My girlfriend bought a roll of cold laminate sheet
to laminate an album, but we couldn't figure out how
to do it without any air bubbles. We have a small
cold/hot laminating machine. Any tips ? Thanks.
--
Bo-Ming Tong
Doug Franklin wrote:
As one Doug to another, I'm with you all the way. I'm also getting
tired of the folks attending the BR school of "let's stir up the mud
just for the sake of it". I've been on the list since '98 and I can't
remember it being less useful, with the possible exception of the "The
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 1:43 AM
Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Re: Re: Lenses without aperture rings (WAS:
Re[2]: Lens co...
>
> These are not football teams to root for or something. The *ist is not a
> linebacke
- Original Message -
From: "Caveman"
Subject: The elusive SG 60 LX screen
> Just put my grubby paws on one today (thanks Peter!).
>
> Unbelievable. Very bright with very fine grain and easy snappy focus at
> same time.
>
> Just a note for those looking for one: on Boz site it is describ
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> >Really, I don't know why anyone would expect to
> >handhold a lens exceeding 1kg in weight (e.g. any
> >70-200/2.8, or 300/4) and get away with that using
> >"new technology". IS is based on the assumption that
> >you c
T Rittenhouse wrote:
> There is a link to that information at the top of the page, no need to
> scroll at all.
>
> Ciao,
> Graywolf
> http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
If you do that, then you skip over the description, Tom -
Certainly not what I want my prospective buyers to do.
But what i
Tonghang Zhou wrote:
> The BMW dealership should've hired a more ept ad writer
> I think, but here's what I can manage:
>
> The top 10 characters in big fonts:
>
> Should (we) go out for a dragon dance tour, or
> should (we) fire up the firecrackers?
This has got to be one of thos
The tripod collar for the old F* 300/4.5 is equally
inviting, or maybe even more so because of the
Pentax factor :)
And double as a handle too. :-) But what were Pentax thinking? They either
gave you nothing or made the tripod collar real BIG! Didn't they know that
damn thing fits nowhere in an
AFAIK, true ICE works better on scratch & dust removal. If this is important
to you, go for Elite. If not, Dual will do. I have the original Elite myself
for a year.
regards,
Alan Chan
Hey, I am looking at a couple of Minolta Film Scanners. 1. the Quick Scan
Dual III a 2800 bpi 16 bit USB 2.0 sc
i have been trying 3rd party brands, but not Agfa yet. i have always returned to Epson
so far, but i do like some of the Lumijet papers. they are more expensive than the
Agfa papers.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Franklin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tu
Thanks Zhou
--- Tonghang Zhou <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
> The BMW dealership should've hired a more ept ad
> writer
> I think, but here's what I can manage:
>
> The top 10 characters in big fonts:
>
> Should (we) go out for a dragon dance tour, or
> should (we) fire up the firec
Graywolf spake thusly:
"Entry level cameras from 40 years ago sure were different than they are now
weren't they? Anybody out there think an *ist will be usable in 2043?"
Based on some of what I've read here at PDML, some would argue that an *ist won't be
usable in 2003! ;) But enough about that
The BMW dealership should've hired a more ept ad writer
I think, but here's what I can manage:
The top 10 characters in big fonts:
Should (we) go out for a dragon dance tour, or
should (we) fire up the firecrackers?
The smaller font below the photo of the dealer's building:
If the DMax figures are real DMax figures, yes DMax
is more important than any other feature and maybe
even resolution. Unfortunately, from what I've
heard, Minolta's DMax values are not measured values
but theoretical, calculated values. For instance a
DMax of 3.6 for a 12 bit scanner tells you no
Grats to you Brendan.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Brendan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 9:03 PM
Subject: Re: WOOHOOO
> DAVE YES lol.
>
> --- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >
> T
DAVE YES lol.
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >
That should have been an exclamation
> point after "great
> work, Brendan"
> >
> > They have spell-check, they should have
> idiot-check as well...
> >
> > -frank
> >
> > frank theriault wrote:
> >
> > >
Hey, I am looking at a couple of Minolta Film Scanners. 1. the Quick Scan
Dual III a 2800 bpi 16 bit USB 2.0 scanner. and 2. the Scan Elite 2800 bpi
12 bit SCSI scanner. The Elite has ICE-3, multi pass noise reduction, etc.
