On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Markus Maurer wrote:
> thanks for you comments, I appreciate every reaction on PAW's and newly
> PESOS a lot :-)
I cannot follows PAWs, far too much going on :-(
> I wear glasses so it could be my inability to
> focus correctly this time :-)
But you used AF, you said.
K
Hi James,
When I only had a Program A I thought I needed AF. This was shortly
after the MZ-6 was released, so I bought it sight unseen.
It's a very capable and (at least in my case) reliable camera. What I
have realised is that I'd sacrifice all manner of it's gee-wizzbangery
for a decent viewfinde
Hi Frantisek,
You can count on ad-hoc welcoming committee ready to walk you
through the Bucharest, show you the pubs and we might even talk you
in a trek in the Fagaras mountains (that is, if Serbia can wait ;o) )
Just let us know (addresses at cc) when you arrive.
Servus, Alin
Fr
Count me in!
(But I'd like to know a few days in advance...)
Alex Sarbu
--- Alin Flaider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi Frantisek,
>
> You can count on ad-hoc welcoming committee ready
> to walk you
> through the Bucharest, show you the pubs and we
> might even talk you
> in a trek
Amazing software, Herb. Not too expensive either.
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Herb Chong [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 9. juli 2004 02:56
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: *istD anti-aliasing?
USM isn't a deblur
That's exactly the reason I'd like to upgrade my MZ-6
with a nice, heavy-metal style camera.
OTOH, the viewfinder is imho it's only (major) fault.
Well, it's a cheap camera...
Alex Sarbu
--- Simon King <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi James,
> When I only had a Program A I thought I needed AF.
>
Wha' happen? What'd I do? :-(
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(snip)
>
> However, Brian, I would take it as a personal favor if you would leave
Anthony's
> name in the message somewhere so my troll filters can delete it with out
my
> seein
Find my replies interspersed, gringo.
> I can produce files as sharp as anything with my istD and photoshop CS.
You're obviously a better photographer than me, then. Care to show some pics?
> You are probably the type that
Thanks for bringing this discussion up to a personal level.
>
> I
Know Jostein & his photography well, do you?
It may be a case of the way things read on the internet, but you did
come across as very nearly attacking Jostein and his photography
personally - especially with the tripod comment etc.
Don't get me wrong, I hear what you are saying - and I am reasona
Yeah, the 10d produces much sharper/nicerimagesIMO. I guess it all comes
down to a personal preference. Every tool is different.
Antonio Russell
On 9/7/04 12:11 am, "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>> And
Hey Rob, El Gringo wasn't attacking anyone, he was just making some
valid points about sharpness and the *istD and peoples perception of
it. A tripod may well help. What is the camera slap like on those
things?
Antonio Russell
Rob Brigham wrote:
Know Jostein & his photography well, do you?
It
on 09.07.04 11:57, Antonio Aparicio at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hey Rob, El Gringo wasn't attacking anyone, he was just making some
> valid points about sharpness and the *istD and peoples perception of
> it. A tripod may well help. What is the camera slap like on those
> things?
No, I have the
I don't want to get into a flame war over this, but El Gringo certainly
read as saying that Jostein was imagining these things and/or was too
useless to use the tools involved (software & tripod/camera etc)
properly. If you have a look at what Jostein has on his website and
read some of what he ha
I went from a Super Program to a ZX-L (MZ-6). I put a ZX-M's focusing
screen (which has a split-image and microprism) in the ZX-L to make
focusing with manual-focus lenses easier, and have been very happy with
it. The ZX-M's focusing screen only cost about US $3, direct from Pentax
USA.
Now if onl
Antonio Aparicio:
So, is anyone gonna let me in on what the rules are? I have asked before
but they seem to be some sort of secret or something as nothing then
materialized. From my experience so far with this group, the rules seem
to change depending on who is involved and how long you have been
s
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004 12:08 , 'Peter Loveday' <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>On the LX at least, OTF metering only works at slower than X speed anyway.
