https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1018393
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
lv2-artyfx-plugins-0-1.2.20131011git918613f.fc19 has been submitted as an
update for Fedora 19.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023690
Bug ID: 1023690
Summary: Review Request: rspamd - Fast, free and open-source
spam filtering system
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
Bug ID: 1023706
Summary: Review Request: ghc-zlib - Compression and
decompression in the gzip and zlib formats
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
--- Comment #1 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
This package built on koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6104174
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023619
Emmanuel Seyman emman...@seyman.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
Bug ID: 1023714
Summary: Review Request: lpf skype: Skype internet phone client
package bootstrap
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||182235 (FE-Legal)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023714
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review Request: lpf skype: |Review Request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
Darryl L. Pierce dpie...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023706
--- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Tidied the description:
Spec: http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-zlib/ghc-zlib.spec
SRPM:
http://petersen.fedorapeople.org/reviews/ghc-zlib/ghc-zlib-0.5.4.1-26.fc19.src.rpm
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #41 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
(In reply to Björn besser82 Esser from comment #40)
btw. looking at comment 9: mschwendt said he got the build working using
`export LANG=us_US.UTF-8` before invoking the compiler-stage.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892335
--- Comment #42 from Sven Baus s.bau...@gmx.net ---
SPEC:
http://sbbaus.fedorapeople.org/AudioCuesheetEditor/SPECS/AudioCuesheetEditor.spec
RPM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=875087
Paul Cochrane p...@liekut.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(p...@liekut.de) |
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
--- Comment #4 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
You can use cblrpm -l spec to force a BinLib package to become Lib.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
--- Comment #5 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
(Hmm perhaps cblrpm should just default all package with a library to be called
ghc-*. I might do that in the next release.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023601
--- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen peter...@redhat.com ---
Sorry I see I didn't answer your actual question:
Should I just combine the subpackage it made (ghc-aeson-pretty) and the base
package (aeson-pretty) into ghc-aeson-pretty?
Hmm it
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021919
--- Comment #2 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
admesh has been built for rawhide.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Oops, I run fedora-review on this, and there still are issues:
1. Bundled jar/class files should be removed before build
There's lib/javaversion.class, which should be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=995933
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
Thank you so much!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001746
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #20 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
I learnt in another review that .woffs are not supposed to be packaged:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Web_Assets#Fonts.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=970956
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=989866
--- Comment #10 from Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com ---
Back from holidays now...?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842107
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842107
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=842107
--- Comment #11 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Oh, the font is also in sugar-srilanka-0:1-4.fc20.noarch. It should be
unbundled from both and shared.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #21 from Parag AN(पराग) panem...@gmail.com ---
That's right. Whichever format upstream is providing fonts, try to package ttf
or otf only if available that format.
For fonts packages its recommended to create a font package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=821455
Cristian Ciupitu cristian.ciup...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1013669
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001407
Mario Blättermann mario.blaetterm...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|package-review@lists.fedora |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1019435
Eduardo Echeverria echevemas...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023769
Bug ID: 1023769
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-dist - An
implementation of Erlang node
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023771
Bug ID: 1023771
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-epmd - Erlang
Port Mapper Daemon protocol
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023772
Bug ID: 1023772
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-etf - Erlang
external term format encoding/decoding for Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023773
Bug ID: 1023773
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-node - An
implementation of Erlang node
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023774
Bug ID: 1023774
Summary: Review Request: golang-github-goerlang-port - Simple
API to write Erlang ports in Go
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023776
Bug ID: 1023776
Summary: Review Request: eclus - An Erlang Port Mapping Daemon
service
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023776
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1023769, 1023771,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023769
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023774
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023773
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023772
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023771
Peter Lemenkov lemen...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1023776
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1002151
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6105063
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005930
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Task info: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6105088
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1005904
--- Comment #1 from gil cattaneo punto...@libero.it ---
Spec URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/restlet-jse.spec
SRPM URL: http://gil.fedorapeople.org/restlet-jse-2.1.4-1.fc19.src.rpm
- update to 2.1.4
Task info:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #25 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
No problem, all will be fixed.
* java-devel is enough
* Can we write (GPL2+) instead of (GPLv2+ and GPLv3 and GPLv3+) ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015778
--- Comment #8 from Ken Dreyer ktdre...@ktdreyer.com ---
(As a correction to comment #6: my license clarification request is at
https://github.com/openid/ruby-openid/issues/64, not 60.)
(In reply to Mamoru TASAKA from comment #7)
* Note
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015868
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #8 from Scott Talbert s...@techie.net ---
I think /usr/share should be fine for *.pl. 'fedora-review' package, for
example, uses /usr/share for all of its *.py files, which I think is similar.
So it seems fine.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984560
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #23 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
- Dropped .woff fonts.
- Update description by official one.
- Make this package ready for building if it possible later.
Spec : http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/amiri-fonts.spec
SRPM :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1022283
--- Comment #26 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
License names are taken from
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main?rd=Licensing#Software_License_List.
There's only GPLvX not GPLX in that list. And GPLv2+ means
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #9 from Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Scott Talbert from comment #8)
I think /usr/share should be fine for *.pl. 'fedora-review' package, for
example, uses /usr/share for all of its *.py files, which I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016170
Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #24 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek zbys...@in.waw.pl ---
Oh, one more issue:
1. change %define to %global
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=954074
--- Comment #10 from Scott Talbert s...@techie.net ---
Package Review
==
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Issues:
===
[!]: License field should be GPLv2 (vs GPLv2+) - I did not see
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1008772
--- Comment #6 from Scott Talbert s...@techie.net ---
(In reply to Christopher Meng from comment #5)
Would you like to add BR of fox-utils so you can test the
GUI(https://github.com/signal11/hidapi/blob/master/README.txt#L148)?
I disabled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1023848
Bug ID: 1023848
Summary: Review Request: closure-compiler - JavaScript minifier
and checker
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Severity:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021749
--- Comment #8 from Remi Collet fed...@famillecollet.com ---
I think(In reply to Shawn Iwinski from comment #0)
* Intl requires Icu and Icu requires Intl so I'm not sure I can separate out
the Icu pkg
I think is will be preferable to have a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1015701
--- Comment #25 from Mosaab Alzoubi moc...@hotmail.com ---
OK done:
Spec : http://ojuba.org/oji/SPECS/amiri-fonts.spec
SRPM : http://ojuba.org/oji/SRPMS/amiri-fonts-0.106-6.oji.fc19.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
65 matches
Mail list logo
