Hi Jonathan,
I agree with you. The MSD is purely a local information attached to the
router. To correctly manage this informationfor Segment Path
computation, the PCE must be aware of MSD of each router, not only the
PE, but also the P routers. So, the best way is to add MSD metric
to compute the path.
Best regards,
GUEDREZ Rabah
De : Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] De la part de Olivier Dugeon
Envoyé : jeudi 26 mars 2015 09:31
À : Jonathan Hardwick; Jeff Tantsura
Cc : draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@tools.ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Objet : Re: [Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce
regards
Jon
From: rabah.gued...@orange.com [mailto:rabah.gued...@orange.com]
Sent: 26 March 2015 06:18
To: DUGEON Olivier IMT/OLN; Jonathan Hardwick; Jeff Tantsura
Cc: draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@tools.ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01
Hi,
I
-pce-segment-rout...@tools.ietf.org
*Subject:* [Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01
Hi Jeff
I just wanted to clarify the comment that I made at the mic today as
we seemed to be talking at cross-purposes.
The draft sets a maximum SID depth in the Open message, which
effectively
-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@tools.ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01
Hi Jeff
I just wanted to clarify the comment that I made at the mic today as we seemed
to be talking at cross-purposes.
The draft sets a maximum SID depth in the Open message, which effectively
[mailto:rabah.gued...@orange.com]
*Sent:* 26 March 2015 06:18
*To:* DUGEON Olivier IMT/OLN; Jonathan Hardwick; Jeff Tantsura
*Cc:* draft-ietf-pce-segment-rout...@tools.ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
*Subject:* RE: [Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01
Hi,
I totally agree with Olivier and Jonathan
@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org pce@ietf.orgmailto:pce@ietf.org,
Sriganesh Kini sriganesh.k...@ericsson.commailto:sriganesh.k...@ericsson.com
Subject: Re: [Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01
Hi,
Great discussion!
Let’s try no to mix things.
1. Entropy labels (LB for ECMP/LAG) use case has been
Tantsura jeff.tants...@ericsson.commailto:jeff.tants...@ericsson.com
Subject: Re: [Pce] Comment on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-01
Hello Jon,
Yes you agree. From the pure Segment Routing and MPLS point of view. Now,
looking to load balancing, it is quiet different. When you setup LAG or Load
Hi Jeff
I just wanted to clarify the comment that I made at the mic today as we seemed
to be talking at cross-purposes.
The draft sets a maximum SID depth in the Open message, which effectively
creates an implicit constraint on all queries that are sent over the PCEP
session, such that
+1, I agree with Jon.
Perhaps a new METRIC type for MSD?
Regards,
Dhruv
On Wed, Mar 25, 2015 at 6:23 PM, Jonathan Hardwick
jonathan.hardw...@metaswitch.com wrote:
Hi Jeff
I just wanted to clarify the comment that I made at the mic today as we
seemed to be talking at cross-purposes.
I fully agree with the comments and thanks Jon for bringing it up.
We will work to address it.
Regards,
Jeff
On Mar 25, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Dhruv Dhody
dhruv.i...@gmail.commailto:dhruv.i...@gmail.com wrote:
+1, I agree with Jon.
Perhaps a new METRIC type for MSD?
Regards,
Dhruv
On Wed, Mar
11 matches
Mail list logo
