P.S. Meant I have the Tamron 90.
Ooops, Marnie aka Doe What a waste of bandwidth!
On 27 Feb 2004 at 17:09, David Nelson wrote:
> G'day fellow Pentaxians,
> Here's a photo I took just then for my first PAW - it's a beetle with
> some pretty spectacular pectinate antennae (possibly a
> /Peisarthrius /species).
> http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/beetle.jpg
The last beasty like yo
On 27 Feb 2004 at 17:09, David Nelson wrote:
> G'day fellow Pentaxians,
> Here's a photo I took just then for my first PAW - it's a beetle with
> some pretty spectacular pectinate antennae (possibly a
> /Peisarthrius /species).
> http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/beetle.jpg
G'day David,
Welcome a
Peter,
Thank you ever so much
Time for reading now
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 1:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SUN 24/2.5 lens
You can find a great deal of data on 3rd party manufacture le
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > One of the stores in San Antonio will no longer be carrying anything by
> > Pentax. The only other stores has minimal stock.
> >
> > Mark
> >
>
> Which is which, Mark (like I can't guess?)
Camera Exchange told me they are no longer going to be carrying Pentax.
Period
Sheesh, David ... that's easy. Ferrari
David Mann wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> I think my first PAW was Saturday so this one's a few days early.
>
> The recent car discussions reminded me of some slides I shot a few
> years ago. This week's photo is a mystery - try and guess which model
> car it is
David Mann wrote:
The recent car discussions reminded me of some slides I shot a few years
ago. This week's photo is a mystery - try and guess which model car it
is. I'll reveal the answer in a few days, or sooner if someone guesses it.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/paw/2004-2-26.html
It's a
On 26 Feb 2004 at 4:40, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Sheesh, David ... that's easy. Ferrari
328?
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~distudio/publications/
Pentax user since 1986, PDMLer since 1998
Mark said:
> > > One of the stores in San Antonio will no longer be carrying anything by
> > > Pentax. The only other stores has minimal stock.
Then I said:
> > Which is which, Mark (like I can't guess?)
Mark replied:
> Camera Exchange told me they are no longer going to be carrying Pentax.
> Pe
The mode dial is very important when you have a lens w/o an aperature
ring, like th FAJ or DA series. In a simaler way, you need to set it to
manual or it won't let you change the Tv and Av separately using the
dials. (I also like the MZ-S layout, but I'm getting hooked on those Tv
and Av dials.)
- Original Message -
From: "Michel Carrère-Gée"
Subject: Re: *istD - I got one, and it's great!
> >
> Have you noticed the image size in LCD screen ??
> 24x36 mm
> *istD ist a 35mm body !!
>
Try as I might, I haven't been able to put film into mine.
William Robb
Oh dear! Wasn't Steve Jobs was it?
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> I sent that link on to a few pwople.
> One Mac user was rather ummm, at a loss for humour.
>
> William Robb
>
>
>
Que son las más lindas del mundo.
;-)
Albano
--- Cesar Matamoros II <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> With apologies to the list...
>
> Digame Albano. Que dicen de las mujeres Argentinas?
>
> En realidad pensando una visita,
>
> Cesar
> Panama City, Florida
>
> -Original Message-
> Fro
On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:59:52 CST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Csar posted:
> > Digame Albano. Que dicen de las mujeres Argentinas?
>
> Wonder of wonders, I actually understood that.
>
> ERN
> 20+ years past high school Spanish class
So did I, and I've never had a Spanish class. But I know Cs
Il cavalino rampante!
Sorry, no idea what model is it.
Testarrosa? F50?
Regards
Albano
--- David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I think my first PAW was Saturday so this one's a
> few days early.
>
> The recent car discussions reminded me of some
> slides I shot a few
> years
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 22:02:51 +1300, David Mann wrote:
> - try and guess which model car it is.
>
> http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/paw/2004-2-26.html
Ferrari 308?
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 25/2/04, PIBE EL ASAHI DE PICTARIO AMAZINIO
> disgorged:
Mega-Big-LOL!!! What language is it? Spanese?
Portuguish? ;-)
Anyway I understood. THANKS.