>
Ah, I didn't realise that. I can see that the ability to respond to light
changes during the exposure (i.e. the integrating aspect) is much reduced
a
My error! Sorry to worry you. You did nothing. I mispelled the trolls name here,
but luckily not in the filter. Otherwise I would not have seen this.
--
Anthony Farr wrote:
Wha' happen? What'd I do? :-(
regards,
Anthony Farr
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(sni
On 9/7/04 12:22 pm, "Anders Hultman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Are these your rules or the group rules Anders?
They all seem completely subjective and open to interpretation. Personally I
find you to be not nice Anders, rather boring and you have extended an OT
thread longer than I feel is appro
Sorry Rob, I don¹t buy into this nonsense about Josteins opinion being more
valid than anyone else's because he has a website and has written this or
that. He has an opinion like anyone else.
A.
On 9/7/04 12:08 pm, "Rob Brigham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't want to get into a flame war
Hi!
It doesn't work. Trolls are trolls, and always will be. The only
remedy is to STOP RESPONDING TO THEM.I hereby resolve to do so.
Please join me, everyone.
It makes two of us, at least two .
Boris
This is so weird. I still can't get to it this morning. Time to call
the help desk again.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/09/04 08:45AM >>>
I check last nig
Interesting. Of the two, I find the hay one better and the balloon a
bit to simplisitic. I'll look at them both again.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/08/04 08:11PM >>>
In the fence rail image you've got a lot of potential subjects, the
fence,
the grass, the hay rolls. You need to choose one and work i
Mark (or anyone else),
Do you know of a good reference (or could you explain) how these three
properties in the unsharp mask work. I've made some guesses based on
experimentation, but I'd like to be sure I'm doing it right.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 07/08/04 08:30PM >>>
"JosteinPx" <[EMAIL PROTECTED
on 09.07.04 15:40, Steve Desjardins at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Mark (or anyone else),
>
> Do you know of a good reference (or could you explain) how these three
> properties in the unsharp mask work. I've made some guesses based on
> experimentation, but I'd like to be sure I'm doing it right
... and then there is that excellent web site by Rob Studdert, where I have
learned much about the LX. Thank you!
Sven
Zitat von Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On 9 Jul 2004 at 15:21, keller.schaefer wrote:
>
> > IIRC, and I think this is explained in enough detail in the LX brochure and
>
I didn't want to get involved again in the endless *ist D sharpness
discussion, but...
Mark Roberts wrote:
> All the reports I've seen indicate than, rather than put in "more
> softening" (a lower frequency anti-aliasing filter, in other words),
> Pentax has just applies less sharpening in camera
> I've just picked up an old (but looks as good as new) Tamron SP 300mm f5.6
> (Adaptall 2 mount), for use on my *ist D. I'm surprised at how small and
> light this lens is, and I'm thinking of adding it to my general
> walking-around kit. But that would be easier without its relatively large,
> r
Me too. It's too hard to keep adding to my killfile.
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 9:27 AM
Subject: Re: Trolls
> Hi!
>
> > It doesn't work. Trolls are trolls, and always will be. The only
> >remedy
I've always looked at Shel's posts. Miss him, I will.
Norm Baugher wrote:
Huh? Much a part of things? Of course you have been.
Anyway, have a great vaca and do come back.
Cheers,
Norm
Trevor Bailey a écrit :
G'day Greg.
Did you do it your self?
Did the split screen affect the AF?
H
No, the AF don't use the screen. The AF sensor is bottom the mirror
Gianfranco, Frank, Annasan, and who?
graywolf wrote:
I hope my disagreeing with you had nothing to do with this decision. For
one thing there are five people on the list I consider truely excellent
street photographers. You are one of those five. You have contributed a
lot of useful information
Could you tell us who you contacted at Pentax?
I've tried to get these screens and was told they were only available as an
assembly,
at an outrageous price!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Lovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 5:11 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Now this is an eating disorder. ;-)
"I've thought long and hard in recent weeks about un-digesting myself
for
exactly this reason!"
I haven't seen anyone posting about this camera so I thought I'd be the first.
