On 15/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I'm also
>having some difficulty trying to fathom how a gravity based sensor
could lead
>to incorrect orientation too, when would it be wrong?
The only time the orientation sensor gets fooled for me is when shooting
(say, artwork) looking
Gonz wrote on 15.11.05 7:29:
> http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
>
> Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
>
> Caveats:
>
> It was too big so I had to compress to a somewhat lower quality jpg than
> I wanted.
> It has CA touchup + a little sharpening
> levels + WB fixing, so its not totally
Rob Studdert wrote on 15.11.05 9:28:
> That's very impressive, it's pretty darned good right into the corners, how
> prevalent was the CA prior to the correction?
No matter how low CA was, you won't ever buy limited circle DA lens Rob,
will you? ;-P
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regar
I think there's some rules about not posting open auctions in the ML.
Beside it, so what?
May you explain it to me?
is it an outrageous price?
or a very rare piece of glass?
or you are selling it?
sorry I'm out of the collector business.
danilo.
danilo wrote:
I think there's some rules about not posting open auctions in the ML.
Open? That's a closed auction. BTW, I was also following it, but I gave up
far before reaching such prices!
Dario
Beside it, so what?
May you explain it to me?
is it an outrageous price?
or a very rare piec
On 11/15/05, Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> danilo wrote:
>
> >I think there's some rules about not posting open auctions in the ML.
>
> Open? That's a closed auction. BTW, I was also following it, but I gave up
> far before reaching such prices!
> Dario
ehm, I must drink a coffee...
danilo
ehm, I must drink a coffee...
I've already done that :-)
> Beside it, so what?
> May you explain it to me?
> is it an outrageous price?
> or a very rare piece of glass?
Both of them. Sure the "outrageous" price is due to rarity, but this time
it
went far beyond the average price fo
another doubtful day here,
but another learning-day too!
thanks,
Danilo.
p.s.: isn't it ironical? In an international ML like this, I'm asking
for english words explanation to the only (?) other Italian guy here!!
LOL.
p.p.s.: Dario do you still live in Italy? (or have you ever lived there?)
I *
Danilo wrote:
p.s.: isn't it ironical? In an international ML like this, I'm asking
for english words explanation
Yes, ironical. Go figure which explanations we can invent & reach this way!
LOL
to the only (?) other Italian guy here!!
No, not the only other Italian guy here. Gianfranco I
On 15 Nov 2005 at 9:39, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> Rob Studdert wrote on 15.11.05 9:28:
>
> > That's very impressive, it's pretty darned good right into the corners, how
> > prevalent was the CA prior to the correction?
> No matter how low CA was, you won't ever buy limited circle DA lens Rob,
>
On 15 Nov 2005 at 8:03, Cotty wrote:
> On 15/11/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I'm also
> >having some difficulty trying to fathom how a gravity based sensor
> could lead
> >to incorrect orientation too, when would it be wrong?
>
> The only time the orientation sensor gets
Well, sound interesting.
Alatri is actually in the Frosinone area, but then, that is a great
region for food!!
(do you know other things to live for? (ok, at least another one:))
I'll try to be there.
ciao,
Danilo
In a message dated 11/14/2005 8:27:57 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Actually the blond-haired one, seems to me more a man that a woman,
are you sure he is a girl?
Look at his/her arm and butt... don't they seem to belong to a man?
Also judging by his face I would say he is a
Thanks Gonz. Sharpness looks good in the corners. I think that lens is
a keeper .
Paul
On Nov 15, 2005, at 1:29 AM, Gonz wrote:
WARNING WARNING WARNING!!
__
Not for the bandwidth impaired
http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
It's a beautiful piece of Asahi history that many of us have never
seen. There is no real "rule" about posting auctions. We have a
gentleman's agreement not to post auctions for Pentax equipment that
might attract bids from a number of people. This is a specialized piece
of equipment that was p
I hope he gets an update on the autocomposition mode. I think it would give
Pentax an unbeatable competitive advantage. It would be the only camera in the
world that refuses to take a crappy picture and there would be a huge demand
for it.
