident that with a few conversations they can > consider other options. > > I suggested to organize one day convergence after those 3 events. > How would you

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

ow up everything, which, of course, shows that it's not easy to change the model. But I am confident that with a few conversations they can consider other options. I suggested to organize one day convergence after those 3 events. How would you design it ? and who would you invite ? I would love  to

Re: [OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

which, of course, shows that it's not easy to > change the model. But I am confident that with a few conversations they can > consider other options. > > I suggested to organize one day convergence after those 3 events. > How would you design it ? and who woul

[OSList] what convergence after 3 OS events ?

they should invent a new model but right at the moment they want to follow up everything, which, of course, shows that it's not easy to change the model. But I am confident that with a few conversations they can consider other options. I suggested to organize one day convergence after thos

Re: [OSList] prework but no convergence

; prework? >> >> Or do you mean no one from top management will be there, the day of the >> events? >> >> Or both? Sounds like both, is this correct? >> >> >> On 9/4/13 1:43 PM, christine koehler wrote: >> >>Hi everybody, >> >

Re: [OSList] prework but no convergence

like both, is this correct? > > > On 9/4/13 1:43 PM, christine koehler wrote: > >Hi everybody, > > I am currently working with a consultant who has sold to his client a one > day OST for 100 managers, without convergence. > He also sold one day with 3x8 people, repre

Re: [OSList] prework but no convergence

e from top management will be there, the day of the events? Or both? Sounds like both, is this correct? On 9/4/13 1:43 PM, christine koehler wrote: Hi everybody, I am currently working with a consultant who has sold to his client a one day OST for 100 managers, without convergence. He also so

[OSList] prework but no convergence

Hi everybody, I am currently working with a consultant who has sold to his client a one day OST for 100 managers, without convergence. He also sold one day with 3x8 people, representative of the group. His idea was to interview them in order to have them talk at the beginning of the OST. I

Re: [OSList] Half-day Open Space? - Different convergence

Diane, thans so much for your detailed explanations, another piece to keep in mind! lolll, * Eleder BuM31Mind Mapping-Open Space Technology-Sormena* http://www.burumapak.blogspot.com/ (eus) @Eleder_BuM (Twitter) http://www.in-fluyendo.blogspot.com/ (esp) http://w

Re: [OSList] Half-day Open Space? - Different convergence

Hi Elder, This approach of an Action Sheet as you describe below works well for short OS events even if participants have not read reports at the News wall and other reports to be completed after the closing. I also use it for multiple OS consultations where the client does not want actions d

[OSList] placemaking, City Repair, and the Village Building Convergence

o look like, or what does wave riding look like. perhaps this is one of the answers? every year, City Repair (Portland, Oregon, USA) organizes a Village Building Convergence (VBC number 11 is happening as we speak)-- different neighborhood sites organize workparties to build "places"

Re: Convergence of Themes -- theatre and Sreet Kids

rison Owen" Date: Tue, Sep 28, 2010 21:37 Subject: Convergence of Themes -- theatre and Sreet Kids To: I love it when a plan comes together! Or maybe better - I love it when thinking converges. Pat Black's posting about Sugata and the Hole in the Wall crowd set the stage. Sugata, of cours

Convergence of Themes -- theatre and Sreet Kids

I love it when a plan comes together! Or maybe better - I love it when thinking converges. Pat Black's posting about Sugata and the Hole in the Wall crowd set the stage. Sugata, of course was not doing an Open Space - it was even better. He was being open space. I just loved his repeated phrase, "A

Re: Convergence with more self-organization

ested an adaptation to the process of action planning for priorities set by the group after discussions. This option - One Market Place Per Priority - offers a convergence process with more space for self-organization, which is the fundamental intent of Open Space. Participants choose which of the

Re: Convergence with more self-organization

the process of action planning for priorities set by the group after discussions. This option - One Market Place Per Priority - offers a convergence process with more space for self-organization, which is the fundamental intent of Open Space. Participants choose which of the priorities the

Re: Convergence with more self-organization

suggested an adaptation to the process of action planning for priorities set > by the group after discussions. > > This option - *One Market Place Per Priority - *offers a convergence > process with more space for self-organization, which is the fundamental > intent of Open S

Re: Convergence with more self-organization

one, >> At a recent training workshop I facilitated in Ottawa, some participants >> suggested an adaptation to the process of action planning for priorities set >> by the group after discussions. This option - One Market Place Per Priority >> - offers a convergence proc