Is anyone interested in it? Sure it's a P&S with real video capabilities, but what
are your thoughts?
I know some of you have opinions about the name
I actually ordered one today from B&H. I think it will be fu
anand -
One fact that comes to mind is to always shut off the printer using the on/off switch
on the printer. Do not turn off any other way.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Anand DHUPKAR <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: epson printers ...
hi
quite some time back, there was discus
Well this thread went nuts... Anyhow...
It's not because I'm a better photographer. If you want sharper images,
shoot RAW, use PS CS to convert, enhance sharpness using the RAW converter.
(Better than turning up sharpness in camera.)
This is a random shot I picked. It's not particularly amazin
The ex-wife volunteered me to be the "official" photographer of our 8-year-old
daughter's swim team.
I normally don't do people photogrpahy (except family snaps) because... well... I suck
at it. But... I was happy with this shot and wanted to share it with the group.
It was originally shot in
Well, I'll believe you, but it seems unusual to me. If I pick up a metal
rod, and hold it by the end, it will ring more than if it I hold it at more
balanced position. But, I can also see how the lens tripod mount would act
as a fulcrum producing a see saw vibration... Well, I only posted what I
Oh, at some point someone brought up the pentax 300 f4.5 as an example of a
lens meant to be used without a tripod collar, and I was just saying that
people have complained extensively about the lack of a tripod collar.
Although its apparently a fine lens otherwise.
-el gringo
Not sure who wro
Yeah - sorry about the nuts & all that.
However, Jostein had already stated in the thread that he had used CS
RAW, Capture One etc and was STILL unhappy with the results.
And while the tripod comment is perfectly valid in a general sense, it
read as though it was directed as Jos which would be ri
Christian wrote:
The ex-wife volunteered me to be the "official" photographer of our 8-year-old
daughter's swim team.
I normally don't do people photogrpahy (except family snaps) because... well... I suck
at it. But... I was happy with this shot and wanted to share it with the group.
It was ori
I only had one hot pixel:
[DeadPixelText]
Version=1.0
Description=tenth second exposure
FileType=TIFF
NumBadPixels=1
0=Hot,945,1600,61
This seems odd, given the result of other. I used a lens cap,
eyepieice cover, Tv-1/10, Tiff file, etc.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington a
Great shot Chrisitian, you can see all the pre-race emotions in his face...
Norm
Christian wrote:
The ex-wife volunteered me to be the "official" photographer of our 8-year-old
daughter's swim team.
I normally don't do people photogrpahy (except family snaps) because... well... I suck
at it. But
Hi,
a lot of it is very gruesome:
http://www.i-witness.net/
--
Cheers,
Bob
I'm still looking for an extra front grip for the Pentax P5/P50
camera. It's different than the one for the Super Program/Super A.
I'll even take one attached to a P5/P50, though it can be a parts
body.
Joe
--
Joe Wilensky
Staff Writer
Communication and Marketing Services
1150 Comstock Hall
Cor
Yeah, he's a pretty intense kid.
Thanks for looking!
Christian
-Original Message-
From: Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Jul 9, 2004 1:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PAW - swimmer
Great shot Chrisitian, you can see all the pre-race emotions in his face...
Norm
Christian
> a lot of it is very gruesome:
>
> http://www.i-witness.net/
I'm off with a group of like-minded colleagues(*) to see this on
Monday (along with Bill Brandt's restrospective at the V&A and the
Jacques-Henri Lartigue retrospective at the Hayward Gallery).
I might even buy the book seeing as he
Very powerful stuff Bob, thanks for the link.
Norm
Bob W wrote:
Hi,
a lot of it is very gruesome:
http://www.i-witness.net/
Regards,
Bob...
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2512530
Here is another 100% crop, again, there are some tiny jpeg artifacts in
there that are the result of "save for web". PHoto.net doesnt allow the
uploading of photoshop jpegs due to preview data which apparently causes
images to upset internet exp
Fantastic photography... I'm holding my tongue not to get into the politics
of it all though.
