Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6

Same here. Finally, we get this important work here for adopting. I support the adoption. Thanks, Cheng From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Boris Khasanov Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2023 4:37 AM To: julien.meu...@orange.com;

Re: [Pce] Clarification regarding SID and NAI validation of SRv6-ERO

Hi Mrinmoy, We have updated the draft[1] to address your comments, please review it to see if it is ok for you ☺ Thank you for your comments! Thanks, Cheng [1]. https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-ipv6-15 From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07

HI WG, I support the adoption as an author. This should be adopted by the PCE WG because this is a PCEP related extension draft. Thanks, Cheng From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com] Sent: Friday, September 2, 2022 5:09 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-y...@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07

; Chengli ; Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ; Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-pcep-srv6-yang-07 Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05

) ; luc-fabrice.ndi...@mtn.com; Chengli (Cheng Li) ; hanliu...@chinamobile.com Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-pmtu-05 Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance

Re: [Pce] 答复: Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Thanks Martin! Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Martin Vigoureux [mailto:martin.vigour...@nokia.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2022 5:32 PM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; Dhruv Dhody Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org; pce-chairs ; pce@ietf.org; Julien Meuric

[Pce] 答复: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-vn-association-05

I have read the latest version of the draft and support the WGLC. Cheng 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody 发送时间: 2022年2月22日 20:18 收件人: pce@ietf.org 抄送: draft-ietf-pce-vn-associat...@ietf.org; pce-chairs 主题: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-vn-association-05 Hi WG, This email

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Benjamin, Thank you for your comments and sorry for my delay. We have updated the draft based on the discussion between you and Dhruv. Regarding the TE-PATH-BINDING TLVs, we think it will be better to keep it and add a rationale for how PCE could use. That is Option B in the discussion. We

Re: [Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Murray, Sorry for my delay and thank you for your comments. Please review the updated draft to see if it works. Thank you again! Cheng Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-13 A diff from the previous version is available at:

[Pce] 答复: Lars Eggert's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Lars, Many thanks for your comments and sorry for my delay due to the SPRING festival. We have updated the draft to address your comments. Please review it. Thanks, Cheng Link: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-13 A diff from the previous version is

[Pce] 答复: Erik Kline's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with COMMENT)

Hi Erik, Many thanks for your comments and question, the answer would be [b] {LB=48, LN=16, FUN=..., ARG=...} For clarity, we have added the following text in the draft- [RFC8986] defines an SRv6 SID as consisting of LOC:FUNCT:ARG, where a locator (LOC) is encoded in the L most significant

[Pce] 答复: Martin Vigoureux's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

Hi Martin and Dhruv, Sorry for my delay due to the Lunar tiger new year, and many thanks to Dhruv for your help! I have updated the draft according to the recent discussion in the mailing list. Hope it can address your comments: Respect, Cheng There is also an htmlized version available

Re: [Pce] Genart last call review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-11

Hi Theresa, Many thanks for your reply! We have updated to address your comments. Please see my reply inline for more information. Hope it address your comments. Thank you! Cheng Htmlized: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid Diff:

Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-li-pce-pcep-l2-flowspec

Hi Julien, Since the text already had WG consensus when it was part of the draft-ietf-pce-pcep-flowspec, I would like to support the adoption. Thank you! Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Thursday, January 6,

Re: [Pce] AD review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-10

Hi John, Sorry for my delay due to the PTO, have updated the draft to address your comments, please take a look of if it works. Thanks, Cheng URL: https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-11.txt Status:

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

Yes, support as an coauthor. Any comments are welcome! Thanks Chairs, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Tuesday, September 21, 2021 10:01 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll for draft-dhody-pce-stateful-pce-optional

Hi PCE, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Cheng From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com] Sent: Wednesday, September 22, 2021 12:09 AM To: Zhenghaomian ; slitkows.i...@gmail.com; Chengli (Cheng

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid

] Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2021 12:32 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid Hi Cheng, Thanks for the update and sorry for the late feedback. I've spotted a couple of nits

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid

will happen, it seems not error will occur. Thanks for the deep review! Cheng -Original Message- From: Chengli (Cheng Li) Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 9:18 AM To: 'julien.meu...@orange.com' ; draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] Shepherd's

Re: [Pce] Shepherd's Review of draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid

Hi Julien， Many thanks for your comments! Will address the comments and then post the new revision for discussion ASAP. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Saturday, May 29, 2021 1:47 AM To:

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync

Support as an author, the document has been written for a long time, and I think it has been mature for adoption. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Monday, May 17, 2021 9:41 PM To: pce@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync

...@gmail.com; Chengli (Cheng Li) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll on draft-litkowski-pce-state-sync Hi Authors, In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR rules. Please respond (copying

[Pce] Request for Implementation info of PCEP SRv6 extension

Hi PCE, We are going to update the PCEP SRv6 extension draft, and we would like to add the implementation information of it. If you have any info, please reply to this email, we will add it the draft. Many thanks, Cheng ___ Pce mailing list

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05

Yes, support, the draft is useful for SR Policy. Cheng From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, April 14, 2021 10:52 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-koldychev-pce-multip...@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-koldychev-pce-multipath-05 Hi WG,

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Thanks again for your help! Cheng -Original Message- From: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:andrew.st...@nokia.com] Sent: Saturday, March 27, 2021 2:42 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Subject: Re

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Chengli (Cheng Li) Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 10:46 AM To: Aijun Wang ; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Tom, Sorry for sending the error diff. The latest diff is here https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url1=https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07.txt=https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-08.txt Also, Julien has

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Of Chengli (Cheng Li) Sent: Friday, March 26, 2021 10:27 AM To: adr...@olddog.co.uk; julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation) Hi Adrian, Long time no see! Thanks

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Tom, Thanks, please see inline. Cheng -Original Message- From: tom petch [mailto:ie...@btconnect.com] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 8:02 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc: draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-...@ietf.org Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Tom, Many thanks for your comments. Please see my reply inline. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of tom petch Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 8:14 PM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Olivier, Many thanks for your comments, please see my reply inline. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: olivier.dug...@orange.com [mailto:olivier.dug...@orange.com] Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 12:39 AM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org;

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your comments, please see my reply inline. Also, the diff is attached. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Stone, Andrew (Nokia - CA/Ottawa) [mailto:andrew.st...@nokia.com] Sent: Saturday, March 20, 2021 4:21 AM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Aijun, Many thanks for your comments! Please see my reply inline. The diff is attached. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Aijun Wang [mailto:wangai...@tsinghua.org.cn] Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 11:57 AM To: julien.meu...@orange.com; pce@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Hi Adrian, Long time no see! Thanks for your valuable comments! :) It takes few days to address them, LOL. The latest revision has updated, see https://raw.githubusercontent.com/dhruvdhody/ietf/master/draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-08.txt

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07

Hi Hari and PCE, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Cheng From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com] Sent: Friday, March 19, 2021 1:10 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; cfils...@cisco.com; jefftant.i

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call for draft-ietf-pce-binding-label-sid-07 (and Code Point Allocation)

Many thanks Dhruv and Julien! I support the adoption and early allocation as a co-author. Luckily, before April 1st. Thank you for your work! Respect! Cheng -Original Message- From: julien.meu...@orange.com [mailto:julien.meu...@orange.com] Sent: Thursday, March 18, 2021 7:09 PM

[Pce] 答复: Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03

Yes, support. This document can addresses the issue of running out the flag bits. Thanks to the author! Cheng -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Dhruv Dhody 发送时间: 2021年2月2日 1:48 收件人: pce@ietf.org 主题: [Pce] Adoption of draft-xiong-pce-lsp-flag-03 Hi WG, This email

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, thanks for your reply! Take care, Cheng -Original Message- From: Benjamin Kaduk [mailto:ka...@mit.edu] Sent: Friday, January 22, 2021 6:18 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) Cc: The IESG ; draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org; Hariharan

Re: [Pce] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15: (with COMMENT)

Hi Ben, Many thanks for your comments! :) We have updated the document to address your comments, please check https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-16. Looking forward to your reply. Cheng Name: draft-ietf-pce-association-policy Revision: 16

Re: [Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-15.txt

Hi PCE, Many thanks for AD & RTGDIR's comments, really helpful! We have updated the document to address the comments, please review the draft. Thanks again! Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of internet-dra...@ietf.org Sent: Thursday,

Re: [Pce] Routing Directorate Last Call Review for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-13.txt

Hi Nic, Many thanks for your review. Please see my reply inline. Thanks, Cheng From: n.leym...@telekom.de [mailto:n.leym...@telekom.de] Sent: Monday, December 7, 2020 7:32 PM To: rtg-...@ietf.org Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org; draft-ietf-pce-association-pol...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org Subject: Routing

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-09?