Albano
=
Albano Garcia
"El Pibe Asahi"
__
Do you Yahoo!?
Get bet
on 26.02.04 14:58, Albano Garcia at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Il cavalino rampante!
> Sorry, no idea what model is it.
> Testarrosa? F50?
> Regards
No, it is rather 456 called "Maranello" or so :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
Thanks for the tip. I'll try that out.
It still is a totally different effect than soft focus. Soft focus is
not meant to smooth wrinkles per se, but it actually causes highlights
to expand and blur a bit - more like a halo. That is why a standard
diffusion filter doesn't do the trick.
Bruce
Ft. Worth is about 5 hours or so from San Antonio. That's quite a
"visit". LOL.
rg
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2004 10:47 PM
From: "Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cord tells me th
Hmm.. that adds up to 100.1%. That doesn't leave much room for the rest
of us. LOL!
rg
graywolf wrote:
99 and 44/100ths talk. The other 0.66% are scared. And the rest of us
are too old. (grin)
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
OMG - no wonder my poor hubby worries about me and "that bloody
pho
Definitely the 308, cant tell if its the GTS or GTB though.
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
I think my first PAW was Saturday so this one's a few days early.
The recent car discussions reminded me of some slides I shot a few years
ago. This week's photo is a mystery - try and guess which model car i
> Any suggestions as to how I can print
a 'contact-sheet' page of pics
> straight from the File Browser in Photoshop - without using Contact Sheet
> II ??
>
> TIA
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Cotty
Cotty.
This was a topic on the PS list a while back i think.I
David Mann wrote:
> The recent car discussions reminded me of some slides I shot a few years
> ago. This week's photo is a mystery - try and guess which model car it
> is. I'll reveal the answer in a few days, or sooner if someone guesses it.
>
> http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/paw/2004-2-26.htm
A question for the LXers:
What's the longest (ballpark figure) successful exposure
you've made using the LX's automatic, direct-metering mode?
Although I've grown to trust the AE mode in conventional
photo situations, around New Year's I tried out its low-
light capabilities for the first time. I
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hello guys,
> It seems that the new (next to come for Frenchies) Apple Ipod Mini has a
> big secret inside :
> It contents a real Hitachi Micro Drive 4Go...
>
> Need free space for your *ist D ???
I've been following a thread about these on dpreview.
Before I sold my LX I made several 4 or 5 minute exposures on Auto at
dusk with Velveta and had, what looked to me, like perfectly exposed slides.
I was always impressed with it's low-light performance and never experienced
reciprocity failure
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "S
William Robb a écrit :
- Original Message -
From: "Michel Carrère-Gée"
Subject: Re: *istD - I got one, and it's great!
Have you noticed the image size in LCD screen ??
24x36 mm
*istD ist a 35mm body !!
Try as I might, I haven't been able to put film into mine.
When I recei
Shel asked:
> Does this happen when a particular shutter speed is
> selected, or when the camera is used on automatic?
Used on automatic.
> Or with
> a particular speed when used on automatic? Does it happen
> when a particular aperture is used, or with any aperture?
This one's tougher, but, c
Shel Belinkoff a écrit :
There has been some discussion here about finding a slide
duplicator for the istd. Well, I was looking at some slides
on the light box earlier, and decided to try out the little
Sony's macro setup to copy a slide. I did a few, and seem
to have gotten a little better at i
The use of an 18% grey card to adjust the apeture/shutter speed with the
available light conditions will usually fix that. Anyone correct me if I'm
wrong.
Cheers,
Alejandro
> Try boosting saturation and see if any green pops on those trees. A
> touch of color would spark the picture a bit -
Wednesday, February 25, 2004 10:47 PM
> From: "Collin Brendemuehl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > Cord tells me that the reason they're not stocking the istD
> > (or any other Pentax SLR) is because Pentax is not able to
> > deliver the quantities they need for building volume sales
> > and the large
>In a message dated 2/26/2004 8:12:45 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Hello Steve,
>Try boosting saturation and see if any green pops on those trees. A
touch of color would spark the picture a bit - me thinks.
--
>Best regards,
Bruce
Thursday, February 26, 2004, 7:40:09
In a message dated 2/26/2004 6:28:04 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>ERN
>pretending to be a stereotypical girl
Don't think you carry that it off that well, sowwy.
Marnie aka Doe ;-) Hehehehe.
In a message dated 2/26/2004 8:29:21 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Mann wrote:
> The recent car discussions reminded me of some slides I shot a few years
> ago. This week's photo is a mystery - try and guess which model car it
> is. I'll reveal the answer in a few da
At 12:23 PM 2/25/2004 +, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
In http://www.its.caltech.edu/~atomic/snowcrystals/photo2/photo2.htm
he says:
"One suspects Bentley would have really appreciated PhotoShop."
I wonder...
I wondered about that too - though Wilson Bentley used to actually carve
the emuls
At 05:23 AM 2/26/2004 -0500, you wrote:
I believe I read somewhere that using polarizers can cause
colors when shooting crystals. I don't know if the polarizers
go on the light sources, on the camera, or both.
I tried a polarizer on the lens, but it really did nothing. I know that
there are colo
>In a message dated 2/25/2004 6:28:50 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>http://home.kc.rr.com/smhalpin/HappyDaze.jpg
>This is absolutely untouched except for resizing and
compressing. No sharpening, no color or levels work, no nothing.
>*ist-D with FA* 80-200/2.8 @ 200mm, han
Hi,
Cesar Matamoros II wrote:
> Though it would be fun to shoot them working the pedals... I used to bike
> quite a bit, I volunteer to pedal for a while to send messages to the PDML.
>
> Need to get in training for that one,
Are you suggesting that Tanya posts a lot? Perish the thought
m
I have also used the LX for long time AE night shots, up to probably 4 or 5
minutes and I have also wondered whether Pentax has built in some
compensation for the reciprocity error that no doubt exists for such long
exposures.
As the Impresa is a print film and from your description of the 'milky
I heard that the same drive, taken from Creative's MuVo2, works with
cameras, this on dpreview also.
rg
alex wetmore wrote:
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello guys,
It seems that the new (next to come for Frenchies) Apple Ipod Mini has a
big secret inside :
It contents a real Hi
I do not miss the trafficwheew.
Norm
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
http://home.earthlink.net/~digisnaps/rainview.html
Taken from my bedroom window this morning ...
** Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:42:44 -0500
** From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
**
** ...
** dusk with Velveta and had, what looked to me, like perfectly exposed
** ...
**
** Christian
**
Can't call them cheesy shots 'cause
I heard that the same drive, taken from Creative's MuVo2, works with
cameras, this on dpreview also.
rg
Isn't the 4 Gb iPod itself a good and cheap device to stock photos ?
Andre
In my experience it's just the opposite. PC's are appliances, and we
all hate the OS, or at least the OS's vendor.
Mac's are a cult.
Cotty wrote:
Amazing, isn't it? If a Mac user had posted a link to something in a
similar vein about PCs, there'd be flames. As it is, I think what's even
more am
Hi Cesar
I worked on them 30+ years ago. This post is the first that I had heard
about them being used as drones. I suppose all things must come to an end.
However, given the fact that until fairly recently they were in active duty
as Wild Weasels (anti radar/ missile site planes) is a testament t
The post was on rec.photo.equipment.large-format. I though it was worth
forwarding to the list.
--graywolf
Original Message
"Willhelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
David Wallis wrote:
> I am an artist
Honey, we're all artists. Do you mean that you're a PAINTER?
But painters a
>In a message dated 2/26/2004 10:10:35 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>G'day fellow Pentaxians,
Here's a photo I took just then for my first PAW - it's a beetle with
some pretty spectacular pectinate antennae (possibly a
/Peisarthrius /species).
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.ne
Milford photo, (in milford Connecticut), used to only carry the low end
in pentax ZX-M, ZX-60 etc. Since the introduction of
the *ist-d they started carrying them. They seem to be selling a fair
number of them as well.
Mark Dalal wrote:
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
One of the stores in San A
>> The A 35-70/4 is surprisingly good optically, but I do have to admit
>> that it's the most "plasticky" lens I own.
> Really? Plastickly? For such a heavy lens? Granted, the exterior
> rings are all hard black plastic, but the barrel and all internals
> are metal. Maybe it's the glass that makes
On Thu, 26 Feb 2004, Robert Gonzalez wrote:
> alex wetmore wrote:
> > On Thu, 26 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> >>Hello guys,
> >>It seems that the new (next to come for Frenchies) Apple Ipod Mini has a
> >>big secret inside :
> >>It contents a real Hitachi Micro Drive 4Go...
> >>
> >>Need
> For me, constant 2.8 is important. I find that many receptions are
> quite dim, and focusing is a bit tougher.
True. Once in a while, I wish my A 28-135/4 were a bit faster. The
f/4 spec is fine outside most of the time, and inside, when I'm
often using flash with it (set at f/8 usually), it's
What speed film are you using?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anybody have an idea as to why my LX should produce the occasional, severely
underexposed frame (like no more than once per roll of film)? It does this in
quite unchallenging light conditions, with perfect exposures to either side of
the
> My sample of the A35-70, purchased used and showing obvious signs
> of use, has more slop in focusing than most of my primes, but is
> tighter than any of my other zooms. This is one lens I regard as
> more than adequate in build quality, despite the plastic bits.
Yes, I'd say that the build of
Hi Peter ...
How might film speed affect the problem?
"Peter J. Alling" wrote:
>
> What speed film are you using?
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> >Anybody have an idea as to why my LX should produce the occasional, severely
> >underexposed frame
It _could_ be the ISO resistor.
m
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Hi Peter ...
>
> How might film speed affect the problem?
>
> "Peter J. Alling" wrote:
> >
> > What speed film are you using?
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > >Anybody have an idea as to why my LX should produce the occasional
Ahhh, that's the thing I was trying to remember. Darn all
these technical thingies and terms. ;-))
mike wilson wrote:
>
> It _could_ be the ISO resistor.
>
> m
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> >
> > Hi Peter ...
> >
> > How might film speed affect the problem?
Hi!
What do you think?
http://www.desertrose.de/fotopage/paw_bw_bergsee.jpg
It's from one of my few attempts in the darkroom... the print looks
much better and is sharper... my scanner isn't very good... -_-
bye
Katrin
Uh, a few days ago, when I said the bluest skies I've ever gotten
in a photo have been on Konica film? I just found something bluer.
Velvia, slightly underexposed in a box camera. Shot last October,
just got it developed this week. The patches of sky behind the
trees ... wow, is that blue!
M. Beastly, beastly things.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Ahhh, that's the thing I was trying to remember. Darn all
> these technical thingies and terms. ;-))
>
> mike wilson wrote:
> >
> > It _could_ be the ISO resistor.
> >
> > m
> >
> > Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Peter ...
> > >
>
There is surprisingly little color and the sky gets noisy quickly. If I
really push the saturation, I get something "artistic". If there was a
little more detail, like a fence of something, this would make a good
silhouette.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee Universit
- Original Message -
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> It is going to cost me around au$4k to come, and I could have my entire
> office and front verandah gutted and renovated for that amount, so
convince
> me guys, how can I truly justify the expense? And don't jus
Here is a selection of *ist D pictures I took yesterday:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04e.htm
Dario Bonazza
Hi,
this was one of the symptoms of sticky mirror that I experienced
before the syndrome became really severe.
--
Cheers,
Bob
Thursday, February 26, 2004, 2:31:37 PM, ernreed2 wrote:
> Anybody have an idea as to why my LX should produce the occasional, severely
> underexposed frame (like no
From: "Katrin " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hi!
> What do you think?
> http://www.desertrose.de/fotopage/paw_bw_bergsee.jpg
>
> It's from one of my few attempts in the darkroom... the print looks
> much better and is sharper... my scanner isn't very good... -_-
I think it is a fascinating picture. A
LOL! Good "pick up" Mike, I totally missed that one!
Well, you can all breath easy for a few days as I am off to Brisbane again
in a couple of hours, probably won't post again till Sunday, BUT will get to
meet up with Ryan Lee and John Coyle in the meantime, so I'll have some pics
to post!
tan.
I forgot to write that many pictures were taken at higher ISO settings
(800), with very good color rendition and no visible noise. However, the
Exif will tell you the whole tech stuff.
Dario
(Glad to be there when Schumacher scored the new record of Imola circuit)
- Original Message -
Fro
GREAT shots Dario, not too sure about the music though! Kinda gave me a
headache after a while, although are you trying to tease us by saying "Wish
you were here"?
tan.
-Original Message-
From: Dario Bonazza [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 27 February 2004 7:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PR
Jostein, it took me a few moments to work out what you meant with this, but
I think what you are proposing is a SENSATIONAL idea!! Now I just gotta
find someone to "back" me (and then do some work on my skills with the
English language! lol). I'm onto it and I'll let you know what I "achieve",
t
I'm going to pick one up from my local dealer today. B&H also lists
them as in stock.
alex
Hi, Stephen
The longest successful exposure I have timed with my LX is 12 minutes.
I can't comment on the film you used, but in my experience, there are big
differences between films in reciprosity properties.
I have only worked with slide films. From my experience, it kicks in at
around 1 minu
Katrin...
I am no landscape photographer but...
Despite the initial impact of the image and the fact that I do like it
overall, I really think it lacks "something" due to the blown out sky and
reflections on the water. Pardon the pun, but there is really no "depth" to
the water. There are no ri
The seller was fromthemensroom. He had several *istDs at various times over the past
few weks but they had all gone for a bit higher.
I notice there have been a few more on eBay from other sellers, some with the 18-35
lens and offering a $200 rebate in a years time. One went for £770 the other d
Recently shot a roll of Provia and, yesterday, when
examining the frames, I found this problem:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/provia.jpg
Any ideas on what it could be, what may have caused it?
> On Wed, 25 Feb 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > are not so good stopped down past f/5.6 or so. Of course shooting
> > a 200/2.0 at f/8 is madness!
>
> Why?
>
> Kostas (genuine question)
1) The Nikkor 200/2.0 EDIF at least is optimized for performance
at or near f/2.0. According to those
Peter asked:
> What speed film are you using?
Seen it happen with both 400 and 800.
No physical damage?
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Recently shot a roll of Provia and, yesterday, when
> examining the frames, I found this problem:
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/provia.jpg
>
> Any ideas on what it could be, what may have caused it?
> Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 04:53:11 -0500
> From: Lon Williamson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> As I understand it, distortion is _inevitable_ in a lens
> as wide as 24mm, which is why, for example, a 35mm is better
> for group portraits.
I'm not sure this is true. Certainly retrofocus design does not he
On 26/2/04, PETER A disgorged:
>In my experience it's just the opposite. PC's are appliances, and we
>all hate the OS, or at least the OS's vendor.
>Mac's are a cult.
Come on over to the dark side :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=| http
Nope, none that I can see ...
mike wilson wrote:
>
> No physical damage?
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> >
> > Recently shot a roll of Provia and, yesterday, when
> > examining the frames, I found this problem:
> >
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/provia.jpg
> >
> > Any ideas on what it c
Cleveland? Just like Detroit without the glitter, right?
keith
graywolf wrote:
>
> The post was on rec.photo.equipment.large-format. I though it was worth
> forwarding to the list.
>
> --graywolf
>
> Original Message
> "Willhelm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
> > David Wallis w
Gee, that was pretty quick.
The car in question is the Ferrari 308 GTB. It's the real deal -
certainly not a kit car.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/paw/2004-2-26-answer.html
BTW yes, that cloudy stuff is smoke, from the exhaust. Actually its
mostly steam. I remember that it was pretty cold
I had a similar shape mark, once. It was due to the film being loaded
in the d&d tank the wrong way round, so that the emulsion side was
resting on the holder and kept away from the soup. It was slide film
but the mark was orange.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Nope, none that I can see ...
>
> mik
Looks like they used some tongs when it was still wet to me...
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 26 February 2004 21:54
> To: PDML
> Subject: Provia Processing Problem?
>
>
> Recently shot a roll of Provia and, yesterday, when
> examining the
Yeah,
Even though it was my suggestion to crop out that evergreen on the right,
now that I see the crop, I think I like it better in.
And, my other suggestion about cropping out all that snow and twigs on the
bottom kind of doesn't work either - I like the first one better, now that I
see both
It certainly _looks_ like something physical happened but Shel says no
damage. Not watermark shaped, wrong colour for light leak or processing
botch.
Maybe you got a defective film?
Rob Brigham wrote:
>
> Looks like they used some tongs when it was still wet to me...
>
> > -Original Messag
- Original Message -
From: "Michel Carrère-Gée"
Subject: Re: Digicam Slide Duplicator / Scanner
>
> >
> I have tried:
> *istD + M42/K adaptor + Pentax Auto-Bellow (screw) + SMC Takunar
1.4/50
> (and 1.8/55, screw, normal or reverse) + Pentax Slide-Copier
> Its good !
Are you able to ge
- Original Message -
From: "Stephen Moore"
Subject: LX: Long exposures on auto
> A question for the LXers:
>
> What's the longest (ballpark figure) successful exposure
> you've made using the LX's automatic, direct-metering mode?
The longest I have managed succesfully was around 10 min
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Intermittent LX metering error
> Anybody have an idea as to why my LX should produce the occasional,
severely
> underexposed frame (like no more than once per roll of film)? It
does this in
> quite unchallenging light conditions,
That shrimp looks Hot'n Spicy!
I like the angle of the rectangular serving dishes, I like the hand and
spoon in there - an action shot!
Looks like it was a fun party.
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppen
Tongs? You're velcome
Rob Brigham wrote:
>
> Looks like they used some tongs when it was still wet to me...
> > Recently shot a roll of Provia and, yesterday, when
> > examining the frames, I found this problem:
> >
> > http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/provia.jpg
> >
> > Any ideas on wha
>In a message dated 2/26/2004 12:54:51 PM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Hi!
>What do you think?
>http://www.desertrose.de/fotopage/paw_bw_bergsee.jpg
>It's from one of my few attempts in the darkroom... the print looks
much better and is sharper... my scanner isn't very good.
I thought all Pentax zooms of the A series and later felt like the A
35-70, until I got a KEH bargain condition A 24-50.
What a difference! Quite heavy and solid, with a beautiful focusing and
zoom feel. Definitely more metal and/or glass.
Do the well regarded Pentax A zooms, like the 35-105 or
Someone suggested a light leak, however I tend to doubt that
as it probably would have shown up in more than just that
one spot on the roll.
mike wilson wrote:
>
> I had a similar shape mark, once. It was due to the film being loaded
> in the d&d tank the wrong way round, so that the emulsion si
Well, I'm gonna take a closer look at the area ... take it
out of the sleeve and see if there is any physical damage.
But it doesn't look like there is
mike wilson wrote:
>
> It certainly _looks_ like something physical happened but Shel says no
> damage. Not watermark shaped, wrong colour for
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff"
Subject: Provia Processing Problem?
> Recently shot a roll of Provia and, yesterday, when
> examining the frames, I found this problem:
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/provia.jpg
>
> Any ideas on what it could be, what may have caus
Dario Bonazza wrote:
Here is a selection of *ist D pictures I took yesterday:
http://www.dariobonazza.com/f1_04e.htm
*DROL*
Beautiul pictures, and my first good look at the new Ferrari aero
package for this year.
Wonder if I can get up to Montreal in June...
-
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb"
Subject: Re: Intermittent LX metering error
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> Subject: Intermittent LX metering error
>
>
> > Anybody have an idea as to why my LX should produce the
occasional,
> severely
> > und
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 26/2/04, PETER A disgorged:
>
>>In my experience it's just the opposite. PC's are appliances, and we
>>all hate the OS, or at least the OS's vendor.
>>Mac's are a cult.
>
>Come on over to the dark side :-)
Drink the Kool-Aid!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography an
I agree with pretty much everything Mr. Robb said, and he said it better
than I could have.
I like it, though, for it's strong composition. Quite the spectacular sky -
it would have made a good PUG from Clouds month (if you had the shot then).
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the bes
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
