[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 Miroslav Suchý changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) |201449

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 Jonathan Underwood changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #35 from Michael Schwendt (Fedora Packager Sponsors Group) bugs.mich...@gmx.net --- Skimming over the comments in this ticket, I see comment 19 where Dominik wrote: | I intend to sponsor him once this review is completed. So

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #36 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Please close this ticket. I feel discouraged to continue work on this package. Thank you every person who participated in this ticket for effort in review process and for valuable

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #34 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Just I added first package on way to unbundling PRADO Framework and finally to add Baculum. This package is FirePHPCore and my request is here:

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #33 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Right. I will check it before open every review request. Thanks for the tip. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #31 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Thanks for the information. So, I guess that now there can be only better :-) I will try to prepare each project in a separate feature request. I estimate that it will take a few

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #32 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Please check the currently open review requests first. Some of your dependencies may already be under review. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #29 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Hello, I have a doubt about proper way for providing PHP framework in Baculum together in one package. From this reason and for not overload this feature request I sent question to

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #30 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- fedora-join is probably not the best place to ask such questions, The devel or the packaging list would have been better places in my opinion. However, the answer

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #28 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Spec URL: http://bacula.pl/downloads/baculum/baculum.spec SRPM URL: http://bacula.pl/downloads/baculum/baculum-7.0.6-0.6.b.fc22.src.rpm Hello, @Dominik: You are right. Duplicate

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #27 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Hello, Thanks for your suggestions. (In reply to Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski from comment #26) If this file is modified over time, you should put it somewhere in /var

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #26 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- (In reply to Marcin Haba from comment #23) For now I would solve this error: baculum-httpd.noarch: E: non-readable

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #24 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Here are next informal reviews that I have done: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1243061 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1244102

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #25 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Just I successully built Baculum on Koji: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10406385 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #23 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Spec URL: http://bacula.pl/downloads/baculum/baculum.spec SRPM URL: http://bacula.pl/downloads/baculum/baculum-7.0.6-0.5.b.fc22.src.rpm Changes: - Change baculum.users and Data/

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #22 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Hello, I moved more work to Makefile for make Spec easier. Here are latest changes: - Remove source files: baculum.users, baculum-apache.conf baculum-lighttpd.conf and

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #21 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Hello, I prepared all pointed errors and improvements. They are: - Separate to subpackage Lighttpd support - Add Apache subpackage - Use upstream Makefile to prepare build files

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #19 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- @Jonathan, I also like Marcin's contributions and I intend to sponsor him once this review is completed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #17 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Regarding selinux policy, you should not import the included binary policy module directly: semodule -i %{_datadir}/selinux/packages/%{name}/%{name}.pp 2/dev/null

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #13 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Hello, Thanks for point me these not needed requires (chkconfig and service). I removed them and prepared new Spec and SRPM (attached below). About Apache integration, thanks for

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #14 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Typos and errors in %description: The Baculum program allows the user to administrate and manage Bacula work. ^-

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #16 from Jonathan Underwood jonathan.underw...@gmail.com --- Hi Macin, some points fro looking over the spec file: 1) Please update the Release tag each time you make a change, and add a %changelog entry 2) What is the rationale

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #20 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- @Dominik, @Jonathan, Matthias: Thank you for all your advises and recommendations in this Baculum request. It is precious knowledge for me, specially as a beginner in RPM packaging.

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #18 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Also, allowing the web server user unfettered access to the bconsole command as root seems like a security hole waiting to be exploited. Isn't there a way to

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 Matthias Runge mru...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mru...@redhat.com

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #11 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Up till now I have revieved following requests: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1241383 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1221459

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #10 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Hello, From March till now I have worked a bit on Spec file. I prepared SELinux module (for not using SELinux booleans calls in Spec). In the meantime I also prepared Baculum

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #9 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Any news in this ticket? Thank you in advance for any information. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #8 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- I updated new Spec file and SRPM. Location is the same as previously: Spec URL: http://www.bacula.pl/baculum.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bacula.pl/baculum-7.0.6-0.1.a.fc21.src.rpm I

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #7 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- New Spec file and SRPM location: Spec URL: http://www.bacula.pl/baculum.spec SRPM URL: http://www.bacula.pl/baculum-7.0.6-0.1.a.fc21.src.rpm I fixed pointed things to change: 1) I

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #5 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net --- Some quick comments. 1. You should give full URL to the source tarball in Source0:, not just the filename (it should be downloadable with curl/wget). 2. You should

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski domi...@greysector.net changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #6 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Thank you for all comments and advises. I will work on them. I tested Baculum with Apache and Lighttpd. I chose Lighttpd, because it supports HTTP Basic auth with plain text

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #4 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Hello, I built Baculum by Fedora Build System. Here is link to task: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=9293633 Spec file and SRPM are here: Spec URL:

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #3 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- I let know that just I created Fedora account. My Fedora account name is: ganiuszka It is my first Review Request in this Bugzilla. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #2 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Here are commands to make Baculum working with SELinux policies: # semanage port -a -t http_port_t -p tcp 9095 # semanage fcontext -a -t httpd_sys_rw_content_t

[Bug 1203018] Review Request: baculum - WebGUI tool for Bacula Community program

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203018 --- Comment #1 from Marcin Haba marcin.h...@bacula.pl --- Default Baculum access is: http://localhost:9095 First time login is: admin First time password is: admin -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.