Jack.
Welcome to my world.g
Dave
I'm getting anxiety hemorrhoids
waiting for my
posts (an insignificant
couple) to be passed..er posted. (cute..huh?)
Jack
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam?
Hi Doug
If possible, can you forward a bounced message from my isp( ca
dot inter dot
net) if you
have one. They will look into my sporatic list emails for me.
If you can, thanks, if not, well thanks anyway.g
Dave
If there is a loophole it is not a limited edition. It is not a matter
of legality it is a matter of ethics. The only legal recourse your
buyers would have in such a case is to sue you for breach of contract.
The only ethical way of doing a limited edition is to make your print
run, then
I imagine the vast majority of photographs were stored like my parents'
were when I was a kid. The had a big cardboard box in the attic about 25
inches on a side. In it were a half dozen albums, and half filling it
were snapshot prints and negatives just tossed in loose.
graywolf
On Mon, 01 May 2006 16:50:36 +0100, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On May 1, 2006, at 7:22 AM, John Forbes wrote:
It is not comparable to learning how to operate a computer and knowing
what to do to move data, which simply takes storage devices, a little
time with a book, and
Could we just fuck off with this shit.
No one except a few pompous assholes gives a rats ass about it.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: Cory Papenfuss [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Sent: Monday, May 01, 2006 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Life in the Raw
On Mon, 1 May
- Original Message -
From: Bob Shell
Subject: Re: Limited edition prints?
In the days when artists made prints from etching plates, lithographic
plates, wood blocks, etc., the first prints were always sharper than the
last ones. The plate or block deteriorated with use. This
On May 1, 2006, at 10:36 AM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
I didn't know that hardware was a part of the OS. ];-)
For MacOS it is pretty much by definition. Aside from recent
hacking endeavors WRT MacOS-X-intel on non-macs, the history has
required purchasing Macintosh hardware to run MacOS.
I
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff
Subject: Re: OT: How do you store your precious moments for posterity?
Hey, I'm probably at the low end of the technology oriented. Not a
complete dunce, but nowhere near as knowledgeable as many people on the
list. However, I can burn a
I think you're playing semantics with the definition of lossless.
Me? A semantic argument? Surely you jest... (and don't call me
Shirley... :)
If you
apply a transformation to data, the transformation is considered lossless if
none of the data is lost. A transformation from PEF to DNG
Mon, 01 May 2006 10:27:49 -0700
In the days when artists made prints from etching plates, lithographic
plates, wood blocks, etc.,
the first prints were always sharper than the last ones. The plate or
block deteriorated with use.
This was the reason for preferring early prints in an edition.
P. J. Alling
Mon, 01 May 2006 10:13:55 -0700
That's what I do. All my prints are limited editions...
And shot with Limited lenses, of course. G
graywolf
Mon, 01 May 2006 10:52:16 -0700
snip
Thomas Arthur Rittenhouse, Photography for Advertising and Illustration
never happened either SIGH.
Thus go the best laid plans of mice and men... Too many dreams, not enough
sticktoitness.
graywolf
Follow-through. It's where I'm currently
Far be it from me you to argue the issue with you, but...
XP is actually quite customizable but the learning curve is even steeper
than for Unix. I have a 1298 page book* here by my side that has most of
that information in it.
*Windows XP Inside and Out, 2nd ed; by Bott, Siechert, and
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
Regards the standards, well, the only thing for certain is that
they're a great idea. That's why there are so many of them.
The concept of a lot of standards as being a good thing is moronic.
William Robb
I think
Topic has started on another list i'm on, but no definitive
answer..
For those that frequent the parks, do you pay as an amature photographer, or is
this
something more
for the on location film shoot people, using models etc..
I know up here we don't have to pay.
Dave
For MacOS it is pretty much by definition. Aside from recent hacking
endeavors WRT MacOS-X-intel on non-macs, the history has required
purchasing Macintosh hardware to run MacOS.
I presume you mean purchasing Apple hardware. Mac OS runs on Apple
hardware, not Macintosh hardware. Yes, it's
I've never paid anything more than admission to all the national parks I've
visited.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Paying to shoot in US National Parks
Topic has started on another list i'm on, but no definitive
answer..
For those
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:08:40 US/Eastern
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Paying to shoot in US National Parks
Topic has started on another list i'm on, but no definitive
answer..
For those that frequent the parks, do you pay as an amature
I like the Could we... bit best - keeps it polite, you know.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 01 May 2006 19:32
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Life in the Raw
Could we just fuck off with this shit.
No one except a
mike wilson wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:08:40 US/Eastern
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Paying to shoot in US National Parks
Topic has started on another list i'm on, but no definitive answer..
For those that frequent the parks, do you pay as an
Commercial shooters, whether it be for advertising or entertainment purposes,
have to obtain permits to shoot in national parks. As far as I know, hobby
shooters don't have to obtain permits. I've shot cars in county parks without a
permit. The first time I did it I checked at the park office.
WooHoo (is that the correct PDML techno-term?) ... I'm ahead of some people
;-))
Seriously, Bill, there are a lot of folks who are not on this or other
lists, who rarely surf the web for computer info, or participate in any
technical forums, yet they seem to be able to make backups and burn DVD's
We paid already. Twice in fact. One time through taxes and the second time
with the entrance fee. Other than that, there's no charge.
Tom C.
From: Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Paying to shoot in US National
On May 1, 2006, at 12:10 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
As long as we're being precise, I'll just clarify that the [Apple]
adjective was missing from my description. A Macintosh is by
definition an Apple product, but MacOSX doesn't run in an iPod or
Apple II... only on a Macintosh.
Fun
MOST do not.
Tom C.
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT: How do you store your precious moments for posterity?
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:45:42 -0700
WooHoo (is that the correct PDML techno-term?) ... I'm
Just thought to try another variation on the jeans theme. I'm starting to
enjoy this.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/tornjeans.html
Tech stuff: istDS, 77mm, 1/25-sec @ F8.0, ISO 200 converted in PS CS2
Shel
On May 1, 2006, at 12:26 PM, Bob W wrote:
Fuck you, and the horse you rode in on.
You'll be needing Steve Swing Low Cotterell for that...
The horse I rode in on isn't interested in Bill, sorry.
Cotty?
Godfrey
On 1/5/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'd rather not waste
bandwidth.
Mark!!!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Only one limited lens...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
P. J. Alling
Mon, 01 May 2006 10:13:55 -0700
That's what I do. All my prints are limited editions...
And shot with Limited lenses, of course. G
--
When you're worried or in doubt,
Run in circles, (scream and shout).
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/05/01 Mon PM 06:32:02 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Life in the Raw
Could we just fuck off with this shit.
No one except a few pompous assholes gives a rats ass about it.
William Robb
That's raw enough for me.
it's not just a matter of general ignorance (not meant pejoratively), but of
people's priorities, and the arrogance of the IT industry as a whole, which
seems to delight in inflicting unnecessary complexity and work on people.
This was exemplified for me at work recently. One of the project
Actually in theory it's our land, and it would be interesting to see
what the courts say...
mike wilson wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 15:08:40 US/Eastern
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Paying to shoot in US National Parks
Topic has started on another
On 5/1/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope Ann's paying you for the advertising.
For a fuzzy pic like that? I wouldn't if I were her!
LOL
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
It's only a matter of time. In the UK, the national organisation that
looks after much of the building heritage has banned indoor photography for
the last decade or so. Partly for security and partly to make you buy the
guidebooks and postcards. The same will happen in National Parks,
Semantically:
Apple hardware is a generic term. Apple II, iPod, etc are specific products,
as is Macintosh. Apple II, iPod, Macintosh, Macintosh Plus, Power Macintosh
G5, etc are all examples of Apple products which fall under the generic term
Apple hardware. Not all Apple hardware is the
On 5/1/06, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I only made five exposures while at Juan's reception. I posted them
all here:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/jb-spr-20060428/
Hardly great art, but I like the first and the last. All were made
with the Zenitar 16mm f/2.8 Fish-Eye.
(Juan,
On 5/1/06, keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nah... Probably that lower lip stud got caught on her dental appliance, and
you can imagine how nasty *that* is! g
keith
LOL
That photo was taken several years ago, and I was chatting with the
lovely Natalka the other day. I noticed that the
just in time to see Frank advertising my calendar :)
after a weekend of Scrabble tournament playing - I came in
8th in my division - won a fancied up dictionary. one more
win and I'd have been in 3rd place. :( - but I did raise my
rating.
I'm eyeball deep in making t-shirts for someone -
At 3:21 PM -0500 5/1/06, Larry Levy wrote:
It's only a matter of time. In the UK, the national organisation
that looks after much of the building heritage has banned indoor
photography for the last decade or so. Partly for security and
partly to make you buy the guidebooks and postcards.
frank theriault wrote:
On 5/1/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope Ann's paying you for the advertising.