Re: Convergence with more self-organization

Thanks Diane! That's a great idea. As Jack, I'm keeping this for future reference. Cheers! Esther Matte From: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Diane Gibeault Sent: 7 septembre 2010 8:54 To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Convergence with

Convergence with more self-organization

Hi everyone, At a recent training workshop I facilitated in Ottawa, some participants suggested an adaptation to the process of action planning for priorities set by the group after discussions. This option - One Market Place Per Priority - offers a convergence process with more space for

Re: convergence query

Thanks for the helpful (and provocative) comments on my query re convergence, especially Chris, Michael, Jack, Wendy, Christine, Peggy (apolgies if I've missed anyone). All helpful stuff. I'm signing off for a week while I go to my brother's wedding...in the Hunter Valley. Th

Re: convergence query

Since others have spoken to the question of control/engagement, I won't. Over the last year or two, I've been playing with approaches to convergence. I've noticed three situations with different centers of gravity: * The focus is on individual action People come from all

Re: convergence query

experience I know that convergence "old style" (voting, dots, Delphi, families of issues)is a low energy drag since it focuses on "themes" rather than "issues" or "projects" and does not allow the rich potential for action to unfold? Is it that I f

Re: convergence query

Michael ~ I frequently blend methods and have never seen a downside if the principles and practices of each of the methods are honored.    Since you are thinking about World Cafe conversations for the convergence, might you extend the time a bit so that participants have the opportunity to do more

Re: convergence query

shape policy? > Is it that I wonder why I am invíted to make an input and not to actually > be involved in shaping policy? > Is it that from my experience I know that convergence "old style" (voting, > dots, Delphi, families of issues)is a low energy drag since it focuses on >

convergence query

s (as do I) that it could be useful to invite the group into some preliminary `first cut' analysis of emerging themes as a 'convergence' activity. I am wondering how to do this is way which is somewhat more conversational than the "red dot" system. I quite like the W

Re: convergence query

communications after the event so that people can > see how their input was used to shape policy. > > The sponsor believes (as do I) that it could be useful to invite the group > into some preliminary `first cut' analysis of emerging themes as a > 'convergence' activit

Re: convergence query

after the event so that people can see how their input was used to shape policy. The sponsor believes (as do I) that it could be useful to invite the group into some preliminary `first cut' analysis of emerging themes as a 'convergence' activity. I am wondering how to do this i

Re: Convergence or Group Consensus

o:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Chris Corrigan Sent: 18 mars 2008 12:51 To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Re: Convergence or Group Consensus I have in the past done a useful convergence within the confines of an organization's strategic plan, and I think it was i

Re: Convergence or Group Consensus

reopen space for action..just like the host creates that safe space at the very beginning of the OS by speaking to the goal, givens if any, leadership's commitment and encouraging creative thinking. At convergence, this same message is focused on confirming the safe space around the priorities

Re: Convergence or Group Consensus

I have in the past done a useful convergence within the confines of an organization's strategic plan, and I think it was inspired by Michael Pannwitz. Basically the client said that the 30 people in the room could host discussions on anything they wanted to, but if they wanted their proposa

Re: Convergence or Group Consensus

some feedback after from some participants that they felt the process had been excellent to the point of convergence, and somewhat contrived afterwards. I vowed not to do this again. I would recommend that you try and ask your client to trust the process, and keep it open. There is the sense tha

Re: Convergence or Group Consensus

Institute www.openspaceworld.org > > Personal website www.ho-image.com > > OSLIST: To subscribe, unsubscribe, change your options, view the > archives Visit: > www.listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html<http://listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html> > > > > -Original

Re: Convergence or Group Consensus

nt to give too much away in the convergence process (or the 'invitation to action phase'). The client just isn't willing to give a green light, in advance, to whatever project emerges, and doesn't want to mislead the people assembled. Would the re-opening of the space on the thi

Re: Convergence or Group Consensus

2008 9:08 AM To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Re: Convergence or Group Consensus Thank you Harrison, Michael and Michael for your simple, elegant suggestions. I am wondering how you (or anyone else) would handle this situation: The client is happy to open the space for issues and idea

Re: Convergence or Group Consensus

e anchored with leadership support. Diane From: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Martin Boroson Sent: 14 mars 2008 09:08 To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Re: Convergence or Group Consensus Thank you Harrison, Michael and Michael for your simpl

