Thanks for all the replies everyone!
Tim Sherburne wrote:
Nice job, Francis. I like the vivitar TC: cheap, but a good performer.
Haven't used it much lately, though, as I've been enabled with an FA 100/2.8
macro. Still keep it around just in case I really need to get close.
Tim
Yeah, that
It's a garter snake, which, to be honest, I don't know all that much
about. They are quite common here on the south-west coast of Canada.
Though they can be easily found foraging for frogs and other snakes in
gardens and the like, around here (I was rather excited when I
discovered this) they
I spent a few hours playing with the latest offering from Canon.
On the front of it we put a 70-200mm f2.8 lens and went walking around Sydney.
The camera is a 16.7 megapixel full frame shooting 4 fps. ISO from 100-1600 and
custom settings will stretch it from ISO 50-3200.
My first impression
You look like Zaphod Beeblebrox in that photo.
Or Ann Boleyn's executioner, taking his work home.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Albano Garcia [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 29 December 2005 01:32
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO Shit happens...
Quoting Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Brilliant photographs, Jostein. It interesting that snow actually looks like
this at close range.
The only thing missing IMO is a pretty background - like a nice dark blue
colour.
Thanks, Jens!
I absolutely agree about the background. I'm experimenting
Quoting Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Nice stuff, Jostein! Looks like you're giving Mark C. a run for his
money. I don't even have snow around here to make an attempt (not
that I would, mind you).
Hi Bruce,
It'll be a while before I can match Mark C.'s photos, but thanks anyway. :-)
Quoting Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Wow, very nice. Most of my experiements with high magnification are
small shells in the comfort of my home.
LOL.
I've been practising in the kitchen, on sugar grains, for several weeks... It
does have certain advantages over working in the
At http://users.adelphia.net/daoswald/ you can see a few shots I snapped
today in Chinatown, Los Angeles. These were shot as RAW and coerced
into jpegs after a little postprocessing. This was the first time I've
taken exclusively RAW images. After initial RAW processing, I didn't
re-touch
Rob Studdert wrote on 29.12.05 8:26:
Unless the crowd with the printer provide instructions indicating what CMYK
profile to use I'd stick with RGB, wide gamut if possible.
I'm not sure Rob if it is a good idea. Many, many RGB colours will fall out
of CMYK gamut. So there's no sense to tweak
Getting a page not found ...
Which camera are you using?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 12/29/2005 1:35:25 AM
Subject: Burned sky, underexposed subject
At http://users.adelphia.net/daoswald/ you can see a few shots I
I get a page not found message David, so I can't really comment.
Dave
On 12/29/05, David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At http://users.adelphia.net/daoswald/ you can see a few shots I snapped
today in Chinatown, Los Angeles.
My experience:
Squirrels in the house + cat = new sofa, drapes, plants, glassware, picture
frames, panic attack, and a hefty MasterCard bill...
But that was a LONG time ago...
CW
- Original Message -
From: Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, P. J. Alling wrote:
especially on a *ist-D/Ds body. I use the M85 f2. It's got pretty much the
same limitations that Cotty has using his Pentax A85 f1.4 on a Canon body,
Absolutely not. It certainly does not stop down when you do.
Kostas
an MX screen will fit in your Z1 nicely ;)
Of course, forget your spot metering...
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
Hi gang.
I have a licensed version of PSEL 3 registered with Adobe, and a copy of PS 6,
that came
with the
computer.I have the code,but its not registered.
I know i can upgrade to CS or CS2 with the El3 version(its a bit more expensive
than if i
Advertising art directors generally adjust the image in RGB and allow
the printer's pre-press people to do the CMYK conversion.
Paul
On Dec 28, 2005, at 10:23 PM, Adam McKenty wrote:
Color management, yay! (not).
I'm going to be printing a bunch of scans, which need some adjusting
in PS. My
Many laser printers require CMYK for accurate color matching.