-el gringo
-Original Message-
From: Bob W [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: iWitness - work in progress by Tom Stoddart
Hi,
a lot of
I don't think Gregory was that good ... :-)
> Gianfranco, Frank, Annasan, and who?
>
> graywolf wrote:
> > I hope my disagreeing with you had nothing to do with this decision. For
> > one thing there are five people on the list I consider truely excellent
> > street photographers. You are o
I see you've been taking your meds Shawn, very good
Norm
El Gringo wrote:
Fantastic photography... I'm holding my tongue not to get into the politics
of it all though.
-el gringo
Hi,
>> a lot of it is very gruesome:
>>
>> http://www.i-witness.net/
> I'm off with a group of like-minded colleagues(*) to see this on
> Monday (along with Bill Brandt's restrospective at the V&A and the
> Jacques-Henri Lartigue retrospective at the Hayward Gallery).
> I might even buy the bo
On Jul 9, 2004, at 2:43 PM, Norm Baugher wrote:
I see you've been taking your meds Shawn, very good
Norm
That's totally uncalled for Norm.
Hi Jostein,
Interesting corner of the world and a nice shot. I saw your question
about softness on the photonet page. I'd love to see a blow up of just
the coal basket. It should resolve quite well if you converted a RAW to
a 16 bit 144 meg file or an 8 bit 72 meg file. Could the softness be in
Marvelous shot, the smile is great, the eyes priceless!
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 2:21 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: PAW: Birmingham Gentleman
>
>
> This young fellow operates a shoe shine stand on Old
Good price for new. B&H was selling them for that a couple of years or so
ago new. Don't know about Samys reputation as far as "add on" pricing.
Beware.
Robert
- Original Message -
From: "Joseph Tainter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pdml" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 5:17 PM
Thanks Sylwek. He was pleased to have his picture taken. I like that.
The glow in his eyes is the brightly lit street behind me. I always say
hello to him, and he always has a smile for me. I have to think that he
is a man who is at peace with the universe.
Paul
On Jul 9, 2004, at 5:27 PM, Sylwe
Thanks Greg, I'll give it a try.
I have several bodies I'd like to try it with.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Greg Lovern [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 3:00 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: pentax-discuss-d Digest V04 #784
>
>
On 2004-07-09, at 23:51, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Thanks Sylwek. He was pleased to have his picture taken. I like that.
The glow in his eyes is the brightly lit street behind me. I always
say hello to him, and he always has a smile for me. I have to think
that he is a man who is at peace with the u
Mounting the camera to the tripod will give you a lot more vibration than
mounting the lens tripod collar.
I have the same conclusion as William. Mounting through the lens collar
induces more vibration that through the camera. The balancing theory is a
myth imho, for not so heavy lenses like F*3
Hi Paul,
Thanks for looking. There's a link to a crop of the coal basket blown up to
100% on the page, as well as a link to a full-size jpg of the whole image.
The image is slightly cropped on the left and top, btw, to remove half a
stone and some odd looking cloud.
My opinion on the Sigma is that
On Fri, 9 Jul 2004, Robert Woerner wrote:
> Good price for new. B&H was selling them for that a couple of years or so
> ago new. Don't know about Samys reputation as far as "add on" pricing.
> Beware.
Based on my recent experiences (elements in two of these lenses
delaminating from each other) I
Another Test
Regards,
Bob...
Sorry, I forgot to answer one q.
The raw file was converted to a 16 bit tiff, using the C1 Pro converter. I
adjusted the whitebalance a little, cropped out a stone on the left and a
small cloud on top, and did my best to find the optimum amount of
sharpening, based on the coal basket.
In photoshop
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein"
Subject: Re: Max weight of tele lens on *ist D
>
. Mounting the camera to the tripod will give you a lot more
vibration than mounting the lens tripod collar.
>
Wrongo me boy. Sorry. The mechanics of the situation are against you.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "cbwaters"
Subject: Re: *istD anti-aliasing? not anymore!