TR
> I asked George to stop in at Ulan Bator and see
> Op Mon, 14 Nov 2005 16:28:05 +0100
schreef
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
>
>
> > Only complain is on the istD. When the lens is at its full 28 or 105
> > ends, it hunts for focus. Move it off
> > just a hair, and its fine.
> > My 35-70 F2.8 Nikkor does the
>
> - Original Message -
> The least they could have done was put an orientation sensor in the vertical
> grip.
> Odds are, if you have the thing mounted, you are shooting a % of verticals.
>
> William Robb
>
>
The D1 and and obviously the istD
On 11/14/05, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank, it does not work really for me... I'll try to explain.
>
> I see two men, but only one face... Both men are busy playing their
> instruments... The man with the bass is of course more interesting
> 'cause the exposure is long and the
I can't figure out why you'd extend the center column?
With the concern about stability/vibration, raising the center column is going
in the wrong direction re stability.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Joseph Tainter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Accessorizing Bertha
Bertha now
How come this shows as a 6100x4100 pixel jpeg on my screen here?
Did you up-size it somewhere in the process?
Have you got the new 24 megapixel sensor?
Regards, Bob S.
On 11/15/05, Gonz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> WARNING WARNING WARNING!!
> __
>
>
> Not for the bandwidth
Thinking about holiday gifts...
Those of you who have the 5 megapixel waterproof Optio.
Do you like it?
Is it small enough for carrying in a purse?
Is there an optical viewfinder?
Any options to shoot RAW?
Thanks, Bob S.
On 11/15/05, Tom Reese <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope he gets an update on the autocomposition mode. I think it would give
> Pentax an unbeatable competitive advantage. It would be the only camera in
> the world that refuses to take a crappy picture and there would be a huge
> demand for it
Doug Franklin wrote:
Here are three of my favorite shots from the Atlanta Historics a couple
of weeks ago. I won't be able to post the shots from this weekend
until I get approval from the local SCCA region, for whom I was doing
the shooting.
Grid: http://www.NutDriver.org/IMGP0207.jpg
Action
On 11/14/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The purse and pink shirt are good clues as well.
Well, first of all, men who are secure in their masculinity wear pink.
Second of all, maybe it's not a purse, but a European Carry-all
.
BTW, I really like the pic, Paul. You are the master
graywolf wrote:
Addendum:
Of course one of the points Bill makes with his rather sarcastic reply
is that doing it right in the camera saves a lot of time in Photoshop.
Another point, is that while my attempts needed some PS'ing, I did
know why they needed PS'ing. Folks who only know how to u
Bob,
PS Raw Processing engine (whatever its name which I forgotten) allows
you to up-size the image up to 25 MP. Rumour has it that this kind of
up-sizing is the best.
HTH.
--
Boris
First, I'd like to thank everybody for beating me up. That may sound a bit
funny, but there is no irony in me saying that. It does not change my
perceptions on the image, but it is educative.
I have been thinking about lightening the foreground a bit and see what
happens. The reason I haven't is
On 11/13/05, Arturo Medina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3876098
>
>
> Hi,
>
> It's been a while since my last post, but I think this one qualifies as
> a funny snap ...
>
> too bad I didn't took it :( , well at least it was my camera.
>
> regards
>
H
Herb
The moon shot is great. Nice detail.
Being a fan of IR pictures, i like the 3 you have chosen to show.
Very smooth texture in these,much different than film were grain rules.LOL
I'd be interested to see the colour pictures prior to conversion.
I keep forge
Ah.
hehehe.
Jostein
Quoting David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Nov 15, 2005, at 12:36 AM, Jostein wrote:
>
> >> I guess we have to call him Mike "two sheds" Wilson from now on.
> >>
> >> - Dave
> >
> > Um...
> >
> > Does the ferry qualify as a water-shed?
> >
> > :-)
>
> I fear my referenc
On 11/14/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Out walking with the long lens this morning. I came across a flock of
> wild turkeys. I was just a little downhill from them and was trying
> not to spook them. I got a bunch of shots - all through a few weeds.
