https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066029
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #2 from Dan Hor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066028
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #1 from Dan Hor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066027
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #2 from Dan Hor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066026
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||d...@danny.cz
--- Comment #2 from Dan Hor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844753
--- Comment #13 from Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda ---
- It seems that you want to Obsolete/Provide django-typepad, but you
Provide/Obsolete typepadapp.
- You should use %{__python2} macro instead of "python" binary.
- The URL you're referring to (h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844753
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Review request: |Review request:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030755
Pete Travis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066255
Bug ID: 1066255
Summary: Review Request: php-pear-console-color2 - Easily use
ANSI console colors in your application
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Re
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066027
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066029
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066238
Bug ID: 1066238
Summary: python-trollius package
Product: Fedora
Version: 19
Component: Package Review
Assignee: nob...@fedoraproject.org
Reporter: iwien...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066026
Ralf Corsepius changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rc040...@freenet.de
--- Comment #1 f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977638
--- Comment #33 from Eduardo Echeverria ---
Yes, if you erase the egg before of the conditional, it is logical that you
will obtain a source for both (py2 and py3) without the eggs, so, this is just
to redound.
Other thing, isn't needed use wi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=983843
Pete Travis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m...@petetravis.com
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1010741
--- Comment #33 from Pete Travis ---
Spec URL: http://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola.spec
SRPM URL: http://immanetize.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola-6.3.0-1.fc21.src.rpm
Description: Nikola is a static site and blog generator using
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062786
Benjamin Gilbert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #10 from Richard Shaw ---
Ok, I thought about it and I think we still have two options...
1. omniORBpy for the libraries (Do we really have to append -libs?)
omniORBpy-devel and
python-omniORB (noarch)
OR
2. Like before, m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
--- Comment #17 from Luya Tshimbalanga ---
(In reply to Elad Alfassa from comment #14)
> (In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Elad Alfassa from comment #10)
> > > New Package SCM Request
> > > ==
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061019
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062237
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||928937 (qt-reviews)
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062237
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1061019
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061019
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||1062237 (polkit-qt5-1)
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062237
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1061019
Lubomir Rintel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #9 from Sandro Mani ---
And now I guess I remember why I called the src.rpm omniORBpy: I'd have to make
the main package noarch but the subpackage arch. I think the only way to do
that is to have an empty main package and the subpa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1066176
Bug ID: 1066176
Summary: Review Request: min-metadata-service - Client for
EC2/OpenStack metadata
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: Package Review
Sever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1016863
--- Comment #6 from Troy Dawson ---
Spec URL: http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/rubygems/rubygem-parallel.spec
SRPM URL:
http://tdawson.fedorapeople.org/rubygems/rubygem-parallel-0.9.2-3.fc20.src.rpm
Hi Ken,
Sorry about that. You are correct i
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060502
Jeff Schroeder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060580
Jeff Schroeder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060500
Jeff Schroeder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060503
Jeff Schroeder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060494
Jeff Schroeder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Depend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060454
Jeff Schroeder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Depend
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060494
Jeff Schroeder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1060454
Jeff Schroeder changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=844753
--- Comment #12 from Luis Bazan ---
New SPEC:
http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-typepadapp.spec
New SRPM:
http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-typepadapp-1.2.1-4.fc20.src.rpm
Fix: name typepad to typepadapp
Fix: Test
Bes
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-wavpack-4.70.0-1.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-wavpack-4.70.0-1.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1064579
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System ---
mingw-wavpack-4.70.0-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-wavpack-4.70.0-1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1051771
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||vdr-tvguide-1.2.1-1.fc20
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=858078
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #19 from Fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998483
--- Comment #9 from Wesley Hearn ---
As for the missing man page, I have created a bug report here:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/granite/+bug/1281294
For the unused-direct-shlib-dependency I am trying to track down exactly what
is causing it.
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #34 from Richard Shaw ---
Ok, one thing we need to fix, if you run rpmlint on the installed packages it
finds a BUNCH of "unused-direct-shlib-dependency"
Which means:
$ rpmlint -I unused-direct-shlib-dependency
unused-direct-shlib
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #8 from Richard Shaw ---
Just glancing at the spec it looks much better but I wonder if we should ask
the omniORB maintainer why there are files that conflict between the two
packages.
