I think I've seen plenty of suggestions to avoid using IE in similar
circumstances.
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
Behalf Of Wallace Turner
Sent: Friday, 11 January 2013 4:53 PM
To: ozDotNet
Subject: [OT] Java 0-day vulnerability
Because it seems that with .NET, problems are actually fixed; no one gives
Microsoft the credit they deserve! When is the last time you have heard of the
bad guys touching an ASP.net web site with there poison code?
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com [mailto:ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com] On
This is not an attack against Java or JSP based websites - this is an attack
against Java running in your client browser.
And there have been plenty of attacks against vulnerabilities exploitable via
IE (e.g. in XML parser, DHTML etc.)
Cheers
Ken
From: ozdotnet-boun...@ozdotnet.com
Folks, I'm experimenting with VS2012's unit testing features. When this
feature arrived many years ago I found it crippled and difficult to
navigate, so I continued using NUnit. Now I am compelled to use the Visual
Studio test features.
The first confusion is the 3 different windows. I have 'Test
Forget my problem with the test output. I was dumping rows from an empty
database table, so there was no output.
Now I can see all of the 4 types of WriteLines appearing in a new pane when
I click the 'Output' link. It's curious that the Console output comes
first, then the Debug and Trace output
I think I've lost more sleep on MS Test than any other technology from MS
including COM! I believe it's a tool from the pre MS accepting the open
source ecosystem and it did show it's 'me too'
I've not used it since vs2010 and wouldn't wish that tool on my enemies.
Well maybe some all of them.
I
