On March 14, 2003 09:25 am, gfen wrote:
>
> I think this is what I expected to hear, and I'm surprised i haven't yet.
> I'm glad to know that I can point more to teh paper and less to my
> often-less-than-ideal exposed negs. The greater bulk of my 4x5 stuff was
> done before I really came to full
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi,
> But if I use it mostly for landscapes and shoot from
> f=4 the results should be great I hope.
Yes indeed, I have meade some really great shots with
this lens.
So even at
> 2.8 is not so good but probably better than 2.8
> version full open.
> Thank you!
> A
<< > 200mm f2.5 m (it's not a K lens, and I am sticking to that)
Gee, Peter, did it actually say "Pentax-M" on the barrel ???
Fred
>>
Fred. As it was puchased new in ?1983? and sold in 1986 (moved to Canon FD
system) I can barely remember. Fairly sure 'K' was not marked, though. Even
th
On March 14, 2003 08:56 am, gfen wrote:
> On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Nick Zentena wrote:
> > Which may be the problem. ND filters if you can't cut the light
> > any other way? You may solve all your problems by going back to the
> > 1:9 and cutting the exposure down some how.
>
> One of the things I'
<< So You did not like A35/2.0. Why?
What about optics?
Alek >>
Hello Alek. It was an ugly graded lens. Quite horrible. Plenty of paint wear,
dings, dents, scuff, you name it. Of course I never shot it. The previous
owner was an LX wielding pj who travelled the world & moved to Nikon AF for
I might even consider the American model if it yelled out, "Hey,
Stoopid!" With custom functions for loud and louder. Lend it to in-laws
so they can take "good" pictures at music recitals.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Perhaps the camera should give a verbal warning when the ring is moved
from t
it's a K lens and I'm sticking to that...
Vic
In a message dated 3/14/03 7:34:53 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> 200mm f2.5 m (it's not a K lens, and I am sticking to that)
>
>Gee, Peter, did it actually say "Pentax-M" on the barrel ???
>
>Fred
Too bad. Time for the Pentax mantra: The flagship is coming, The
flagship is coming, The flagship is coming, The flagship is coming...
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dear Roland,
The *Ist SLR can take all auto focus Pentax lenses.
When I asked for clarification, they wrote:
---
Well I believe the A series lenses should work too, but I do not
Have enough information to confirm it.
---
So, no word on K-mount then... Only KA, KAF and KAF2.
Best wishes,
Roland
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Don't change the developer mix or the development time. Change the
> exposure time.
I'm hoping that a contrast filter should also help me out by cutting back
some of the light reacing the paper, too.
> Unfiltered MG paper is somewhere around 0 or -1. I
Well, a little power-point presentation (or Freelance graphics) running on
the LCD-panel at the back would probably do the trick. :-)
Best wishes,
Roland
From: "Gregory L. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 09:19:49 -0500 (EST)
You think they'd read the user manuals?
Perhaps the
I have tried both winders on a P50. ME didn't work, ME-II did.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Bojidar Dimitrov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 14, 2003 1:58 PM
Subject: Winder ME and A-series bodies
> Hi all,
>
> I have virtually never used a m
Roland Mabo said:
> >From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:45:13 -0500
> >
> >According to Pentax, it's to prevent bonehead consumers (they didn't
> >actually use the word "bonehead" but that's my poetic license!) from
> >accidentally moving the lens off the "A" sett
I wrote:
---
Dear Sirs,
I'm feeling very excited about the *ist, but since I have a lot of K-mount
equipment (lenses, extension tubes...) I would like to know if the *ist can
use my K-mount lenses and accessories without problems ? (Does aperture
coupling and metering works?). I have a MZ-5n but
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
> You did too much in even metioning the movie. I thought you were cool like
> that! Now you are making me have to take a trip to PA! :-) Oops, now
> if you don't show up on the list people will look to me :-0
You'll have to have the same perso
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Butch Black wrote:
> I'm not familiar with Sprint chemistry but 30-45 seconds sounds too short
> for a developing time even with RC paper and a 15W lamp bounced off the
> ceiling sounds like it's way too weak of a light source. I would normally be
Believe it or not, its pretty
So You did not like A35/2.0. Why?
