On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 5:06 PM Stéphane Graber wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 6:55 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
> >
> > On 3/31/22 06:24, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> > > Thanks for the patch!
> > >
> > > I've applied it on top of my 5.17.1 and I'm now getting a very very
> > > large number of:
> > >
Hi Ilya,
Thanks for review comments.
> -Original Message-
> From: Ilya Maximets
> Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2022 10:46 PM
> To: Amber, Kumar ; ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: i.maxim...@ovn.org; Ferriter, Cian ; Stokes, Ian
> ; f...@sysclose.org; echau...@redhat.com; Van
> Haaren, Harry
Hi everyone,
We have a weekly OVN development meeting on Thursdays in the
#openvswitch channel on the Libera.Chat IRC server. Some OVN devs found
the current meeting time to be inconvenient, so during today's meeting
we agreed that we would move the meeting one hour earlier than it
already is
On Tue, Mar 29, 2022 at 01:06:36PM +0200, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 2/25/22 13:29, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> > On Thu, Feb 24, 2022 at 03:20:23PM +0100, Eelco Chaudron wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 23 Feb 2022, at 17:23, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 22, 2022 at 04:26:10PM
Hello:
This patch was applied to netdev/net.git (master)
by Jakub Kicinski :
On Wed, 30 Mar 2022 15:42:45 -0400 you wrote:
> When hitting the recirculation limit, the kernel would currently log
> something like this:
>
> [ 58.586597] openvswitch: ovs-system: deferred action limit reached, drop
On 3/31/22 17:21, David Marchand wrote:
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 4:41 PM Eelco Chaudron wrote:
The dp_netdev_get_pmd() function is using only the hash of the core_id
to get the pmd structure. So in case of hash collisions, the wrong pmd
is returned.
This patch is fixing this by checking for
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 4:41 PM Eelco Chaudron wrote:
>
> The dp_netdev_get_pmd() function is using only the hash of the core_id
> to get the pmd structure. So in case of hash collisions, the wrong pmd
> is returned.
>
> This patch is fixing this by checking for the correct core_id using
> the CMA
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022 at 6:55 AM Ilya Maximets wrote:
>
> On 3/31/22 06:24, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> > Thanks for the patch!
> >
> > I've applied it on top of my 5.17.1 and I'm now getting a very very
> > large number of:
> >
> > [ 188.616220] openvswitch: netlink: ovs_ct_free_action at depth 3
>
On Thu, Mar 31, 2022, 8:32 AM Abhiram Sangana
wrote:
> Hi Numan,
>
> Is it ok if we make the “gateway_port” column optional in a subsequent
> patch?
> Will send out a v5 patch that addresses other comments.
>
I'm fine if you can
- make the column as weak reference
- and if gateway_port is not
The dp_netdev_get_pmd() function is using only the hash of the core_id
to get the pmd structure. So in case of hash collisions, the wrong pmd
is returned.
This patch is fixing this by checking for the correct core_id using
the CMAP_FOR_EACH_WITH_HASH macro.
Fixes: b19befaef ("dpif-netdev: Add fu
> -Original Message-
> From: Amber, Kumar
> Sent: Wednesday 23 March 2022 12:40
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: f...@sysclose.org; i.maxim...@ovn.org; Ferriter, Cian
> ; Stokes, Ian
> ; echau...@redhat.com; Van Haaren, Harry
> ; Amber,
> Kumar
> Subject: [PATCH v7 4/4] tests/mfex
> -Original Message-
> From: Amber, Kumar
> Sent: Wednesday 23 March 2022 12:40
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: f...@sysclose.org; i.maxim...@ovn.org; Ferriter, Cian
> ; Stokes, Ian
> ; echau...@redhat.com; Van Haaren, Harry
> ; Amber,
> Kumar
> Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] dpif-netde
> -Original Message-
> From: Amber, Kumar
> Sent: Wednesday 23 March 2022 12:40
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: f...@sysclose.org; i.maxim...@ovn.org; Ferriter, Cian
> ; Stokes, Ian
> ; echau...@redhat.com; Van Haaren, Harry
> ; Amber,
> Kumar
> Subject: [PATCH v7 3/4] dpif-netde
> -Original Message-
> From: Amber, Kumar
> Sent: Wednesday 23 March 2022 12:40
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: f...@sysclose.org; i.maxim...@ovn.org; Ferriter, Cian
> ; Stokes, Ian
> ; echau...@redhat.com; Van Haaren, Harry
> ; Amber,
> Kumar
> Subject: [PATCH v7 1/4] dpif-netde
> -Original Message-
> From: Amber, Kumar
> Sent: Wednesday 23 March 2022 12:40
> To: ovs-dev@openvswitch.org
> Cc: f...@sysclose.org; i.maxim...@ovn.org; Ferriter, Cian
> ; Stokes, Ian
> ; echau...@redhat.com; Van Haaren, Harry
> ; Amber,
> Kumar
> Subject: [PATCH v7 0/4] IPv4 Hashi
Hi Numan,
Is it ok if we make the “gateway_port” column optional in a subsequent patch?
Will send out a v5 patch that addresses other comments.
Thanks,
Abhiram Sangana
> On 30 Mar 2022, at 19:32, Numan Siddique wrote:
>
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2022 at 1:41 PM Abhiram Sangana
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Numa
currently ovn-controller allow users to claim lport of type container
to ovs bridge which is invalid use-case.
This patch will prevent such invalid use-cases by ignoring the claiming
requests for container lports and will throw a warning message to the
controller logs.
Signed-off-by: Mohammad Hei
On 3/31/22 06:24, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> Thanks for the patch!
>
> I've applied it on top of my 5.17.1 and I'm now getting a very very
> large number of:
>
> [ 188.616220] openvswitch: netlink: ovs_ct_free_action at depth 3
>
> After just 3 minutes of uptime I'm seeing 230 such lines but also
On 3/30/22 22:36, Gregory Rose wrote:
>
>
> On 3/21/2022 3:18 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>> On 1/6/21 20:42, Ilya Maximets wrote:
>>> On 1/6/21 8:09 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
On 1/6/2021 10:55 AM, Ilya Maximets wrote:
> On 1/6/21 7:09 PM, Gregory Rose wrote:
>>
>>
>> On
On 30 Mar 2022, at 21:42, Stéphane Graber wrote:
> When hitting the recirculation limit, the kernel would currently log
> something like this:
>
> [ 58.586597] openvswitch: ovs-system: deferred action limit reached, drop
> recirc action
>
> Which isn't all that useful to debug as we only have
On 3/30/22 22:35, Ilya Maximets wrote:
On 3/23/22 12:56, Adrian Moreno wrote:
When running builds with UBSan, some undefined behavior was detected in the
iteration of common data data structures in OVS.
Coincidentally, a bug was reported [1] whose root cause whas another, this time
undetecte
21 matches
Mail list logo
