I prefer the original. While the pot might be somewhat unfortunate,
eliminating the railing makes the shot feel unbalanced. And while I
might crop a bit off the top of the original, I would preserve the
upper porch railing. The pot was largely unnoticed by me. But if I
really felt it was a
On Nov 27, 2007 7:50 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=viewcurrent=boo-bW.jpg
Well, it seems my google photos cannot be uploaded. Not sure i should
have upgraded the OS now.:-0
For Mark, who convinced me BW cat photos are fine
On Nov 25, 2007 7:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back to Baylands today to eat
my lunch by the water.
Gulls flocked to wait for crumbs.
Steel gray sky on water.
They got nothing.
Made a few photos.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48b.htm
Interesting, Peter. Thanks for this. I'm quite fond of the Series 1 70-210/3.5
version 1, although I rarely use it any more. It is a tank. It's quite good
optically. Of course I haven't compared it to the other two versions, so they
may well be better. But it's a relatively fast, high quality
With 'em on 'em, Seems to have made little difference...
Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Bob W
I have just discovered the following quotation:
Nothing compares with the
simple pleasure of a bike ride
John F Kennedy
Coming from a man who shagged Marilyn Monroe,
On Nov 30, 2007, at 7:04 PM, Scott Loveless wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Bob W
I have just discovered the following quotation:
Nothing compares with the
simple pleasure of a bike ride
John F Kennedy
Coming from a man who shagged Marilyn Monroe, and thought
Thanks for looking, Frank. Probably a bit too clinical, but as you
say, interesting. It will soon disappear from my page:-).
Paul
On Nov 30, 2007, at 6:25 PM, frank theriault wrote:
On Nov 23, 2007 5:07 PM, Paul Stenquist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
The cold weather is upon us, so I'm back to
On Nov 30, 2007 7:51 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know why they were rejected, too subtle.
Meaning, crappy.:-)
Dave
David J Brooks wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5076840
The other.
Dave
On Nov 30, 2007 9:30 AM, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I know why they were rejected, too subtle.
David J Brooks wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=5076840
The other.
Dave
On Nov 30, 2007 9:30 AM, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any chance we can see these photos?
David J Brooks wrote:
After reading a few of the
Another sunset over the most prominent off shore object in these parts.
Yes the horizon divides the image entirely in half, but I tried to fill
the frame with something interesting. Putting the horizon anywhere else
just put a lot of empty space somewhere.
Scott Loveless wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Bob W
I have just discovered the following quotation:
Nothing compares with the
simple pleasure of a bike ride
John F Kennedy
Coming from a man who shagged Marilyn Monroe, and thought
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-dslr-discussion/15697-dangerous-third-party-lenses-pk-r.html
Dave
--
Equine Photography
www.caughtinmotion.com
http://brooksinthecountry.blogspot.com/
Ontario Canada
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Nov 30, 2007 9:30 AM, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any chance we can see these photos?
Yes.
Dave
David J Brooks wrote:
After reading a few of the latest Pentax Gallery threads, i decided to
enter two of my best like photos, as decided by me and others
comments.
I checked
Here is one.
http://picasaweb.google.com/pentkon52/GFM07/photo#5073488817319576162
Dave
On Nov 30, 2007 9:30 AM, Doug Brewer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
any chance we can see these photos?
David J Brooks wrote:
After reading a few of the latest Pentax Gallery threads, i decided to
enter two
Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Bob W
I have just discovered the following quotation:
Nothing compares with the
simple pleasure of a bike ride
John F Kennedy
Coming from a man who shagged Marilyn Monroe, and thought 'first lady'
meant the one he had before
David J Brooks wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 1:03 PM, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=viewcurrent=boo-bW.jpg
He was talking about Mendoza's Ernie - yours appears to be a gray cat. :)
I spent a
Very nice, but (I'll beat Godders to this) the horizon
tilts to the left. You must be unconsciously
compensating for Savage's Diagonal.
Rick
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another sunset over the most prominent off shore
object in these parts.
Yes the horizon divides the image
Your part of the world is upside down. This is moving
in that direction, but you still have about 145
degrees to go.
Rick
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
One from this evening (~130KB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9880.jpg
Just a bit of
Huge improvement. I like it now.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jeez, don't you just hate it when you screw up a
reply...
Based on several comments of list members I have
made some
alterations:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5295a.htm
Original:
Having problems here. Must be my ISP
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Oh yes, one other small difference, the v.2 lens has a slightly cooler
lens cap...
P. J. Alling wrote:
So I decided to write a review. I hope people find it useful.
I acquired an almost New Vivitar series 1 version 3 not too long ago,
and I've decided to do a comparative review verses the
Pretty sky... Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 30, 2007 6:22 PM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another sunset over the most prominent off shore object in these parts.
Yes the horizon divides the image entirely in half, but I tried to fill
the frame with something interesting. Putting the
Everyone may thank a burned-out DSL modem for the lack
of PESOs from me this week.
We now have a new (I suspect reconditioned) modem, and
I need to make up for lost time.
Two from the Pike Place Market in Seattle. These are
of the market's mascot, which is a bronze pig. The
hoofprints are
Looks quite in focus here Frank.
Dave
On Nov 30, 2007 3:19 PM, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Nov 27, 2007 7:50 AM, David J Brooks [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=viewcurrent=boo-bW.jpg
Well, it seems my google photos cannot be
Only about 2-3/10 of a degree.
Rick Womer wrote:
Very nice, but (I'll beat Godders to this) the horizon
tilts to the left. You must be unconsciously
compensating for Savage's Diagonal.
Rick
--- P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Another sunset over the most prominent off shore
I should think that Seattle would be more politically correct, this
either offends pigs or witches or maybe both.
Rick Womer wrote:
Everyone may thank a burned-out DSL modem for the lack
of PESOs from me this week.
We now have a new (I suspect reconditioned) modem, and
I need to make up for
Very strange. This flew right through. But the PESO I've tried to
send is hanging somewhere. Whatever. Time for bed. Try again tomorrow.
Paul
On Nov 30, 2007, at 11:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Having problems here. Must be my ISP
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Nicely observed and very nicely captured. Very tricky
exposure, I would think, to get the leaf nicely
illuminated without the pine bough going to silhouette
against the bright background.
Rick
--- Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This leaf almost made it down. It was caught by
this
On Nov 30, 2007 1:03 PM, ann sanfedele [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David J Brooks wrote:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=viewcurrent=boo-bW.jpg
Well, it seems my google photos cannot be uploaded. Not sure i should
have upgraded the OS now.:-0
For Mark, who convinced
Scott Loveless wrote:
Mark Roberts wrote:
William Robb wrote:
From: Bob W
I have just discovered the following quotation:
Nothing compares with the
simple pleasure of a bike ride
John F Kennedy
Coming from a man who shagged Marilyn Monroe, and thought 'first lady'
meant the one
William Robb wrote:
From: Bob W
I have just discovered the following quotation:
Nothing compares with the
simple pleasure of a bike ride
John F Kennedy
Coming from a man who shagged Marilyn Monroe, and thought 'first lady'
meant the one he had before breakfast, that has got to be a
It has to be either version 3 or 4. the first two are pre A mount.
Charles Robinson wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 14:32, P. J. Alling wrote:
Problems.
In every case the exposure was underexposed
until f4.0 then exposures were identical for each stop to f22.
(These f
stops were
AM,
A very enjoyable set of pictures. They put me in a good frame of mind.
Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 30, 2007 11:02 AM, Inner Focus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, this is the first time that I subject my photos to public scrutiny... A
few weeks ago I had the opportunity to spend one day on the
Well, I have to admit that sometimes I get the urge to run down the University
Bicycle team types here. They have no concept of the term share the road, an
act
like cars do not exist. But I guess that is more a teenage feeling of
imortality
than anything else. However I have noticed that
P. J. Alling wrote:
Well yes, there was a noticeable problem with the v.3 lens. I've come
to the conclusion that the aperture response may not be as linear as
required by the Pentax specification.
Yep. I've found the same thing with my sample of this lens.
It's a good thing that bracketing
On Nov 30, 2007 4:09 PM, Bob W [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have just discovered the following quotation:
Nothing compares with the
simple pleasure of a bike ride
John F Kennedy
Coming from a man who shagged Marilyn Monroe, and thought 'first lady'
meant the one he had before breakfast, that
I have just discovered the following quotation:
Nothing compares with the
simple pleasure of a bike ride
John F Kennedy
Coming from a man who shagged Marilyn Monroe, and thought 'first lady'
meant the one he had before breakfast, that has got to be a good
recommendation.
