On Dec 11, 2006, at 9:19 PM, Bob W wrote:
>> You can use gearbox bikes on gnarly terrain; they just need to be
>> built for it :)
>>
>> http://www.laharbikes.com/
[...]
>
> Try a Rohloff:
> http://www.rohloff.de/en/home/index.html
A Rohloff hub is what Lahar uses :)
They mount their gearbox in
On Dec 13, 2006, at 1:55 AM, SJ wrote:
> funnily enough :) the same thing happens with me too. can't ever
> access
> robertstech.com from home but no problems at the workplace...
It times out for me, but my ISP doesn't exactly have the best
reputation so it's probably been blacklisted.
- Dav
On Dec 12, 2006, at 11:12 PM, John Forbes wrote:
> I don't think you are correct. Canon says SR doesn't work with long
> lenses. :-)
Yes but "long" doesn't start until you have at least two 2x TCs on a
600mm lens.
- Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mail
On Dec 12, 2006, at 9:31 PM, Boris Liberman wrote:
>> I think its simply calibrated better for the class of users that
>> Pentax expected to be interested in it, and that user group is more
>> inclined to use RAW and higher-end fine tuning of JPEGs destined for
>> post processing rather than print
> Does anybody know if the old Spotmatic era right angle magnified viewer
> will
> fit the K10D?
It shouldn't. The Spotmatic and K-series viewfinders are smaller than
viewfinders on all M- and later models. I have right angle finders for both
and just double-checked. You might be able to fin
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Another pic from the wedding shoot:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5321317&size=lg
> K10D, DA 16-45, f4.5, 1/25th, ISO 100, flash bounced off the ceiling
"Wedding 69"? None of them are upside down! :-)
--
Thanks,
DougF (KG4LMZ)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Excellent, great to hear it.
G
On Dec 12, 2006, at 7:35 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> I figured it out. I forgot to move the file/format plugin into the
> Elements
> 4 plugin folder. Now it works right!!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.
Adding a film look to ones photographs can easily be done (at the present
moment) - by using film.
These were - of course - done more than 30 years ago:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/bladt/sets/72157594413264675/show/
Regards
Jens Bladt
http://www.jensbladt.dk
+45 56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype:
The deadline is approaching - what's the theme this month?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Another pic from the wedding shoot:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5321317&size=lg
> K10D, DA 16-45, f4.5, 1/25th, ISO 100, flash bounced off the ceiling
Nicely composed. Good job, Paul.
Gabriel
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.
Hi!
Finally, I managed to extract the most necessary bit of information from
you, Godfrey! I'll get to that in due course.
> My large "-half" size renderings are only 1000 pixels on the vertical
> dimension at best. That is insufficient to image at the quality I
> desire for A3 size prints. And
Got photoshop 5.0
no problem converting now. but I don't much like the way it is set up
otherwise
another case of changing things you do have to change.
ann suffering from "post party depression" :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml
Congrats, Tom!!!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I figured it out. I forgot to move the file/format plugin into the Elements
4 plugin folder. Now it works right!!
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I have the same problem. DNG from K10D, opened in PE 4.0 on the Mac, I
am only offered the option of saving as a .dng or .DNG!
The only way I have found to get out of the DNG format in PE 4.0 (or
3.x, before I finally installed the upgrade last week) is to do a Batch
Process. That will work on h
Reminder - a passel of Pentaxistas will parlay prime weather into a
photo outing this Saturday in the grater DC environs.
Four of us so far, (me, Scott Loveless, Mike Beaker, Cesar) with many
of the regulars out of town or otherwise engaged.
Contact me if you for details if you may be able to jo
Ken
Many thanks for this addition to the series - Read it immediately I found it
and it was very interesting
Rod
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
K.Takeshita
Hi folks,
Several days ago, I promised to translate yet another interview artic
I like 5350, nice shot.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Hi there!
>
> I must apologize for not only be silent on the list but not even being able
> to lurk :-(
>
> I am now situated in Baltimore, Maryland - DCPDML gatherings abound :-)
>
> I will be back in the warmer confines of Florida starting
Another pic from the wedding shoot:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5321317&size=lg
K10D, DA 16-45, f4.5, 1/25th, ISO 100, flash bounced off the ceiling
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Thanks Stan.