> Careful Bill,
> Remember the "I beat people up" and the "I've got my lawyer on the
case"
> threads. You could be smacked with a defamation case! literally!
Defamation requires an identifiable victi
Antonio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Sorry Rob, I don¹t buy into this nonsense about Josteins opinion being more
>valid than anyone else's because he has a website and has written this or
>that.
That isn't the *reason* his opinion is more valid than yours.
I wrote:
> > . Mounting the camera to the tripod will give you a lot more
> > vibration than mounting the lens tripod collar.
William Robb replied:
> Wrongo me boy. Sorry. The mechanics of the situation are against you.
Uh. Yes. Guess my thoughts were a little behind my typing. Sorry.
Jostein
Hi Paul,
Thanks for looking. There's a link to a crop of the coal basket blown up to
100% on the page, as well as a link to a full-size jpg of the whole image.
The image is slightly cropped on the left and top, btw, to remove half a
stone and some odd looking cloud.
My opinion on the Sigma is tha
"Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I couldn't agree more on your comments about Photoshop, and I'd like to add
>one more reason; the filter inside the camera is nowhere near as good as the
>ones in Photoshop. :-)
That's really the point I was trying to make. Guess I didn't do it well
enough!
On 9 Jul 2004 at 21:21, Jostein wrote:
> I guess my "complaint" with the *istD is that I feel bereft of control over the
> degree of anti-aliasing applied. Btw, I'm not entirely sure if it's correct to
> call it an anti-aliasing filter when it's implemented in front of the CCD...
>
> I imagine an
Fantastic. Thats a real keeper! Eyes are amazing and your
focus/composition is great. Might be even better if converted to B&W.
rg
Paul Stenquist wrote:
This young fellow operates a shoe shine stand on Old Woodward in
Birmingham, Michigan's wealthiest suburb. I suspect he does quite well.
In
since OTF metering can possibly change the exposure time during exposure, it
can't be used faster than X synch speed. think about the position of the
shutter blades if the lighting changed a lot during exposure.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Morphet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <
this also makes it the most predictable and amenable to sharpening using a
true deblurring filter and not just an unsharp mask.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Studdert" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 6:45 PM
Subject: Re: *istD anti-aliasi
ten seconds, not tenth.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Desjardins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, July 09, 2004 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: Real-life calibration assistance welcomed
> I only had one hot pixel:
>
> [DeadPixelText]
> Version=1.0
> Descripti
The coal basket is very sharp on my monitor. There is no blurring of
the lines and sky background. I think it would print very well on a
good inkjet printer.
Paul
On Jul 9, 2004, at 6:22 PM, Jostein wrote:
Sorry, I forgot to answer one q.
The raw file was converted to a 16 bit tiff, using the C1
I don't think you're too picky, the scene is nice, but is lacks a little
"punch"?
Norm
Jostein wrote:
About time I shook the water off my paws again.
Here's one for public scrutiny.
http://www.oksne.net/paw/worldsend.html
On 9 Jul 2004 at 18:58, Herb Chong wrote:
> since OTF metering can possibly change the exposure time during exposure, it
> can't be used faster than X synch speed. think about the position of the shutter
> blades if the lighting changed a lot during exposure.
Precisely, it forms a slit which pass
I think it might benefit from a small increase in contrast, but the
resolution and sharpness are evident on my monitor.
Paul
On Jul 9, 2004, at 7:03 PM, Norm Baugher wrote:
I don't think you're too picky, the scene is nice, but is lacks a
little "punch"?
Norm
Jostein wrote:
About time I shook t
Someone on this list directed my attention to the photographic competition
under the theme "Connected". Pentacameras to be won. 1. prize an *ist D. The
deadline was 9th of July.
Did you participate?
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Howdy all
Just updated my website with a new photo (hoary
marmot), under Photo of the Month: July at the bottom
of the Home page.
www.cliffnietvelt.com
Taken with a SMC F-300mm F4.5 ED[IF] & an MZ-S with
Provia 100F. Still using Pentax...
Also Art Cards are available.