The Dual III has 16 bits per color, etc. The question I have is this. Is th
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 19:54:40 -0400, Doug Franklin wrote:
> > If I print a lot of 8x10's I use a lot of ink.
>
> I get 20-40 eight inch by ten inch prints from a color cartridge on my
> Epson 820, depending on the actual images printed. The black cartridge
> lasts for about three color cartridges
There is a link to that information at the top of the page, no need to
scroll at all.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: my photograp
Right on, Brendan! Here's hoping for many more!
Pat White
On Wed, 09 Jul 2003 08:57:56 +1000, Rob Studdert wrote:
> Sorry Doug (listmaster, god), talk about whining. Surely discourse
> regarding varied opinions and experience with Pentax equipment and
> other brand equipment is educational and interesting?
If it was discourse, it would be interesting.
Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> I have to scroll to the bottom of every page just to see if the seller will
> even ship to me, this information used to be in plain view. I also cut and past
> information into a data base, now there are hidden page returns etc. So from my
> perspective I don't believe that
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 16:13:10 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Although I have looked around at replacement inks made by other
> manufacturers. Places found on the Internet. But I like Epson
> inks, the richness in color, so I am not sure any of those
> replacements would cut it for me.
The Epson i
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 13:54:40 -0400, Herb Chong wrote:
> i find there is enough difference between the regular photo paper and
> the Premium Photo paper that i always use the latter.
Try something serious like the Agfa papers and you'll never go back,
until the pocketbook is empty, anyway. :-)
TTY
On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 12:55:49 -0400, Doug Brewer wrote:
> It's getting damned tiresome going through my email and getting the
> feeling that since I, as an unapologetic fan of Pentax and Pentax gear,
> appear to be unwelcome on the PDML.
As one Doug to another, I'm with you all the way. I'm also
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003 11:27:15 EDT, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Also, if you print on more absorpant paper, the ink is used up 5-10X
> faster because it is absorbed more.
Actually, it should be just the opposite. If you configure the printer
settings to reflect that you're using more absorbent (low
> That should have been an exclamation point
after "great
work, Brendan"
>
> They have spell-check, they should have idiot-check as well...
>
> -frank
>
> frank theriault wrote:
>
> > Seriously, great work, Brendan?
Dont worry Frank,my idiot check is
On 8 Jul 2003 at 12:43, T Rittenhouse wrote:
> Interestingly enough, I was upset also, but after only two days, I think I
> like the new format better. It is very consistent and it is easy to find the
> information you need before bidding.
I have to scroll to the bottom of every page just to see
I feel your pain.
Couldn't have said it any better.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Doug Brewer"
Subject: On cheerleading
> It's getting damned tiresome going through my email and getting the
feeling
> that since I, as an unapologetic fan of Pentax and Pentax gear, appear to
>
> But nothing worse than blurred pictures because
the shutter speed
> wasn't
> fast enough. For that "IS" sure saves your day.
But of course, one
> can
> always request the action to be stopped until the
tripod was
> properly setup.
To address your concern, I would say the included
tripod co
On 8 Jul 2003 at 12:55, Doug Brewer wrote:
> So you use another camera brand. I couldn't care less. Why do you spend
> your time and energy worrying about what I use? Why do you feel the need to
> insult me because I use a brand you don't like? Are you really that pathetic?
Sorry Doug (listmast
> James Moniz wrote:
>> Largely for fun, I just picked up a Honeywell Pentax H1a with a
>> 55mm f2 Takumar from ebay. This will be my first screw mount.
But probably not your last.
>> While I'm waiting for it to arrive, I wanted to know if any of
>> you have used this ancient, beautiful-lookin
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> Kripes, Tom, I thought ~I~ needed to get a life!
Oh please, I have more than I can shake a stick at.
Anyone who gives up lawyering to ride a bike and wear bunny ears is a
hero and gets a toast.
I raise my Bass t
I'm a cheerleader as well. And there are quite a few of us here. Witness
the current thread about pre-Spotmatic screw mount cameras.
