on 28.06.04 4:23, Alan Chan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Say these are correct. How do Canon & Nikon deal with it? Do they have more
> effective solution?
I wouldn't say so. Nikkor AF-S 17-35/2.8 and DX 18-70/3.5-4.5 exhibits more
or less similar problems with CAs, first being high-end FF glass,
On Jun 27, 2004, at 11:39 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
I have no idea how you got this outcome, but it is very pleasing...
I just set the camera on the tripod, composed and shot. Nothing
special at all, but I was pretty careful about exactly where in the
frame I should place the trees and exactly h
On Jun 27, 2004, at 9:13 PM, Dr. Heiko Hamann wrote:
- It has a smaller image circle than a 35mm lens (as expected) but I'm
quite sure that the imgae circle ist wide enough for a larger CCD
(maybe
crop factor 1.3).
I'd love to see a full frame photo from this lens on film, just to see
what it loo
Hi!
From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Again, one of what's becoming a series:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2479712
Frank, it is quite fine naturally, but what about "hairless"? I see no
hairlessness, well almost none ...
May I ask you about your height? You see, it seems to
Hi,
> The way I figure it, if this was an Erwitt, it would be at street level, and
> include the master's feet, not the head. I love those shots of his, BTW.
> How the hell did he get down that low? I know he usually used a Leica, but
> did he maybe use a TLR for those? Or was it a 35mm, and he
Hi!
The weed on the bottom makes it look almost like painting. The sky is
a bit dull, but still, it does not spoil the autumn mood.
Me likes it ...
I guess a URL would help...
http://home.earthlink.net/~allaround6/wehrnaturecenterlake.htm
Joe,
At the start of your rant (sorry, vent), it sounded like a Bugs Bunny
cartoon.
As in "I knew I should have made that left at Albequerque". And, of course,
then flying into O' "HARE" (hare as in rabbit)...
However, I realized it wasn't a Looney Toon when you didn't end up in Pismo
Beach.
It's kind of in focus - was that a mistake?
Bruce
Sunday, June 27, 2004, 7:53:02 PM, you wrote:
ft> Again, one of what's becoming a series:
ft> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2479712
ft> Just a friend (Milan), holding a weird hairless thing that isn't actually
ft> hers. Not mu
You may be "annsan the procrastinatoress" (I wouldn't have spelled it that
way, but who am I to argue with a Scrabble Babe? ), but you're also
"annsan the linkless" (as in: where's the link for the pic?)
ever hopeful,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pess
Nah, being the predictable fellow that I am, bereft of any discernable
imagination, I sent in a GFM pic. I'm pretending that folks outside of PDML
actually look at this little gallery (even though I know it's not true).
No worries though, it's not one of my best works (I know, that casts a very
Again, one of what's becoming a series:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2479712
Just a friend (Milan), holding a weird hairless thing that isn't actually
hers. Not much more than a snapshot; I kind of like it, but knowing Milan
(as you don't) may influence me.
Please feel free to c
Forget what I said earlier. Just let the photo stand by itself. I said
too much in my initial post, proving, or at least giving credence to, the
idea that the viewer can be influenced by too much information.
What difference does it make where the garden is in relation to the wall
and the shoe
Say these are correct. How do Canon & Nikon deal with it? Do they have more
effective solution?
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
Mast all wide angle lenses exhibit some CA, the problem with digicams is a
little more complex, sensors have two characteristics that are very
different
from fil
yep uh-huh
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton"
> Since I had already put up a gallery of GFM pictures, I purposely
> chose not to submit a GFM picture. I suspect others may have felt the
> same.
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http:/
>> Yes. It's still a nice lens for certain situations, whether on a
>> film body or (I assume) on the *ist-D. (Actually, has anyone
>> used this critter on his/her *ist-D?)
> I use mine with the *ist D, but only when there is insufficient
> light to use my V125/2.5
;-)
You know, Rob, when I sa
>> Yes. It's still a nice lens for certain situations, whether on a
>> film body or (I assume) on the *ist-D. (Actually, has anyone
>> used this critter on his/her *ist-D?)
> Yes, I use it regularly for stage (low light)
And how does the lens perform on the *ist-D, then, Kevin, either
compared
Very interesting. My eyes are drawn to the odd assortment to the right,
I'm trying to find some meaning in them. Is is random, or intentional?
I don't know. The shot has become more interesting, but I want more,
there has to be more, given the story you gave us behind it. Where is
the gard
I'm going to continue using my film cameras, although my volume has
been reduced dramatically. I've gone from averaging one roll of 36
exposure film per day to about one roll per month. However, I'm now
shooting about 50 digital frames every day.