On Dec 12, 2006, at 9:03 PM, Stan Halpin wrote:
> I like it. Almost all of the ancillary elements bring you back to the
> in-focus main story, the smile on the lady's face. The two changes
> that
> would make it perfect would be if the musicbox player was looking
> right
> at the
You may be absolutely right in what you say.
Jack
--- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> But the "look" is similar. I forgot to
> post that in either of these cases
> the film grain is NOT an issue. Its more
> the tonal range captured and the look
> of the extreme highlights. Film ca
On 13/12/06, Cory Papenfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, for example, if one were to apply a cloudy WB vs. a tungsten
> WB, the red channel gain would likely be at least a bit (i.e. f-stop) or
> two different. It makes sense to chose a different "dynamic range" for
> each channel base
and its pronounced "Dung" files...
:)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Francis
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 9:42 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: ACR and K10D
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:36:40PM -0600, Bob Sullivan wrot
Hi there!
I must apologize for not only be silent on the list but not even being able to
lurk :-(
I am now situated in Baltimore, Maryland - DCPDML gatherings abound :-)
I will be back in the warmer confines of Florida starting next week through the
New Year though...
Anyhow, I really should
At 11:52 AM 13/12/2006, J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>and its pronounced "Dung" files...
>:)
I pronounce it D - N - G.
I also call .psd files, P - S - D. "Pi55ed" doesn't do down well in polite
company :-)
>-Original Message-
>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>
Hmm. ACR shouldn't care, but I have no experience with PE4.0. Perhaps
the workflow settings (bit depth) are preventing you from saving in
the format you want.
G
On Dec 12, 2006, at 6:38 PM, Walter Hamler wrote:
> I ain't using CS2, I'm using PE 4.0
>
> Walt
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
You're both EVIL:, EVIL I say.
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Savage"
> Subject: Re: Black on black
>
>
>
>> It needs one of the black limited lenses fitted. I recommend the 31mm.
>>
>
> :-) Like this?
> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/i_suck/
Dave -
Well I have done a few things and nothing works...
it converts stuff on the cf card that I shot with the Rebel but not the
things that I shot with
the pro-1 in the past couple of days.
before that, I had no problem shooting raw and converting with the pro-1
although I didnt do it much.
John,
My apologies. I have three kids who graduated from Downers Grove
North highschool -- Abbreviated DGN, and obviously imbedded in my
neural pathways. I'll try to stop doing this. (DNG, DNG, DNG, DNG,
DNG, DNG, DNG, DNG)
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/12/06, John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Iridient's RAW Developer and Silkypix both work with K10D PEF files now.
All the Adobe products that work with DNG files will work with K10D
DNG files, many others will as well (like iView MediaPro). Some (like
Apple's Aperture and iPhoto) do not implement the DNG specification
fully and so
> I tried to open DNG Raws from the K10 in my ACR ver3.5. It would open
> but not save and then reopen the saved file. Also only gives me the
> option to save as a dng file again. Could not open, and save in any
> other format in PE 4.0.
> Am I missing a step or something else here?
>
> Walt
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:36:40PM -0600, Bob Sullivan wrote:
> Walt,
> I don't think the vendors are up to snuff yet.
> Only the Pentax supplied software works for the PEF files.
> I can get DGN files to work with Photoshop Elements 5.0.
> Regards, Bob S.
Bob - this has been nagging at me for so
I bet the 22 bit deal is so they dont
get the degenerative interpolation errors
with the various digital signal processes
that they would have gotten if they stayed at 16 bit or
lower max.
jco
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
John Francis
Se
On Tue, Dec 12, 2006 at 08:54:25PM -0500, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
>
> Most likely the reason for using 22-bits was so that variable-gain
> analog amplifiers and fixed-full-scale-voltage A/D's were NOT used. For
> ISO 100, choose bits 10-22. For ISO 200 choose bits 9-21. ISO 400 choose
>
On 13/12/06, Cory Papenfuss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Umm... sorry. I'll have to throw the "bullshit flag" on that
> play. If one measures and analog voltage at 22-bits, does nothing to it,
> and then throws away the least-significant 10 bits to produce 12-bits, the
> results are abso
Walt,
I don't think the vendors are up to snuff yet.