Hi PCE, This document specifies the SR-MPLS extensions based on PCECC base draft, and also a long document. Many thanks for authors. I think making PCE as a center controller is useful in SR-MPLS scenarios, and CCI object is a good idea. Therefore I support the adoption. Thanks, Cheng

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-bidir

Hi， I support the document. This document is well written and the text is mature. Also, I think this is a good base work for associating bidir LSPs for MPLS, SR-MPLS and even SRv6. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

Hi Shuping, Many thanks for your comments! We have updated the document to address them. Please check the diff: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-12 Thanks again for your comments! Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

Hi Aijun, We just posted a new revision to address your comments. Please check the update. https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-pce-association-policy-12 As per your suggestion, new error-codes and examples in the appendix are added. Many thanks for your comments! Cheng -Original

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

Support as a co-author. This document provides a useful mechanism for associating policies to LSPs. Comments: more details should be added in the abstract. Respect, Cheng -Original Message- From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com] Sent: Friday, September 4, 2020 1:13 PM

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy

...@gmail.com; Jonathan Hardwick ; Mahend Negi ; Chengli (Cheng Li) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR Poll on draft-ietf-pce-association-policy Hi Authors, In preparation for WG LC on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF

[Pce] 答复: PCE WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller

Hi PCE, This is a useful draft that defines the extensions of PCEP for PCECC. Hope this document can be published as an RFC in the future to guide implementation and deployment of PCECC. Therefore I support the WGLC of this document. Thanks, Cheng -邮件原件- 发件人: Pce

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Thanks, Cheng as a contributor. From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Hariharan Ananthakrishnan Sent: Monday, June 8, 2020 11:49 PM To: Mike Koldychev (mkoldych) ;

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-06

Support with some comments. SR policy is very important for Segment Routing. Adding an Association object to support SR policy is a very simple extension, therefore I support this adoption. Comments: The SR policy name can be configured via PCEP and BGP or other ways, do we need to make

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Hi Adrian, Rakesh, Andrew and Dhruv, Sorry for my delay, I was in Spring (Not that SPRING) Festival PTO recently, and many thanks for your comments and discussions. I think we have the consensus about we need an extension to define these new actions of associating Bidir path without signaling.

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06

Hi Hari, I am not aware of any IPR applies to this document. Best regards, Cheng From: Mach Chen Sent: Monday, January 20, 2020 6:00 PM To: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan ; Chengli (Cheng Li) ; chengweiqi...@chinamobile.com; Lizhenbin ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; rgan...@cisco.com; xiong.q...@zte.com.cn

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06?

Hi PCE, support as a co-author. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Friday, January 17, 2020 6:13 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06? Hi all, It is time to

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

Hi Chairs and WG, Many thanks for your work, supports and contributions. We have upload the draft, please see the link below. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-sr-path-segment/ There are also htmlized versions available at:

Re: [Pce] Adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment?

Hi WG, Support as a co-author since the text of this draft is mature and ready for WG adoption. This document is being implemented by Huawei Product, and it will be used in CMCC's SPN in the future. Many thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On

Re: [Pce] IPR Poll on draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08

Hi Hari and WG, I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules. Cheng From: Hariharan Ananthakrishnan [mailto:h...@netflix.com] Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2019 1:49 AM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; Mach Chen ; chengweiqi

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-farrel-pce-stateful-flags-01

+1. A simple, straightforward and useful document. Support to be published. Thanks, Cheng 李呈 Cheng Li Email: chengl...@huawei.com From: Jonathan Hardwickmailto:Jonathan.Hardwick=40metaswitch@dmarc.ietf.org>> To: Dhruv

Re: [Pce] Adrian stepping down as PCE co-chair

Many thanks to Adrian! Best, Cheng From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of BRUNGARD, DEBORAH A Sent: Thursday, September 12, 2019 4:14 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-chairs Subject: [Pce] Adrian stepping down as PCE co-chair Hi, As we noted earlier, Adrian stepped in to help us

Re: [Pce] IPR poll on draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07

...@previdi.net; Chengli (Cheng Li) Cc: pce@ietf.org Subject: IPR poll on draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07 Hi Authors, In preparation for Working Group last call on this draft, I'd like all authors and contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR

[Pce] F and S bit in draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing

Hi authors, I am a little bit confusing of F and S bit in SR-ERO subobject. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-16#section-4.3.1 What is F standing for ? and how about S ? S for SID? It seems like S and F bit can not be set at the same time, correct? Thanks, Cheng

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-07

Yes, support. Binding SID is very useful in many use cases, such as inter-domain/Multi-domain routing, SR policy, tunnel stitching, etc. Also, as descripted in this document, Huawei has implemented the mechanism. Since the text is mature, I support this WG adoption. Best regards, Cheng as a