Also, thinking about things a bit more (don'
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=960252
Andrea Veri changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from Andrea Veri -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #33 from Richard Shaw ---
Maybe today, maybe later this week. I ran fedora review on it and stepped away
for a while. Now just a matter of checking and checking boxes.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC lis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065301
Leon Weber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Leon Web
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065301
--- Comment #5 from Leon Weber ---
Thank you, Rex!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=998483
Wesley Hearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||whe...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8 from W
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054933
--- Comment #4 from Mihkel Vain ---
Spec URL: http://mihkel.fedorapeople.org/SPECS/esteidcerts.spec
SRPM URL:
http://mihkel.fedorapeople.org/SRPMS/esteidcerts-3.8.0.9128-1.fc20.src.rpm
Koji task: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?tas
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675649
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675649
--- Comment #12 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675646
--- Comment #13 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675646
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055398
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
0install-2.6.1-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/0install-2.6.1-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055398
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675646
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=675649
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055398
Michel Alexandre Salim changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1066133
Referenced Bugs:
h
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=845115
--- Comment #16 from Luis Bazan ---
New SPEC:
http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-recaptcha.spec
New SRPM
http://lbazan.fedorapeople.org/python-django-recaptcha-0.0.9-1.fc20.src.rpm
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1055915
--- Comment #8 from Darryl L. Pierce ---
I've done my review of the package. The only issues I came across were the use
of macros (Source0 doesn't) and that the URL for Source0 uses https and is
invalid.
Please fix the specified items, bump t
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System ---
alef-fonts-1.0-2.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/alef-fonts-1.0-2.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System ---
alef-fonts-1.0-2.fc19 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 19.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/alef-fonts-1.0-2.fc19
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified a
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=951827
--- Comment #14 from Elad Alfassa ---
(In reply to Luya Tshimbalanga from comment #12)
> (In reply to Elad Alfassa from comment #10)
> > New Package SCM Request
> > ===
> > Package Name: alef-fonts
> > Short Description: A f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001799
Mario Blättermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Blocks|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1001799
Antonio Trande changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(mario.blaetterman
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039138
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039138
--- Comment #6 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
__
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065754
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065754
--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System ---
libbatch-2.1.0-3.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libbatch-2.1.0-3.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list f
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039138
--- Comment #5 from Ryan Lerch ---
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: key-mon
Short Description: A screen cast utility that displays your keyboard and mouse
status
Owners: ryanlerch
Branches: f19 f20
--
You are rec
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1039138
Ryan Lerch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|cicku...@gmail.com |rle...@redhat.com
Flags|needi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065306
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
spo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065301
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |
--- Comment #4 from Rex Dieter ---
spo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065301
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #3 from Rex D
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065306
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065301
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054933
--- Comment #3 from Rex Dieter ---
Some initial comments:
rpmlint is clean:
$ rpmlint *.rpm */*.rpm
3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings
sources verified:
92b79074e4f6db85453f561f9d9ab35f esteidcerts-3.8.0.9128.tar.gz
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065754
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065754
--- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this ma
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723
--- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla ---
Git done (by process-git-requests).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
___
package-review
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054938
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdie...@math.unl.edu
Alias|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1054933
Rex Dieter changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533723
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||p...@city-fan.org
Flags|fedo
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #7 from Sandro Mani ---
Ok, this should clean up the mess:)
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-omniORB.spec
SRPM URL:
http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/python-omniORB-3.7-2.fc21.src.rpm
* Mon Feb 17 2014 San
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #32 from Jeremy Newton ---
(In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #31)
> Either way works for me, I usually use the rhel definition because it's
> defined on epel but I doubt that's true in reverse.
Indeed, but this way I don't ha
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1048815
--- Comment #17 from Dan Horák ---
now I am satisfied :-) The package is APPROVED also from the sponsor.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and co
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896193
--- Comment #31 from Fedora Update System ---
plank-0.5.0-4.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/plank-0.5.0-4.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about c
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=896193
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #31 from Richard Shaw ---
Either way works for me, I usually use the rhel definition because it's defined
on epel but I doubt that's true in reverse.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065754
--- Comment #10 from Sandro Mani ---
Thanks!
New Package SCM Request
===
Package Name: libbatch
Short Description: Generic batch management library
Owners: smani
Branches: f20
InitialCC:
--
You are receiving this mail be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065754
Sandro Mani changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-cvs?
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065758
--- Comment #6 from Richard Shaw ---
Are you going to post new spec and SRPM?
I would rename the package to python-omniORB as well and use:
%global realname omniORBpy
or upname, sourcename, etc, to use in the Source: tag and %setup.
As far
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065624
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1020942
--- Comment #30 from Jeremy Newton ---
Thanks for the patch and the tips!
Just a few minor stylistic changes to make it a little cleaner.
Also I used %{?epl6} instead of %{?rhel} to be ready to support epel 7 (as it
uses gtk3); note that I do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065754
Richard Shaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review+
--- Comment #9 from Ric
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065624
Mukundan Ragavan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||fedora-review?
--
You are receivi
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1065754
--- Comment #8 from Sandro Mani ---
Changes look good, thanks a lot!
Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/libbatch.spec
SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/libbatch-2.1.0-3.fc21.src.rpm
%changelog
* Mon Feb 17 2014 Richa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1062901
Jon Ciesla changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+
--
You are receiving this m
1 - 100 of 173 matches
Mail list logo