Paul
On Dec 28, 2005, at 11:54 PM, David Mann wrote:
What are you printing them with? I'd just use RGB unless it's going
to a press, and even then the pre-press people would probably make a
better job of converting and handling
Yes, a lot of commercial printing is now done on industrial-strength
laser printers. These generally require CMYK files. You should probably
make your adjustments in RGB, then convert to CMYK as a final step. The
printer should show you a proof of the work before they print the
entire run,
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Upgrading PS question
Hi gang.
I have a licensed version of PSEL 3 registered with Adobe, and a copy of
PS 6, that came
with the
computer.I have the code,but its not registered.
I know i can upgrade to CS or CS2 with
Paul Stenquist wrote on 29.12.05 13:19:
Advertising art directors generally adjust the image in RGB and allow
the printer's pre-press people to do the CMYK conversion.
I work in advertising agency and I can tell you that's not true. Too much of
RGB gamut falls outside of CMYK one. That would
Is it just me or are regular Pentax filters getting
hard to come by? Unless I am missing something,
neither B+H nor Adorama nor even the
Pentaximaging.com purchase section has the standard
49mm UV filters. Adorama does not even list Pentax as
one of the manufacturers of filters when you
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Upgrading PS question
Thanks inadvance
It will install beside your current program.
William Robb
Thanks Bill.
Dave
Your page wouldn't come up. But in general, when shooting RAW you
should expose to preserve your highlights right at the limit. When
processing in the PSCS RAW converter, adjust the highlight level with
exposure slider, then bring your midtones back up to where you want
them with the
Adam McKenty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the useful info David.
They're being printed commercially (but not on a press) and when I asked
the fellow at the printer he said, with some hesitation, that the images
should be in CMYK. If an RGB workflow is standard as you suggest,
however,
No need to hate the Maple Laughs, just pity them.
-Adam
A Canucks fan, since 1988 and the worst trade ever.
frank theriault wrote:
Thanks, Perry.
Although I live in Toronto, I was born and brought up in Montreal.
I'm a life long fan of Les Glorieux, and it's my sworn duty as a
native
Good to know there's another ad guy here. I've worked in advertising
agencies for the last quarter century. I'm currently at Young
Rubicam.
I didn't say that clients are shown RGB images. I said the art
directors work with the image in RGB when comping up an ad. As you
noted, retouching and
Does anyone have experience with any of these gorgeous
new SL lenses from Voigtlander? For Pentax fit, it
seems they currently make a 180/4 APO, 125/2.5 APO,
90/3.5 APO, and a 40/2 ASPH. (A few other of their
lenses are either no longer available or only fit
certain Nikons.) It is interesting
On Dec 29, 2005, at 3:33, David Oswald wrote:
At http://users.adelphia.net/daoswald/ you can see a few shots I
snapped today in Chinatown, Los Angeles. These were shot as RAW
and coerced into jpegs after a little postprocessing. This was the
first time I've taken exclusively RAW images.
This one looks interesting --
Voigtlander 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar -- a
macro with a decent focal length for
people who can afford it. Is there test
data for these lenses to be found anywhere?
Don
Chaso DeChaso wrote:
Does anyone have experience with any of these gorgeous
new SL lenses from
Just another proof that the K/M crippling
of Aperture priority on Pentax DSLR matters
Its absurd the screwmount lenses are more
flexible than the K/M lenses on a K mount camera...
jco
-Original Message-
From: Adam Maas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 12:38
I can lagh about it now, but at the time it wasn't too funny.
On 12/28/05, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really had me laughing out loud.
rg
Perry Pellechia wrote:
(long tale of woe follows)
That should be laugh
On 12/29/05, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can lagh about it now, but at the time it wasn't too funny.
On 12/28/05, Gonz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You really had me laughing out loud.
rg
Perry Pellechia wrote:
(long tale of woe follows)
--
Fearing such an incident, we had our cats locked in our bed room.
On 12/29/05, cbwaters [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My experience:
Squirrels in the house + cat = new sofa, drapes, plants, glassware, picture
frames, panic attack, and a hefty MasterCard bill...
But that was a LONG time ago...
CW
An obvious question; are you into graduated ND filters? My sense is
that you've been around the photo scene awhile and are looking for
something embedded in PS to save the investment/hassle.
