have ripped to mp3 and ape.
> They rip to separate tracks, why does flac need cueing?
> - Original Message -
> From: Dane Trethowan
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 7:29 PM
> Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
>
&g
I've heard the first, but none of the others. Thanks very much.
- Original Message -
From: Kevin Lloyd
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 3:02 AM
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
Typical errors from bad rips include:
sta
Now, I'm not understanding this. I have ripped to mp3 and ape. They rip to
separate tracks, why does flac need cueing?
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 7:29 PM
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Pac
"PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 9:28 PM
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
I understand. One of my questions is, how do these errors manifest
themselves besides unplayable tracks, that is.
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan
BTW. if
> anyone believes they might be interested in purchasing some of the
> original
> disks, let me know.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:2
05, 2007 6:29 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
>
> FLAC files are lossless compressed files, a Cue file contains all the
> instructions necessary for the ripper to split the FLAC file into
> tracks
> when writing to a CD, converti
ent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:28 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
Ok point taken but technology and accuracy (not to mention more products
being accessible) have come a long way.
On 06/10/2007, at 8:35 AM, albert griffith wrote:
> I believe people
Ok, how would I go about developing these cue files?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 6:29 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
FLAC files are lossless
-Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 5:48 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
>
> I and other people have ripped
age-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 4:25 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
>
> Why would anyone use CDEX? Its error correct
What is a flack-cue pair?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 5:48 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
I and other people have ripped thousands upon
---Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Gary Petraccaro
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:27 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
>
> Why aren't you using cdex?
> T
f date for improvement sake.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 11:28 AM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
>
&
?
>
>
> Paul Henrichsen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 9:32 AM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re:
bert griffith
> To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 11:30 AM
> Subject: RE: Rippers and Conversion Packages
>
>
> EAC is quite configurable but it's kind of a geek's program in that
> few
> operations are automatic. I
copy them so
I want everything to go well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gary Petraccaro
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 3:27 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
Why aren't you using cdex?
Thannk
ssion List
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
Excuse me? Can you explain what you meant by that? All operations in EAC are
automatic, I've been using this thing for 4 years.
Yes in the begining it was a bit hard to work around but its vastly improved
since those days.
On 06/10/2007, at
Does eAC work under vista?
Paul Henrichsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dane Trethowan
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 9:32 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
I woul
wan
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 12:31 PM
> Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
>
>
> I would also add to this message, if you can configure CDEX then
> you'll have absolutely no problem with EAC and you'll enjoy load
riffith
> To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
> Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 11:30 AM
> Subject: RE: Rippers and Conversion Packages
>
>
> EAC is quite configurable but it's kind of a geek's program in
> that few
> operations are automatic. If yo
I understand. One of my questions is, how do these errors manifest themselves
besides unplayable tracks, that is.
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 12:31 PM
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
Why aren't you using cdex?
Thannks.
- Original Message -
From: albert griffith
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 11:30 AM
Subject: RE: Rippers and Conversion Packages
EAC is quite configurable but it's kind of a geek&#
Thanks very much.
Appreciated.
- Original Message -
From: Dane Trethowan
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Sent: Friday, October 05, 2007 12:25 PM
Subject: Re: Rippers and Conversion Packages
EAC is as its name suggests, Exact Audio Copy, that is its for audio
work only
Well when it comes to Exact Audio copy then that would certainly seem
to be the case .
On 06/10/2007, at 4:39 AM, Tim Grady wrote:
> I think you'll find that a lot of the information you hear on this
> list is out-of-date.
> On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
>
>> Excuse me? Can
I think you'll find that a lot of the information you hear on this
list is out-of-date.
On Oct 5, 2007, at 12:28 PM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
> Excuse me? Can you explain what you meant by that? All operations in
> EAC are automatic, I've been using this thing for 4 years.
> Yes in the begining it
I would also add to this message, if you can configure CDEX then
you'll have absolutely no problem with EAC and you'll enjoy loads of
benefits including error-free rips, that's why EAC was written in the
first place, the author was sick of all these "so-called" rippers and
their claims of a
Excuse me? Can you explain what you meant by that? All operations in
EAC are automatic, I've been using this thing for 4 years.
Yes in the begining it was a bit hard to work around but its vastly
improved since those days.
On 06/10/2007, at 1:30 AM, albert griffith wrote:
> EAC is quite confi
EAC is as its name suggests, Exact Audio Copy, that is its for audio
work only and not DVD'S, its not a CD copier.
Waht audio formats will EAC handle? Most of them including any other
format which has a plug-in which will support a command line interface.
On 05/10/2007, at 11:38 PM, Gary Petra
EAC is quite configurable but it's kind of a geek's program in that few
operations are automatic. If you haven't, check out CDEX. It's not
commercial but easier to use than EAC.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Gary Petraccaro
Sent: Frida
29 matches
Mail list logo