Paul
Bruce Dayton wrote:
>
> Doug,
>
> Wonderful. I count myself as one of the cheerleaders. I am more than
> happy with my gear! Thanks for the comments. I've
Don't let him fool you. Frank is an attorney who chooses to work as a
bike messenger. He's among the most interesting people I've met here,
and I can heartily recommend him as good company. Particularly for
attractive young ladies .
tom wrote:
>
> Oh please, he's a hero to most of us.
>
> Well, m
C'mon Brendan, unveil the details, camera, lens, film...
Brendan wrote:
I did a job for a BMW dealership, the first add is
running this weekend in the Ming Pao ( I'm sure Dave
knows it ) Daily, to be followed by other papers and
magazines soo.
http://www.torphoto.net/images/ParkviewBMWAd.jpg
can
For the angry words of various members I saw since I
joined this mailing list, I wish to give my 2 cents.
Some of you wanted USM or IS. Pentax has always been
lagging behind other manufacturers for several
years. One of their industry firsts was to put a
built-in flash on an SLR body but do you ca
This years market for DSLR's will probably reach 1 million. Extremely few
of this one million buyers sits on many lenses. Even fewer sits on many
Pentax lenses. Even fewer of those sits on more than 20 year old Pentax
lenses. Even fewer of those who do will buy a digital slr. And few of those
w
Hear bloody hear Doug. Who gives a monkey's bum as long as the pictures
are good?
Chris
On Tue, 8 Jul 2003, Doug Brewer wrote:
> But you know what? Kiss my ass. Enjoying my Pentax gear, and reading about
> others who enjoy theirs, is just as valid a use for this list as the
> constant whining a
Excellent photo, Christian.
Joe
Doug's topic (qv), it seems to me, points to why Pentax may be
short-sighted in not making the newer cameras fully k-mount compatible.
Granted, Pentax is looking toward future users and future compatibility.
But doesn't Pentax benefit from cheerleaders among established Pentax
users? When peopl
since we're obviously so unimportant to Pentax.
LOL! At least you got that right. :-)
regards,
Alan Chan
_
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*.
http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail
Perhaps it has to do with the exiting angle of this lens (similar to DSLR
issue). I used to have the A35/2.8 and experienced the same problem when
mounted it on MX with Beattie or SE-20 screen. Heavy vignetting at the
corners of the viewfinder, but gone with standard MX screen or Z-1p. It has
n
i'm highlighting that Epson makes two grades of photo paper and that the cheaper one
has more artifacts from the printing process than the Premium papers. mostly it's in
the magenta shine from the black ink when the print is held at an angle to light.
Herb
- Original Message -
From:
Herb,
In 4X6 I get the same premium paper I use for 8X10. I agree with you
that each paper will print a bit differently - I only meant to say
that printing tests on uncoated paper seems not such a good idea.
Bruce
Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 10:54:40 AM, you wrote:
HC> i find there is enough dif
Doug,
Wonderful. I count myself as one of the cheerleaders. I am more than
happy with my gear! Thanks for the comments. I've been thinking of
writing just such a piece, but you've done a great job.
Thanks,
Bruce
Tuesday, July 8, 2003, 9:55:49 AM, you wrote:
DB> It's getting damned tires
I just got one as well, beautiful isn't it?
At 11:00 AM 7/8/03 -0400, you wrote:
Just put my grubby paws on one today (thanks Peter!).
Unbelievable. Very bright with very fine grain and easy snappy focus at
same time.
Just a note for those looking for one: on Boz site it is described as
simila
Best of Luck. Please let your son know that his countrymen have deep
respect for his efforts on our behalf.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi
This problem (slow stop-down action) often is due to leaving the lens NOT
stopped down (i.e. on camera). That's something Pentax lenses do not like.
The spring tend to get "tired". Don't leve the lens on the body. My
2.0/85mm, 2.5/135mm frequently get this illness, ifthey're cared for
porperly.
>From my perspective:
A couple of local pjs being harassed into picking something up. (Nikon in
both cases since they already have the lenses). A wannabe pj looking to pick up
some extra income (Nikon again). An art student from the local University (most
likely Nikon again, could be Pentax). A
Oh please, he's a hero to most of us.
