I missed anything about AF -- what did he say about it?
Better AF performance and an evolution of the K-mount. It is generally
interpreted as meaning USM.
Then it's a poor interpretation. There is nothing to suggest Pentax has
come up with a new focusing system. Nothing but hyped-up rumors
Thats all. $900.
$800 body only, which is how I suspect you will buy it.
I was under the impression, and again i'm way off it seems, that the
K10D was a big body camera, that would take a run at the D2X, the MK
II etc.
This boggles my mind. If you'd been paying attention to the photos from
On Aug 4, 2006, at 10:37 PM, Don Williams wrote:
I find the buttons too small and indistinct. They are also not
where you
would expect them to be. The pictures are great.
Thanks for the feedback (and to everyone else).
I'll take a look at the buttons later...
- Dave
--
PDML
Does it bother anyone else that the K1D may shortly follow? Of course I
wouldn't absolutely need it, but for just a few hundred more and with
that larger sensor, etc..etc..
I don't need two. Learned that from my wife. :-(
Jack
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 8/4/2006 7:02:48
As a lurker on this incredibly active forum, let me share a few points of
view as seen from a non-Pentax user, as that mat say something about market
potential for Pentax. I currently use a Fuji S3, and am looking for a second
system. What is unique to me about Pentax is:
- Compact, fast, high
Does it bother anyone else that the K1D may shortly follow? Of course I
wouldn't absolutely need it, but for just a few hundred more and with
that larger sensor, etc..etc..
What bothers me is where you got that crazy idea. There is no such thing as
a K1D, and even if there were, it wouldn't
No, I'm with you too.
If a larger sensor 35mm style camera were coming from Pentax, their new lenses
would be rendered useless. Why would they do that to themselves?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subj: Re: K10D - More News
Date: Sat Aug 5, 2006 3:43
While you're right that pro representation is slim, your store doesn't have the
glass because your store didn't order the glass -- end of story. Call them up
and check on availability. What they don't have in stock can be brought in
from Japan (or the Philippines, where apparently they're
I agree. It's bizarre. Pentax never implied they were building a camera
to challenge the MK II end of the market. I'm not disappointed by the
price positioning. Rather pleased in fact. Surprised, but pleased.
Paul
On Aug 5, 2006, at 2:06 AM, John Celio wrote:
Thats all. $900.
$800 body only,
That thought crossed my mind as well. But I think any further upgrade
is at least a year away. I'll by the K10. If we get a K1 down the road,
I'll sell my other D and pick up one of those. I do need two cameras.
Don't expect a larger sensor in any Pentax camera other than the 645D.
The lens
If that's the case, My D is for sale.
CW
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Well, if it delivers on all we were expecting AND sells for $800, it will
be a definite coup for Pentax.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
No, I'm with you too.
If a larger sensor 35mm style camera were coming from Pentax, their new lenses
would be rendered useless. Why would they do that to themselves?
And encourage us to buy new lenses? Gosh, no!
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
First off, I never saw any pictures of the camera. If someone posted
some, they never made it to my mailbox. I don't seem to get everyyhing.
Secondly, if they didi make a D2h equivalent, i would buy one for my
horse work, if it had higher buffer and write speeds then the D.
Thirdly, i have
Some time last fall or very early this year, i saw a picture on the
net, and the bosy design was of a much bigger camera then we have now.
Maybe they changed the design or it was just a first run mock up.
Never know i quess.
I was just interested in something to replace the D2H and use
Really very nice photos. Pity they're not bigger on my screen.
CW
- Original Message -
From: David Mann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 6:21 AM
Subject: GESO: McKenzie Country
Hi all,
I've recently finished a long-overdue
IMO the K10 is nothing else than a D replacement maybe with a couple
added features but nothing else.
2006/8/4, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Well, I've only actually seen photos of the latest build of it, courtesy of my
Pentax rep, but at least I've got a little more information for you
Mark Roberts wrote:
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
No, I'm with you too.