Only the Pentax supplied software works for the PEF files.
I can get DGN files to work with Photoshop Elements 5.0.
Regards, Bob S.
On 12/12/06, Walter Hamler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I tried to open DNG Raws from the K10 in my ACR ver3.5.
On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:54 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
> Umm... sorry. I'll have to throw the "bullshit flag" on that
> play. If one measures and analog voltage at 22-bits, does nothing
> to it,
> and then throws away the least-significant 10 bits to produce 12-
> bits, the
> results are a
There's something wrong with your installation of Photoshop CS2.
My system: Mac OS X v10.4.8
Photoshop CS2 v9.0.2
Camera Raw v3.6
-Open .DNG file direct from camera
-Make settings
-Save as button permits TIFF, PSD, JPEG, etc outputs through the
dialog and popup menu.
I processed 122 of the fil
I ain't using CS2, I'm using PE 4.0
Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
I tried to open DNG Raws from the K10 in my ACR ver3.5. It would open
but not save and then reopen the saved file. Also only gives me the
option to save as a dng file again. Could not open, and save in any
other format in PE 4.0.
I downloaded ACR 3.6 and get the same results.
The Pentax Lab work
Right, you need the Refconverter compatible with the Pentax ME and
later eyepiece oculars.
I bought an Olympus VariMagni finder instead ... used for $85. Works
great, although it does give a L-R reversed image.
Godfrey
On Dec 12, 2006, at 5:13 PM, P. J. Alling wrote:
> Probably not. The M
I like it. Almost all of the ancillary elements bring you back to the
in-focus main story, the smile on the lady's face. The two changes that
would make it perfect would be if the musicbox player was looking right
at the couple rather than past them, and if the second lady on the
right were loo
But the "look" is similar. I forgot to
post that in either of these cases
the film grain is NOT an issue. Its more
the tonal range captured and the look
of the extreme highlights. Film captures
more but the curves are not straight,
there is a knee on the hightlights. Whereas
digital can't capture
I tried to open DNG Raws from the K10 in my ACR ver3.5. It would open but
not save and then reopen the saved file. Also only gives me the option to
save as a dng file again. Could not open, and save in any other format in PE
4.0.
I downloaded ACR 3.6 and get the same results.
The Pentax Lab work
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Dec 11, 2006, at 12:04 PM, Doug Brewer wrote:
>
>> Does the battery grip come with a battery?
>
> No. (I've never seen an optional battery grip for any camera come
> with a battery.)
>
> Godfrey
The most popular way to get a Canon grip includes a battery. But that
I've had the same experience. Stills, by their nature, may lend
themselves to more scrutiny.
Jack
--- "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My interpretation of the "film look" is like
> watching a high quality movie ( 70mm print )
> vs. a high defintion live video broadcast
> ( more lik
- Original Message -
From: "David Savage"
Subject: Re: Black on black
>It needs one of the black limited lenses fitted. I recommend the 31mm.
:-) Like this?
http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/i_suck/k1031.html
Dave (doing his part for enablement)
It's a noble cause.
William
Happens all the time. I had three people request usage rights for a
couple of pictures. All three were from Australia ... by the time I
got the email 10-12 hours later, their deadlines were up and they had
to go with a different photo from a local photographer.
Godfrey
On Dec 12, 2006, at 3
Bingo! Image handling is everything.
Jack
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis"
> Subject: The "Film Look"
>
>
> > Pentax engineers (and others) refer to a desirable digital image
> goal
> > as having a "film look". To me, that mean
On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:18 PM, Charles Robinson wrote:
> Well crud. Now that I have typed all of that, I pulled down a copy
> that I could pull up in Photoshop and show the funkiness of the
> histogram - and it's displaying much darker in Photoshop than it is
> on my display in Firefox. (This is
> Thats not true. Nikon and Canon both do a lot of their own sensor to
> digital representation processing too, ya know? And their RAW data is
> just as much RAW as anyone else's. I don't know what quantization
> they use in their A-D converter; I suspect it's greater than 12 bits
> at least in the
My interpretation of the "film look" is like
watching a high quality movie ( 70mm print )
vs. a high defintion live video broadcast
( more like the "digital" look ).
jco
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: The "Film Look"
> Pentax engineers (and others) refer to a desirable digital image goal
> as having a "film look". To me, that means grain.
> Each viewer will have a somewhat different interpretation of such a
> statement, but is there so
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Tom C
> Sent: 12 December 2006 23:47
> To: pdml@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Request for photos
>
> In that case it was an e-mail that took over two weeks to
> reach my inbox,
> because I just received it
Probably not. The M version probably will.
Bill Lawlor wrote:
> Does anybody know if the old Spotmatic era right angle magnified viewer will
> fit the K10D?
>
> Thanks, Bill Lawlor
>
>
>
>
--
Things should be made as simple as possible -- but no simpler.
--Albert Eins
By the way, I did a new RAW conversion of this and a new BW conversion,
all with the aim of maintaining a better range of grays in the flesh
tones. The crop is slightly different as well. (The accordian player
made the cut:-). It's still here:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5321423&
Kenneth Waller
> I like the accordeon player very much
>there, slightly out of focus, because it helps in telling the story.
>Without
>the player, it could be just a hug.
The real judge here is the bride & groom. ;+)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Frits Wüthrich" <[EMAIL PR
Does anybody know if the old Spotmatic era right angle magnified viewer will
fit the K10D?
Thanks, Bill Lawlor
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
On 13/12/06, Peter Lacus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Mike,
>
> >>more precisely it's premium to get it _anywhere_ outside of the USA.
> >>Price here in the UK is about £600 which is almost the same.
> >
> > Where did you find it for that price???
> >
> > The biggest seller in the UK is char
>>Nice capture Paul, but the accordion player is an intrusion.
>
> Aren't they always? ;-)
ROTF but not LMAO!
;+)
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: Daddy's Gi
On 13/12/06, graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Looks bronze on bronze to me. Has my monitor drifted that far? Since I
> can not remember when I last calibrated it, I guess that is possible.
Your monitor is fine.
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EM
Is the tree still standing? no broken bulbs? :)
cute as a bugs ear, Dave
ann
David J Brooks wrote:
>When ever we put up our Christmas tree, i seem to get this feeling i'm
>being watched.
>
>Happened to have a camera handy and took this shot, before it disappeared.
>
>D200 with pop up flash. A
687 is my fave... lots of good stuff - but that works the best for me.
ann
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>Aside from speed testing, that is.
>
>I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
>exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
>exclusively, and just went s
Hi Rob,
>>>Bit of a premium to get it to Israel, eh?
>>
>>more precisely it's premium to get it _anywhere_ outside of the USA.
>>Price here in the UK is about £600 which is almost the same. And if you
>>add some lenses it's probably worth to fly across the ocean to get them.
>
> Hmm, they are sel
Looks bronze on bronze to me. Has my monitor drifted that far? Since I
can not remember when I last calibrated it, I guess that is possible.
Margus Männik wrote:
> Hi all,
> just a picture without any comments :)
> http://www.eol.ee/~margus/misc/imgp3223a.jpg
>
> (taken with Pentax 43WR)
>
> B
http://www.srsmicrosystems.co.uk/index3.asp?id=48§ion=Pentax&set=3
(and scroll down)
Body only, £599.
They are expecting supplies this week, and have enough for their
pre-orders. They may also have a few extra, if you are lucky.
John
On Tue, 12 Dec 2006 23:17:13 -, mike wilson <[EMAI
Have, for many years, been a big fan and user "essentially grainless"
25, 50 and 100 ISO films.
These were/are the films that I have replaced with digital, not so much
for its work flow advantage, but because I see a cleaner more detrailed
image.
If film is your thing, knock yourself out.
Jack
-
Have, for many years, been a big fan and user "essentially grainless"
25, 50 and 100 ISO films.
These were/are the films that I have replaced with digital, not so much
for its work flow advantage, but because I see a cleaner more detrailed
image.