For a fuzzy pic like that? I wouldn't if I were her!
LOL
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
hehe -
well, Peter, I sure
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/tiggerwoods4web.jpg
This past weekend I escaped to New England to play in a
Scrabble tourney and stay with
friends in Amesbury, Ma who has a loveable tortoise-shell
kit. I cropped a lot
to get out annoying background and concentrate on her eyes.
ann
Trying another variation on the jeans theme. I'm starting to enjoy this.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/tornjeans.html
Tech stuff: istDS, 77mm, 1/25-sec @ F8.0, ISO 200
Converted in PS CS2 with Double Hue Sat method
Sorry if this appears twice. Didn't see the first either on list or
On 5/1/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hehe -
well, Peter, I sure didn't know he had taken that -
Pretty soon my whole apartment will be viewable -
and my kitchen is going to be in print too.
I figured that this one I didn't need permission to post - it's not
great, but nothing
Not nearly as interesting as your initial post on Jeans.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Torn Jeans
Just thought to try another variation on the jeans theme. I'm starting to
enjoy this.
On 5/1/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
just in time to see Frank advertising my calendar :)
after a weekend of Scrabble tournament playing - I came in
8th in my division - won a fancied up dictionary. one more
win and I'd have been in 3rd place. :( - but I did raise my
rating.
On 5/1/06, Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/tiggerwoods4web.jpg
This past weekend I escaped to New England to play in a
Scrabble tourney and stay with
friends in Amesbury, Ma who has a loveable tortoise-shell
kit. I cropped a lot
to get out annoying
Nice capture Ann.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: tigger woods
http://users.rcn.com/annsan/tiggerwoods4web.jpg
This past weekend I escaped to New England to play in a
Scrabble tourney and stay with
friends in Amesbury, Ma
I've also heard from some outdoor photog pros, that leading workshops/tours
in national parks can also be costly if/when the park officials find out.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Paying to shoot in US National Parks
Commercial shooters,
On May 1, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I've never paid anything more than admission to all the national
parks I've visited.
There are all sorts of hoops to jump through to shoot in a park if
you're doing commercial work, but I've never heard of any
photographer fees for
Nor I.
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 1, 2006, at 3:12 PM, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I've never paid anything more than admission to all the national
parks I've visited.
There are all sorts of hoops to jump through to shoot in a park if
you're doing commercial
On May 1, 2006, at 15:57, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Trying another variation on the jeans theme. I'm starting to enjoy
this.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/tornjeans.html
Tech stuff: istDS, 77mm, 1/25-sec @ F8.0, ISO 200
Converted in PS CS2 with Double Hue Sat method
Sorry if this
That's because they saw it said PENTAX and they knew you weren't a pro. :-)
Tom C.
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Paying to shoot in US National Parks
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 14:25:28 -0700 (PDT)
Nor I.
Jack
Welcome back! OK everybody, hush it up about Ann.
Tom C.
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: back on list...
Date: Mon, 01 May 2006 16:49:16 -0400
just in time to see Frank advertising my
At 5:14 PM -0400 5/1/06, Kenneth Waller wrote:
I've also heard from some outdoor photog pros, that leading
workshops/tours in national parks can also be costly if/when the
park officials find out.
Kenneth Waller
To operate a business in a national park you need liability insurance.
--
No it it is really. The song says so...
This land is your land,
This land is my land,
From California
To the New York Island,
From the redwood forest,
To the Gulf stream waters,
This land was made for you and me
Tom C.
From: P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To:
Yeah, now it all makes sense. A sympathetic park ranger insisted we
take a hand full of postcards along with 4 disposable Fuji cameras and,
also, refunded our park admission.
Jack
--- Tom C [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's because they saw it said PENTAX and they knew you weren't a
pro. :-)
frank theriault wrote:
On 5/1/06, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hope Ann's paying you for the advertising.
For a fuzzy pic like that? I wouldn't if I were her!
But that's your trademark...
LOL
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Others just catch on quicker. ;-)
Tom C.
From: William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Limited edition prints?
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 12:36:26 -0600
- Original Message - From: Bob Shell
Subject: Re: Limited edition
Thank you so much lads :-) - I really appreciate your kind words... You
really made my day and motivated to keep shooting at least for two weeks ;-)
BTW - how would you see a better navigation? :-) I'm open to any
suggestions except make it in php ;-)
cheers
alkos
--
go out, burn some
Mumble, mumble, mumble... Oh, hi Ann!