[Pce] Request for WG adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.txt

: Monday, August 19, 2019 9:51 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi ; Quan Xiong ; Weiqiang Cheng ; Mach Chen ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Mach Chen ; Chengli (Cheng Li) ; Lizhenbin Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.txt A new version of I-D, draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-06.txt has been

[Pce] Request for WG adoption of draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08

[mailto:internet-dra...@ietf.org] Sent: Monday, August 19, 2019 9:54 PM To: Rakesh Gandhi ; Quan Xiong ; Weiqiang Cheng ; Mach Chen ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Mach Chen ; Chengli (Cheng Li) ; Lizhenbin Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-08.txt A new version of I-D, draft

Re: [Pce] PCE WG Adoption poll for draft-leedhody-pce-vn-association

Support. The draft will help on virtual network in PCE architecture, and the text is mature with implementation status as well. I am thinking that I should read more drafts of PCE association, so many good ideas! Thanks to the authors and contributors, the stepping down chair as well. :)

[Pce] FW: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-06.txt

, July 09, 2019 12:35 AM To: Rakesh Gandhi ; Quan Xiong ; Weiqiang Cheng ; Mach Chen ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Mach Chen ; Chengli (Cheng Li) ; Lizhenbin Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-06.txt A new version of I-D, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-06.txt has been

Re: [Pce] Chair's pre-adoption review of draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid-06

Hi WG, We have updated the document to address the comments: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-sivabalan-pce-binding-label-sid/ Point 1 and 6 are pending and can be resolved during the WG adoption process. Best Regards, Cheng -Original Message- From: Siva Sivabalan (msiva)

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-lsp-control-request-04

Yes/Support+1. This draft is important for controller. Thanks for authors' contributions! Best Regards, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody Sent: Wednesday, June 05, 2019 12:26 AM To: pce@ietf.org Cc:

Re: [Pce] WG LC for draft-ietf-pce-association-diversity and draft-ietf-pce-stateful-path-protection

Hi Chairs, I have read these documents and I feel these two documents are ready for publication. Sorry for missing the email. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of julien.meu...@orange.com Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2019 8:58 PM To:

[Pce] Request WG adoption call for draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04

; Lizhenbin ; Weiqiang Cheng ; Mach Chen ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Mach Chen ; Chengli (Cheng Li) Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04.txt A new version of I-D, draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Rakesh Gandhi and posted to the IETF

[Pce] Request for WG adoption call for draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-04

bin ; Weiqiang Cheng ; Mach Chen ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Mach Chen ; Chengli (Cheng Li) Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-04.txt A new version of I-D, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-04.txt has been successfully submitted by Cheng Li and posted to the IETF repository. N

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE WG Agenda for the IETF 104

:) Thank you for your work! See you in Prague! Cheng -Original Message- From: Adrian Farrel [mailto:adr...@olddog.co.uk] Sent: Friday, March 08, 2019 6:16 PM To: Chengli (Cheng Li) ; pce@ietf.org Cc: pce-cha...@ietf.org Subject: RE: [Pce] Building the PCE WG Agenda for the IETF 104

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE WG Agenda for the IETF 104

Hi Chairs, We would like to request 10 minutes slot for Path Segment related extensions. - the draft(s) you want to discuss: draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment and draft-li-pce-sr-bidir-path(may move to Bidir path drafts slot) - the expected presenter name: Cheng Li - the requested duration,

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption Call for draft-negi-pce-segment-routing-ipv6

Support. This document specifies the extensions of SRv6 in PCEP, which is very import to SRv6 control plane. After several revisions, the content of this draft has been mature and ready for WG adoption. Thanks, Cheng as co-author. -Original Message- From: Pce

Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth

Hi WG, Yes, support. I've reviewed this document and believe it is ready for publication. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Julien Meuric Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2018 9:30 PM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] WG Last Call on

Re: [Pce] New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-03.txt

PM To: Rakesh Gandhi ; Lizhenbin ; Weiqiang Cheng ; Dhruv Dhody ; Mach Chen ; Dongjie (Jimmy) ; Mach Chen ; Chengli (IP Technology Research) Subject: New Version Notification for draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-03.txt A new version of I-D, draft-li-pce-sr-path-segment-03.txt has been

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-zhao-pce-pcep-extension-for-pce-controller-08

Yes/Support. This draft is well written, and good to be adopted since it is the base of drafts of PCECC-SR and other use cases. Thanks, Cheng From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Hardwick Sent: Saturday, October 13, 2018 10:47 PM To: pce@ietf.org Cc: