On Tuesday, October 29, 2002, at 01:11 AM, Jostein wrote:
Put out some images and text on my site.
Hope it does some justice to showing what you missed, folks.
Yer should have been there...
http://oksne.net
Click PDML_UK_III on the menu.
The page is somewhat biggish, so be patient while it l
Are you still seeing the spots?
Don
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: "Dan Scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 2:35 AM
Subjec
Put out some images and text on my site.
Hope it does some justice to showing what you missed, folks.
Yer should have been there...
http://oksne.net
Click PDML_UK_III on the menu.
The page is somewhat biggish, so be patient while it loads.
Jostein
Has anyone ever own or used a Pentax-A 28-135mm f/4.0 macro zoom. I would
like to get some feedback on it's quality.
Thanks,
Glen O'Neal
hi William
Probally a dumb question but,
do these machines have a lens
like a normal darkroom
enlarger or is the image
made from this laser?
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 3:11 AM
Subject: Re:
One time when I was flying Southwest Airlines I stuck
my little point-and-shoot right up to the cabin window
and took some pictures. That's the closest I've ever
come to aerial photography. Have fun on that glider
and don't drop your camera.
Deb in TX
___
This is pretty cool. In one sitting I've seen PDML
images of both the sun (from JCO) and the moon.
Nothing like the internet to give you the celestial
tour.
How long was your moon exposure? I notice a rainbow
effect around the moon. The sky fades from yellow to
orange to red on through violet.
Whoa, warn me next time! Now I'm all sunburned.
Really, these are nice. You even showed the gold
edging on the clouds. I really like the ship,
especially the colors. It is a good composition. If
you settle for a smaller enlargement, the grain won't
be as noticable. Don't worry too much about
I've done that! But instead of using a screw to hold the adapter to the
lens I used lok-tite (spelling? whatever..) witch basically glued the
adapter to the lens. I think I even used the same technique for finding the
position of the slot. Instead of a dremel I hand drilled VERY carefully.
Aft
Yeah, me too.
Along with the caps lock.
W.
At 09:56 AM 29/10/2002 +1100, you wrote:
From: "Paul Jones" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The first option i turned off :)
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:28 AM
S
I don't remember what happened exactly, but my Super A/Program with MDA had
the same problem many years ago. I remember everything was ok again when the
camera was cleaned & lubricated, or was it the MDA? Sorry I can't be more
helpful.
regards,
Alan Chan
I bought a used Pentax Super A two mont
I bought a used Pentax Super A two months ago, took
one roll of pictures with it, and it seems to work
fine. I just bought a MEII winder from ebay and it is
not working with the Super A. I don't have another
body that can use the winder and I am trying to
determine if it is the camera or the wind
BlankFor some reason, the PDML Server has been sending emails to my hotmail
Account
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last time this happened was when Doug Brewer was trying to sort out some
problems and he contacted me via my hot mail account.
James
Hi JCO!
Well, you where playing with your eyes! The ultraviolet emission of the
sun is invisible and undetectable by the naked eye. And while the sun
may have been low in the horizon and so, there was more "filtering" from
our atmosphere, you could have damaged your eyes. UV damage sometimes
On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 07:49 PM, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
1. it was sunrise, not mid day.
sun isnt as bright then. Sun was
a deep orange color.
2. the
lens was stopped down to f16 so
image view was even dimmer.
No eye damage. seeing the sun spots
was amazing. JCO
Good. Glad you are
> I've had better luck with a well set up Agfa D-Lab. I find the Fuji
> Crystal Archive paper just a bit too contrasty. But I certainly agree
> with staying away from Ritz and Walmart/Sams Club. Pretty much you
> have to go with a lab that doesn't cater to people who only care about
> the price
Butch,
I've had better luck with a well set up Agfa D-Lab. I find the Fuji
Crystal Archive paper just a bit too contrasty. But I certainly agree
with staying away from Ritz and Walmart/Sams Club. Pretty much you
have to go with a lab that doesn't cater to people who only care about
the price an
John,
You should take somewhere, have the Nikon removed, have an expert put on
Pentax and then take pictures of it and post them to web sites. People will
go nuts ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "John Mustarde" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002
On Mon, 28 Oct 2002 21:47:30 +, you wrote:
>The Pentax DSLR will be a mighty temptation, if only to have that
>glorious word 'Pentax' emblazoned on the front.
My D100 sports the wonderful Pentax-logo neck strap from a PZ1p. Much
better looking than that Halloween-costume "Nikon Digital"
blac
1. it was sunrise, not mid day.
sun isnt as bright then. Sun was
a deep orange color.
2. the
lens was stopped down to f16 so
image view was even dimmer.
No eye damage. seeing the sun spots
was amazing. JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Scott [mailto:daniel559@;directvinternet.com]
> S
On 28 Oct 2002 at 17:09, Rob Brigham wrote:
> The prosumer £2000 models seem to be more 'normal' sized SLRs without
> the bulky vertical grip assembly below the lens. The MZ-D had an
> integral grip like having the BG-10 permanently attached. I don't think
> this makes sense for a cheaper versio
We were discussing the possibility of permanently mounting an
M42 to K-Bayonet adaptor to a screw mount lens some time ago.
On the surface, it is quite an easy modification to make, with
some caveats.
The biggie is that some screw mount lenses don't have a wide
enough base to catch the locking pin
Just in case you guys wanted to know,
its 1:30am, its raining and its 24C
good thing I have my sweater on,
summer is still a month away
don't want to catch a cold :)
(frank do you lie in the snow before
or after taking "anti-freeze")
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Please answer the following 3 questions:
1.)
FA24-90/f3.5-4.5 IF&AL
FA*28-70/f2.8 AL
A35-105/f3.5
2.) What 3rd party zoom lenses covering at least the 40-70mm range would
you consider good alternatives? Please name up to 3 3rd party zooms.
No choice. Too afraid of flare.
3.) If you were dr
William Robb wrote:
> I found the LX was at it's worst as a wedding camera because of
> the flash failure "feature".
Bill,
With respect, much as I love my LXs there is a time and a place for 67
operation, and this is it.
They love weddings :-) LXs go clack during church use, as I found out to
Issue #3 of Mike Johnston's 37th Frame Newsletter reviewed a number
of 35mm lenses (Nikon, Zeiss, Hexanon, Canon, etc.) and I believe
Issue #4 will review a number of Pentaxes in case anyone is
interested.
Any URL? Or it is the video journal (100$ to get 4 issues). If so,
any conclusions tha
- Original Message -
From: andre
Subject: LX's auto-flash disabling, why?
> >William Robb
>
> I tend to find myself in that situation once in a while with
my LXs.
> Even after a CLA. Is it a problem only related to bad
contacts
> inside the finder or is it due to the the body's electron
Hmmyes, that is an expensive throw-away item :) I wasn't thinking
straight when I wrote the email. You have to you rechargeable of some kind,
not Duracells, even in my tiny 230 it takes less than 5-10s to drain 2AA
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
They could also put in a few hidden bugs, such as auto flash
disabling at the least opportune moment , like the LX...
William Robb
I tend to find myself in that situation once in a while with my LXs.
Even after a CLA. Is it a problem only related to bad contacts
inside the finder or is it
The first option i turned off :)
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, October 29, 2002 9:28 AM
Subject: RE: Atlantic Sunrise w/ the 1000mm F8
> INTERNET EXPLORER 6.0 AUTOMATICALLY
> RESIZES PIX TO FIT YOUR SCREEN.
> GET I
Normally, when I'm lying in the snow at -20 degrees, I've got so much
"anti-freeze" in me that I'm not feeling much of anything, let alone the
cold...
-frank
William Robb wrote:
> Lying in snow at -20 is generally warmer than standing up
> at -20.
>
> William Robb
--
"The optimist thinks this
- Original Message -
From: Feroze Kistan
Subject: Re: Just say "No" to burn-out Re: Photographic Training
> Thanks for that, I must say though that
> you trully are dedicated to the craft to
> get those photographs. I've seen a bit of
> snow maybe 3 times in my life. Cannot imagine
> how
Ya don't happen to have a release cable for the MZ-S do ya? ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Michael St. Jean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:40 PM
Subject: Pentax ZX-5n, FA Lenses, 500FTZ for Sale, more
On the plus side of my friend's now dead D100 - the battery that comes
with it is quite good. He was able to get over 300 shots - some flash
and viewing the LCD monitor during shooting. He had bought a spare
battery to carry with him on his trip, but never needed it because he
didn't shoot more t
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
http://jcoconnell.com/temp/1000_SUN2WEB.jpg
Cracking shot, nice work (and nice equipment).
Malcolm
At about $300 Cdn for batteries for the N D1, no one's tossing used
batteries like cigarettes.
The batteries are rechargeable. Problem is, a pro out on a shoot will likely
need at least two sets of batteries to get through the day.
cheers,
frank
Brad Dobo wrote:
> Yup, they eat batteries l
On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 01:56 PM, P Temmerman wrote:
Question, question, questions.
Weather permitting, this weekend I have the chance of fulfilling the
life-long dream of going gliding. I think that it will be a fairly
short flight maybe only 15 or 20 minutes and my primary goal
INTERNET EXPLORER 6.0 AUTOMATICALLY
RESIZES PIX TO FIT YOUR SCREEN.
GET IT ITS FREE.
JCO
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:cottycam@;mac.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 4:24 PM
> To: Pentax List
> Subject: Re: Atlantic Sunrise w/ the 1000mm F8
>
>
>
>
> >>Shot the sunris
Battery consumption has never been a real consideration with the digital
cameras I use. They are Lithium Ion rechargeables and have plenty of power
to carry me through a wedding or any other assignment I get. I top off the
charge thhe night before I do the shoot and I have always had plenty of
>I agree. Unless Pentax makes a really dumb choice, you're gonna need a big
battery pack. I don't think the smaller sensor
>makes that much of a difference.
There is little reason why a DSLR would be worse for battery consumption
than a digital P&S, and there's no winding mechanism so there's
>focal plain
LOL! Jees I'm sloshed.
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www.macads.co.uk/
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Hi Lon,
Yes, very interesting. I have been wandering in the back of my mind about
this, and in a way, I suppose I am trying to subconsciously avoid it at
the moment.
I think that I am truly wound up too much in getting to know my current
DSLR to suddenly chuck it all away and start again. Plus
Thanks for that, I must say though that
you trully are dedicated to the craft to
get those photographs. I've seen a bit of
snow maybe 3 times in my life. Cannot imagine
how it must be to breathe let alone lie in
snow at -20.
Is the printer trashed or just one cartridge.
I normally take the cartrid
Just got back the 4x6's from Saturday's band competition shooting Fuji Press
1600. I'm very pleased with the results. I was using MZ-S/AF360FGZ/Tamron
75-300 on a monopod. Shot at 1/30 with lens open wide and let the flash
take care of the exposure since I didn't want the background totally blac
Poll Jensen?
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Vastaanottaja: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Päivä: 28. lokakuuta 2002 20:59
Aihe: Re: Favorite Poll
>Nahhh,
I may regret this later...but I am streamlining my photography. Back
when I had time and money, I "enabled" myself more than necessary. Due
in part to all the digital discussion on this list, the digital camera I
got my mother (Pentax EI-100) for Christmas (which I have already opened
had a blast w
Myt favourite poll is in the other room reading. She's okay really ;-)
Cotty
>
>On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 12:07 PM, Norm Baugher wrote:
>
>> I'd just like to take a poll to see what your favorite poll is...
>> Norm
>>
>
>I've always liked totem poles.
>
>Dan Scott
>
_
>>Shot the sunrise Sunday morning about 6:30 AM.
>>What do you all think of these?
>>
>>http://jcoconnell.com/temp/1000_SUN1WEB.jpg
>>
>>http://jcoconnell.com/temp/1000_SUN2WEB.jpg
>>
>>http://jcoconnell.com/temp/1000_SUN5WEB.jpg
>>
>>Not that good, but it was only my first attempt.
Very nice pi
In have heard of this (literally). I used to have a Series One Vivitar
70-210 that sounded like a Bakerloo Tube train...
>I have heard that one of the problems that zoom lenses can
>induce is to blow dust around in the camera body as the lens
>changes focal length.
>I don't know if there is any t
Yes, they do indeed, don't know the price however and it doesn't work with
the 230.
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: DSLR, and other things...
>
> Doesn't one of the Optios have a t
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 2:00 PM
Subject: Re: DSLR, and other things...
>
> Doesn't one of the Optios have a two hunnered some dollah option
> for an underwater housing? When I read that, I act
I don't believe that there is particularly a difference. I think that if
the DSLR is weather-proofed the same as the film camera (with
electronics) then a similar result WRT invasion by water/etc will cause,
er, similar results. What I mean is that a well weather-proofed DSLR
should not (IMO) b
Argh.who wants to lug that type of stuff around, camera body only too!!
Imagine a good lens and a flash? Ha! Start bulking up guys ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Nosal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:47 PM
Subject: RE: Exclusive
Of course. There are protocols for cleaning the CCD. Some DSLRs
incorporate a barrier oin front of the CCD, in my case, CMOS. This aids
cleaning by enabling removal of dust from a surface other than a CCD (or
CMOS), and also providing a resting place for said dust that is not on
the focal plain
My two year old has a Disney T-shirt with a picture of Ariel (Little
Mermaid) and she's wearing it in most her recent portraits ...
Sorry, that was bad..
Cory Waters
not at work today and his mind is wandering toward the absurd
- Original Message -
From: "P Temmerman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Or our favourite object to make fun of. Wich is ever so easy...
Jens Bladt schrieb:
> Yeah, poll are fine:
> How about:
> Favorite
> -Pentax flash
> -3rd party flash
> -Slide film
> -Portrait film
> -all round film
> -fast neg. film
> -B&W film
> -B&W paper
> -B&W developer
> -flash meter
> -pict
My favourite 'poll' is private. Sorry ;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Norm Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:07 PM
Subject: Favorite Poll
> I'd just like to take a poll to see what your favorite poll is...
> Norm
>
>
You forgot: Our favourite objects to make fun of. Which is ever so easy.
Jens Bladt schrieb
> Yeah, poll are fine:
> How about:
> Favorite
> -Pentax flash
> -3rd party flash
> -Slide film
> -Portrait film
> -all round film
> -fast neg. film
> -B&W film
> -B&W paper
> -B&W developer
> -flash meter
Chris, just letting you know I'm interested perhaps. I assume you speak in
USD? I'm a Canuck, so double that and it's still a good deal.
Questionwhy are you dumping it? It rocks! (I used to own one, don't
ask)
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: "Christopher Lillja" <[EMAIL PROTE
Yeah, poll are fine:
How about:
Favorite
-Pentax flash
-3rd party flash
-Slide film
-Portrait film
-all round film
-fast neg. film
-B&W film
-B&W paper
-B&W developer
-flash meter
-picture editor/munipulator
-favorite diggie
-at what price level will you stop buying film and go 100% digital
-favori
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Nosal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 11:45 AM
Subject: Re: Exclusive picture of "new" Pentax D-SLR
> Why? The K-mount is the same size, the mirror box is the same size. The
> thing will still need plenty of
I hope you are right Rob. I cannot imagine if something breaks in it a year
from now. I'll send it away and get it back a year later.
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:16 PM
Subject: RE: Exclu
Finally got a chance to play with the LX at night. Overall, I'm pretty
impressed with the low light and OTF metering - I got by taking 2 or 3 of
each rather than the 8 or so I was doing with the k1000 in low light.
a couple samples are at
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=248862
I'
It is slowly becoming the latest Optio by the time it comes out.
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 12:09 PM
Subject: RE: Exclusive picture of "new" Pentax D-SLR
> The prosumer £2000 models seem t
Ah heck, I really should have bought the Nikon F100. It wasn't as if I was
tied down to Pentax thru lenses.
I can imagine the nightmare getting parts to fix this thing in the future
will be.
Ya ya, it's a great camera now, enjoy it, yadda yadda, but how about
accessories as well in the future?
- Original Message -
From: P Temmerman
Subject: Anybody out there do aerial photography
When ballooning, I think I tried just about every lens from 16mm
fisheye right up to 400mm telephoto over the 50 or so flights I
have been on. I found the 80-200 to be the most useful lens I
own.
I fou
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Re: DSLR and existing lenses at 1.5x
> Ahhh... filters beyond my measly Photoshop 5.
Ther you go. You want your digital to look like film, just go
out and buy some expensive software.
Or, go out and buy some film..
William Robb
I'm definitely waiting until buying and processing film because too
expensive or a hassle. (For more than just reason)
Brad Dobo
- Original Message -
From: "Tim S Kemp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 10:11 AM
Subject: Re: Re[2]: DSLR, and other
- Original Message -
From: Lon Williamson
Subject: Re: Exclusive picture of "new" Pentax D-SLR
> Brother Bruce:
>
> Repent now for Seduction Of a Pdml'er or Prepareth Yourself
> to Defend Wannabe Brother Lon in court when divorce #3409-b
> comes up for settlement.
Careful Brother Bruce,
What I'm wondering is what you do when first one pixel, then another, then
8 more, then the whole upper left square, of pixels decides to blink out
on you. With film, you buy a new roll. With DigiWonderTech, you buy a new
camera.
-Lon
Steve Desjardins wrote:
>
> I have always read that the F10
I agree. Unless Pentax makes a really dumb choice, you're gonna need a big battery
pack. I don't think the smaller sensor makes that much of a difference.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTE
This is the last chance for anyone who wants this stuff to get it, cause
tomorrow it's gone. If you want any of this I need to know by the end of the
day, or first thing in the morning.
fa 28-70/4- $75
f 35-135/3.5-4.5 macro- $75
af500ftz- $100
af330ftz- $50
fa* 300/4.5 $250
Again, everything wor
Might be - I don´t use much flash and my memory is not the most dependable. My Z-20
did not do it however, I always chose the slowest handholdable speed manually.
All the best!
Raimo
Personal photography homepage at http://www.uusikaupunki.fi/~raikorho
-Alkuperäinen viesti-
Lähettäjä: Bru
This danged brotherhood stuff is ticking me off.
I decided long ago to stick with Pentax 35mm, and
you 6x7 folks just keep hurling up the "big neg"
arguement, and I want a 6x7 but I want a 300 f4 for
K mount even more.
Damn, this group is expensive. Grin.
-Lon
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Someone
On Monday, Oct 28, 2002, at 12:30 America/New_York, Steve Desjardins
wrote:
I know the sensor itself is senstive, but it's behind a few things.
When a fim camera gets splashed, does a lot of water get on the film?
I have to profess my ignorance here. I do know that the first time I
picked up
On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 01:11 PM, Lon Williamson wrote:
Brad, in the field I clean my glasses a LOT more than I clean my
lenses.
In fact, my lenses tend to get a bit of breath before mounting, mebbe
a swipe with once a
month,
and a careful sit-down cleaning about once a year or whene
My personal favorite is the null poll.
Len
---
From: Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Favorite Poll
Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2002 10:07:35 -0800
I'd just like to take a poll to see what your favorite poll is...
Norm
___
On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 01:08 PM, Dr E D F Williams wrote:
I use negative film too, because my scanner doesn't like dense film
either.
In fact its impossible to scan a slide with dense areas. Incidentally
- I
processed a twelfth roll in chemicals (Tetenal C-41) that should have
been
Cotty,
This makes me wonder. You have started to stray from the Pentax
fold, not only lusting in your heart for harlot DSLRs, but
actually purchasing one, as I recall.
Will you repent? Buy the new Pentax, insert your Nikanonlta into
a garbage disposal and turn the knob to "Heavy Shred"?
Grin.
I use negative film too, because my scanner doesn't like dense film either.
In fact its impossible to scan a slide with dense areas. Incidentally - I
processed a twelfth roll in chemicals (Tetenal C-41) that should have been
discarded after eight this morning and it looks great. Its also 9 weeks ol
Brad, in the field I clean my glasses a LOT more than I clean my lenses.
In fact, my lenses tend to get a bit of breath before mounting, mebbe
a swipe with once a month,
and a careful sit-down cleaning about once a year or whenever the heck I feel
like it. But the glasses get cleaned OFTEN in the
- Original Message -
From: Norm Baugher
Subject: Favorite Poll
> I'd just like to take a poll to see what your favorite poll
is...
> Norm
Mine would be Anna Marek
WW
I really appreciate Arnold's polls. I am trying to get a decent kit
together, and the polls are very useful for me.
Thanks Arnold!
Michael Cross
Arnold Stark wrote:
This is not the last poll that I will start here, but it is the last
before the last one. The last one will be on telephoto zoom
I don't see photoshop's Noise filters simulating grain except for very
low resolution scans. Have you a magic filter I don't know about?
Herb Chong wrote:
>
> Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >That is a nice shot, I like the color, sharpness, but I can't seem to
> find a way
Dan Scott wrote:
> That is a nice shot, I like the color, sharpness, but I can't seem to
> find a way to like that smoothness. I've seen a lot of people praise
> that aspect of digital. But it bothers me and it frustrates me that I
> can't articulate why.
>
> Could this be one of those "vinyl v
You see, the French claim she was... (surprise, surprise) French :)
Lukasz (a "poll" himself ;)
-Original Message-
From: Mark Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 7:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Favorite Poll
Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
Doesn't one of the Optios have a two hunnered some dollah option
for an underwater housing? When I read that, I actually lusted
for an Optio for an hour, but then pulling out a few KXen and MXen
and stroking their pointy little prism housing heads made me feel
better.
-Lon
Dan Scott wrote:
>
>
on 28.10.02 19:32, Arnold Stark at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello Arnold,
my choices:
> 1.)
FA24-90/f3.5-4.5 IF&AL
FA*28-70/f2.8 AL
FA28-105/f3.2-4.5 IF&AL
> 2.) What 3rd party zoom lenses covering at least the 40-70mm range would
> you consider good alternatives? Please name up to 3 3rd party
I'd love to be able to agree. I think this probably depends on the scanner.
My Pacific Image Primefilm 3600 "Pro" does a decent job on slides provided
there is not dark detail to wring out. It poops all over dark slides, but
then I got it for about $500. Its limitations have turned me into a di
- Original Message -
From: Pål Jensen
Subject: Re: Exclusive picture of "new" Pentax D-SLR
> William wrote:
>
> > Absolutely. Whoever wrote that needs to give their head a
shake.
>
> Nonsense. Pentax doesn't do any marketing towards professional
use (or amateur for that matter). They sel
At 05:09 PM 10/28/02 +, you wrote:
The prosumer £2000 models seem to be more 'normal' sized SLRs without
the bulky vertical grip assembly below the lens. The MZ-D had an
integral grip like having the BG-10 permanently attached. I don't think
this makes sense for a cheaper version aimed at no
Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'd just like to take a poll to see what your favorite poll is...
>Norm
Marie Curie.
--
Mark Roberts
www.robertstech.com
Photography and writing
This is not the last poll that I will start here, but it is the last
before the last one. The last one will be on telephoto zooms. After that
there will have been 12 polls on all kinds of lenses available in
k-mount. Those who think these polls are boring or who even consider
them a nuisance, pleas
Thanks to all for your responses.
Wow! If a little question like mine can stir up
emotions imagine what a bigger question or a statement
claiming something or another can do?
Anyway, the lenses I mentioned are exactly what I own
and what I will be bringing. I will be home-based for
my trip so I
On Monday, October 28, 2002, at 12:07 PM, Norm Baugher wrote:
I'd just like to take a poll to see what your favorite poll is...
Norm
I've always liked totem poles.
Dan Scott
10 ft.
> -Original Message-
> From: Norm Baugher [mailto:nbaugher@;earthlink.net]
> Sent: Monday, October 28, 2002 1:08 PM
> To: Pentax
> Subject: Favorite Poll
>
>
> I'd just like to take a poll to see what your favorite poll is...
> Norm
>
>
And a poll to see what poll you would like done next?
> -Original Message-
> From: Arnold Stark [mailto:pdml@;arnoldstark.de]
> Sent: 28 October 2002 18:18
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Favorite Poll
>
>
> Norm Baugher schrieb:
>
> > I'd just like to take a poll to see what yo
Norm Baugher schrieb:
> I'd just like to take a poll to see what your favorite poll is...Norm
Two more polls from me (one starting tonight), and then I will stop.
Promise!
Arnold
Great anecdote
BTW, no wonder Pentax DSLR's do not sell well in Canada. As far as I know,
there was never made *any*!
Regards
Jens
PS: None was sold in Europe either...
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Michael Nosal [mailto:mike.nosal@;divine.com]
Sendt: 28. oktober 2002 17:24
Til: [EMAIL PR
On 28 Oct 2002 at 10:07, Norm Baugher wrote:
> I'd just like to take a poll to see what your favorite poll is... Norm
Definitely this one!
Gabor
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo
