On Jun 23, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The subject line says it all -
$619.00 for the K100D with SR,
$519.00 for the K110D w/out SR
Bodies only
Expected delivery in July and August respectively
Good! Seems like Pentax is delivering as promised ... BH generally
list only
On Jun 23, 2006, at 2:05 PM, Joseph Tainter wrote:
P.S. Complicating things, it is just possible that there is a DA 30
F??
in the wings.
Joe, you've mentioned this a couple of times. Where are you getting
this rumor, or are you starting it? There is no such lens on the
Pentax roadmap
On Jun 24, 2006, at 5:13 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
So, my question is - are the limited lenses truly worth it? Beyond
the cachet of owning one - will there be a marked improvement in my
images?
The 43mm is the only Limited lens I have, and it's the only lens I've
ever bought new.
The main
I owned the FA31/1.8 Limited. I found it an excellent performer
overall, but several things about it annoyed me (size, weight, the
clumsy fixed lens hood, the irritating lens cap). I sold it and later
bought the FA35/2.
The latter is 1/3 the price and 95% as good a performer as the 31
On 6/24/06, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, my question is - are the limited lenses truly worth it? Beyond
the cachet of owning one - will there be a marked improvement in my
images?
Yes Yes :-)
I have both the 31 77 I don't regret getting ether one.
They won't help you take
On 23/6/06, Tom C, discombobulated, unleashed:
Lets compare the PUG to a nice cool clean glass of water. A few seagulls
fly over and poop in it. Is that glass of water as nice now? :-)
Tom, the time will soon be here when some very nice men will come and
bring you a nice white jacket and
On 23/6/06, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm trying Google's Picasa with a free web gallery.
Here's something from our trip to GFM this year.
Let me know how the site works for you.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/GrandfatherMountain
Much better than flickr, nice gallery
It should work fine. This was taken with the Pentax f 70-210 4-5.6 and
the AF1.7x on film.
http://www.mindspring.com/~pjalling/PAW_--_Gull_in_Flight.html
P. J. Alling
Very nice.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Interesting find. Is it a limo or a station wagon? Seems to have 12 roof
pillars.
Powell
It was taken on an overcast day, the paint on the car and the buildings are
faded. I could have adjusted numerous elements to make a nice, bright
photo, but on my monitor it looks like the scene looked,
Midsummer in Denmark is celebrated by building thousands of fires on the
beach - we symbolically burn our witches!
For those of you who don't mind modern technology and images made for the IT
media - I have posted a panorama showing how we celebrate midsummer in
Denmark:
John, I paid 67 BGP including shipping for mine 2 years ago. I suspect it's
100-200 USD.
Anything below 100-150 USD is a steal. It's a brilliant tool, BTW.
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL
The subject line says it all -
$619.00 for the K100D with SR,
$519.00 for the K110D w/out SR
Bodies only
Expected delivery in July and August respectively
Suspiciously, there are two K100D's listed on a website here in the UK right
now! I think we all know which site I'm referring
From: Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alas - I have no comptent handy person nearby to give it
too...
But this isn't, after all, a mechanical camera - and it is
sealed, not a
DSLR.
and Canon had it for a whole month before letting me know
they couldnt fix it
actually, Photo
We have the 43 and 77 - my wife actually owns them but I use them more.
I have the FA50/1.4 and prefer the 43 most of the time to the point
where it now lives on the bellows. The slightly wider field of view
just seems to be right more often and the pictures have a different,
preferable to
8-))
At work, and occasionally elsewhere, I'm using a really crappy webmail
interface supplied courtesy of my ISP.Although I can configure permanently
how mails appear to me, there appears to be no way to do it with outgoing
stuff. I don't want to use a proper email programme when I'm
Hi,
on several of the black white pictures I have taken recently the
illumination is uneven across the frame - part of the left side is
significantly lighter than the rest of the frame. Here are some
examples which show this:
http://www.web-options.com/Fret/pages/1361.htm
What model camera Bob?
How are the film door light seals?