If you need further info on grad filters, you'll have no shortage of
advice from the group.
Jack
---
I had the chance to play with Rob Studdert's when he was here (125mmf2.5
lens...get your mind out of the gutter). The build quality isexceptional the
optical performance is stunning. The Pentax versioneven has the 'A' position on
the aperture ring.
If I wasn't on a self imposed lens buying ban
This one looks interesting -- Voigtlander 125/2.5 APO-Lanthar -- a macro
with a decent focal length for people who can afford it. Is there test
data for these lenses to be found anywhere?
Rob Studdert is likely to chime in with all sorts of good things to say
(and photos to back his words up)
Kevin,
Thanks for summing up you reaction to a quick spin with the latest 16.7
Canon.
You took a quick turn at the point where you brought in the 'blad H1
and if you had an image comparison comment, I missed it. Does the 'blad
carry a 22mp back?
If you find a moment, I'd appreciate your
On 29 Dec 2005 at 19:35, Kevin Waterson wrote:
I really only have the Hasselblad H1 to compare this to and when it comes
down to
bang for bucks, this one really has everybody in second place. I guess with
the only
16mp full frame 35mm sensor on the market they can charge what they like
FA 35/2 on the *istD, f11, ISO 200, three flash units:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3983927
On 29 Dec 2005 at 10:38, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
I'm not sure Rob if it is a good idea. Many, many RGB colours will fall out
of CMYK gamut. So there's no sense to tweak colours which anyhow will appear
later completely different in CMYK colour space. And that's what I usually
do working for
On 29 Dec 2005 at 19:35, Kevin Waterson wrote:
I can see journo's and
wedding photographers looking for this en-masse.
A fifteen thousand dollar camera for journalists and wedding
photographers???
Not likely.
Paul Stenquist wrote on 29.12.05 14:19:
Good to know there's another ad guy here. I've worked in advertising
agencies for the last quarter century. I'm currently at Young
Rubicam.
Wow! I didn't know that Paul :-) I've been working in this job for about 15
years. So it is nice to know that
Chaso DeChaso wrote on Thu, 29 Dec 2005 at 05:04:02 -0800:
(snip)
Can someone recommend any good sources for Pentax
filters? And does anyone know whether Pentax is
getting out of filters altogether?
I have had similar difficulty in finding Pentax
I bought mine through a couple of shops in Canada. Don's was one, and
there was another in Vancouver, the name of which I've forgotten. Chris
was working at Don's at the time. Maybe you can dig up his address and ask
him about the filters. Prices were quite good as well.
Shel
At 02:42 AM 12/29/2005, you wrote:
It's a garter snake, which, to be honest, I don't know all that much
about. They are quite common here on the south-west coast of Canada.
Though they can be easily found foraging for frogs and other snakes
in gardens and the like, around here (I was rather
On 29 Dec 2005 at 10:19, Paul Stenquist wrote:
A fifteen thousand dollar camera for journalists and wedding
photographers???
Not likely.
That's $15K Aus (about US$11k) including an 2.8/70-200 zoom and probably local
taxes. I'm guessing that a Pentax 645 DSLR will be somewhat more expensive
Dave,
It won't overwrite Elements, but, I'm sorry to say, 256mb of ram will not
be enough to run CS2.
Shel
...
[Original Message]
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 12/29/2005 4:16:17 AM
Subject: Upgrading PS question
Tasty looking. Well done.
On 12/29/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FA 35/2 on the *istD, f11, ISO 200, three flash units:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3983927
--
Perry Pellechia
Primary email: [EMAIL
On 29 Dec 2005 at 5:37, Chaso DeChaso wrote:
Does anyone have experience with any of these gorgeous
new SL lenses from Voigtlander?
I do and I am enthusiastic about my 125/2.5 APO (as mentioned by those who have
read my rants before) however I'd hardly call it new since I purchased my copy
On 12/28/05, Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi gang,
Today I finally got around to play with real snow in front of my macro
setup.