Paul
On Jun 27, 2004, at 8:40 PM, graywolf wrote:
Since I had already put up a gallery of GFM pictures, I purposely
chose not to submit a GFM picture. I suspect others may have felt the
same.
Bruce
Sunday, June 27, 2004, 5:21:07 PM, you wrote:
etn> Annsan posted:
>> Not many pics up - undoubtedly because people ARE
>> on vacation :)
>>
>> "b
DA14 does have ED.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
They could have gotten rid of it, if they had used ED elements. It's that
simple, typically lenses with that type of glass cost a bit more though.
_
MSN Premium helps eliminate
Any DA14 users care to test it on film and see how serious the CA actually
is? Or was it the CCD?
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
_
MSN Premium with Virus Guard and Firewall* from McAfee® Security : 2 months
FREE*
http://j
They could have gotten rid of it, if they had used ED elements. It's that
simple, typically lenses with that type of glass cost a bit more though.
-That Guy
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2004 7:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject
To me the craft of B&W photography in the darkroom is still an interesting and
important part of the hobby.
-
mike wilson wrote:
Hi,
Jens Bladt wrote:
It seems that some of you are still buying film gear. Are you camera
collectors or do you actually still use film (like me)?
I have been very clos
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Annsan posted:
> > Not many pics up - undoubtedly because people ARE
> > on vacation :)
> >
> > "but what there is is churce" (choice)
>
> What surprised me -- and this is simply an observation, not any kind of
> complaint or judgement -- is that there weren't more Gr
Annsan posted:
> Not many pics up - undoubtedly because people ARE
> on vacation :)
>
> "but what there is is churce" (choice)
What surprised me -- and this is simply an observation, not any kind of
complaint or judgement -- is that there weren't more Grandfather Mountain
pictures in this PUG,
Not sure if I like this much better. The lack of contrast doesn't
help. Perhaps this is a case where color may have been better. What
may have been interesting is to have even a little more context, shot
in B&W and then hand colored the shoes.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Sunday, June 27, 2004, 4:
On 28 Jun 2004 at 9:22, Rob Studdert wrote:
Sorry I'll try that paragraph again:
Most all wide angle lenses exhibit some CA, the problems exhibited when using
them with digicams is a little more complex as sensors have two primary
characteristics that are very different from film.
Firstly for
Thanks for the honest comments. Really appreciate 'em.
I did take make another shot:
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/paw/shoes04.html
which shows more context. I'll say no more
Shel
Subject: Re: PAW - The Shoes in Marilyn's Garden
>
> Too tight, left & right edges over-cropped. N
On 27 Jun 2004 at 16:09, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> Here's a question since not everyone has PS CS or other programs: Why can't
> these lenses be made so there's no or minimal CA? Seems to me that all the digi
> folks have gotta put up with this crap, and the solution offered is to go buy a
> $600.0
Here's a question since not everyone has PS CS or other programs: Why can't
these lenses be made so there's no or minimal CA? Seems to me that all the
digi folks have gotta put up with this crap, and the solution offered is to
go buy a $600.00 program to remove it in the editing process. Regular
Mine is 5687xxx, purchased early December 2003, small local photo store.
Stan
On Jun 18, 2004, at 9:52 AM, Dario Bonazza wrote:
Hi all,
In my effort of understanding (guessing?) something better about the
*ist D,
I'll ask all *ist D owners to post the main part of the serial No. of
the
camera the
On 27 Jun 2004 at 20:47, DagT wrote:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder.tcl?folder_id=408620
>
> Se the picture of the tree and the cropped picture showing the upper
> left part of the tree picture.
This looks more like sensor vs angle of incidence problems than projected CA as
the areas wh
On 27 Jun 2004 at 19:34, Jens Bladt wrote:
> They advertice the EOS 300D as "Enthusiats Kit"!
Down the bottom of the page they also have a "Canon EOS 300D Super Kit" at
AU$1,849.95 whereas the equivalent "Pentax *ist-D/Sigma 18-50 Kit" is
AU$2,499.95. Unfortunately due to the conflicting intere
On 27 Jun 2004 at 14:19, Fred wrote:
> Yes. It's still a nice lens for certain situations, whether on a
> film body or (I assume) on the *ist-D. (Actually, has anyone used
> this critter on his/her *ist-D?)
I use mine with the *ist D, but only when there is insufficient light to use my
V125/2.
"Adelheid v. K." wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> The July PUG is ready on my website AND on the komkon server.