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Bob W
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 4:39 AM
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List'
Subject: Problem with uneven illumination
Hi,
on several
Now we're all itching to know what was so important.
John
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:47:08 +0100, Robert and Leigh Woerner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pleeaase!
Sorry. I was rather abrupt but I get that way when I'm excited about
telling somebody something, so there. Hah!
Robert :-))
Leica M4-2.
Don't know. Does it have a film door? To load the camera you take off
the bottom plate. If it was a problem with the camera I would expect
it to show the same thing on each frame.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
No doubt:
Tokina AT-X 2.6-2.8/28-70mm and an equally often used zoom is the FA*
2.8/80-200mm ED IF.
Next runner up must be the small SMC-F 4/24-50mm
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL
Mike, most e-mail clients, including Outlook and Outlook Express have
an option to Leave a copy of messages on server.
That way you could use it from work and still recieve all messages
at home. That's what I do.
Don (Hates web-mail)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Second shutter curtain slowing down at the end of its travel? Perhaps
only occurring at certain shutter speeds? Course, with digi, you could
check the exif data to see the speed!
John
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 10:39:11 +0100, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
on several of the black white
Sorry Bob, I was assuming Pentax. ;-)
Don't know much about Leicas but a light leak can cause wierd things,
different effects depending on light direction, etc.
Also if the camera has a horizontal run shutter the trailing shutter
curtain may be hesitating at the start of it's run.
Pretty common on
Nice Shel, I like it a lot.
Lighting looks good here for the conditions you describe.
Car must have a lot of stories to tell. ;-)
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Shel Belinkoff
Sent: Friday, June 23, 2006 12:20 PM
To: PDML
Subject:
From: Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/24 Sat AM 01:31:46 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], PDML pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Small GFM gallery
I'm trying Google's Picasa with a free web gallery.
Here's something from our trip to GFM this year.
Let me know how the site works for you.
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/24 Sat AM 10:15:33 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Problem with uneven illumination
Sorry Bob, I was assuming Pentax. ;-)
Don't know much about Leicas but a light leak can cause wierd things,
different
I'd rather say the first curtain slowing down at the end of it's travel,
causing the second to catch up and the left side of the picture being
underexposed.
Groeten,
Vic
John Forbes wrote:
Second shutter curtain slowing down at the end of its travel? Perhaps
only occurring at certain
It might be related to shutter speed.
From: Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/24 Sat AM 09:57:44 GMT
To: 'Pentax-Discuss Mail List' pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Problem with uneven illumination
Leica M4-2.
Don't know. Does it have a film door? To load the camera you take off
the
From: Don Sanderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/06/24 Sat AM 10:03:00 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: RE:RE: Re: My kludge is broken (further question)
Mike, most e-mail clients, including Outlook and Outlook Express have
an option to Leave a copy of
Hi!
On 23/6/06, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
I'm trying Google's Picasa with a free web gallery.
Here's something from our trip to GFM this year.
Let me know how the site works for you.
http://picasaweb.google.com/rf.sullivan/GrandfatherMountain
Much better than flickr,
Hi!
I have come to appreciate the beauty of narrow DOF more, since I (yesterday)
got the FA 1.8/77mm lens.
Using narrow DOF often leads to not very sharp pictures, unless you use a
very high quality lens.
When using an extreemly hight quality lens and a narrow DOF, the results can
easily be
On 24.06.06, at 2:38 , Jens Bladt wrote:
A 1.4/85mm IS very expensive. But I guess a FA 77mm does rather
well too, at
lesser cost..
Used FA* 85/1.4 will be as good as A* version, but less expensive -
rather around price of 77/1.8 Ltd ;-)
--
Best regards
Sylwek
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss
Not loading anything over here Jens. :-(
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/24/06, Jens Bladt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Midsummer in Denmark is celebrated by building thousands of fires on the
beach - we symbolically burn our witches!