If a larger sensor 35mm style camera were coming from Pentax, their new
lenses would be rendered useless. Why would they do that to themselves?
And encourage us to buy new lenses? Gosh, no!
Nikon, by the way, is working on a
Hi Dave,
The big body you saw was probably the 645D. I'm not a fan of tiny
bodies either, but the D with the grip fits me well enough. Plus, when
I have two of them hanging around my neck packed with 16 batteries, I'm
happy that they aren't any larger or heavier than they are.
Paul
On Aug 5,
- Original Message -
From: Aaron Reynolds
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
While you're right that pro representation is slim, your store doesn't
have the glass because your store didn't order the glass -- end of
story. Call them up and check on availability. What they don't have
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe we're seeing movement in the digital camera market. Perhaps
well speced cameras are now going to be commonly available for $800.
I've always thought that the mature market
to the contrary. If Pentax comes out with (and actually delivers to
consumers) a 35mm-type dSLR in the next couple years that has a sensor
larger than what is in their current line, I'll print out and eat this
email.
Headers and all? :)
Seriously though... I don't
- Original Message -
From: John Celio
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
Am I the only person being driven nuts by all the incredibly
irrational
speculation going on around here?
You are still a relative newcomer.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Mark Roberts
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
No, I'm with you too.
If a larger sensor 35mm style camera were coming from Pentax, their
new lenses would be rendered useless. Why would they do that to
themselves?
And encourage us to
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I agree. It's bizarre. Pentax never implied they were building a camera
to challenge the MK II end of the market.
Actually, they did say that they were building a semi-pro digital camera in
the $2000 segment. They also said
Mercy, Gentlemen!
I was actually thinking of a more pixel rich sensor.
The symbolic name, K1D happened to come from someones earlier
speculative post which, for some reason, didn't seem to stir such
disgust.
Never mind! Get some rest.
Jack
--- Aaron Reynolds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No, I'm
Actually, I totally agree, Paul. I miss-spoke by using the term larger
sensor. What I was 'thinking'(?) was a more highly pixel packed
sensor.
No way would I consider waiting for a 35mm sensor from Pentax.
Appreciate your thoughts.
Jack
--- Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That
To sell more lenses obviously.
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
No, I'm with you too.
If a larger sensor 35mm style camera were coming from Pentax, their new lenses
would be rendered useless. Why would they do that to themselves?
-Aaron
-Original Message-
From: John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It's a marketing thing. Establish a market, then float a new and
improved version, relegating the 'old' to the equivalent of brand X.
I'm not contending that this ploy is, necessarily, in motion at this
point, but...
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message
On Aug 5, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
They also said that they would make DSLR's in all
segments and also eventually make the DSLR equivalent to a sportscar
(whatever that means).
0 to 1/60th second in twelve seconds flat.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Yep, if he stays long enough he'll no longer be being driven nuts, he
will be nuts. (Lots of bes there).
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: John Celio
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
Am I the only person being driven nuts by all the incredibly
irrational
speculation
Well said!
Jack
--- Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Aug 5, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
They also said that they would make DSLR's in all
segments and also eventually make the DSLR equivalent to a
sportscar
(whatever that means).
0 to 1/60th second in twelve seconds
nice capture Jack, it makes me lol
russell
On 8/4/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is all about a cute accident.
At Bryce Canyon, UT, several years back, my wife was 'playing' with a
chipmunk by placing bits of Ritz crackers on a pine root. (Probably a
Chipmunk nutritional NO
Would they all of the new lenses be rendered useless? If they were
wouldn't that create a market for the line of reformulated and re
packaged DFA lenses that have full frame 35mm coverage.
Is anyone asking for the same sensor density that the current cameras
have to keep digital noise under
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/05 Sat PM 01:40:17 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
On Aug 5, 2006, at 9:09 AM, Pål Jensen wrote:
They also said that they would make DSLR's in all
segments and also eventually make the
Anyone read/heard what the K10D frame rate might be? If so, I likely
missed it.