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
just in time to see Frank advertising my calendar :)
after a weekend of Scrabble tournament
And congradulations.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
just in time to see Frank advertising my calendar :)
after a weekend of Scrabble tournament playing - I came
Here is a guy listening in on someone else's conversation and then
telling them to shut up because he isn't interested. Says more about the
eavesdropper the the eavesdropees.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
On 1/5/06, alkos, discombobulated, unleashed:
BTW - how would you see a better navigation? :-) I'm open to any
suggestions except make it in php ;-)
Once a picture is opened, 'next' and previous' buttons would be useful.
The PUG pages are a good example. I like seeing where I am with an
index,
Yo!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Shoot for yourself is free. A commercial shoot is supposed to have a
permit which my or may not cost something (depends upon the park, the
ranger who gives you permission, and how President Bush's corns are
doing). I one the other hand get in free.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
Cotty wrote:
Once a picture is opened, 'next' and previous' buttons would be useful.
The PUG pages are a good example. I like seeing where I am with an
index, but if I like to hang around, then I like a 'slide show' but I
choose how fast I get through the pics using buttons.
Can do.
(I
-Original Message-
From: alkos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
BTW - how would you see a better navigation? :-) I'm open to any
suggestions except make it in php ;-)
I like to see a page of thumbnails in rows and columns, rather than having
to scroll one column.
You also have some
Aren't the British sites run by a non-government
organisation...the National Trust or something? I know I
encountered the no photo rule at several historic sites when
I visited way back in 1985.
Some are National Trust, some are English Heritage (in England, don't know
about the other
I'll take your suggestions under heavy consideration, however it may
take a bit more of days-off than Cotty's proposition ;-)
Thanks - you help me a lot guys. I always lacked practical distance to
my own products ;-)
cheers
alkos
--
go out, burn some film!
24x36 at op pl
http://pad.go.pl
An old one:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=467
Every now and then, I find an old shot that never got the attention I
think it deserves. This one has been in my website for a while, but I
never printed it. I need to make a better scan of it.
Thanks for looking,
j
--
Juan
Very odd, almost disturbing shot, Juan. Maybe the most unique street
scene I've encountered for some time.
I agree, it does deserve attention.
Jack
--- Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
An old one:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=467
Every now and then, I find an
In a message dated 5/1/2006 10:52:50 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If there is a loophole it is not a limited edition. It is not a matter
of legality it is a matter of ethics. The only legal recourse your
buyers would have in such a case is to sue you for breach of
In a message dated 5/1/2006 1:50:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
just in time to see Frank advertising my calendar :)
after a weekend of Scrabble tournament playing - I came in
8th in my division - won a fancied up dictionary. one more
win and I'd have been in 3rd place.
- Original Message -
From: Ann Sanfedele
Subject: back on list...
just in time to see Frank advertising my calendar :)
And to watch me implode..
HAR!!
b...
There were some nice cloud formations this evening so I though I'd see how
they looked through the Hoya R72 infrared filter.
Here's an example in false colour infrared, and the same shot in BW.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fwwidall/138662071/
http://www.flickr.com/photos/fwwidall/138662084/
I
On 1/5/06, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=467
Every now and then, I find an old shot that never got the attention I
think it deserves. This one has been in my website for a while, but I
never printed it. I need to make a better scan of
- Original Message -
From: Kenneth Waller
Subject: Re: Paying to shoot in US National Parks
I've never paid anything more than admission to all the national parks
I've visited.
I've been talked to a couple of times, but I was shooting 4x5. Assurring
them that I was not shooting
I like these Fred. You've got the veg coming out white, just
like with B/W infrared film -- an effect I've always enjoyed.
So spring must have come? The vegetation is giving off heat.
Joe
Just wasn't happy with the last one and all the noise in the shadows, so
I deleted it.
Here's a better one:
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1407794
Comments and suggestions as always most welcome.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage:
On May 1, 2006, at 9:33 AM, mike wilson wrote:
There's no point in framing at waist level if you then have to bend
double to focus. It's a paradox with this type of finder that I
never resolved. The original post gave me the impression that part
of the desire was to be less obtrusive.
If you shoot posed folks, be sure to raise the camera to chest-ish
height so as not shoot up their nostrils.
Jack
--- Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 1, 2006, at 9:33 AM, mike wilson wrote:
There's no point in framing at waist level if you then have to bend
double
Yes, do re-scan that one ... it has a lot of sharpening halos.
That's the central plaza, right?
I spent several days in Salamanca in 1999 and did a ton of pictures
with a Contax Tix ... A beautiful city, very photogenic. I've wanted
to go back there ever since.
I should find those scans...
I like the composition, but I think the tonalities are a trifle off.
It looks a little flat.
Godfrey
On May 1, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Trying another variation on the jeans theme. I'm starting to enjoy
this.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/tornjeans.html
Tech stuff:
I like it. That old guy has one hell of a woody:-)).
Paul
On May 1, 2006, at 6:53 PM, Juan Buhler wrote:
An old one:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=467
Every now and then, I find an old shot that never got the attention I
think it deserves. This one has been in my website
Congratulations on your scrabble success. Good to have you back. Now
we'll have to go back to talking about Mafud:-).
Paul
In a message dated 5/1/2006 1:50:15 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
just in time to see Frank advertising my calendar :)
after a weekend of
Juan Buhler wrote:
An old one:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=467
Every now and then, I find an old shot that never got the attention I
think it deserves. This one has been in my website for a while, but I
never printed it. I need to make a better scan of it.
Thanks
Paul Stenquist wrote:
Congratulations on your scrabble success. Good to have you back. Now
we'll have to go back to talking about Mafud:-).
Paul
oh'oh
ann
In a message dated 5/1/2006 1:11:08 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If I was in control of
that team I would immediately send them all on a user-centred design course
and make sure they learn to listen to people's needs, and understand the
context in which their crap software
Intriguing. Excellent, thought provoking photograph.
Paul
On May 1, 2006, at 7:50 PM, Ralf R. Radermacher wrote:
Just wasn't happy with the last one and all the noise in the shadows,
so
I deleted it.
Here's a better one:
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1407794
Comments and
WHERE IS THE URL!!
On May 1, 2006, at 7:33 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
I like these Fred. You've got the veg coming out white, just like with
B/W infrared film -- an effect I've always enjoyed.
So spring must have come? The vegetation is giving off heat.
Joe
Very nice. Love the BW version.
Paul
On May 1, 2006, at 7:22 PM, Fred Widall wrote:
There were some nice cloud formations this evening so I though I'd see
how they looked through the Hoya R72 infrared filter.
Here's an example in false colour infrared, and the same shot in BW.
Nice. Sharp, with good detail and contrast. Well done.
Paul
On May 1, 2006, at 4:57 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Trying another variation on the jeans theme. I'm starting to enjoy
this.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/tornjeans.html
Tech stuff: istDS, 77mm, 1/25-sec @ F8.0, ISO 200
In a message dated 4/30/2006 10:30:05 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some time ago we had a discussion about you doing something similar with
your mom's things. I mentioned seeing some photos in Lenswork where a
daughter photographed a number of her deceased mom's (or
In a message dated 5/1/2006 1:59:09 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Trying another variation on the jeans theme. I'm starting to enjoy this.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/tornjeans.html
Tech stuff: istDS, 77mm, 1/25-sec @ F8.0, ISO 200
Converted in PS CS2 with
In a message dated 5/1/2006 10:12:15 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I only made five exposures while at Juan's reception. I posted them
all here:
http://homepage.mac.com/godders/jb-spr-20060428/
Hardly great art, but I like the first and the last. All were made
with
Don't hold back Bill, tell us what you really think.
LOL
Dave S
On 5/2/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Could we just fuck off with this shit.
No one except a few pompous assholes gives a rats ass about it.
William Robb
In a message dated 5/1/2006 4:51:48 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Just wasn't happy with the last one and all the noise in the shadows, so
I deleted it.
Here's a better one:
http://www.photosight.ru/photo.php?photoid=1407794
Comments and suggestions as always most
Thanks for the tip, Marnie:-). Seriously, I doubt that she's underage,
but I do wonder where she came from. Don't think she's Ralf's. Very
soft core. Not offensive, but not exactly inspired either.
Paul
On May 1, 2006, at 9:19 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/1/2006 4:51:48 PM
In a message dated 5/1/2006 4:30:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 1/5/06, Juan Buhler, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=467
Every now and then, I find an old shot that never got the attention I
think it deserves. This one has
101 - 200 of 225 matches
Mail list logo