>
> This means:
>
> The archives are NOT!!! working on both pages. At least not for the last 5
> months.
> But you have at least a link to Josteins page and you can look at the
> pictures of
have you tried a tool to remove the chromatic abberation. there is one in
the Photoshop CS converter and there are other programs that have it as a
built-in function like Picture Window Pro.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pdml" <[EMAIL PROTEC
This one time, at band camp, Fred <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> This just sold tonight for $1,695.00 USD. Wow...what a price.
> >>
> >> http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3822857681
>
> > I still think I will keep mine, tis a fine lens for stage photography
>
> Yes. It's s
"I do see some CA in the corners,"
Is this color fringing something we will just have to live with?
Last week, between transit disasters, I took some pix of the Jefferson
Memorial with the *ist D and DA 16-45 f4. One shot was from a distance,
across the Tidal Basin. At the juncture between the wh
Too tight, left & right edges over-cropped. No sense of context. Good
tonality though, excellent detail. But the comp is wrong, sorry, but
doesn't live up to a shelbel.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Marilyn has a small garden at the front of her small home in a quiet part
of Oakland, California.
Yay, Adelheid & Jostein!
Thanks again for all the hard work.
ERN
Hi
Can any of you guys help me with something. A few days ago there was a 645
rear cover on eBay. Anyone know the lister? or remember the item number?
Badly need one to test my 645's functions.
Any help very much appreciated.
John Whittingham
Technician
Hi,
Jens Bladt wrote:
It seems that some of you are still buying film gear. Are you camera
collectors or do you actually still use film (like me)?
I have been very close to selling all my 35mm film gear (Pentax bodies). I
wonder if I should keep it or sell. Is ait already to late to sell at
reasona
Hi folks,
The July PUG is ready on my website AND on the komkon server.
This means:
The archives are NOT!!! working on both pages. At least not for the last 5
months.
But you have at least a link to Josteins page and you can look at the
pictures of July.
I don't have much space on my site, so
>> This just sold tonight for $1,695.00 USD. Wow...what a price.
>>
>> http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3822857681
> I still think I will keep mine, tis a fine lens for stage photography
Yes. It's still a nice lens for certain situations, whether on a
film body or (I assume
Two words here are professional standards. You wouldn't want to shoot
a wedding without a 2.8 lens, in a church. With a fast lens you do not
have to use flash (or can use it just to spicy up the photographs, not
as a sole means of illumination). Of course many slower lenses are as
good optically, s
On a general note, any recommendations on lens hoods? Are the
Pentax recommend worthwhile? Or has someone found something better.
The recommended hood is fine but quite large. I think you can use it
with one filter and it still won't vignette but I have not tried the
20mm with both filter and
Jens Bladt wrote:
> It seems that some of you are still buying film gear. Are you
> camera collectors or do you actually still use film (like me)?
> I have been very close to selling all my 35mm film gear
> (Pentax bodies). I wonder if I should keep it or sell. Is ait
> already to late to sell
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> Hi Ann,
>
> It took a second viewing, after my morning tea, to see the subtlety of this
> shot. I like it. However, I think that the heavy black border around it
> is too much, and that a thinner black border won't compete as much with the
> image. Also, the white bac
They advertice the EOS 300D as "Enthusiats Kit"!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Rob Studdert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 27. juni 2004 02:58
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: Another one bites the dust.. lost customers
It seems that some of you are still buying film gear. Are you camera
collectors or do you actually still use film (like me)?
I have been very close to selling all my 35mm film gear (Pentax bodies). I
wonder if I should keep it or sell. Is ait already to late to sell at
reasonable prices?
Jens Bla
Marilyn has a small garden at the front of her small home in a quiet part
of Oakland, California. The garden is a little wild, and that's Marilyn's
preference. She works hard to maintain the wild feel. On a low wall in
the garden are the shoes. They belonged to her dad who has been gone for
sev
But the specs! The specs will sell it. The ignorant will buy it.
The sensor is 1/2.5 (0.4") says so right in the specs.
--
John Francis wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "John Mustarde"
Sent: Saturday, June 26, 2004 7:10 PM
Subject: Kowa Prominar TD-1, 3mp, 450-1350 f2.8-4 zoom
450-1350
Thanks. One of the things I like about it is the tonality of the Tri-X.
The silvery greys are just super, imo. Even with the shots I don't get
right, I can still revel in their tonality. Long live silver!
