Now, kind sir, would you please explain what Copse means?
Similar, but not exactly the same as, spinney. 8-)))
Small group of trees.
Copse in London translates as 'Luxury development of flats
or houses
available shortly'.
Malcolm
So the same as meadow,
Brian,
I think of it as a good value for money lens. I don't use it a lot
and didn't pay a lot. It does nicely enough what I do use it.
Cheers,
Gautam
On 2/18/06, Brian Dipert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's $99.95 right now at BH. Thoughts on this lens, folks, both in absolute
terms and
I have the F100-300, even at 300 mm is not bad. It shows some CA at
300mm which is easily fixed with adobe camera raw. Price/performance
is excellent.
A stitch from several shots:
http://www.bmt.tue.nl/panorama/Goor_30dec2005/default.htm
On 2/19/06, Brian Dipert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's
Hello,
I am currently planning to ruin my funds and go superwide with my DS.
The choice is very limited, actually two lenses, SMC-DA 12-24/4 and
Sigma 10-20/4-5.6 are available on the market (I don't want DA 10-17
Fisheye, at least I don't want it now :). The big advantages of Pentax
are SMC
On 19/2/06, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic41.html
That's a very nice photo. If I were you I'd rotate it slightly to
make the horizon straight, then make a big print.
Thanks Dave. The distant hill is actually inclining upwards to
Don, I tried replying to your post off list but it was bounced back at
me 'access denied'...
The original message was received at Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:41:19 -0800 (PST)
from smtpin07-en2 [10.13.10.152]
- The following addresses had permanent fatal errors -
email deleted
(reason:
Hi Cotty,
That's very strange. It may be something
local -- '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' -- is in
order and is my main email client. But
'[EMAIL PROTECTED]' works as well.
There are a hell of a lot of Don Williams' in
the world.
D
Cotty wrote:
Don, I tried replying to your post off list but it
Hi again Rob,
I took another look at that stack.
http://www.kolumbus.fi/mimosa/HOLD/401-452.jpg
Much of what you interpreted as chromatic
aberration is the phase contrast halo. Phase
contrast is an imaging method that uses 1/4
wavelength 'out of phase' illumination to
enhance very small
Some very nice panoramas you have, Toine. I like the class-room ones a lot.
Well done!
I kinda like the Spiffy viewer too, although the images are rather large
(needy).
All the best
Jens
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Toine Kuiper [mailto:[EMAIL
Thanks Dave. What OS and browser are you using? I just threw that page
together with some quick dirty xml/xsl/css that I played with a couple of
years ago and never bothered to finish. It hasn't been extensively tested at
all.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: David Mann
Cotty,
that's a superb photo. It captures the rolling downland beautifully, with
the characteristic copses on top. I'm immediately reminded of quite a famous
photo by Bill Brandt of a very similar scene, but without the farm and in
black and white.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
Can't argue with that! Quite nice. It instantly evoked a memory-smell. We
had roses in a vase recently and several were yellow. They smelled the best
and were quite strong. I swear I was smelling it again the instant I saw
your shot.
Cool how that happens. Thanks!
Here's an early photo:
On 2006-02-18, at 23:55, Jens Bladt wrote:
I hope the others are right.
*ist D, DS and DS2 offers 0.95, the *ist DL 0.85 magnification
ikon DX2 offers 1.0, D1X 0.8
You're not right ;-) Nikon D2X has 0.86x magnification but 100%
coverage. So it should have similar size to the viewfinder
Hi Gang,
I was about to order a copy of Real World Camera Raw and thought that, as
long as I'm ordering one book, I may want to order another book or two.
Are there any other highly recommended books on camera raw that might be
worth having, and what might they offer that Fraser's book doesn't.
William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Joseph Tainter
Here's an early photo:
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3537/display/5022625
Joe, that's gorgeous.
Seconded.