Thanks,
Jack
--- mike wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Bob Shell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2006/08/05 Sat PM 01:40:17 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
I know. The luck of it makes me laugh. When the mirror returned, there
was nothing. Thought I might have a fur streak.
Thanks.
Jack
--- Russell Kerstetter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
nice capture Jack, it makes me lol
russell
On 8/4/06, Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is all
especially for a
company that relies on third parties to produce them.
-Cory
Having a shring ressources on lens development with a third party
isn't the same as relying on a third party for lens development IMO.
Other brands have been rebadging lenses quite a bit (Nikon, KM, Sony,
Panasonic
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Maybe we're seeing movement in the digital camera market. Perhaps
well speced cameras are now going to be commonly available for $800.
I've always thought
I don't remember where I read it, but it was supposed to be ~3fps 10
frames Jpeg, ~3fps 5 frames raw. Since I might have seen that here you
can make your own judgment.
Jack Davis wrote:
Anyone read/heard what the K10D frame rate might be? If so, I likely
missed it.
Thanks,
Jack
--- mike
G'day All,
This is a bit of a hail Mary, but have any of you come across the
above mentioned lens for sale? I realise that it's been discontinued,
but I have been hoping there may be a few units still floating around.
I've been pulling what's left of my hair out trying to track one down,
but so
HECK!! Well, since you may have seen it here, I'll continue to hope for
more. :)
Thanks,
Jack
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't remember where I read it, but it was supposed to be ~3fps 10
frames Jpeg, ~3fps 5 frames raw. Since I might have seen that here
you
can make
William Robb wrote:
My concern is that I know that well built, good quality equipment costs
extra to produce. A build and finish like the istD is not cheap to
produce. A build and finish like what has come after isn't up to my
standard.
Bravo. Exactly right.
They proved with the ist-D that
William Robb wrote:
From: Mark Roberts
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
No, I'm with you too.
If a larger sensor 35mm style camera were coming from Pentax, their
new lenses would be rendered useless. Why would they do that to
themselves?
And encourage us to buy new lenses? Gosh, no!
After getting
That's why at
this point I'd like to see a larger sensor. Physics is working against
the APS-C sensor as densities get higher, and it can only get worse.
There is room to grow. Take a look at the Fuji F30.
Sensor is a tiny 7.6 x 5.7 mm with 6.3 Mega pixels. APS size equivalent
would be
Sorry to break up the wild speculation on the K10D, but for those who
care to look:
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3243a.htm
Comments welcome.
--
Bruce
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
This is shot with the dam just about eye level. You can see the water
backed up behind the dam in the upper section and the water down below
coming out of the dam in the lower section.
Pentax *istD, DA 16-45/4 @ 45mm, handheld
ISO 800, 1/90 sec @ f/11
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3268.htm
Here is my simple take on it:
I love the *istD - but it could have a few improvements. More
megapixels, bigger buffer - slightly faster frame rate. Better
handling of TTL Flash (no pre-flashing crap though).
I like the current ergonomics with two dials and the grip. I love
HyperManual.
So if
Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
My concern is that I know that well built, good quality equipment costs
extra to produce. A build and finish like the istD is not cheap to
produce. A build and finish like what has come after isn't up to my
standard.
Bravo. Exactly right.
They
to the contrary. If Pentax comes out with (and actually delivers to
consumers) a 35mm-type dSLR in the next couple years that has a sensor
larger than what is in their current line, I'll print out and eat this
email.
Headers and all? :)
Seriously though... I don't
at the US Scrabble Open in Phoenix - alas, I'm missing that
one -- the first Nationals I
haven't attended either as a word judge, photographer or
player since 1980. It feels
odd.
To make up for it, I have a session today with G.I. Joels
older bro, Larry - who decided
not to go to the SHOW
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Subject: FA* 200mm f4 Macro??