Best regards,
Cliff Niet
Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Paul Stenquist wrote:
>> This young fellow operates a shoe shine stand on Old Woodward in
>> Birmingham, Michigan's wealthiest suburb. I suspect he does quite well.
>> In any case, he always has a smile for me. Shot just a couple of hours
>> ago during a walkaro
BRILLIANT PHOTOGRAPH, PAUL.
JENS
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. juli 2004 00:51
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: PAW: Birmingham Gentleman
Fantastic. Thats a real keeper! Eyes are
Not me. Although I would have if I had known of it.
Paul
On Jul 9, 2004, at 7:14 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
Someone on this list directed my attention to the photographic
competition
under the theme "Connected". Pentacameras to be won. 1. prize an *ist
D. The
deadline was 9th of July.
Did you particip
Thanks Jens. I'm a bit surprised at how well this has been received,
but I'm very pleased.
Paul
On Jul 9, 2004, at 7:23 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
BRILLIANT PHOTOGRAPH, PAUL.
JENS
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks Mark. The light is my favorite source for street portraits: open
shade. It's free, and it's everywhere.
Paul
On Jul 9, 2004, at 7:22 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Paul Stenquist wrote:
This young fellow operates a shoe shine stand on Old Woodward in
Birmingham, Mi
Browsing a bit I came across the following article from Forte Photochemical in
Hungary:
-
BEGIN QUOTE
In spite of the invasion of digital techniques, and more recently that of APS,
not only can it be asserted that traditional techniques will remain with us for
On 9 Jul 2004 at 20:02, graywolf wrote:
> Browsing a bit I came across the following article from Forte Photochemical in
> Hungary:
Maybe this is just the product of a capable marketing dept, not something we
are used to seeing from Pentax :-)
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4
I have two of these lenses, and there's no sign of any problems with the
glass. I bought the first one used a few years ago, and was pleased with
the image quality, less so with the build quality. The zoom ring became a
little loose over time, so I looked for another lens at a good price.
A few
While I waited in vain at Nubble Light, Maine, for the skies to clear
last Tuesday, I noticed that many people there were carrying cameras. I
did not notice a single film camera. No doubt there were some, but what
I noticed was a large number of P&S digital and EVF digital. 'Tis the
summer of K
Interesting. Had this lighthouse been put into operation, would the coal
net be the light?
Jim A.
> From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:24:33 +0200
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: PAW: At World's end
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
At least a majority of stereo photographers attending the National Stereo
Association convention in Portland, Oregon USA use film. We had lots of
film turned in for processing. All of the film was for E-6 processing.
Jim A.
> From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Da
I think its pretty sharp too. Maybe shooting MF makes you more
sensitive to anything less? I bet a print would be fantastic.
rg
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The coal basket is very sharp on my monitor. There is no blurring of the
lines and sky background. I think it would print very well on a good
Joseph Tainter wrote:
>
> While I waited in vain at Nubble Light, Maine, for the skies to clear
> last Tuesday, I noticed that many people there were carrying cameras. I
> did not notice a single film camera. No doubt there were some, but what
> I noticed was a large number of P&S digital and EVF
On 9/7/04, Jim Apilado, discombobulated, offered:
>At least a majority of stereo photographers attending the National Stereo
>Association convention in Portland, Oregon USA use film. We had lots of
>film turned in for processing. All of the film was for E-6 processing.
IIRC there were a few fil
On 9/7/04, Cliff Nietvelt, discombobulated, offered:
>Howdy all
>
>Just updated my website with a new photo (hoary
>marmot), under Photo of the Month: July at the bottom
>of the Home page.
>
>www.cliffnietvelt.com
>
>Taken with a SMC F-300mm F4.5 ED[IF] & an MZ-S with
>Provia 100F. Still using Pen
Another shot from the Catlins Coastline. I had a better pic of another
waterfall but I think I've shown that one before on PUG or something.
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/cgi-bin/paw.cgi?date=10-Jul-2004
FWIW I don't like the branches on the left but there's not a lot I
could do about them.
T
99 matches
Mail list logo