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus

Diana: Impact and Energy: One on the "it" side" and one on the "passion" side. Great combination. Larry Larry Peterson Associates in Transformation Toronto, ON, Canada 416.653.4829 la...@spiritedorg.com www.spiritedorg.com

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus

the work into the 'real world' of the everyday working, in the desk chairs again. mherman On Sun, Mar 9, 2008 at 12:10 PM, Martin Boroson wrote: > Great discussion. I'm very interested in this evolution of our > understanding, and thanks to everyone for sharing your expe

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus: Here: Action Planning, somewhat lengthy

rlin mmp Martin Boroson wrote: Great discussion. I'm very interested in this evolution of our understanding, and thanks to everyone for sharing your experience and wisdom. I assumed that the ability to facilitate 'natural convergence' is one of the most wonderful, magica

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus

Great discussion. I'm very interested in this evolution of our understanding, and thanks to everyone for sharing your experience and wisdom. I assumed that the ability to facilitate 'natural convergence' is one of the most wonderful, magical, and marketable features of OS

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus

ist.html -Original Message- From: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Martin Boroson Sent: Sunday, March 09, 2008 2:10 PM To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Re: Convergence for Group Consensus Great discussion. I'm very interested in this evolution of our underst

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus

Diana-- I like the sound of your approach. The term "impact" is a little vague for me (and also a bit more violent than I would like to use ): could you say a little about what it means to you and what you hope it means to your participants? Thanks! -- :- Doug. Germann

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus

07, 2008 11:13 AM To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Re: Convergence for Group Consensus I'm late to the conversation, and this discussion of PASSION hooked me. I'm also skeptical of group consensus. Particularly with larger groups; i.e., more than ~10 people. More and more often, in

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus

After working for a while "by the book" and doing the 55 dots convergence followed by action planning around the 7 most highly voted issues I came to the conclusion that I, clients,the real business issue at hand, the world, etc. dont benefit much from consensus (especially by votin

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus

iana Larsen co-author: "Agile Retrospectives: Making Good Teams Great!" Ask me about: * "Secrets of Agile Teamwork: Beyond Technical Skills" * April 21-23, Stockholm, Sweden; June 3-5, Portland, Oregon 503 288 3550 www.futureworksconsulting.com/blog On Mar 7, 2008, at 12:45

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

Seems like convergence, action planning and carrying out the action was all wrapped up into 3 nanoseconds. Way cool! Greetings from Berlin mmp Harrison Owen wrote: On the subject of Door Prizes - my very favorite happened when I was an early teenager. Thirteen to be exact, and for all you

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

Harrison I checked the Users Manual (always next to my desk) on convergence, as you suggested. Forgive me for quoting you back to you, but there are a couple of differences between what you said in the Manual and what you've written below, and I'm really interested in understandin

Re: Convergence for Group Consensus

n Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2008 5:34 PM To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Re: Convergence for Group Consensu Harrison I checked the Users Manual (always next to my desk) on convergence, as you suggested. Forgive me for quoting you back to you, but there are a couple of differences b

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

the door. Talk about building community. Loving your neighbor, Caring for the down trodden. I have been trying to reform ever since. But one thing for sure -- I, with the help of Sniffy, created a lot of Open Space! But when it comes to convergence, I don't think I had the proper instructions.

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

customs. :-) Chris On Wed, Mar 5, 2008 at 11:13 AM, avner wrote: > How didn`t I think about it Michael? > > Avner > > - Original Message - > From: "Michael M Pannwitz" > To: > Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:54 PM > Subject: Re: Convergence for Group

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

How didn`t I think about it Michael? Avner - Original Message - From: "Michael M Pannwitz" To: Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:54 PM Subject: Re: Convergence for Group Consensu come on avner, thats simple: you look in the catalogue of doors and find out how much that

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

Thank you dear Christee, great to hear from you We will try it in Israel Avner - Original Message - From: Christy Lee-Engel To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 8:58 PM Subject: Re: Convergence for Group Consensu Hi dear Avner and all, A

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

Chris, what is a `door prize drawing`?, for us the non english speakers? Avner - Original Message - From: Diane Gibeault To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 6:43 PM Subject: Re: Convergence for Group Consensu Hadn't thought of that

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

- Original Message - From: Diane Gibeault To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Sent: Wednesday, March 05, 2008 6:43 PM Subject: Re: Convergence for Group Consensu Hadn't thought of that Chris. The door prize is a fun way to reconnect with the more free and playful part of O