G'day All,
This is a bit of a hail Mary, but have any of you come across the
above mentioned lens for sale? I realise that it's been discontinued,
but I have been hoping there may be a few units still floating
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: PESO - Simple Nature Shot
Sorry to break up the wild speculation on the K10D, but for those who
care to look:
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3243a.htm
John Celio wrote:
Does it bother anyone else that the K1D may shortly follow? Of course I
wouldn't absolutely need it, but for just a few hundred more and with
that larger sensor, etc..etc..
What bothers me is where you got that crazy idea. There is no such thing as
a K1D, and even
On 8/6/06, William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
I've been pulling what's left of my hair out trying to track one down,
but so far no luck.
Sucks to be you, don't it?
WW
Cheeky bugger :-) Generally it doesn't.
What sucks is being a Pentax
- Original Message -
From: keith_w
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
For one who has not yet made a jump to the *ist side, are you telling
me that
when all the follow-up family members of the *istD's are considered,
the *istD
is still top of the line in build and finish?
The istD
Hi, Look more close and who knows?
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de David
Savage
Enviada: sábado, 5 de Agosto de 2006 16:47
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Assunto: FA* 200mm f4 Macro??
G'day All,
This is a bit of a hail Mary, but
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
No, I'm with you too.
If a larger sensor 35mm style camera were coming from Pentax, their
new lenses would be rendered useless. Why would they do that to
themselves?
And encourage us to buy new lenses? Gosh, no!
After getting pissed on for
Sorry Dave,
I thought I red A*.
Manuel
-Mensagem original-
De: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Em nome de David
Savage
Enviada: sábado, 5 de Agosto de 2006 16:47
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Assunto: FA* 200mm f4 Macro??
G'day All,
This is a bit of a hail Mary, but have
The poor thing made me smile. :)
Like it. Somewhat due to it's placement in the frame.
Love the bokeh.
Jack
--- William Robb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: PESO - Simple Nature Shot
Sorry to break up the wild speculation on the
grin - you lost me on that comment and picture - are you saying you
love mine and yours, love mine-hate yours, love yours-hate mine, or
hate all these kind of shots?
--
Bruce
Saturday, August 5, 2006, 10:11:15 AM, you wrote:
WR - Original Message -
WR From: Bruce Dayton
WR Subject:
...or perhaps it's just me.
Taken with my phonecam
http://www.web-options.com/IMAGE_00020a.jpg
--
Regards,
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Be glad you don't have my cel-phone, Keith. The one thing it lacks is a
ring tone that sounds like a telephone, I keep looking around for the
guy who has his walkman turned up so loud, and miss my calls.
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
Idiot Proof
Me!
Especially because all those features just do something I already know
how to do myself. You can read a 12 page camera manual and a 200 page
book on photography; or you can read a 200 page camera manual, and a 200
page book on photography, so you know when to turn on those hundreds of
P. J. Alling wrote:
[ ... ] Rob Studdert did a masterful
analysis of why noise levels would increase as sensor densities
increased a couple of years ago. Maybe he'll repost it.
I'm not Rob, but...
It's really very simple: When the sensor elements get smaller, obviously
less light will hit
On Aug 5, 2006, at 10:48 AM, Bob W wrote:
...or perhaps it's just me.
Taken with my phonecam
http://www.web-options.com/IMAGE_00020a.jpg
I'm not entirely certain I understand it, but visually it's fun. :-)
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
As always, very nicely done.
Godfrey
On Aug 5, 2006, at 9:28 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/8.0
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_3243a.htm
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
The Fuji may be using a lot of post processing to clear the noise. I'm
speaking of clean output from the sensor, not programming to clean up
afterward. The sensor sites are just too small to capture enough
light. I'm not going to do the math and repeat what's already in the
archives you can
On Aug 5, 2006, at 9:46 AM, keith_w wrote:
For one who has not yet made a jump to the *ist side, are you
telling me that
when all the follow-up family members of the *istD's are
considered, the *istD
is still top of the line in build and finish?
I find it rather difficult to make that
This image is an extremely small part of the frame and not quite a
solid freeze.