> When I watched this pair mov
On 11/15/05, Stephen Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Great shots, Doug!
I agree!!
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Boris Liberman wrote on 15.11.05 15:16:
> PS Raw Processing engine (whatever its name which I forgotten) allows
> you to up-size the image up to 25 MP. Rumour has it that this kind of
> up-sizing is the best.
This is not just a rumour Boris ;-) We are just preparing '07 calendar for
one of our key
The URL is found, but I'm not able to see the picture. And the expand to
full size button is visible.
I don't understand.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> ---
Thanks Frank. I wore pink shirts in the seventies, and I carried a little bag.
But I didn't call it a purse. I called it "my stash."
Paul
> On 11/14/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The purse and pink shirt are good clues as well.
>
> Well, first of all, men who are secure in t
On 11/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks Frank. I wore pink shirts in the seventies, and I carried a little
> bag. But I didn't call it a purse. I called it "my stash."
> Paul
O-kay...
In those days, "my stash" was what I kept ~in~ those bags (generally
army surplus ca
The purse and pink shirt are good clues as well.
Well, first of all, men who are secure in their masculinity wear pink.
Second of all, maybe it's not a purse, but a European Carry-all
.
Hmm. I have at least one Hawaiian shirt with a lot of pink in it, and
my boyfriend calls the Billingham
A friend bought one on my recommendation. She likes it a lot (she's a
marine geologist, it survives her shipboard hours..). It's small
enough to carry in a pocket, nevermind a purse, has a cheesy little
optical viewfinder but it works ok. No RAW option at all.
Godfrey
On Nov 15, 2005, at 5
frank theriault wrote:
Unless the price jumps up in the next hour and a bit, someone could
cash in bigtime:
http://tinyurl.com/d8cwo
I wish I had the money to seriously bid...
cheers,
frank
Yeah, that's really nice, Frank!
If I hadn't just bought a truly *minty* Contax IIIa Colored Dial, an
But Frank. Army surplus canvas shoulder bags are so, soSIXTIES! In the
seventies the sixties tie-dyed t-shirts and jeans gave way to blousy pink
shirts and striped bell bottoms. That army surplus was replaced by a little
leather bag with drawstrings. God that was awful. Thank goodness for th
Hmm. Nice kit, decent price. I'd bid if I thought I'd use it. But the
MX is still sitting waiting for me to find time to take a picture
with it, and I just spent my toy fund on a new compact digital.
Godfrey
On Nov 15, 2005, at 7:12 AM, frank theriault wrote:
Unless the price jumps up in
On Nov 14, 2005, at 10:29 PM, Gonz wrote:
http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
Caveats:
It was too big so I had to compress to a somewhat lower quality jpg
than I wanted.
It has CA touchup + a little sharpening
levels + WB fixing, so its not totally r
On 11/15/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmm. Nice kit, decent price. I'd bid if I thought I'd use it. But the
> MX is still sitting waiting for me to find time to take a picture
> with it, and I just spent my toy fund on a new compact digital.
>
> Godfrey
>
>
> On Nov 15, 2005, a
Wow. That reminds me so much of where my dad's uncle lived... Thanks for
bringing back a flood of memories, Boris.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2005 11:39 PM
Subject: PESO - Norwegian skies
Hi!
http://w
Are you sure about the optical viewfinder?
I think that neither the Optio WP nor the Optio WPi
has viewfinder...
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> A friend bought one on my recommendation. She likes
> it a lot (she's a
> marine geologist, it survives her shipboard
> hours..)
Hi, does anyone know where I can get one of those wee knurled rings that
sits between the metering prism and the shutter speed dial on the 6x7?
Or does anyone actually know what the part number for it is?
I've mailed Pentax UK and they need a part number. They first sent me
an exploded parts
Nice shot Bruce. Turkeys are not easy to approach.
birds are NOT descendants of dinosaurs They ARE dinosaurs! :-)
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 1:33 PM
Subject: PESO - Raptors?