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

Dear Kimberley, your inquiry has initiated a number of responses. And I have tempted myself to add another response since I intrigue myself with the question of "conversion", "consensus" and "action planning" in the ongoing journey of my ever changing practice as os facilitator. I have been res

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Re: Convergence for Group Consensu That's a very cool way to do it Diane. could combine it with a door prize drawing as well (also very common in Aboriginal community meetings ...:-) ) Thanks for this. chris On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:13

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

ish speakers? > > Avner > > - Original Message - > *From:* Diane Gibeault > *To:* osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 05, 2008 6:43 PM > *Subject:* Re: Convergence for Group Consensu > > Hadn't thought of that Chris. The door prize is a fun

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

That's a very cool way to do it Diane. could combine it with a door prize drawing as well (also very common in Aboriginal community meetings ...:-) ) Thanks for this. chris On Tue, Mar 4, 2008 at 11:13 AM, Diane Gibeault wrote: > Hi Kim, > > > > When looking for the general directions the m

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

Hi Kim, When looking for the general directions the majority of a group wishes to take after discussions in Open Space, here is an option similar to dot voting but with less peer influence on the results. That may not always be important but when it is, the following alternative helps. Can

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

nice, diane. computer voting without the computers. here's some language i've adapted from what i've heard harrison use, for invitations and opening briefings: ...Differences of opinion do exist, but it is out of this rich diversity that powerful new futures can be formed now. ...hope that each

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

Kimberly: Good question. I've been working with consensus models for a while now both in Open Space and with other methodologies and here is some of what I have learned. I think there are two uses o fthe word "consensus" in common parlance, and I can see both used in this little thread. One ref

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

First, thanks to Harrison for your legacy of profound inspiration. As for building consensus, two things have been important for me. On Day 1 asking people in groups to keep track and record all and any areas of agreement: Wrap up conversations with the question about what there is alignment on. T

Re: Convergence for Group Consensu

, change your options, view the archives Visit: www.listserv.boisestate.edu/archives/oslist.html -Original Message- From: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu] On Behalf Of Kimberley Willing Sent: Monday, March 03, 2008 11:09 PM To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Converg

Convergence for Group Consensu

Does anyone have any experience or advice in 'converging' open space, in such a way that the emerging consensus of the whole group is identified? Specifically, I have a 2 day event coming up - the purpose of which is to develop a best practice framework for reporting on the topic, and at least

Re: Advice for convergence

27;s names connected to their work and to ensure that no one moves another person's work around. Without that you don't have the necessary responsibility to see the conversation through, especially to convergence. To me it would make more sense to find a way to have a central bulletin board so

Advice for convergence

er by your postings. I'm already planning to come to the SF OSonOS. I am part of a facilitation team planning an Open Space for the General Assembly (GA) of the Unitarian Universalist Association of Congregations (UUA) in a few weeks. My key question for you all is about the convergence proce

Re: Paper: "Convergence Approaches" - and other papers and resources

Hello, Maria - Maria wrote: < I've had the opportunity to open several one-day Open Space events but never had the opportunity for a 2-day event until now. My first thought"ConvergenceI've never done it the OS way. How do I do it well?" And the answer was your

Re: Paper: "Convergence Approaches"

Dear Lisa, I've had the opportunity to open several one-day Open Space events but never had the opportunity for a 2-day event until now. My first thought"ConvergenceI've never done it the OS way. How do I do it well?" And the answer was your timely reference to the

Paper: "Convergence Approaches"

Next: "Convergence Approaches" http://www.openingspace.net/openSpaceTechnology_method_resources_Converg ence_Approaches.shtml Lisa ___ L i s a H e f t Consultant, Facilitator, Educator O p e n i n g S p a c e 2325 Oregon Berkeley, California 94705-1106

Paper: "Convergence -- A Conversation"

Next: "Convergence - A Conversation" http://www.openingspace.net/openSpaceTechnology_method_resources_Converg ence_A_Conversation.shtml Lisa ___ L i s a H e f t Consultant, Facilitator, Educator O p e n i n g S p a c e 2325 Oregon Berkeley, Califo

Re: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy AND Follow-up practices

Larry-- This is great stuff! I'd really like a peek at the simple project planning approach, if that is available somewhere. I'd like to compare with my own "simple approach," which I've used in similar situations. Besides, I'm facilitating a short OS next month with a group of project manag

Re: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy AND Follow-up practices