Still, a cute capture. Well done
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO: Chipmunk Flare
This is all about a cute accident.
At Bryce Canyon, UT, several
My camera store, Camera Mart, which rarely handles Pentax, has the
K100D in stock, along with a fairly decent selection of DA lenses,
including the 12-24, the 10-17 fish, the 16-45, 50-200 and 50 macro.
Not bad for Pentax deniers. They said they expect to have the K10D by
the end of
There are a few small problems with the mechanics of the *ist-D but
comparing it to the Ds, in my opinion it is. On the other hand I grab
the DS more often than the D these days. The buffer is just enough
faster to tip the balance as to which I would have with me.
keith_w wrote:
Mark
Toralf Lund wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
[ ... ] Rob Studdert did a masterful
analysis of why noise levels would increase as sensor densities
increased a couple of years ago. Maybe he'll repost it.
I'm not Rob, but...
It's really very simple: When the sensor elements get smaller,
Not your best, but a good one. The backlight saves it.
Paul
On Aug 5, 2006, at 12:28 PM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Sorry to break up the wild speculation on the K10D, but for those who
care to look:
Pentax *istD, A 70-210/4, Handheld
ISO 200, 1/500 sec @ f/8.0
I think this ignores the axiom about the price of technology. It
never increases. I would bet we'll get D quality in the 10.
Paul
On Aug 5, 2006, at 12:30 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
My concern is that I know that well built, good quality equipment
costs
extra to produce.
Yes I know it's really very simple, but it's actually worse than that,
since we're getting to the level where quanta live.
Toralf Lund wrote:
P. J. Alling wrote:
[ ... ] Rob Studdert did a masterful
analysis of why noise levels would increase as sensor densities
increased a couple of
Quoting Pål Jensen [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I agree. It's bizarre. Pentax never implied they were building a camera
to challenge the MK II end of the market.
Actually, they did say that they were building a semi-pro digital camera in
the $2000 segment. They also said that they would make DSLR's
Of course the Biltmore is a Frank Lloyd Wright masterpiece, so it's
worth a visit. But I understand the reluctance to fork over the cash.
Can't say that I would either if they were having a convention of '55
Chevy owners or Pentax photographers:-)
Paul
On Aug 5, 2006, at 1:08 PM, Ann
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060805182744
That's what time does to a man or a woman. Remember peach? This could
happen to her too, but I like this picture in a way.
Comments welcome.
--
home http://roman.blakout.net/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Took awhile to determine what I was actually looking at.
Why such a large file - 523kb - for web posting?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Jack Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2006 3:46 PM
Subject: PESO: Polar Pivot
My earlier Chipmunk
Paul. If we ever get a chance to meet up, GFM next year.???I'll bring
the D2H and or the D200 and grip or D1 and put the 70-200 and 80-200
on them. You'll definatly notice the difference in the two systems,
carring them around tour neck.
VBG
Dave
Quoting Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Too much contrast to pull this off.
Makes me want to see the darkened areas.
Also why the inclusion of the blank sky reflection?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Saturday, August 05, 2006 12:30 PM
Nice subject, focus, lighting DOF. Love the backlighting also.
Wished it weren't so centered.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: PESO - Simple Nature Shot
Sorry to break up the wild speculation on the K10D, but for those who
care to
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I think this ignores the axiom about the price of technology. It
never increases. I would bet we'll get D quality in the 10.
I've never seen that hold true in terms of mechanical construction...
but I'll cross my fingers this time :)
--
Mark Roberts Photography
Bob W wrote:
...or perhaps it's just me.
Taken with my phonecam
http://www.web-options.com/IMAGE_00020a.jpg
Next time you're there nick the sign for me - I want it to display
here :)
(And, no, I won't make my own. It just wouldn't be the same.)
--
Mark Roberts Photography Multimedia
I forget a lot things I didn't used to. Geezer syndrome. :-(
Failed to save for web.
Sorry.
Otherwise??