Well, maybe he should get a girlfriend, but otherwise he's the man.
tv
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> How sad, . Please accept this a token of my sincere
> condolences.
> Yours makes even my current life lo
> -Original Message-
> From: jerome [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> > One can wonder what drive certain people who practically
> > only post negative and hateful post on PDML on issues
> > that doesn't even affect their photography! A mystery!
>
> Not really a mystery... have you seen
I'm trying to help a friend whose home page is,
alas, on AOL. I made a banner for him
and linked to the page, as it is , in fact, the
Scrabble club 56 (new) homepage. If
anyone is savvy to the peculiarites of using HTML
on AOL could you write me off list?
Basically it is a matter of getting the
> One can wonder what drive certain people who practically
> only post negative and hateful post on PDML on issues
> that doesn't even affect their photography! A mystery!
Not really a mystery... have you seen some of their photography?!
> > The Auto 110 sets exposure for ASA 80 when the film cartridge has an
index
> > tab and for ASA 400 without the tab. Those are the only two exposure
> ...
> This is not the opposite ?, the cell seems more sensitive when the tab
> is present
> Michel
Michel,
I just performed a little exposure t
I didn't see it I must be board.
At 11:39 AM 7/6/03 -0400, you wrote:
Practical experience, not partical experience. Why is it that I can only see
mistakes like that after I post the comment?
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "T Rittenhouse" <
For this to work you have to make a change in the Jpeg. Otherwise
most editing programs won't re-compress the image which is were the loss in
image quality comes in, but editing Jpegs and saving your work between edits
is not advisable.
At 11:06 AM 7/6/03 -0400, you wrote:
Well, take that jpeg and
Jens Bladt wrote:
> Hi
> First. Are you sure you mean vignetting - thr picture being brighter towards
> the edges??? I could understand if it's the opposite.
Um Jens - he de say the opposite (darker) :)
I get vignetting with the 28 under certain lighting conditions using my LX and
my KX.
I thin
How sad, . Please accept this a token of my sincere condolences.
Yours makes even my current life look good.
At 09:43 AM 7/6/03 -0400, you wrote:
I'm too poor to do wireless, I have no girlfriend, and I'm a bike
messenger...
'N'uff said!
cheers,
frank
Alin Flaider wrote:
> How many of you ch
That was said sometime after the release of the MZ-S, the way things are going
I see a mis-translation, not a camera to carry to your grave but one that will
put us in our graves, since we're obviously so unimportant to Pentax.
At 07:50 AM 7/6/03 -0400, you wrote:
What about the report someone post
Bravo! Very well put.
One can wonder what drive certain people who practically only post negative and
hateful post on PDML on issues that doesn't even affect their photography! A mystery!
Pål
Doug wrote:
It's getting damned tiresome going through my email and getting the feeling that since
I
Amen, Doug.
Pat White
Doug, I'm with you man.
--- Doug Brewer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
It's getting damned tiresome going through my email
> and getting the feeling
> that since I, as an unapologetic fan of Pentax and
> Pentax gear, appear to
> be unwelcome on the PDML. It is now, I notice,
> become fashionably
Sure. Someday . . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/07/03 09:42AM >>>
on 07.07.03 15:30, Steve Desjardins at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Even if film SLR's
Thanks! Well said!
I divide these people into two types:
The pessimists, who are like children before christmas. They are so
exited and so afraid to be disappointed that they see boogiemen all
over the place.
The real apologists, who have converted or want to convert, but feel
really bad abo
>Marnie,
>Due to the extreme absorbancy of that kind of paper (sucks up ink) and
>the inability to really look at color/saturation/most anything other
>than cropping, I use photo 4X6 paper to print tests on. Relatively
>inexpensive, not much ink use and you can reasonably evaluate what you
>are g
I must agree with Doug. From some of the current pissing and moaning around
here, I definitely think there are a lot of people here that need to get out
and use the equipment they have rather than bitch about what's upcoming and
what they don't like.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Dou
i find there is enough difference between the regular photo paper and the Premium
Photo paper that i always use the latter.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 13:01
Subject: Re: a
You know, if Pentax offered a real upgrade then it would be an upgrade
path. You yourself
have said that IS and USM are not coming for the for seeable future. What
upgrade?