After sifting through the results, this is what's left:
http://www.oksne.net/foto/html/images/snow/images.asp
I've tried two optical combinations today. The
Paul,
You knew it would happen and I'm here to confirm it. (LOL) I have a
wedding/studio/scenic/airplane author/photog. friend who is a slave to
the latest, and who is able to afford to be.
He has a 22meg back for his AF Contax 645 and, in addition to his
camera shop inventory of 35mm F line of
At 02:12 PM 12/28/2005, you wrote:
I think it is a matter of terminology. If the sun is in a snake's
field of view, I'm sure the snake can see it. That's 93 million
miles away. I think what you were trying to say is that snakes can
only see clearly a few feet in front of them, or in other
On Dec 29, 2005, at 11:14 AM, Rob Studdert wrote:
In this case obviously no one knows exactly what's going on, so
since the image
was RGB in origin then it should likely be presented to the
printers as such.
They should be able to make an appropriate CMYK conversion and
colours that
fall
On Dec 29, 2005, at 10:30 AM, Gary Sibio wrote:
I live in Chicago where we have our very own variety of Garter
Snake although it is very rare and I've never seen one. San
Francisco also has its own variety.
You sometimes find them lying around after weddings.
Bob
Rob Studdert wrote on 29.12.05 17:39:
That's $15K Aus (about US$11k) including an 2.8/70-200 zoom and probably local
taxes. I'm guessing that a Pentax 645 DSLR will be somewhat more expensive
than
this (without such a capable lens).
I guess Nikon will sell 10x more D200 DSLRs to wedding
Very revealing tests. The Pentax shows
nasty chromatic aberration. I think I'll
have to sell something (big) soon. Micro
and Macro are the only things that
really interest me these days.
Don
Rob Studdert wrote:
On 29 Dec 2005 at 5:37, Chaso DeChaso wrote:
Does anyone have experience with
On 29 Dec 2005 at 17:02, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
I guess Nikon will sell 10x more D200 DSLRs to wedding photographers and
journalists as it costs around 3500 USD with 70-200/2.8 VR lens - that's
about 1/3 of price of similar set with 1Ds and real capabilities of this
Nikon camera are not
On 29/12/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Upon lifting this beast it is immediately obvious that it should not be used
without a tripod. The combined weight of the lens + camera made this
something
you dont want to carry for too long or too far.
To use an Australian term, you're
On 29/12/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
My interest was the ability to plug the
camera directly to a pc/laptop and have the files saved directly to the
hard disk.
This can be done via USB (1.1) or a wireless connection. Does it get any
better than that?
Yes, FireWire.
On 29 Dec 2005 at 16:23, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
As I can see it is not easy to work with such a laser printers. Accidentally
service bureau that we used to work with has colour laser printer too. It is
not easy to get predictable results from this machine and they don't even
know what CMYK
On 29/12/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
I was told the LCD screen was large and bright and this may be the case
in the dark
but it was daylight and it was difficult to see. Even when venturing
into a low
light situation it was not great, the *istD has it trumped in this area.
What about them.
Dave
On 12/30/05, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 29/12/05, Kevin Waterson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Upon lifting this beast it is immediately obvious that it should not be used
without a tripod. The combined weight of the lens + camera made this
something
you dont
Rob Studdert wrote on 29.12.05 17:14:
In this case obviously no one knows exactly what's going on, so since the
image
was RGB in origin then it should likely be presented to the printers as such.
They should be able to make an appropriate CMYK conversion and colours that
fall out of gamut
Cotty wrote on 29.12.05 17:27:
Yes, FireWire.
Firewire rulezzz... Pity that it is getting less and less popular in
cameras. Good that I have and use firewire CF cards reader just like you :-)
--
Balance is the ultimate good...
Best Regards
Sylwek
On 30/12/05, Rob Studdert, discombobulated, unleashed:
I also expect that the 5D will
make a dent in sales of the 1DS MkII, it's enough camera for most people and
inexpensive enough for a pro that they might even consider buying two or
three
bodies.
Not a chance. There's much more to it than
On 30/12/05, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
What about them.