Out walking with the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On 11/15/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Thanks Frank. I wore pink shirts in the seventies, and I carried a little
>> > bag.
>> But I didn't call it a purse. I called it "my stash."
>>
>> O-kay...
>>
>> In those days, "my stash" was what I kep
On 11/15/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought the eighties were the years of pink clothing for men? The
> "Miami Vice" look and all that...
>
I was thrilled when the "grunge" look came into style in the early 90's.
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier
On 11/15/05, Christian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nice shot Bruce. Turkeys are not easy to approach.
>
> birds are NOT descendants of dinosaurs They ARE dinosaurs! :-)
>
http://www.rom.on.ca/exhibits/feathereddinos/intro.php
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-B
My apologies ... she got the Optio 43WR.
Godfrey
On Nov 15, 2005, at 7:40 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Are you sure about the optical viewfinder?
I think that neither the Optio WP nor the Optio WPi
has viewfinder...
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
A friend bought one on my
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On 11/15/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I thought the eighties were the years of pink clothing for men? The
>> "Miami Vice" look and all that...
>
>I was thrilled when the "grunge" look came into style in the early 90's.
And you have s
I upres-ed it so it would be a little magnified to allow for closer
examination. I will post a RAW image when I can determine if my
server/ISP has the bandwidth to support the downloads.
rg
Bob Sullivan wrote:
How come this shows as a 6100x4100 pixel jpeg on my screen here?
Did you up-size
Very nice shot.
BTW: Why is there a string from th car atatched to a beam in the roof?
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Gonz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 15. november 2005 07:30
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: full size img taken w/12-24
WA
I hope no one objects to a shameless plug for my new book, coming out
on December 6. It's called The Complete Idiot's Guide To Digital
Photography Like A Pro. I'm sorry the title is so long but I was too
busy to write a shorter one!!
Some people have reported problems in finding the book
In a message dated 11/15/2005 8:17:25 AM Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/1592574343/
Bob
==
Under the author description part, they talk about Steve Greenberg and Steve
Krongard.
HTH, Marnie aka Doe
On 11/15/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> And you have since honed that look to perfection...
Me?
Grungy?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3880638
I don't think so...
-frank (awaiting your apology, Mark)
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Dario Bonazza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Danilo wrote:
> > to the only (?) other Italian guy here!!
>
> No, not the only other Italian guy here. Gianfranco Irlanda is
also here,
> and a few lurkers too.
Hi Danilo and Dario,
Yes, I'm still here (well, almost...)
BTW, I'm in Ercolano, Napoli.
On 11/15/05, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> still an hour to go - with the number of bidders, I wouldn't be
> surprised to see the price jump up in the last few minutes of the
> auction.
>
Went for $1155. A pretty good bargain for someone...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois con
On Nov 15, 2005, at 8:39 AM, frank theriault wrote:
On 11/15/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
And you have since honed that look to perfection...
Me?
Grungy?
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3880638
I don't think so...
This photo look so much better with even a 1
Hi,
I use a Pentax 35-105 f/3.5 on my Pentax PZ-1 currently. I plan to
compliment this
lens with something like 70-200. I notice that there are two versions:
SMC A 70-210 f/4 (which I believe has a very good reputation??)
and the
Takumar-A 70-200 f/4 Macro (how good is this??)
Any thoughts, com
Bob,
In the event you should feel it necessary, let me apologize in advance
for asking..am I missing the site's description of your contribution to
the book?
Jack
--- Bob Shell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I hope no one objects to a shameless plug for my new book, coming out
>
> on December 6
On 11/13/05, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://www.photoforum.ru/photo/233521
>
> Yet another thanks goes to Jostein for letting me use his excellent
> photo gear.
>
Gorgeous! As someone said, it would make a lovely postcard (I mean
that as a compliment).
Well done.
-fr
Let me add one more thing. The page loads within seconds, so I don't believe
it is time out or something like that.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Origin
I suspect this is all tongue-in-cheek... considering the title... Jack.