Thanks Larry...that's another great addition to the ideas we're gathering. Chris - CHRIS CORRIGAN Consultation - Facilitation Open Space Technology Weblog: http://www.chriscorrigan.com/parkinglot Site: http://www.chriscorrigan.com * * ==

Re: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy AND Follow-up practices

Eva and All: I'm glad to be able to check in to so many exiting conversations on the list. I've done some things like Eva with clients with ongoing OS and change work. Recently I was part of the facilitation of a follow-up to the 5 simultaneous OS events I mentioned. I am working with Starfield

SV: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy AND Follow-up practices

st.se -Ursprungligt meddelande- Från: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu]För Chris Corrigan Skickat: den 9 november 2004 23:45 Till: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Ämne: Re: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy Sorry I hit send too soon... On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:30:12 -0800, Chris Corrigan

Re: SV: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy AND Follow-up practices

05 > Mobil:0706-89 85 50 > e...@epshumaninvest.se > www.epshumaninvest.se > > -Ursprungligt meddelande- > Från: OSLIST [mailto:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu]För Chris Corrigan > Skickat: den 9 november 2004 23:45 > Till: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu > Ämne: Re:

FW: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy

o:osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu]On Behalf Of Chris Corrigan Sent: dinsdag 9 november 2004 23:45 To: osl...@listserv.boisestate.edu Subject: Re: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy Sorry I hit send too soon... On Tue, 9 Nov 2004 14:30:12 -0800, Chris Corrigan wrote: > On Tue, 9 Nov 2004

Re: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy

Johann wrote: > How do you "wrap up" in non-convergence? Voting serves me well, > because at the end I can say to the attendants: "today we have worked hard, > had fun, and this is the result: those are the issues we care about, and in > that order". Top mana

Re: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy

ther way... feels like an unaccomplished task. How do you "wrap up" in non-convergence? Voting serves me well, because at the end I can say to the attendants: "today we have worked hard, had fun, and this is the result: those are the issues we care about, and in that order&qu

Re: Non-convergence, action planning and strategy

rs to which will probably be useful in this context. The basic non-convergence process is this: 1. Participants receive a copy of the proceedings with the instructions to review them and note pieces of action which stand out, things that must be done, projects and patterns that seems to want to emer

Non-convergence, action planning and strategy

has some > material on how to do that. OK...I'll bite...but I'm changing the name of the thread because I have a practice question that goes along with this, the answers to which will probably be useful in this context. The basic non-convergence process is this: 1. Participants receive a co

Re: OS and convergence / Action Planning all the time

Thank you, Chris. I like the idea of making visible to the whole group all the "small" results from the event exceeding the action planning itself. I'll try that out! Cheers, Marei "Chris Corrigan" schrieb: > Marei Kiele wrote: > > >A bit late, I know, but it took me a month to catch up with

Re: OS and convergence / Action Planning all the time

Marei Kiele wrote: A bit late, I know, but it took me a month to catch up with all this wonderful stuff on the list I collected within two weeks off-line around easter. Chris, would you please say a bit more about the forms you hand out. What are you doing with them when filled out? Are the a

Re: OS and convergence / Action Planning all the time

A bit late, I know, but it took me a month to catch up with all this wonderful stuff on the list I collected within two weeks off-line around easter. Chris, would you please say a bit more about the forms you hand out. What are you doing with them when filled out? Are the answers going to be pub

Re: Kim (convergence and action planning)

Hey Kimberly What happened? I'd love to know. Warm regards Robyn Williams PERSISTENCE OF VISION Facilitates sustainability RE: "Phew - something like that anyway. I'm very excited! Will keep you posted." * * == osl...@listserv.boisest

Re: convergence and action planning

type=2 and look at picture Nr. 19 and 20 On Mon, 26 Apr 2004 22:10:34 -0300, Judi Richardson wrote: >Hello All, > >In the past two months I've facilitated two OST meetings with a twist to the >convergence. Both groups moved to priority setting and action planning. >After

Re: merger, convergence and action planning

I recently worked with a recently Merged organization (1-2 years) of 3 major organizations. It was the same group that did the five simultaneous OST events I recently reported. We worked with the Planning Team to determine the type of convergence they wanted and needed after the first staff

convergence and action planning

Hello All, In the past two months I've facilitated two OST meetings with a twist to the convergence. Both groups moved to priority setting and action planning. After meeting with the client, we chose a non-convergence -- re-opening the space. The larger of the two groups was around 100 p

  1   2   3   >