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Ann Sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Shel, that is a
Hi Ann,
It took a second viewing, after my morning tea, to see the subtlety of this
shot. I like it. However, I think that the heavy black border around it
is too much, and that a thinner black border won't compete as much with the
image. Also, the white background that comes up on my browser d
The stuff to look for in ethanol, is Everclear (98%). You can get it at liquor
stores. It was actually used during WWII as an optical cleaner used for
periscope lenses on submarines, but being potable they sell it as booze (with
all the appropriate taxes). In some WWII stories from the South Pac
">Today, at noon, my bag is delivered and this nightmare is finally over.
">Wow, that feels better."
"Other than that a pretty good trip eh?"
"Cheers,"
"Cotty"
Or, as the saying in the U.S. goes, "Other than that, Mrs. Lincoln, how
did you like the play?"
Sometime I'll tell the tale of the time
"- It is wide open (2.8) sharper than the 16-45 wide open (4.0); You
have to stop down the 16-45 to 4.5 in order to get the same result."
This is very good news since I use my primes in low light.
"- The 16-45 is told to underexpose one stop."
Really? Who claims this? I haven't noticed such a pro
>
> On 26/6/04, Shel Belinkoff, discombobulated, offered:
>
> >I'm bleary-eyed. Been working on this one for a while, cleaning up a
> >scratched and spotted negative. I wish I could do that as fast and as
> >easily as some of you. Oh well ...
> >
> >This was taken a few years back and was one
Cotty wrote:
>
> On 27/6/04, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, offered:
>
> >
> >>Oh god I did it again ! duh - here it is
> >>
> >>http://users.rcn.com/annsan/pittsburghjune17.jpg
> >
> >I should say I am left kinda confused. What is the purpose of hydrant?
> >Does it compete with the face on the
Paul Stenquist wrote:
>
> Good eye, Ann. Interesting shot. The predominance of white offset by
> the splash of color in the center words well for me as does the
> juxtaposition of the car's curving lines and the architectural
> geometry. Even the lines in the street add interest as they seem to
>
On Sun, 27 Jun 2004 16:06:06 +0200, you wrote:
>Hi all good people.
>Anyone know this lens:
>http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3823874307
>?
>Cheers
>
The design of these old 400mm lenses usually has very long minimum
focus distance, about 30 feet, which becomes frustrating very
This one time, at band camp, Shaun Canning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This just sold tonight for $1,695.00 USD. Wow...what a price.
>
> http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3822857681
I still think I will keep mine, tis a fine lens for stage photography
Kevin
--
__
Its an excellent lens no doubt, but there is a better version with
SMC coatings otherwise just like it, and in any case both of them
have MANUAL aperture setting workable but slow.
I still recommend the RMC Tokina 400 5.6 It has full auto aperture
and the multicoatings and is at least as good as
I don't care, I think this is just sweet.
wendy beard wrote:
Had to join in on this boy/dog theme
http://www.beard-redfern.com/tmp/boy_dog.jpg
The dog is mine (it's Tanja), the boy isn't. This was taken two years
ago at a picnic organised by the local Bernese Mountain Dog club. The
boy could have
Either I need better scenery or more talent...
David Mann wrote:
A day late as I decided to watch a movie last night instead :)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=27-Jun-2004
Sorry about the ugly page design... it's the same basic design as
always but I've fiddled with the colour
This just sold tonight for $1,695.00 USD. Wow...what a price.
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3822857681
Cheers
Shaun
--
_
Dr. Shaun Canning
P.O. Box 21,
Dampier, WA,
6714, Australia.
m: 0414 967644
http://www.heritageservices.com.
Ckiche or not - it's a beautiful photograph.
Cheers
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Boris Liberman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 27. juni 2004 13:40
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: PAW - "Reflection"
Hi!
>A day late as
Hi all good people.
Anyone know this lens:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=3823874307
?
Cheers
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
Love this one. The perfect symmetry is quite fascinating, and the scene
is beautiful. New Zealand remains my favorite corner of the world. Wish
I could visit again.
Paul
Hi!
Henri Cartier-Bresson.
He found wonderful parallels in the components of his pics. I face
looking out from an advertising hoarding would be mimicked by a real
face. They may be considered clicked shots by some but for me they
are brilliant.
Oh I see. Well, I admit to be very illiterate anyway
Actually, I never checked that. For some reason I noticed your email's in the past did
that, and I didn't realize it was related to reading the digest. I noticed you used to
reply to your own email messages when you replied to other threads, so I was wondering
why this happened, now I understand
On 27/6/04, Frits Wüthrich, discombobulated, offered:
>And nice to see that your email client now properly uses threading. So
>your email messages show up in the thread, instead of creating a new one.
