My knowledge of German is limited to subtitles in old war movies, but it only looks
like what you wrote means something like "Nikon rules all". I don't think that putting
that in German makes it offensive; although I do understand the inference. So no
offense taken, no apologies needed.
It mig
Well used LXs seem to go for about that all the time on ebay, not to
mention many many other film bodies. The real money of course is in the
lenses, like it always has been.
A.
On 16 Jul 2004, at 14:52, Mark Roberts wrote:
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 16/7/04, John Mustarde, discombobulat
Joseph Tainter checked his mailbox everyday for four months for lenses that
never came then wrote:
"I am frustrated beyond description about being unable to buy the lenses I
want. I need them soon. Why is Pentax doing this?"
"I am puzzled that few on the list seem to think this is something worth
Yeah, I 'm thinking about that too...
Cheers
Shaun
John Mustarde wrote:
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:30:53 -0500, you wrote:
Very happy. Can't wait to get out into the field in the next few days
and really test it out. Haven't got a 67mm UV filter on it yet, so it's
not going near the great outdoors y
You don't need an action. Convert one photo to B&W that
has a lot of tonal range, make one curve, fiddling and printing
til you reach as neutral as you think you can get, save that
curve, and use it thereafter on every other photo.
Making the curve may require quite a few test prints, so
do a bunc
My SO is having a problem with Photoshop CS that she can't solve. I poked
around in there a little to try to solve it but after 20 yrs of dealing with
lousy software, hardware and bugs my frustration tolerance with computers is
so low that I had to quit.
Her problem is that after she makes her adj
Kim Sherman posted:
> > Apologies if the list has seen this info already.
> > I just saw it on the LUG (Leica Users Group) and wanted to pass it along.
> > No financial interest in Rich Pinto's business, ya da ya da
> > ---
> >
> > Kobayashi goes "K" with the VSL43: revive those Pentax K lense
Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 16/7/04, John Mustarde, discombobulated, offered:
>
>>Actually, the best bargain in a film camera would be a used PZ1p for
>>around $300 - 400.
>
>Crikey, are people still spending this much on a film camera?
I'm now working part-time at a camera store and I c
The 50's style works for me. Nice shot.
On 16/7/04, Simon King, discombobulated, offered:
Hi All,
Our second son Josh, just learning the head control to track and smile
at his 2 1/2 year old brother...
http://wwwstaff.murdoch.edu.au/~sking/josh/pages/bedsession01.htm
I was going for a 50's style
Thanks, Leon
1 mm crop. That's actually very good and mostly acceptable, isn't it.
Would you say it's easier/faster than scanning the slide?
>You need to remove
>the K mount ring from the bellows, mount that on the camera then place
>the camera and ring on the bellows. You have to do this with th
cbwaters wrote:
Yeah, sounds dumb now but I was 16, broke, and on the way to my girlfriends'
house (her parents were seldom home)... kinda puts a little thing like a
smoke filled car in perspective doesn't it?
[smile...] Yup.
keith
On Thu, 15 Jul 2004 11:30:53 -0500, you wrote:
>Very happy. Can't wait to get out into the field in the next few days
>and really test it out. Haven't got a 67mm UV filter on it yet, so it's
>not going near the great outdoors yet. Don't tempt fate I always believe!
>
Do yourself a favor - buy som
Thanks Lon. Thats probably as good an answer as I am going to get.
I was thinking along the same lines.
Did you make an action out of it?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson"
Subject: Re:
> Here's an unsophisticated approach that I use to tame one of
> my printers using thi
An excellent deal!
Yes, you can get a used Pentax body for about the same price, but this
is new!
Folks complain when they now have another choice for fitting those
K-mount lenses to?
Seems to me it's nothing but a good thing...
Whoever did the adv. copy did have a little problem figuring out th
I've been trying to figure out the meaning of the somewhat cryptic
instructions contained in the various Pentax bellows units and extension
tubes. Some of the instructions give me the impression that the focusing
rings of all lenses should be set at infinity when used with extension tubes
(includin
On 16/7/04, John Mustarde, discombobulated, offered:
>Actually, the best bargain in a film camera would be a used PZ1p for
>around $300 - 400.
Crikey, are people still spending this much on a film camera?
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|www.maca
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 06:24:05 -0500, you wrote:
>Kinda ugly, but plastic!
>$225 buys a VERY nice ME Super, complete with CLA.
>Or almost a CLA'd Super A, yeah, yeah, thats the ticket!
>
>Don
>
Yeah, but you don't get that incredible rubberized 35-70/3.5-4.8 Macro
zoom, ya know...
Actually
Here's an unsophisticated approach that I use to tame one of
my printers using third party inks:
I simply converted a photo to B&W, then used
a curves layer to get the thing to print as neutral as possible.
I saved the curve, and load it in on any picture associated with
that printer and those inks
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 09:38:22 +0200, Jens Bladt wrote:
>Thanks a lot Nick and Leon.
>I don't quite understand it all, mainly because I just ordered the *ist D,
>but haven't got it yet. Isn't it possible to use normal TTL metering, i.e.
>with a FA280T flash or a Pentax dedicated Metz flash?
>
>There
On 16/7/04, Anthony Farr, discombobulated, offered:
>Cotty,
>
>Did you happen to look at iagarengio's other auctions? Review his feedback?
>Consider how long he's been an eBay member?
>
>With over 32,000 quids worth of gear (as of now) all closing tomorrow, I
>wonder where he will be after tomorr
> The fountain of knowledge has failed me
miserably.
> I have just been given an Olympus P400 dye sub printer, and have a
> few questions
> The colour coming off it is not quite right (no surprise), but the
> profiling available in the driver seems rathe
A couple of hours ago I wrote,
> Bruce R. still lurks here as you've discovered, but we don't hear so much
> Nikon uber alles as we once did.
>
Since, and without checking my mail to see if anyone actually has taken
offence, I realised that I had unintentionally alluded to a repugnant
ideology.
On Fri, 16 Jul 2004 00:35:09 +0100, Nick Clark wrote:
>Works fine so long as you want to copy a section of the original. I haven't yet
>worked out a lens combination to give a full 35mm frame on the APS sized sensor
>(magnification 0.67).
>
>You also need to attach the adaptor ring to the camer
101 - 123 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
