I may have told you the wrong parameters. Try using 0.005 for the temporal
shift rather than -0.005.
-Ken
On 12/1/16, 3:10 PM, "Huangrui Mo" wrote:
Hello Ken,
Thank you for the provided solution, however, it seems like the solution
does not work
If I understand you correctly, you were able to take each experimental plane
and sample it in a the CFD data on the same plane? Now you would like to stack
your experimental planes together and interpolate it onto the CFD grid?
I haven't done this, so I'm not sure if it's going to work, but
Hello Ken,
Thank you for the provided solution, however, it seems like the solution
does not work well: using the Paraview 5.2.0
(I just downloaded the latest version, and realizing that there is a
modification on showing the max counter of time steps),
after applying the method you provided,
Both the cases are ok on the Windows PC.
On Thu, Dec 1, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Armin Wehrfritz wrote:
> To follow up on this issue, I have done some more testing. From the link
> below you can find two datasets with polyhedral cells, where one is
> working just fine and the other
Huangrui,
I found a work around that I think does what you want. After you load in your
two data sets, right click on one of them in the Pipeline Browser and check on
the “Ignore Time” option. This will tell ParaView to ignore the time in that
data set, so will only visit the time steps in the
Actually, I think Sequence mode is more appropriate than Real Time mode in this
case, but I too think that is the answer.
To explain more what (we think) is going on: When you load data with time in
ParaView, it goes to a Snap to Timesteps mode where it will visit each unique
timestep once
Lugi,
I am fairly sure you are seeing this bug:
https://gitlab.kitware.com/paraview/paraview/issues/16978. It is scheduled to
be fixed in an upcoming release, but the solution isn't trivial. I will add
your example to the bug.
Alan
From: ParaView [mailto:paraview-boun...@paraview.org] On
Dear Joachim: thanks for the help.
My best, Martín
On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 12:20 PM, Joachim Pouderoux <
joachim.pouder...@kitware.com> wrote:
> Hi Martin,
>
> Unfortunately there is no reader for this format in VTK/ParaView.
> Moreoever, VPL looks like a
> vector graphics format and there is
Good day,
I am currently developping a bunch of plugins (filters) for Paraview in the
following setup:
I have input data as a rectilinear grid, including an array of scalar values
per cell (volume-of-fluid data (vof)). On this data I now want to perform some
calculations. First, a plugin
Not sure if this is the correct answer, but try view/ animation View. Then,
change the Mode to Real Time. Enter your start time and end time, and number
of time steps of interest (i.e., 500).
Is that what you are looking for?
alan
-Original Message-
From: ParaView
Dear Paraview Developer,
May you please help me with the following issue:
Suppose when a solver writes data out, the field data is written in
Ensight format, and the time sequence is streamed in "ensight.case".
Meanwhile, the geometry data is written in VTK format, and the time
sequence is
To follow up on this issue, I have done some more testing. From the link
below you can find two datasets with polyhedral cells, where one is
working just fine and the other one is crashing consistently when
opening it in ParaView 5.2.
The XDMF files are created form the respective .vtu files with
Hi Tobias
You could get the DisplayProperties of all your objects and then set them
accordingly in the new render window using the Python Shell. I have written a
short script for myself for this task --- however something is not quite
correct, as strange colorings sometimes appear after turning
13 matches
Mail list logo