For those of you who don't mind modern technology and images made for
Check the aperture blades on the lens in question.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/24/06, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
on several of the black white pictures I have taken recently the
illumination is uneven across the frame - part of the left side is
significantly lighter than the rest of the
On 24/6/06, John Whittingham, discombobulated, unleashed:
Suspiciously, there are two K100D's listed on a website here in the UK right
now! I think we all know which site I'm referring to. It's very tempting at
£375 body only!
Which site is that John?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, John Francis wrote:
automatically during exposure. And while metering has to be done
stopped down, rather than at full aperture, a single push of a button
will stop the lens down, take a meter reading, select an appropriate
shutter speed, and open the aperture again.
On Jun 24, 2006, at 8:18 AM, gfen wrote:
What's the difference between the K100D and the K10D, and where are
they
pricing these things at?
From Shel's BH post --
$619.00 for the K100D with SR,
$519.00 for the K110D w/out SR
The K100D has shake reduction, the K110D does not. Otherwise,
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
We'll have to see about the K10D but the K100D seems to have the same
mount as the D/DS/DL/2...
Pentax has released this many digital cameras? Yow, I have been gone a
long time...Although, I see most of the same names on the list as the last
two times
Hi Jack,
Thanks for looking and noticing the light ... ;-))
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Jack Davis
Don't think I ever saw the original post.
This pleasing image came up with a soft cool subtle lighting.
Love the overcast day or moment.
Jack
--- Ann Sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Jun 24, 2006, at 8:26 AM, gfen wrote:
The Brotherhood? DIsbanded?
We've simply raised our rates.
-Aaron
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jun 24, 2006, at 4:56 AM, mike wilson wrote:
With that, you can also use your old Pentax flashes - not with the DL
Just for clarity, this only applies to old Pentax TTL flashes. If
you're using old thyristor flashes, they'll work the same as they
always did.
-Aaron
--
PDML
Hi Powell,
Checker made a number of station wagons and limos. Based on the number of
pillars, this one is most likely the 12 passenger Aerobus.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Powell Hargrave
Interesting find. Is it a limo or a station wagon? Seems to have 12 roof
pillars.
Hi Don,
Thanks for looking. I may go back and see if I can get ahold of the owner.
Maybe leave a not on the windshield ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Don Sanderson
Nice Shel, I like it a lot.
Lighting looks good here for the conditions you describe.
Car must have a lot of stories to
This also suggests that the 10D will sell for a price similar to that
of the D. Probably around $1200 at BH.
Paul
On Jun 24, 2006, at 2:07 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 23, 2006, at 1:36 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
The subject line says it all -
$619.00 for the K100D with SR,
$519.00
It's a sticky shutter. Time for a CLA.
Paul
On Jun 24, 2006, at 5:39 AM, Bob W wrote:
Hi,
on several of the black white pictures I have taken recently the
illumination is uneven across the frame - part of the left side is
significantly lighter than the rest of the frame. Here are some
I'm sure they will all share the same mount.
Paul
On Jun 24, 2006, at 12:41 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
We'll have to see about the K10D but the K100D seems to have the same
mount as the D/DS/DL/2...
gfen wrote:
What sort of mount does it use? Are M and A series lenses going to
work
Mountain Laural is a Protected Species? I've never heard that one. Maybe
you ought to come to the mountains sometime. You are in for a surprise.
Maybe it is tough to cultivate at lower altitudes, could be a reason
they call it mountain laural? But then, I have seen it growing in
peoples yards
Same price? Don't hesitate, get the DS.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
someone else wrote me off list encouraging me to get the DS
instead of the DL
I have
There is still the Brotherhood, but I think there is a new head of the order -
Abbot Norm.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/24/06, gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
We'll have to see about the K10D but the K100D seems to have the same
mount as the D/DS/DL/2...
- Original Message -
From: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/173336922
Jens, try some portraits ;-).
Boris,
that photo *is* a portrait.
vbg
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I figured I won't be doing this very often, so I stuck with a familiar
acronym.
What I have committed is actually a 3.5 minutes slide show, over the
theme of structures in old woodwork. It's my first attempt at
assembling something like this, so if someone has the time to
download, look and
So far I've kept my head down in the PUG threads, but there's
something I'd like to say.