They're a bit dodgy ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Rob Studdert wrote on 29.12.05 17:34:
Wow, I can't say that I know of one good print house/pre-press bureau that
doesn't run their proofing printers using a suitable hardware RIP with full
calibration, output is very predictable.
This laser printer is not a proofer at all :-) It is just large
On 28/12/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
Thanks Cotty, I wasn't sure you were still speaking to me.
Well, it *is* Christmas after all.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Rob Studdert wrote on 29.12.05 18:09:
I don't know how top end Nikon cameras sell in your part of the world but I'd
guess it's 3:1 in Canons favour here.
It depends on model. 300D is more popular because of its price. If someone
has more money to spend on DSLR then he buys D70 as much better
On 28/12/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I use the M85 f2. It's got pretty much
the same limitations that Cotty has using his Pentax A85 f1.4 on a Canon
body, which is annoying since it is a K mount lens/body combination, but
I've learned to live with it.
Shh
Hi friends, I just popped in for a while, after unsubscribing for doing too
much photography :)
First, let me wish you a good and felicitous New Year (for those with our
calendar, for the Orthodox countries, just wait a week g, and the Chinese
wait a bit longer please), and invite you to look
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Getting a page not found ...
Which camera are you using?
Shel
[Original Message]
From: David Oswald [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Date: 12/29/2005 1:35:25 AM
Subject: Burned sky, underexposed subject
At http://users.adelphia.net/daoswald/ you can see
Tom C, Ken Waller, Paul Stenquist, Cotty, Igor,
Thanks for viewing and commenting. Glad you liked it.
jostein
- Original Message -
From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Wednesday, December 28, 2005 10:00 PM
Subject: PESO - Snow crystals
Hi gang,
Today
Your page wouldn't come up. But in general, when shooting RAW you should
expose to preserve your highlights right at the limit. When processing
in the PSCS RAW converter, adjust the highlight level with exposure
slider, then bring your midtones back up to where you want them with the
Hi, I would like to ask if somebody from the UK isn't planning to visit lovely
Prague in the neartime (hey Mike, I know it's now my turn to go to your country
g, but I have no holidays left...). I wanted to buy some clothing from a fine
army surplus supplier Cotty once recommended (no I am no
When I first got the DA 16-45, I took it out and tested it agains the FA
20-35. The results were very close. That was my first indication of how
good a lens the DA 16-45 is.
Joe
On 28/12/05, Perry Pellechia, discombobulated, unleashed:
This is when things went horribly wrong. As I am trying to knock him
into the tub he
crawls onto the poker. He then races along the poker, to my arm then
over my head and
down my back as I knelt in front of the fire place. Marianne
Better than having them coming out of other places.
Kevin Waterson wrote:
This one time, at band camp, Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Go for it Kevin, I have them coming out of my ears ;-)
thats gotta be uncomfortable. :)
Kevin
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in
Interesting tale, Kevin. Thanks for sharing.
A couple of months back, I chanced to meet a nature photographer using
the same beast with a 500mm f/4. He said that dust was a big problem
with this particular camera. Much worse than its predecessor, the D1s.
He actually considered going back for
For quite some time, I've wanted the FA 20-35 zoom lens. Then I saw it
available from KEH as an excellent +.
When I called, KEH said they couldn't promise its arrival prior to
Christmas. I told them I didn't care since it was for me.
Of course, it arrived on the 23rd and the only differences I
Speaking for myself, they really swing. (large arc)
Jack
--- Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 30/12/05, David Savage, discombobulated, unleashed:
What about them.
They're a bit dodgy ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|
Happy New Year, Frantisek. Good to hear you've jooked on full time with
a daily paper. Hope we'll get to see some of your pics while you're
around.
Paul
On Dec 29, 2005, at 12:02 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi friends, I just popped in for a while, after unsubscribing for
doing too much
I said pretty much. The green button works fine for an Aperture
preferred mode, and if you want to do manual metering, which I prefer
anyway, you can hold the DOF lever in and get stop down metering just
like on a Spotmatic.
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, P. J. Alling
A gorgeous image Paul, although I feel the need for more space between the
subject the edge of the image @ the top the LRH corner, both @ the
bottom side. The proximity of the subject to the edge draws my attention.