In digest, you have to copy and paste the subject line into the reply
email - was this action yo
And nice to see that your email client now properly uses threading. So your email
messages show up in the thread, instead of creating a new one.
On Thursday 24 June 2004 19:30, Cotty wrote:
FJW> On 24/6/04, Keith Whaley, discombobulated, offered:
FJW>
FJW> >Aha! Congratulations!
FJW> >Good to se
On 27/6/04, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, offered:
>>In mono with the car driver looking out towards the camera it would be
>>very HCB.
>
>HCB? What does this mean?
>
>Thanks.
>
>Boris
Henri Cartier-Bresson.
He found wonderful parallels in the components of his pics. I face
looking out from a
Hi,
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I can see no good reason (except cheapness) for using methanol in a
cleaning fluid when there are much safer and equally effective alternatives.
What is better?
Either of the Propanols (there is plain
Hi!
A day late as I decided to watch a movie last night instead :)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=27-Jun-2004
Dave, this is quite excellent. But it brought me way beyond what you
probalby could have concieved. So here goes. There are some sci fi
books in cyberpunk genre that
In mono with the car driver looking out towards the camera it would be
very HCB.
HCB? What does this mean?
Thanks.
Boris
On 27/6/04, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, offered:
>
>>Oh god I did it again ! duh - here it is
>>
>>http://users.rcn.com/annsan/pittsburghjune17.jpg
>
>I should say I am left kinda confused. What is the purpose of hydrant?
>Does it compete with the face on the board for attention of the
>dri
On 27/6/04, David Mann, discombobulated, offered:
>A day late as I decided to watch a movie last night instead :)
>
>http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=27-Jun-2004
Lovely. Very nice.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.macads.co.
Good eye, Ann. Interesting shot. The predominance of white offset by
the splash of color in the center words well for me as does the
juxtaposition of the car's curving lines and the architectural
geometry. Even the lines in the street add interest as they seem to
almost emanate from the archite
A day late as I decided to watch a movie last night instead :)
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=27-Jun-2004
Sorry about the ugly page design... it's the same basic design as
always but I've fiddled with the colour scheme to get rid of the black
border and generally make the pho
On Jun 26, 2004, at 5:06 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm intrigued that people seem to like the FA 300/4.5 clutch mechanism
and
focus feel better, since the F 300/4.5 seems pretty nice to me in those
respects.
What annoys me about the F lens is that when you want to switch between
auto and manua
On Jun 27, 2004, at 6:10 AM, Doug Franklin wrote:
Sorry, that's a "cold, dead hands" lens. :-) Along with the FA*
200/2.8.
Yeah, what he said. I think I'll add the SMCP 35mm f/3.5 to that list
as well.
Boy do I need a holiday.
Cheers,
- Dave (pining for the fjords)
http://www.digistar.com/~dman
Hi!
Oh god I did it again ! duh - here it is
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/pittsburghjune17.jpg
I should say I am left kinda confused. What is the purpose of hydrant?
Does it compete with the face on the board for attention of the
driver? It is a fine shot, really, but it feels like there is some
Hi!
Had to join in on this boy/dog theme
http://www.beard-redfern.com/tmp/boy_dog.jpg
Wendy, I realize this is not original, but I'd much rather see all of
boy's hands. Especially the left one.
I'd say everything is quite fine but the hands...
Just my pixels...
Boris
Andto think I used to like AA!
One thing's for certain: be VERY glad someone found all those "broken"
planes at all!
I don't know why you managed to find so many, but were it me, I'd be
glad they found this stuff while still on the ground!
Another thought: I suspect the phrase "broken plane" or
On 26/6/04, Joseph Tainter, discombobulated, offered:
[snipped justified rant]
>Today, at noon, my bag is delivered and this nightmare is finally over.
>
>Wow, that feels better.
Other than that a pretty good trip eh?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=
On Jun 27, 2004, at 7:36 AM, Kevin Waterson wrote:
Less than 2000.00 would be nice
If you're talking USD you could get a Minolta Scan Multi Pro for that
money. One of these is second on my big-ticket shopping list, right
after a decent printer.
However I suspect you're talking AUD so you might
Hi,
yesterday my smc-DA 14/2.8 arrived. Here are some short impressions.
Maybe I'll find some time to upload some images, later.
- Very good built quality, no plastics, pure metal!
- It has a smaller image circle than a 35mm lens (as expected) but I'm
quite sure that the imgae circle ist wide eno
89 matches
Mail list logo