People like to get comments on their pictures.
Observe that ever since PESOs were introduced, they have harvested a
lot more comments per image than have any PUG entry in the same
period.
No wonder the
- Original Message -
From: gfen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The Little Brotherhood, also dead I assume.. or did they actually
put out
some sort of MF/645 based digital thingy as rumoured last time I was
'round here?
Sisterhood, if you please. :-)
We sit on our hands, and save up for
Which site is that John?
I'm not going to put it in print on this list.
John
John Whittingham
Technician
you can't be optimistic with a misty optic
-- Original Message ---
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Sent: Sat, 24 Jun 2006 12:56:04 +0100
it's always possible to make things a little bit sloppier and a bit cheaper.
boils down to pereferences and available cash. i own 31 and 77 and love them.
best,
mishka
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Hi!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/173336922
Jens, try some portraits ;-).
Boris,
that photo *is* a portrait.
[western like voice]
You got me, partner ;-)...
[/western like voice]
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Your words, let it die peacefully should be all the incentive
we need if we wish not to lose the PUG.
A bit of a reality check.
I've only been around here for a couple of years but have really
enjoyed the PUG.
Up to this point I've felt unqualified to submit or comment.
However I've changed my
Hi!
In Eilat it is +41C today. In Tel Aviv it is just above +30C but it is
very humid and very hot.
http://not.contaxg.com/document.php?id=14154
My main question to you, dear viewer, is whether the heat of the day
shows from the picture.
Brutal and honest comments are as usual wanted.
Boris
Hi!
Midsummer in Denmark is celebrated by building thousands of fires on the
beach - we symbolically burn our witches!
For those of you who don't mind modern technology and images made for the IT
media - I have posted a panorama showing how we celebrate midsummer in
Denmark:
Hi!
Been busy as heck and working on so many pictures ...
This one, taken a couple of months ago, appealed to me strangely ...
it seems to be in a new aesthetic vein. I'm not entirely sure how
successful it is by itself.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW6/23.htm
The
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, Jostein wrote:
Sisterhood, if you please. :-)
Wait for it...No, I do not approve this namechange. :) I'll be sticking
with Little Brother, thank you very much. ;)
--
http://www.infotainment.org - more fun than a poke in your eye.
http://www.eighteenpercent.com
Hi,
No, Boris, the heat of the day doesn't come through, at least not for me.
That Cokin filter doesn't seem to add anything to the shot - maybe it's
better suited for some other situation. Good exposure and processing.
You've nicely preserved the detail in the white wall and the shadows under
Hi!
Shot this with an ancient Soligor Auto 35mm f2.8 screwmount lens on
Aaron's LX. It's the original flatiron building, Toronto's Gooderham
Building. One of my favourite subjects. Tri-X in Rodinal 1:25.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/170072183/
And for those who dislike flickr, a
mike wilson wrote:
I recommend the DS if you can find one cheap enough. With that, you can also
use your old Pentax flashes - not with the DL.
m
DL owner.
Hmmm DL owner recommends DS - h
Re flash:
I shot for about 30 years without even owning a flash - then
I got a
Id tell you, but it would be a lot less interesting that
what your imagination can do!
ann
John Forbes wrote:
Now we're all itching to know what was so important.
John
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 00:47:08 +0100, Robert and Leigh Woerner
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Pleeaase!
Sorry. I
Hi!
Just fooling around with something a little different.
Comments, crits, rotten tomatoes welcome ...
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/soap.html
Language question: does fooling around means playing/experimenting
in this context?
I like what I see, Shel...
Boris
--
PDML
Hi!
http://home.earthlink.net/~ebay-pics/hood_3096.jpg
http://home.earthlink.net/~ebay-pics/hood_detail_3108.jpg
A couple of detailed pics of a well known car in the area. The files are
large as I could find no way to make them smaller and show any detail at
all. They're part of a
Hi!