With all due respect to Mike Johnston g, I like flower shots when
they're done well, that is, almost to the point
- Original Message -
From: Derby Chang
Subject: OT: Good parenting
Oh dear,
Parents find lost digital camera, but declines to return it because their
child likes it.
http://lostcamera.blogspot.com/2006/02/camera-unlost-but-not-quite-found.html
The extra kicker about the memory
First of all, I know I my activity on this list has tailed off of
late. I've been quite busy at work, and so my surfing time is not
what it used to be g. I've not been able to comment on as many PAWs
and PESOs as I'd like to, but I've saved them all, and hope to be able
to catch up over the next
On 2/17/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On the other hand, why should an absence of external purpose be bleak? It's
liberating. It means we get to decide how we want to live and what we want
to do with our lives. Strangely enough, we usually come to the same
conclusion as people who think
I like it. Can't say why exactly, but I do g
Dave
P.S. Alternate title suggestion Streetcar named Mike :-)
On 2/19/06, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
First of all, I know I my activity on this list has tailed off of
late. I've been quite busy at work, and so my surfing time is not
We are condemned to be free
Yeah, baby, existentialism rules! frank thrusts hand in the
air, thumb, index finger and pinky extended
cheers,
frank The Rebel theriault
You must immediately change your surname to Meursault, and go outside.
Salut (with a Gallic shrug),
Bobus
On Feb 18, 2006, at 5:02 PM, John Forbes wrote:
There must be a past. Otherwise, you wouldn't have had a present.
John
False logic.
Bob
Frank,
First of all, I know I my activity on this list has tailed off of
late. I've been quite busy at work, and so my surfing time is not
what it used to be g. I've not been able to comment on as many PAWs
and PESOs as I'd like to, but I've saved them all, and hope to be able
to catch up
Hi!
I've decided to try for 31 Ltd lens... So I am selling some stuff I
gather I won't be needing:
1. M 50/1.4
2. Vivitar Macro Focusing TC (7 element)
3. Sigma 18/3.5 (KA mount)
If you're interested please make me an offer off-list.
--
Boris
On Feb 18, 2006, at 6:48 PM, Bob W wrote:
Right. The paper questioning the out of Africa premise was
published within the last month or so. If I recall
correctly, it was published in Nature, a properly
peer-reviewed journal of high integrity. I can probably find
the reference if you care.
On Feb 19, 2006, at 1:13 AM, Derby Chang wrote:
Parents find lost digital camera, but declines to return it because
their child likes it.
http://lostcamera.blogspot.com/2006/02/camera-unlost-but-not-quite-
found.html
The extra kicker about the memory cards is incredible.
Over $ 300 is
I have found that my new SMC-A 3.5 35-105mm has a lovely smooth focusing
mechanism.
I don't think I ever had a lens that smooth before. Not even much less used
lenses.
Why is that. What has changed? Is it made differently from others?
I never reall understood what smothe focusing was all about -
On Feb 19, 2006, at 9:34 AM, William Robb wrote:
The owner of the camera would be well advised to tell their
insurance company that the camera they had lost (and I presume had
claimed for) was found, and let them go after it.
Good thought! Let the lawyers get involved and these people
Thanks, Bob. I shall enjoy looking at those.
Can't say I've ever met a Leakey, but I do have a friend called Lucy...g
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Bob Shell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 February 2006 15:53
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Religon, Christ
What other Pentax manual focus lenses do you have? In my experience most of
the good ones have very smooth focusing. One in particular that springs to
mind is the M 50/1.4.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: Jens Bladt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 19 February 2006 16:02
On Feb 19, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Bob W wrote:
Thanks, Bob. I shall enjoy looking at those.
If I find any more I'll post. I'll also continue to look for the e-
mail that alerted me to the paper.
Can't say I've ever met a Leakey, but I do have a friend called
Lucy...g
Well, I can say
Yeah, I'll second that on the M50/1.4 - when I bought
my LX, the shop had one and I asked them to get it out
of their showcase... I put it on the camera and it was
love at first twist of that focusing ring. :) So easy
to turn yet well damped and smooth.
--- Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What
Hi Lasse.
Yes, I am the previous jeepgirl that you remember. Sandy, Sandra, Sam,
Jeepgirl, BooBoo, Blubicon, any of the above or version there of is ok with
me. I am mostly Sandy though. Sami is mine. She is such a precious bundle
of joy. I don't see how I can think about her and hate
Not my typical kind of shots, but I can see why both have appeal as people
shots.
Tom C.
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Hiding From the Cold x 2
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 16:41:17 -0500
I stopped in at
I don't buy Sigma lenses due to the problems I've had with Sigma in
the past. The DA12-24 would be my choice of those two, but I
personally prefer the DA14/2.8.
Here's a page with DA14 examples:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/14mm-examples/
The JPEGs are full resolution and processed
After a CLA, my A50/1.4 has a VERY nice smooth focusing feel. It felt
a bit loose before the CLA, and I know I've heard a lot of people
complain about that. My 35-105/3.5 isn't bad, but a CLA would probably
make it even better.
-Mat
On 2/19/06, Jon Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, I'll
On Feb 19, 2006, at 8:34, William Robb wrote:
Oh dear,
Parents find lost digital camera, but declines to return it
because their child likes it.
http://lostcamera.blogspot.com/2006/02/camera-unlost-but-not-quite-
found.html
The extra kicker about the memory cards is incredible.
The
Bruce Fraser's book is the definitive RAW workflow resource to date.
I have looked at every Photoshop book that I see for RAW coverage,
and so far none come up to Real World Camera Raw with Photoshop CS
and the updated version for CS2. Be sure to buy the edition that
covers the version of
On 19/2/06, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
that's a superb photo. It captures the rolling downland beautifully, with
the characteristic copses on top. I'm immediately reminded of quite a famous
photo by Bill Brandt of a very similar scene, but without the farm and in
black and white.
Why
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
On 2006-02-18, at 23:55, Jens Bladt wrote:
I hope the others are right.
*ist D, DS and DS2 offers 0.95, the *ist DL 0.85 magnification
ikon DX2 offers 1.0, D1X 0.8
You're not right ;-) Nikon D2X has 0.86x magnification but 100%
coverage. So it should have
Excellent! Perfect! Cool!
Did I say excellent yet?
Peradventure, you did some additional compositions that you'd share?
Tom C.
On 2006-02-18, at 11:01, Cotty wrote:
We've been so busy moving house, and then there's the day job, I haven't
shot anything at all of worth since before
All my new Pentax FA and DA lenses, with the exception of the
FA135/2.8 IF, have very nice, very smooth focusing feel with just a
touch of resistance for manual use. The 135's focusing ring feels a
bit loose, annoying as it is such a good lens otherwise.
My older M and A series Pentax
On Feb 17, 2006, at 8:24 AM, Larry Levy wrote:
I offer an alternative:
There is a Seagull Right Angle Viewfinder from China.
Yes, I'd forgotten about that one. I'm usually skeptical of the
Seagull products as my past experience with Seagull lenses on their
TLR cameras was pretty
Hi!
I stopped in at Starbuck's this afternoon and took a few pics while I
drank some burnt-bean coffee. (I'm not wild about their brew, but the
local store is full of photo ops.). Plenty of people in the store as it
was 12 degrees F outside. Of the two pics I shot, I prefer this one
rendered
Thanks so much,
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Bruce Fraser's book is the definitive RAW workflow resource to date.
I have looked at every Photoshop book that I see for RAW coverage,
and so far none come up to Real World Camera Raw with Photoshop CS
and the
Cotty wrote:
We've been so busy moving house, and then there's the day job, I haven't
shot anything at all of worth since before Christmas. I was a few
minutes early on my way to a job, and passed this scene. I waited 15
minutes and shot half a dozen frames but the light was shite. 90
Well, let's see.
A- 2.8/20mm, M 2.8/35, M 1.7/50, A 2.8/28, K 2.5/135, M 4/200, K 2.8/150, M*
4/300, M 4/75-150 - and perhaps a few more.
None of them are smoth as the A 3.5/35-105mm. I had a A 1.4/50mm once (got
the FA version instead) - it was quite smooth too.
Regards
Jens Bladt
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
I stopped in at Starbuck's this afternoon and took a few pics while I
drank some burnt-bean coffee. (I'm not wild about their brew, but the
local store is full of photo ops.). Plenty of people in the store as
it was 12 degrees F outside. Of the two pics I shot, I
I agree. I'd frame and hang this one. Very well done.
Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
On 2006-02-18, at 11:01, Cotty wrote:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic41.html
Wow! What a beatiful composition of trees on the hill and buildings
below. Toned colours add much to the
Malcolm Smith wrote:
mike wilson wrote:
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic41.html
The sky is beautifully captured.
Ever so slightly better indeed.
Now, kind sir, would you please explain what Copse means?
Similar, but not exactly the same as, spinney. 8-)))
The recent IR thread got me curious about IR and digital.
Is there a Cokin equivalent to the Hoya R72?
Kind regards
Kevin
--
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch.
Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
That's exactly the address I wanted. He, thorough someone that he knows,
offered some suggestions and i wanted to contact him directly for
clarification. Thanks.
See, even your feeble sense of humour can provide useful information.
Shel
And when I try to teach people
mike wilson wrote:
Now, kind sir, would you please explain what Copse means?
Similar, but not exactly the same as, spinney. 8-)))
Small group of trees.
Copse in London translates as 'Luxury development of flats
or houses
available shortly'.
Malcolm
So the same as
http://www.cottysnaps.com/snaps/landscapes/images/pic41.html
yeah - don't know what the light was before but this light is
lovely to my eye.
what a stark place.
Ann,
it's chalk downland - the same stuff as the White Cliffs of Dover. It was
once the bottom of an ocean, and the
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: mike wilson Subject: Re: Misteries
of Ken Rockwell
He's not using his mouth. As usual.
Nor his brain.
William Robb
He's definitly got an orifice. Not sure about the organ.
Bob W wrote:
Now, kind sir, would you please explain what Copse means?
Similar, but not exactly the same as, spinney. 8-)))
Small group of trees.
Copse in London translates as 'Luxury development of flats
or houses
available shortly'.
Malcolm
So the same as meadow, ancient
From today's Kansas City Star...
http://www.kansascity.com/multimedia/kansascity/archive/starmag/
Starmag_02192006_md/index.htm
The full article will be available on the Web for a limited time:
http://www.kansascity.com/mld/kansascity/living/13899769.htm
(c) 2006 Kansas City Star and wire
I thought I would come out of lurk mode long enough to show off my
new toy, what I believe to be the world's smallest full-frame 35mm
SLR.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/uncamikey/101750740/
I have had the *ist about two years now, and love it. After I saw
the reports from Mark Lindamood and
mike wilson wrote:
Hey! I live in a floodplain!
This is brought home to me quite regularly when I walk
along the side
of the river when there's a very high tide lapping over the berm -
which is at the height of the 1st floor windows of the
nearest houses...
I hope this
Cute little body, but the lack of compatibility with
non-A lenses kills it for me.
--- Unca Mikey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought I would come out of lurk mode long enough
to show off my
new toy, what I believe to be the world's smallest
full-frame 35mm
SLR.
Joseph,
although the picture is lovely and I like shooting roses too, I think
you oversharpened this one. The petal edge on the right looks very
unnatural to me.
And WRT your testing and comparison of D-FA and FA 50/2.8 macro, how did
you judge focus?
Which body did you use? Did you focus
Why would an ist D underexpose only when in manual
mode?
(I'm toying with bidding for one on eBay that
reportedly has this problem).
Rick
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Thanks - this is the print I saw. The entire Hallmark collection is now
at the Nelson-Atkins museum in KC. The museum is currently being
expanded, the new space will include a continuing/changing exhibit from
this collection. Currently they are showing 31 prints as teasers.
From
If they're using K/M or M42 lenses in manual for exposures longer than
about 1/2 second, I found the D's meter to underexpose. It gets less
accurate when there's little light.
-Adam
Rick Womer wrote:
Why would an ist D underexpose only when in manual
mode?
(I'm toying with bidding for one
On 19/2/06, Unca Mikey, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought I would come out of lurk mode long enough to show off my
new toy, what I believe to be the world's smallest full-frame 35mm
SLR.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/uncamikey/101750740/
That is the ugliest thing I have seen in a long
Hey! I live in a floodplain!
This is brought home to me quite regularly when I walk
along the side
of the river when there's a very high tide lapping over the berm -
which is at the height of the 1st floor windows of the
nearest houses...
I hope this thing works:
On 19/2/06, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Peradventure, you did some additional compositions that you'd share?
Ack - you wanna see the damned contacts??
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
I'm blushing. Seriously, thanks for the plaudits.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Unca Mikey wrote:
I thought I would come out of lurk mode long enough to show off my new
toy, what I believe to be the world's smallest full-frame 35mm SLR.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/uncamikey/101750740/
I have had the *ist about two years now, and love it. After I saw the
reports from
Interrested?
Got the latest one and there are quite a number of lenses tested.
There's discussion about this on dpreview forum but if you wish I
could scan the sheets?
Of course, comments are in french but could be still useful.
So, will I scan?
--
Thibouille
Yes, please! (ou, oui s'il vous plait!)
Rick
--- Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Interrested?
Got the latest one and there are quite a number of
lenses tested.
There's discussion about this on dpreview forum but
if you wish I
could scan the sheets?
Of course, comments are in
On 2006-02-19, at 22:45, Thibouille wrote:
So, will I scan?
Yes, please be so good for us :-)
--
Best regards
Sylwek
you will.
best,
mishka
On 2/19/06, Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, will I scan?
--
Thibouille
On Feb 19, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
On 2006-02-19, at 22:45, Thibouille wrote:
So, will I scan?
Yes, please be so good for us :-)
Excuse me for being a bringdown and all.
But can anyone say copyright?
Bob
you mean fair use?
best,
mishka
On 2/19/06, Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But can anyone say copyright?
Bob
On Feb 19, 2006, at 5:34 PM, Mishka wrote:
you mean fair use?
best,
mishka
Fair use is quoting a small portion of an article for the purposes of
critique or review. The only fair use exemption for complete
articles is narrowly defined for bona fide educational institutions.
Copying
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:14:14PM -0800, Rick Womer wrote:
Why would an ist D underexpose only when in manual
mode?
(I'm toying with bidding for one on eBay that
reportedly has this problem).
Rick
It probably wouldn't. But it's quite possible that, if
the user is trying to use the
If it's legal to put them on the web it woluid be very nice :-)
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Thibouille [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. februar 2006 22:46
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: Pentax lenses tests from Chasseur d'Images
If any of you is going to visit Barcelona until mid
May, there is a big exhibit of Diane Arbus work
('Diane Arbus Revelations').
It is showed in CaixaForum building and the entrance
is free.
I have visited it today and it is highly recommendable.
You might put them in a secret place that requires a pasword. It's easy to
make a pdf-file with a pass word.
You might call it somethin cryptic - and let us know :_))
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Mishka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. februar 2006
It would be legal for Thibouille to retype just the
numeric ratings from the lens tests. But scanning the
pages, or retyping the opinions comments (except for
brief excerpts for the purpose of a critique) is not.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:50:44PM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote:
If it's legal to
I regard that as even worse than just openly publishing them -
it's a tacit admission that you know you're doing something wrong.
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 11:53:10PM +0100, Jens Bladt wrote:
You might put them in a secret place that requires a pasword. It's easy to
make a pdf-file with a pass
I bough it last Friday (I can found it quite easily in
Barcelona).
I am glad that they liked 'my' A50/1.4, even more than
the FA also tested. They also liked 'my' FA35/2 and
18-55 kit lens.
By the way, what does 'dénicher' mean? (in the A50/1.4
text)
--- Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED] escribió:
On Feb 19, 2006, at 5:50 PM, Jens Bladt wrote:
If it's legal to put them on the web it woluid be very nice :-)
Regards
It's legal for Chasseur d'Image to put them up on their web site.
Anyone else would need their permission to do so. Do they normally
post their tests on their site?
On Feb 19, 2006, at 5:56 PM, John Francis wrote:
It would be legal for Thibouille to retype just the
numeric ratings from the lens tests. But scanning the
pages, or retyping the opinions comments (except for
brief excerpts for the purpose of a critique) is not.
Correct.
But if you like
On Feb 19, 2006, at 5:57 PM, John Francis wrote:
I regard that as even worse than just openly publishing them -
it's a tacit admission that you know you're doing something wrong.
Yep.
Bob
Good point Bob.
Problem is, I've never been able to find Chasseurs
d'Images in Philly; I've only ever found it in Europe.
Maybe he could email us the tables off-list?
Rick
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 19, 2006, at 5:14 PM, Sylwester Pietrzyk
wrote:
On 2006-02-19, at
Quoting Stan Halpin [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
From today's Kansas City Star...
http://www.kansascity.com/multimedia/kansascity/archive/starmag/
Starmag_02192006_md/index.htm
The full article will be available on the Web for a limited time:
John Forbes wrote:
On Fri, 17 Feb 2006 17:01:36 -, Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Most of the most highly regarded scientists, politicians, and heros
of all sorts prior to the 20th century and many in the 20th century
believed in God.
These include Isaac Newton, George Washington,
On Feb 19, 2006, at 6:09 PM, Rick Womer wrote:
Good point Bob.
Having been in the photo magazine biz for a long time I know the
frustrations of doing good lab tests. Back in the early 90s when we
were doing PhotoPRO magazine we did some real lens tests. Cost a
bundle, and got us
From those I've posted, either as PESO's or in the PUG, this is a really old
one that I still think is one of my best non-people shots:
http://pug.komkon.org/99oct/Catch.htm
Now I'll have to go find a people one...
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: frank
This one time, at band camp, Derby Chang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Looks like there is
http://www.geocities.com/cokinfiltersystem/id277.htm
Thanks, used the number to look it up on cokin site
http://www.cokin.fr/cokin-data/composants2/pages-filtres/filtre-007st.html
thanks a bunch
Kind regards
John Francis wrote:
On Sun, Feb 19, 2006 at 01:14:14PM -0800, Rick Womer wrote:
Why would an ist D underexpose only when in manual
mode?
(I'm toying with bidding for one on eBay that
reportedly has this problem).
Rick
It probably wouldn't. But it's quite possible that, if
the
On 2/19/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You must immediately change your surname to Meursault, and go outside.
Sadly, I'm probably more of a Clamence. We're both ex-lawyers; I
became a bike messenger, he became a drunk, we're both
judge-penitents.
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a
Cotty wrote:
On 19/2/06, Unca Mikey, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought I would come out of lurk mode long enough to show off my
new toy, what I believe to be the world's smallest full-frame 35mm
SLR.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/uncamikey/101750740/
That is the ugliest thing I
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisał(a):
I don't buy Sigma lenses due to the problems I've had with Sigma in the
past. The DA12-24 would be my choice of those two, but I personally
prefer the DA14/2.8.
Here's a page with DA14 examples:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/14mm-examples/
Thanks - I've
Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisał(a):
Why does that not surprise me?
(Just kidding, G. ol' pal...
I found it impossible to pass up a good straight line!)
[...]
keith
I checked the dimensions and it seems that the MX and some other M-series
bodies are smaller than the *ist. The biggest issue is the depth of the
camera bodies as far as being able to slip them into a pocket. I've been
able to slide the MX into a large shirt pocket. Can't do that with the
*ist
This thread reminds me of something that happened a few years ago. Klaus
Schroiff of the Photozone website (www.photozone.de) used to have a
wonderful compilation of lens tests. His tables included ratings from Color
Foto, Popular Photography, and Chasseur d'Image magazines and included
pretty
On 2/18/06, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip. While incidents were recorded with
almost all makes, they were most common with Audi, due apparently to
the close placement of accelerator and brake pedals and perhaps to a
large number of numb owners.
I agree with that, Paul. Pedal
On Feb 19, 2006, at 4:26 PM, keith_w wrote:
Jarek Dabrowski wrote:
Godfrey DiGiorgi napisał(a):
Why does that not surprise me?
(Just kidding, G. ol' pal...
I found it impossible to pass up a good straight line!)
If I knew what it meant, would I be offended? ;-)
Godfrey
1 - 100 of 132 matches
Mail list logo