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: My new book
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 09:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Bob,
In the event you should feel it neces
I dont know what to tell you Tim, I just tried it from my work machine
and it loaded. Maybe your ISP is not letting you have it? What browser
are you using?
rg
Tim Øsleby wrote:
Let me add one more thing. The page loads within seconds, so I don't believe
it is time out or something like th
> > http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
>
> > Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
> > It has CA touchup + a little sharpening
> levels + WB fixing, so its not totally raw
> > its 1.4Mb so it might take its time to load
Low-right corner: shouln't "Texas" be sharper? Was the camera
On 11/15/05, Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi, does anyone know where I can get one of those wee knurled rings that
> sits between the metering prism and the shutter speed dial on the 6x7?
> Or does anyone actually know what the part number for it is?
>
> I've mailed Pentax UK and t
Thanks Frank - you are too kind. I do wish I could have done better,
but they are much faster than me. I'll look through the others and
see if there is anything else interesting.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Tuesday, November 15, 2005, 6:46:36 AM, you wrote:
ft> On 11/14/05, Bruce Dayton <[EMAIL P
Thanks, Christian. I did find out that they are not very approachable
- I was shooting with a 400mm on a DSLR. I think the only thing I had
going for me was that they were up the hill from me so it wasn't as
easy to see me coming.
I can say that watching them move through the viewfinder, they se
Hello Bob,
We love shameless plugs - keeps us up on things. I'm going to have to
take a look.
--
Bruce
Tuesday, November 15, 2005, 8:15:44 AM, you wrote:
BS> I hope no one objects to a shameless plug for my new book, coming out
BS> on December 6. It's called The Complete Idiot's Guide To Di
What page? It's just a JPEG file.
Godfrey
On Nov 15, 2005, at 9:25 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
Let me add one more thing. The page loads within seconds, so I
don't believe
it is time out or something like that.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity
I'm using IE6.0.2
This looks like a dead end. If you have a good connection: Could I ask you
to mail it to me?
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original
On Nov 15, 2005, at 9:34 AM, Andre Langevin wrote:
> > http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
>
> > Full size 100% crop img using 12-24.
> > It has CA touchup + a little sharpening
> levels + WB fixing, so its not totally raw
> > its 1.4Mb so it might take its time to load
Low-righ
> On 11/14/05, Bruce Dayton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Out walking with the long lens this morning. I came across a flock of
> > wild turkeys. I was just a little downhill from them and was trying
> > not to spook them. I got a bunch of shots - all th
My *ist-D has developed a problem, the DOF and Green button no longer
stop down the lens. This is a serious problem for me since I have
mostly K lenses. Does anyone have any idea how long it takes Pentax USA
to repair digital? Some idea of cost would also be appreciated as well.
--
When you
> On 14/11/05, Joseph Tainter,
discombobulated,
unleashed:
>
> >Bertha now has a Berlebach 2042 to keep her steady. With the center
> >column extended, the Berlebach is supposed to reach to 64.5 inches
> >(sorry, metric folks, but it's been a long day an
Thanks Andre for your suggestions. Do you believe the F- lens is better
optically or just because it is auto-focus? And I thought that I will lose an
extra 1.5 stops at 210 mm (f/4 on A vs. f/6.7 on the F-lens). I am now used
to manual-focus since my only lens is a A-35-105 f/3.5.
Gaurav
On 11/15/
Whoa...
I just realised I've forgot to respond to all the comments you took
time to post on my PESO.
Thanks in general to all! Individual comments coming up.
Jostein,
finally sorting out the depths of his inbox.
- Original Message -
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sa
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Dayton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks, Christian. I did find out that they are not very approachable
- I was shooting with a 400mm on a DSLR. I think the only thing I had
going for me was that they were up the hill from me so it wasn't as
easy to see
The page with the jpg. It loads, but I can't see the picture.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAI
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:03 PM
Subject: *ist-D problems
My *ist-D has developed a problem, the DOF and Green button no longer stop
down the lens. This is a serious problem for me since I have mostly K
lens
Hi Boris,
It is in the same area as we walked that day with Galia in the
backpack seat. Your memory for places is pretty good. :-)
Julia is right about the green. It's a moisture-demanding moss,
(Polytrichum sp.) that really is unbelieveably green.
thanks for commenting, mate.
