Re: [otrs] Feature Request

2003-03-05 Thread Sebastian Wormser
Hi Wiktor, Quoting Wiktor Wodecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > I understand the need for such a feature, no question about this. > > In general there is the problem of proper usage and maintenace of > > the custom fields in the OTRS (and the underlying database). > > > > I can say from practical expe

Re: [otrs] Feature Request

2003-03-01 Thread Sebastian Wormser
Hi Charles, Quoting "Charles R. \"Rusty\" Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I would like to request there be more fields for customer contact > information such as phone, alt phone fax and a few custom fields that can be > relabeled to meet the needs of the OTRS implementor. Right now we have to >

Re: [otrs] Install Problems

2003-02-26 Thread Sebastian Wormser
r? > Doug cu, Sibbi -- Sebastian Wormser You can observe a lot by just watching. ___ OTRS mailing list: otrs - Webpage: http://otrs.org/ Archive: http://lists.otrs.org/pipermail/otrs To unsubscribe: http://lists.otrs.org/cgi-bin/listinfo/otrs

Re: [otrs] pop3

2002-11-11 Thread Sebastian Wormser
Hi Diego, Zitat von Diego Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Is it possible to access system email accounts with a email pop/Imap > client? If so, i need to block the access posibility I do not really undertand the question. If you are concerned that Mails stored in the OTRS can be accessed via po

Re: [otrs] procmail out of memory and lock files

2002-11-05 Thread Sebastian Wormser
Hi Eddie, Zitat von Eddie Urenda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I don't know if anyone has been having problems like this, but we > occassionally have procmail lockup on us with the following log > messages: > > Nov 4 11:58:53 procmail[5047]: Out of memory as I tried to > allocate 134582620 bytes

Re: [otrs] Special characters in the subject

2002-09-24 Thread Sebastian Wormser
Hi Ralph, Zitat von Ralph Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > But now I experienced a problem with special characters > (Umlauten) in the subject. If a customer uses such characters > in the subject field and than he/she answers to an reply, the > answers is not attached to the existing case, a new ca