If film is your thing, knock yourself out.
Jack
-
Hi Mike,
>>more precisely it's premium to get it _anywhere_ outside of the USA.
>>Price here in the UK is about £600 which is almost the same.
>
> Where did you find it for that price???
>
> The biggest seller in the UK is charging £850 with the 18-55 (coming
> soon.)
for example her
On 13/12/06, Peter Lacus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Godfrey,
>
> > Bit of a premium to get it to Israel, eh?
>
> more precisely it's premium to get it _anywhere_ outside of the USA.
> Price here in the UK is about £600 which is almost the same. And if you
> add some lenses it's probably worth to
M - luxurious!
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Margus Männik" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Wednesday, December 13, 2006 6:14 AM
Subject: Black on black
> Hi all,
> just a picture without any comments :)
> http://www.eol
On 13/12/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Fra: "Digital Image Studio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > On 12/12/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > If you have three sensors, and they have, the difference between two
> > > sensors with the same orientation but positioned on opposite si
Thanks Frits. Yes, I felt the accordian player was important here as
well. Father and daughter were dancing between the tables in an old
Polish restaurant. Without the accordian player, the story is lost.
The composition could have been stronger, but it's candid. I didn't
want to stage it.
In that case it was an e-mail that took over two weeks to reach my inbox,
because I just received it Sunday night.
I went back and looked at the headers and it was sent Sunday November 26.
Oh well, it show hows unprofessional the whole thing might have been. I was
being given less than 24 hour
I had virtually the same thought. "How in the world" could one fill a 2GB
card in one walk?"
Cory
- Original Message -
From: "Jerome Reyes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, December 12, 2006 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: my first shots with the Pentax K10D
>>
Tom C wrote:
> I figure she made a typo somewhere.
>
I need to finish editing by Monday 27th at 7am (CE time), and
delivery of printed material for investors must be 7.12.2006.
Guess what day 27th of November was?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/li
Jack Davis wrote:
> Pentax engineers (and others) refer to a desirable digital image goal
> as having a "film look". To me, that means grain.
> Each viewer will have a somewhat different interpretation of such a
> statement, but is there some general generic understanding as to what
> that means?
It needs one of the black limited lenses fitted. I recommend the 31mm.
:-)
Dave (doing his part for enablement)
Nice photo BTW
On 12/13/06, Margus Männik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi all,
> just a picture without any comments :)
> http://www.eol.ee/~margus/misc/imgp3223a.jpg
>
> (taken with
Peter Lacus wrote:
> Godfrey,
>
>
>>Bit of a premium to get it to Israel, eh?
>
>
> more precisely it's premium to get it _anywhere_ outside of the USA.
> Price here in the UK is about £600 which is almost the same.
Where did you find it for that price???
The biggest seller in the UK i
I figure she made a typo somewhere.
Tom C.
>From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>Subject: Re: Request for photos
>Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 22:58:05 +
>
>27th of what, though? She definitely says that 7th of December is
Bob W wrote:
>>-Original Message-
>>From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>>Behalf Of mike wilson
>>Sent: 12 December 2006 10:24
>>To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>>Subject: RE: B&H's weird ordering blackouts
>>
>>
>>
>>>From: "Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Date: 2006/12/11 Mo
Roman wrote:
> http://roman.blakout.net/?blog=20060820100454
> ^^^ Just my 2¢ for what year 2006 was... quite nice, no?
Doesn't do anything for me...in any way.
But, thanks for posting it.
SOMEbody might be interested. ;-)
keith whaley
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdm
On 13/12/06, Boros Attila <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> Tuesday, December 12, 2006, 4:06:14 PM, you wrote:
>
> MR> The color space settings on your camera only affect JPEG capture.
> MR> Reichmann is talking about shooting RAW, in which case you're getting
> MR> the (hardware-depende
27th of what, though? She definitely says that 7th of December is when
she has to hand the finished articles out. In her version of English.