Not quite so heavy handed a conversion:
http://www.dsanderson.com/4.jpg
Mighty impressive! My wife thinks the same!
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On Jun 23, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So one wonders if the camera is truly totally dead - or they
just dont want to bother...
I'm getting it back -- hoping that they are lying -
The Canon service people are good. Unlikely they are lying.
That doesn't mean an independent
Hi!
What would you think if you looked out the window and saw these:
http://www.dsanderson.com/clouds.htm
Lasted about 45 minutes and then, a nice sunny day.
Had a lot of people very worried for a bit.
These are really QD RAW conversions, I'll work
on them and post more (and better)
graywolf wrote:
Same price? Don't hesitate, get the DS.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof == Expert Proof
---
I hope I was right about that! that makes a lot of votes
for the DS
A hunting I will
Pretty much so ...
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
Just fooling around with something a little different.
http://home.earthlink.net/~morepix/soap.html
Language question: does fooling around means
playing/experimenting in this context?
I like what I see, Shel...
Bingo! Boris ... that's almost exactly what I thought/felt when taking the
second, closer pic.
Shel
[Original Message]
From: Boris Liberman
Makes me think of Covenant of Noah... (spelling?!)
http://home.earthlink.net/~ebay-pics/hood_3096.jpg
Hi!
Check out
http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
Comments - yea/nay/otherwise.
Yea ;-).
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Depends. If it's a 5fps body (D200 sensor) I'd expect a bit more, around
the same as a 30D. If it's a 3fps body (A100 sensor) I'd expect it to
attempt to match the A100 pricing.
-Adam
Paul Stenquist wrote:
This also suggests that the 10D will sell for a price similar to that
of the D.
Thanks Boris!
Don
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Boris Liberman
Sent: Saturday, June 24, 2006 10:57 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO:One more cloud.
Hi!
Not quite so heavy handed a conversion:
Yes! Primarily due to the just slightly fried glare of the wall.
The yellow seems to add, as well as the hot red chair seats.
Do I detect the slightest bit of movement..or was that added as a
suggestion of heat shimmer?
Absolutely successful.
Jack
--- Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
So it's a dog picture. But it's a very special dog picture.
Today, Boris is 8 years old. Almost three years ago, he was diagnosed
with lymphosarcoma and we were told by the vet not to get our hopes
up when we decided to embark on a course of chemotherapy. (pet
insurance is a wonderful
Ann, the DS, if you don't already know, has been discontinued for some
time. Good luck finding a new one, but if you do, don't hesitate to grab
it, even if it costs a few bucks more (assuming you can afford the extra
few bucks - however, it may well be worth a small stretch of the budget)
Shel
Boris Liberman wrote:
Hi!
Shot this with an ancient Soligor Auto 35mm f2.8 screwmount lens on
Aaron's LX. It's the original flatiron building, Toronto's Gooderham
Building. One of my favourite subjects. Tri-X in Rodinal 1:25.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/mawz/170072183/
And for those who
G'day Boris,
Not particularly. It needs something like a couple of glasses of ice
water or beer with condensation trickling down them.
It's a technically fine picture that IMO is spoiled by the filters effect.
BTW, I find the easiest way to convey heat, is to take a picture of a
thermometer.
-Original Message-
I hope I was right about that! that makes a lot of votes
for the DS
A hunting I will go.
ann
Tri-State Camera still has them new through their ebay store, and are
apparently very reliable through this site.
http://tinyurl.com/zgccn
Good luck,
Lou
--
Agreed. New condition, cheap price. Regards, Bob S.
On 6/24/06, Lou Billing [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
I hope I was right about that! that makes a lot of votes
for the DS
A hunting I will go.
ann
Tri-State Camera still has them new through their
hi
more like bright and sunny rather than hot/humid.
is the back of both chairs unsharp due to camera shake?
probably the wall just to the right of the flowers as well...
weather sounds a lot like how its out here (Vellore, South India)
~ 35 degrees, 65% humidity
regards
Sridhar
- Original
Jostien,
That's a great presentation. It really does take 5 minutes to
download. I expected more structures and less wood, but quickly was
charmed by what I saw. The music fits perfectly.