Jostein
---
Thanks Mike.
It was the logs that drew me in. The hue on the spruce bark is too
cold, I agree. Spruce bark one of those things that I find very hard
to render correctly. :-(
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:
On 15/11/05, frank theriault, discombobulated, unleashed:
>O-kay...
>
>In those days, "my stash" was what I kept ~in~ those bags (generally
>army surplus canvas shoulder bags).
>
>I can say no more...
>
>
Hey man, is Dave there
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pa
No, it doesn't. It started behaving flaky, sometimes stopping down,
sometimes not, then just stopped. The green button doesn't move. Seems
to be bottomed.
Christian wrote:
- Original Message - From: "P. J. Alling"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, November 15, 2005 1:03 PM
Thanks for commenting, Godfrey.
I tried your HSV suggestion, and I agree it looks a lot better. You
may have solved a recurring issue for me there!
Concerning the colour space, I have many bad experiences with sRGB for
web. It may be something I do wrong, I don't know... -But embedding
the A
Christian wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Bruce Dayton"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Thanks, Christian. I did find out that they are not very approachable
- I was shooting with a 400mm on a DSLR. I think the only thing I had
going for me was that they were up the hill from me so it was
Hi Sandra,
Haven't seen you post much since this pic came online. Hope you're
still among us.
Thanks for commenting. :-)
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Hal & Sandra Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:38 PM
Subject: Re: Forest interior
Beautif
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
No, it doesn't. It started behaving flaky, sometimes stopping down,
sometimes not, then just stopped.
Same exact behavior as my first D. How long have you had it?
Christian
Thanks Christian.
Keeping the greens was my reason for not doing anything with the
bluishness. Godfrey's tip helped me figure out how to split those
problems. :-)
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Christian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, October 15, 2005 6:51
> Do you believe the F- lens is better optically or just because it is
> auto-focus? And I thought that I will lose an extra 1.5 stops at 210 mm
> (f/4 on A vs. f/6.7 on the F-lens). I am now used to manual-focus since
> my only lens is a A-35-105 f/3.5.
The quality of the F 70-210/4-5.6 has been
Thanks Dave,
I will try to print this in A3+ sometime. Just have to buy some more
paper first...:-)
Actually, I used one of the last sheets to print a black&white version
of this image.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "David Mann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, October
- Original Message -
From: "E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
a famous dinosaur paleontologist, described T. rex as "the
seven ton roadrunner from hell." His book "The Dinosaur Heresies" was
one of the first to put forward (to the general lay-public) the theory
that dinosaurs are in f
- Original Message -
From: "E.R.N. Reed" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bob Baaker, >
If anybody wants to look up info on this paleontologist, though, spell
his name with one A and two Ks.
Dammit! :-) , stupid keyboard
Christian
On Nov 15, 2005, at 10:04 AM, Tim Øsleby wrote:
The page with the jpg. It loads, but I can't see the picture.
The URL is http://www.g0nz.com/images/fullimg.jpg
There's no HTML page associated. It's simply a JPEG file. Clicking on
that link should open a new browser window and then, dependi
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005 16:42:40 +0100, Chris Stoddart
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've mailed Pentax UK and they need a part number. They first sent me an
exploded parts diagram booklet for the 6x7 and then the same for the
metering prism, and despite the ring being clearly visible in the cov
Why don't you call them and find out directly?
Pentax USA Customer Service is at 800-877-0155. Doesn't even cost
anything.
Also, I believe Pentax offers expediting at added cost. If you're
willing to pay the fee, they can usually improve turnaround time
substantially.
Godfrey
On Nov 15
Strange. I do get an empty page.
Or to be accurate, it looks like a page with a broken link referring to a
picture. I see the frame and a red X icon up in left corner. Nothing else.
Tim
Mostly harmless (just plain Norwegian)
Never underestimate the power of stupidity in large crowds
(Very fre
1 - 100 of 191 matches
Mail list logo