What about optics?
Alek
[EMAIL PROTECTED] napisał:
><< Despite the fact that they are
> >significantly less common than the M lenses, the A35mm F2 handles like a
> >dream. Mind you, I haven\\\'t shot it. >>
>
>Oops. Small typo. Should have read "the A 35mm F2.8
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Nick Zentena wrote:
> Which may be the problem. ND filters if you can't cut the light
> any other way? You may solve all your problems by going back to the
> 1:9 and cutting the exposure down some how.
One of the things I'd like to get a feel for is basic and simple dodg
Sounds like a good idea to me. I plan on taking the Jobo processor so we
can have more than one roll to pick our entries for. I'll have enough
Tetenal chemicals to process 6 rolls
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Jerome Daryl Coombs-Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
Thank you William!
Alek
So maybe A35/2.0 would be nice for me. I must look at the prices of it. If it is
really pricy, maybe it is better to buy FA version...
Alek
Użytkownik William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>- Original Message -
>From: "Peter Alling"
>Subject: Re: Re: A35/2.8 l
I wonder what enlargements you have done to compare your 35mm.
K35/3.5 would be nice but a little too dark and no A but I do not exclude it-some
people believe it is great performer and not so expensive
Alek
Użytkownik Peter Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>I\'ve played with the K 35 f3
Do you have/had any other 35mm from Pentax?
Indeed, K35/3.5 is said to be very nice but ... contacts would be nice to have.
Alek
Użytkownik Mark Cassino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>I was not satisfied with my A35 f2.8 - just never seemed to be sharp. I
>replaced it was a K35 f3.5, and that le
Hi,
But if I use it mostly for landscapes and shoot from f=4 the results should be great I
hope. So even at 2.8 is not so good but probably better than 2.8 version full open.
Thank you!
Alek
PS Is it similar to FA version if performance is concerns?FA lens got great reviews...
Użytkownik alexande
Hi
About masking some contacts I have read. I know that Alan did so with his M135/2.8.
Cheers
Alek
Użytkownik Andre Langevin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> napisał:
>>Dear All,
>>I own M35/2.8 but think about buying A version to have spot/matrix
>>on my PZ1 and more flexibility on Super A. Could you write
On Thu, 13 Mar 2003, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> Gary - just don't show those pictures :)
For the record, outside of the dust and water spots, they're really not
that bad. :)
> I was going to write that we had a naked orgy in the Egyptian tomb and go
> thrown out of the
> museum but decided someone mi
> You were correct, the lens arrived yesterday,
Great. I guess you're a bit relieved now.
Regards,
Lukasz
Hi all,
I have virtually never used a motor or a winder, so I am relatively
ignorant in this area. I received a question from a KMP reader, if the
Winder ME (not the ME II) works properly with the programPlus.
On the Winders KMP page I say that the ME and ME II winders work with
all A bodies. B
On 10 Mar 2003 at 7:48, Chris Stoddart wrote:
> Last month I ordered two filters (big circ polarizers are 1/2 the UK
> price in the USA!) from New Jersey, and they were shipped USPS airmail on
> the same day. One turned up in 5 days whilst the other turned turned up
> last Saturday, exactly a mont
On 03.3.14 7:25 AM, "Bruce Rubenstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's not jpeg artifacts. That's just dust on the sensor.
Where did you get this strange info from?
Ken
(wrt GFM) My plan is to be there and add some color to the canvas.
Perhaps this is the year that PDML sweeps the contest categories...
wudduya say, Bubba?
- ambitious jerome
On March 13, 2003 06:22 pm, Keith Whaley wrote:
>
>
> Is she even _capable_ of speaking in either American or the King's English?
I missed the news. When did she die?
Nick
From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 14 Mar 2003 07:45:13 -0500
According to Pentax, it's to prevent bonehead consumers (they didn't
actually use the word "bonehead" but that's my poetic license!) from
accidentally moving the lens off the "A" setting and taking all their
photos at f/22
101 - 132 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