I loved the wood grains and knots in the first part with the
horizontal full screen persentation. The
The DA 16-45 has been on the camera and in almost constant use for a little
more than week now. Overall, it's a pretty decent lens, but, imo, not
worthy of the praise it's received here.
It's fine for portraits, some landscapes and scenics, and even works nicely
with close-ups and macro shots.
On reflection, I think you are right. But it certainly looks like a
shutter curtain problem, one way or another.
John
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 11:45:01 +0100, Vic Mortelmans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd rather say the first curtain slowing down at the end of it's travel,
causing the second to
Mountain Laurel? Isn't that quite a hardy plant?
John
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006 14:09:03 +0100, graywolf [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mountain Laural is a Protected Species? I've never heard that one. Maybe
you ought to come to the mountains sometime. You are in for a surprise.
Maybe it is tough to
Bob Shell wrote:
On Jun 23, 2006, at 11:56 AM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
So one wonders if the camera is truly totally dead - or they
just dont want to bother...
I'm getting it back -- hoping that they are lying -
The Canon service people are good. Unlikely they are lying.
That
The K10D is expected to be 10mp the K100D is still 6mp. That's the
major difference. (The K10D may have a bigger buffer, and I'm really
hoping for an aperture simulator, or 1.3 crop instead of APS-C but
neither is likely).
gfen wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2006, John Francis wrote:
645d is expected real soon now...
gfen wrote:
On Sat, 24 Jun 2006, P. J. Alling wrote:
We'll have to see about the K10D but the K100D seems to have the same
mount as the D/DS/DL/2...
Pentax has released this many digital cameras? Yow, I have been gone a
long time...Although, I see
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Ann, the DS, if you don't already know, has been discontinued for some
time. Good luck finding a new one, but if you do, don't hesitate to grab
it, even if it costs a few bucks more (assuming you can afford the extra
few bucks - however, it may well be worth a small
It's a state issue. In Connecticut it's protected because it's the
state flower, I hadn't heard of it being protected in NJ before.
graywolf wrote:
Mountain Laural is a Protected Species? I've never heard that one. Maybe
you ought to come to the mountains sometime. You are in for a surprise.
I'll add after my second viewing of the show that the colors and
shapes are very soothing. Just as good the 2nd time around.
It makes me want to see more of these structures in their context to
the landscape/environment.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/24/06, Bob Sullivan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lou Billing wrote:
-Original Message-
I hope I was right about that! that makes a lot of votes
for the DS
A hunting I will go.
ann
Tri-State Camera still has them new through their ebay store, and are
apparently very reliable through this site.
Boris,
Isn't that camera shake on the chair to the right?
Also visible on the vertical edge of the white wall on the left.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/24/06, gibikote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
more like bright and sunny rather than hot/humid.
is the back of both chairs unsharp due to camera shake?
Great! The 18-55 is somewhat underrated based on the few pics I've made
with one, which was back when I got my first DS. See my review of the DA
16-45. The 18-55 would be just a little more of the same. I do like it's
somewhat longer reach than the 16-45, makes the lens just a little more
Hello Sylwester,
I don't think the A* and FA* 85/1.4 are the same optical formula. The
A* is a little more general purpose like the 77 limited. The FA* is
really designed for portrait work. It's sharpness in the longer focus
ranges is not as good as the A* or limited unless stopped down to at
Hello gfen,
Not sure why you are saying alas. You haven't tried it. I have used
an MX for many, many years and it is among my favorite bodies of all
time. The process that John described is faster to use than an MX.
So if you are happy with your MX, you should not be significantly
bothered by
Hi!
Boris,
Isn't that camera shake on the chair to the right?
Also visible on the vertical edge of the white wall on the left.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/24/06, gibikote [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
hi
more like bright and sunny rather than hot/humid.
is the back of both chairs unsharp due to
1 - 100 of 279 matches
Mail list logo