Jack
--- Kenneth Waller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Took awhile to determine what I was actually looking at.
Why such a large file - 523kb - for web posting?
Kenneth Waller
-
Mark Roberts wrote:
Bob W wrote:
...or perhaps it's just me.
Taken with my phonecam
http://www.web-options.com/IMAGE_00020a.jpg
Next time you're there nick the sign for me - I want it to display
here :)
(And, no, I won't make my own. It just wouldn't be the same.)
I know
Dave. Please. Lets not rush to judgement pal...
CW
;)
- Original Message -
From: David J Brooks
So i'm not going nuts.:-)
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Dayton
Subject: Re: PESO - Simple Nature Shot
grin - you lost me on that comment and picture - are you saying you
love mine and yours, love mine-hate yours, love yours-hate mine, or
hate all these kind of shots?
Been there, done that, lost the
- Original Message -
From: Paul Stenquist
Subject: Re: K10D - More News
I think this ignores the axiom about the price of technology. It
never increases. I would bet we'll get D quality in the 10.
This may be true for technolgy, but not machinery.
A camera is a machine.
William
1. Lots of filters
72mm - C-Pl
67mm - Sky, Orange, 812
62mm - C-Pl
58mm - Orange, Yellow
55mm - Sky, Yellow, Red
52mm - Red, C-Pl, Pl
49mm - Green, Pl, Soft (B+W)
Mostly Tiffen and Promaster. All in very clean, excellent
condition. In cases. $25 shipped.
2. LOTS of Old Travel Slides
My mobile phone has a ringtone that's like an old-fashioned phone with
a bell - so it sounds like Sam Spade's office when it rings. But I
still miss most of my calls because I'm so deaf that when it rings it
takes me forever to realise it's my phone. I can hear something, but
I'm thinking What the
On Aug 5, 2006, at 12:18 PM, Roman wrote:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060805182744
That's what time does to a man or a woman. Remember peach? This could
happen to her too, but I like this picture in a way.
I'm not sure what you're implying in the text above.
This is a beautiful photo
Kinda what I was thinking...
- Original Message -
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
I'm not sure what you're implying in the text above.
This is a beautiful photo of a wonderful face.
Godfrey
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 4/8/06, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
$900 bucks is pretty cheap for that kind of camera, so again, i'm
missing something in the loop here. I was hope ing to buy a Pentax
equivalent to the Nikon big bodies i have.
That'll be the K1D.
Ain't gonna happen :-(
--
Cheers,
On 5/8/06, David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
Paul. If we ever get a chance to meet up, GFM next year.???I'll bring
the D2H and or the D200 and grip or D1 and put the 70-200 and 80-200
on them. You'll definatly notice the difference in the two systems,
carring them around tour
Not my favorite breed, but they are lovely additions never the less.
:-)
Dave
When I built my house, I was trying to keep photo
quality lighting in
mind.
These two pictures were shot available light in my living room.
Cotty wrote:
David J Brooks, discombobulated, unleashed:
$900 bucks is pretty cheap for that kind of camera, so again, i'm
missing something in the loop here. I was hope ing to buy a Pentax
equivalent to the Nikon big bodies i have.
That'll be the K1D.
Ain't gonna happen :-(
It happened
On 5/8/06, Roman, discombobulated, unleashed:
http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060805182744
That's what time does to a man or a woman. Remember peach? This could
happen to her too, but I like this picture in a way.
Comments welcome.
GREAT shot. Too much headroom, needs a trim. Well done
Having lower noise, higher ISO, and more megapixels I think is
the way to improve things at the moment.
Yes, but a larger sensor is a way to get all that. Beyond a certain
point that may not be too far away, it is the only way - unless someone
designs a sensor based on
Bob W wrote:
My mobile phone has a ringtone that's like an old-fashioned phone with
a bell - so it sounds like Sam Spade's office when it rings. But I
still miss most of my calls because I'm so deaf that when it rings it
takes me forever to realise it's my phone. I can hear something, but
I'm
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