Either give it more space or cut it off more.
Kenneth Waller
-
Wouldn't be surprised if Nikon were making gains lately.
Jack
--- Sylwester Pietrzyk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Studdert wrote on 29.12.05 18:09:
I don't know how top end Nikon cameras sell in your part of the
world but I'd
guess it's 3:1 in Canons favour here.
It depends on model.
Unless I am missing something, neither B+H nor Adorama nor even the
Pentaximaging.com purchase section has the standard 49mm UV filters.
--
A quick glance at BH's site suggests that the only one missing is the
one you are interested in -- 49 mm UV in black. Suggest you email BH
Hell, I get one in my apartment every once in a while. Drives the dog
crazy...
Gary Sibio wrote:
At 02:42 AM 12/29/2005, you wrote:
It's a garter snake, which, to be honest, I don't know all that much
about. They are quite common here on the south-west coast of Canada.
Though they can be
We take our hockey seriously here in Canada:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3972928size=lg
Taken at a Toronto-Montreal hockey game back in November. Yet more
fisheye fun. g
Yet another standing-room-only game in Toronto. In both Toronto and
Montreal, tickets are so hard to come
It still pisses me off...
Cotty wrote:
On 28/12/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
I use the M85 f2. It's got pretty much
the same limitations that Cotty has using his Pentax A85 f1.4 on a Canon
body, which is annoying since it is a K mount lens/body combination, but
I've
Hi Fra!
Good to hear from you!
Great to hear that you're still a full time pro. :-)
Cheers, and best wishes for the year to come
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, December 29, 2005 6:02 PM
Subject: PF 2006 wanting to
As a big time Canadiens fan I can understand the tension of a Leafs game.
You shot captured it well.
Go Habs Go
On 12/29/05, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We take our hockey seriously here in Canada:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3972928size=lg
Taken at a
I didn't think this image worked initially, but it grew on me after
seeing how her eye is visible:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/jbuhler/78827292/in/set-1667678/
Thanks for viewing, comments welcome.
j
--
Juan Buhler
http://www.jbuhler.com
photoblog at http://photoblog.jbuhler.com
On 29/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
Hi, I would like to ask if somebody from the UK isn't planning to visit
lovely Prague in the neartime (hey Mike, I know it's now my turn to go
to your country g, but I have no holidays left...). I wanted to buy
some clothing from a fine
On 29/12/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
journalism can be lot of fun but also a lot of work, endless waiting
with brief moments of shutters tearing
We have a saying here:
'Hurry up and wait'
;-)
Hope you're well. Lemme know re the parka (see other thread).
Cheers,
On 29/12/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
It still pisses me off...
You'll wake up you-know-who.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
On 12/29/05, Perry Pellechia [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As a big time Canadiens fan I can understand the tension of a Leafs game.
You shot captured it well.
Go Habs Go
Thanks, Perry.
Although I live in Toronto, I was born and brought up in Montreal.
I'm a life long fan of Les Glorieux,
Just in case anyone missed it, or we missed e-mailing someone, or
someone in the Southern Ontario area may be lurking, the Toronto
chapter of PDML (TOPDML) will be meeting tomorrow, Friday afternoon at
2:00pm at C'est What? pub, corner of Front West and Church streets
downtown. Looks like we may
Only slightly off topic. I saw a firewire/USB comparison on the
television show Call for Help.
The results were interesting. I don't remember the exact details, but
they used firewire and USB to transfer about 10 Gbytes of data. They
did the test on an apple and on a dell.
Here are the
Thanks Ken. That's valuable input.
Paul
On Dec 29, 2005, at 1:17 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
A gorgeous image Paul, although I feel the need for more space between
the subject the edge of the image @ the top the LRH corner, both @
the bottom side. The proximity of the subject to the edge
On 12/29/05, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
FA 35/2 on the *istD, f11, ISO 200, three flash units:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3983927
Love the composition (that cascading effect...). Technically brilliant.
I believe that I'll go make a BLT right about now g.
1 - 100 of 172 matches
Mail list logo