Which is, assuredly, better than my Croatian.
ann sanfedele wrote:
> Time to clean your glasses again, Mike :)
> 27th is the deadline
>
> ann
>
> mik
> Below is a link that shows the difference I'm seeing - on the left-
> hand side is a fraction of the file from within Photoshop, overlaid
> with the histogram from (again) Photoshop. On the right half is the
> Firefox screen that is right below Photoshop, and it is noticeably
> brighter/lighter.
According to wikipedia (insert appropriate disclaimer here):
> It has been suggested that women who are carriers for variant cone pigments
> may be born as full tetrachromats, having four different simultaneously
> functioning kinds of cones to pick up different colors.[1] However, this has
>
Everyone will then want the "digital look".
Jack
--- "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I know, I know. Use film.
>
> Scott Loveless wrote:
> > On 12/12/06, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Pentax engineers (and others) refer to a desirable digital image
> goal
> >> as
> Very interesting. Where are you located?
East Aurora NY -- 20 miles outside Buffalo
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Mark Roberts a écrit :
> Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
>
>
>> Selecting a colorspace is not a matter of "which is better than the
>> other", it's a matter of how much data you can capture vs editing
>> flexibility vs what device will you be presenting a rendering on.
>>
>
> Rule of thumb: Whe
I don't think I can conjure up that much "nice" without hurting myself
somehow. =)
Jack
--- Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/12/06, Jack Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Pentax engineers (and others) refer to a desirable digital image
> goal
> > as having a "film look". To me
Very Nice..Jay
At 03:14 PM 12/12/06, you wrote:
>Hi all,
>just a picture without any comments :)
>http://www.eol.ee/~margus/misc/imgp3223a.jpg
>
>(taken with Pentax 43WR)
>
>BR, Margus
>
>
>
>--
>PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>PDML@pdml.net
>http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
--
PDM
Funny how people can see it differently, I like the accordeon player very much
there, slightly out of focus, because it helps in telling the story. Without
the player, it could be just a hug.
If I may ad some comment: perhaps the accordeon player a bit more to the left
and the father/daughter to
Hey, give us a break, our economy is not too great and the dollar is
still falling.
On 12/12/06, Peter Lacus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Godfrey,
>
> > Bit of a premium to get it to Israel, eh?
>
> more precisely it's premium to get it _anywhere_ outside of the USA.
> Price here in the UK is abou
On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:20 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
>> RAW format has always been what was written from the sensor into a
>> digital representation, a 2D array of photosite values along with
>> metadata describing the camera state and organization of that array,
>> no matter what transformations o
On 12/12/06, Jerome Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I went for a walk today and filled a 2G card with K10D RAW/DNG
> > exposures. I put the FA20-35 on it, used autofocus almost
> > exclusively, and just went snapping around the neighborhood. About
> > 120 some exposures in all fit on a 2G card
Kinda like buying the Billingham L2 bag I wanted ... It was 30% less
money to order it from Robert White UK Limited and pay the shipping
and import fees than to find it anywhere in the US. And I got exactly
the one I wanted, not the ones that the importers here decided were
saleable in the
Very interesting. Where are you located?
Dan M
On 12/11/06, Michael Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
>
> We saw the local deer grazing as we drove out today and snapped a few
> pix with the new K10D. It was set for automatic, and as we have a
> 16-45 mm lens on it now, I have cropped these do
On Dec 11, 2006, at 19:39, Michael Levy wrote:
>
> The ONLY Photoshopping? A couple of pix are cropped, and brightness/
> contrast was adjusted on them all -- except for the last snap, where
> I used the "shadow/Highlight" adjustment, too. That has a lot of
> "noise" IMO.
>
Cute to see all those
> On Dec 12, 2006, at 12:06 PM, Cory Papenfuss wrote:
>
>> I'm not saying I know how it's done... just trying to provide food
>> for thought. RAW isn't RAW anymore if the 22-bits have been
>> truncated on
>> a per-channel basis to 12...
>
> RAW format has always been what was written from the
Godfrey,
> Bit of a premium to get it to Israel, eh?
more precisely it's premium to get it _anywhere_ outside of the USA.
Price here in the UK is about £600 which is almost the same. And if you
add some lenses it's probably worth to fly across the ocean to get them.
For example:
K10D + 77Ltd.
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