At 11:35 PM 7/5/03 +0200, Pål wrote:
Alan wrote:
> There is a major difference here. SM & K are completely different
> p
At 10:09 PM 7/5/03 +0200, Pål wrote:
Collin wrote:
Pentax is now ready to lead Nikon in the consumer marketplace.
This year will be the FIRST year in the boom of the inexpensive
DSLR. Canon & Pentax will be there in the $1200-$1500 class.
These are NEW purchases and people will need NEW lenses.
T
Hi
First. Are you sure you mean vignetting - thr picture being brighter towards
the edges??? I could understand if it's the opposite.
I owned that lens once - my first Pentax lens actually, with my MX. I'm sure
there is no vignetting visible to the naked eye - that would surprise me
very much. I sh
Yep. Well said.
Matjaz
> It's getting damned tiresome going through my email and getting the
> feeling that since I, as an unapologetic fan of Pentax and Pentax
> gear, appear to be unwelcome on the PDML. It is now, I notice, become
> fashionably oh-so-clever to refer to Pentax fans as cheerleade
If it were my apple tree or other hard wood I certainly would have.
But it's one of those Bradford pear trees that's too soft.
Burns like paper.
And ...
... like so many modern homes our fireplace is for decor & not home heating.
When the city chips it they either (a) use it for mulch in the local
Marnie,
Due to the extreme absorbancy of that kind of paper (sucks up ink) and
the inability to really look at color/saturation/most anything other
than cropping, I use photo 4X6 paper to print tests on. Relatively
inexpensive, not much ink use and you can reasonably evaluate what you
are going t
It's getting damned tiresome going through my email and getting the feeling
that since I, as an unapologetic fan of Pentax and Pentax gear, appear to
be unwelcome on the PDML. It is now, I notice, become fashionably
oh-so-clever to refer to Pentax fans as cheerleaders, in a pejorative
sense. Is
Entry level cameras from 40 years ago sure were different than they are now
weren't they? Anybody out there think an *ist will be usable in 2043?
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: "James Moniz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sen
Waste of wood. You should have cut it into 12" pieces and split it for
winter fuel.
Don
___
Dr E D F Williams
http://personal.inet.fi/cool/don.williams
Author's Web Site and Photo Gallery
Updated: March 30, 2002
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTE
Interestingly enough, I was upset also, but after only two days, I think I
like the new format better. It is very consistent and it is easy to find the
information you need before bidding.
Ciao,
Graywolf
http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Some storms went through yesterday ...
#1. Electricity went off yesterday about 4pm
#2. Didn't sleep soundly in the warm humid still air.
#3. Electricity finally back on @ 4am today.
During the night another batch went through ...
#4. Kept me awake the rest of the early morning.
Went out @ 7
I have a persistent attachment to the screwmount Pentaxes, as well.
While I have a Spotmatic and ESII, I have had several pre-Spotmatic
Pentaxes, too (an H3v, then an H3, a lovely black H2), although the
only pre-Spotmatic Pentax I own now is a very nice SV. The lines are
somehow more pleasing
Check August Shutterbug for a glowing report on Pentaxes from this era.
I had a used H2, my first SLR. Wish I'd never parted with it.
Joe
When I had to replace my printer, I found a store and salesman
who allowed me to bring in a file of my own and then print it
on 3 different printers in the store. I figured that the in-store
manufacturers prints would be optimized for colour and detail
for each particular printer and I wanted to s
One P.S. I sometimes use plain paper, typing paper, to print some photographs
simply as "test runs" (if I have cropped or something) before I print for
"real." To see if my alignment, etc. is correct. The quality is not the same as
using photo quality/photo paper. There is a big fall off. A sign
Scott D said:
> Never seen a fox in the wild myself, cool! I did see a pair of wolves
> about 15 years ago in East Texas, but didn't have a camera on me (too
> young then...).
I'm not even sure there are many foxes in Texas.
>
> I think this goes back a few threads to when someone mentioned to m
hi folks,
once again a little bit of OT - about the printers.
some time back i asked about the cost of the prints if printed at home and
it was indeed a nice feedback from all of the folks over here. in the
meantime, i have been playing with my printer - i have HP 932c printer. i
personally,
<< Check this:
http://www.olympusamerica.com/oai_HeadlinesDetails.asp?pressNo=249
From $2,199 to $847.17 (street price)? I don't think so... or maybe this is
quite common, and street prices are usually less than half of the list
prices? >>
That is body only. The strap is an extra $100. The ba
The Canon IS effort amounted to 11 million dollars. USM is somehow
cheaper, but still expensive enough for Pentax not to release
anything of the kind in the near future.
The utmost we can hope for is well build, full frame, aperture ring
enabled lenses. Even this seems today like da
What a great website this is:
http://www.olympusamerica.com/
The microscopy section is worth a look for anyone technically minded ...
wonderful images in the galleries. There was a Nikon confocal microscope on
eBay that went for $500 dollars yesterday. If it had been in Europe I'd have
bid myself
My first SLR was an H1a bought in 1964 to move up from my venerable Argus C-3.
Matched with my GE PR-1 light meter, it served well for almost 15 years until the
shutter died. I still have it with the idea of someday having it repaired so I can
use it again
Does having bought this camera new m
Alan wrote:
That means Pentax did not expect current Pentax users to buy any DSLR?
REPLY:
This years market for DSLR's will probably reach 1 million. Extremely few of this one
million buyers sits on many lenses. Even fewer sits on many Pentax lenses. Even fewer
of those sits on more than 20 y
> On Monday, July 7, 2003, at 04:39 PM, Cotty wrote:
> >
> > I just like looking at nice pretty pictures that I
> make myself.
Same here Cotty, I thought that was what photography
was about.
Ken Waller
PeoplePC: It's for people. And it's just sm
Hi, Ann,
I LOVE, Kliban! Being a cat-person and all, how could I not?
But I've already got it.
cheers,
frank
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> H looks like a potential buyer here :)
> annsan
>
> >
> > Ann Sanfedele wrote:
> > > In a rash moment, as I only have 5 or 6 copes
> > > left, I put one copy
On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 03:56:23PM +0800, James Moniz wrote:
> Ironic that in the midst of all the discussion of the *ist and its upcoming digital
> sibling, I chime in with this...
>
> Largely for fun, I just picked up a Honeywell Pentax H1a with a 55mm f2 Takumar from
> ebay. This will be my f
dmmit.
Better try again, then... ;-)
THanks, mate.
Cheers,
Jostein
-- Original Message --
From: "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2003 10:31:22 +0100
>Nope, its not working!
>
>> -Original Message-
>>
Hi!
I think I'd finally bite on this one. I tend to agree with Alexander
here. When I was buying ZX-L I was already a somewhat experienced
amateur. I had 6 years of SLR shooting with Zenit and some more years
of P&S shooting with my trustful Fuji Discovery. I chose ZX-L over
ZX-5n for two reas
on 08.07.03 10:00, Alan Chan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Believe me, if someone was going to offer me the Canon equivalence of my
> current Pentax kit, I would take the offer in no time. But I doubt I could
> even buy 1/2 of what I have if I switch to Canon now.
I think you could change to Canon
Hang in there Marnie - if you let the naysayers get to you you're lost!
Some people are just _never_ satisfied...
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 5:43 PM
Subject: Re: =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Re: Re:
Jim, nearly everyone who's used Pentaxes from this era has fallen in love
with them!
I had a new SV in 1968. I bought another early this year which had exactly
the same setup, and I really enjoyed using it again. As you say, they are
big and beautiful hunks of metal and glass!
Enjoy - I did.
Joh
Pål wrote:
> > Entry level means that camera will apeal to first
time slr buyers
without lots of lenses. This is the
> > target for the *ist.
Artur replied:
> No way. The MZ-60 or MZ-30 are the cameras you're
talking about. First
> time slr buyers don't buy the cameras packed with
features -
Nope, its not working!
> -Original Message-
> From: Jostein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 08 July 2003 10:24
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Test: pls ignore
>
>
> Got spontaneously unsubscribed some time on July 5th.
> Just testing that resubscription is now OK.
> Jostein.
>
>
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