--
Bon weekend, tout le
That's a nice set. I've been there. One of my brothers has a house
just outside Colmars-les-Alpes to the north. Getting to and from the
house sometimes entails a drive along the lake and the gorge. It's a
very pleasant part of the world and the local people are very kind and
friendly.
--
Bob
So I decided to write a review. I hope people find it useful.
I acquired an almost New Vivitar series 1 version 3 not too long ago,
and I've decided to do a comparative review verses the version 2 model
that I've had for a number of years now. First off I'd like to thank
Mark Roberts for
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 23:50:54 -0500
P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should think that Seattle would be more politically correct, this
either offends pigs or witches or maybe both.
well from the witchy side, no offence. I am sure the pig does not
object too much.
Bran
--
PDML
Hi Godders,
On Wed, 28 Nov 2007 06:09:22 -0800, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Will fiddle with it some more before giving up :-)
As I said, you have to close and reopen the database to have the
metadata browser show the new lens names.
But hat would happen on close/reopen lightRoom as well
Dave,
Get out of the box!
1) Print it up and mount it in a standard frame on your wall.
2) Print it up and mount it in a standard frame with the horizon horizontal.
Regards, Bob S.
PS: I will resist all jokes about things being a bit askew in the
land 'down under'
On Nov 30, 2007 7:36 AM,
Godfrey,
Better, I like the concept, but still not good.
Regards, Bob S.
On Nov 29, 2007 4:41 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL ... I don't know why, but this photo appeals to me a lot. So I
did some more editing on it ... ;-)
I'm not wild about multiple exposures when they're used to achieve a surreal
effect, although there can be situations where that kind of image is
appropriate. But when the technique is used to extend the dynamic range of the
camera to more closely approximate the eye I find that it's most
Should be set to music, A.M. Thanks for the restful interlude.
Well done.
Jack
--- Inner Focus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
OK, this is the first time that I subject my photos to public
scrutiny... A few weeks ago I had the opportunity to spend one day on
the Esparron lake in Provence, southern
David J Brooks wrote:
http://smg.photobucket.com/albums/v408/divad_b/?action=viewcurrent=boo-bW.jpg
Well, it seems my google photos cannot be uploaded. Not sure i should
have upgraded the OS now.:-0
For Mark, who convinced me BW cat photos are fine art.:-)
Dave
He was talking about
OK, this is the first time that I subject my photos to public scrutiny... A few
weeks ago I had the opportunity to spend one day on the Esparron lake in
Provence, southern France. The colour of the water was simply amazing, and I
also claim that it is accurately rendered in most of the photos,
On Nov 27, 2007 10:56 AM, Beaker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/685341665/
Cheers
Mike Beacom
http://tinyurl.com/3xwxxz
cheers,
frank
--
Sharpness is a bourgeois concept. -Henri Cartier-Bresson
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Always good to reply to yourself. It is interesting to note that
several have commented on the foreground being murky. On my monitor
it is dark, but just fine - no murkiness - I can see the details. Now my
monitor is
calibrated and I don't know about any others. It is not uncommon for
some
aa.my head has righted itself.
Pretty nice shot. The sky looks just a little blown - don't know if
that is recoverable or not.
--
Bruce
Friday, November 30, 2007, 6:26:18 AM, you wrote:
DS G'day All,
DS Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
DS
grin my head just fell to the side as that opened up. Pretty goofy.
--
Bruce
Friday, November 30, 2007, 5:36:41 AM, you wrote:
DS G'day All,
DS One from this evening (~130KB)
DS http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9880.jpg
DS Just a bit of goofing around.
DS Cheers,
DS
On Nov 30, 2007, at 11:32, frank theriault wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 8:36 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
One from this evening (~130KB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9880.jpg
Just a bit of goofing around.
How come the water isn't pouring out
Shut it fella!
Cheers,
Dave
P.S.
Just in case it's needed:
=== :-) ===
On Dec 1, 2007 12:44 AM, P. J. Alling [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hah! Play nicely he says. What list does he belong to?
John Coyle wrote:
As my wife and I are off to Egypt and Spain!
For those who celebrate them,
Now it's more of an abstract, but to my mind it's still missing something.
Bruce Dayton wrote:
Based on your comments I have done some alteration:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5287a.htm
Original:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5287.htm
--
The difference between
Hah! Play nicely he says. What list does he belong to?
John Coyle wrote:
As my wife and I are off to Egypt and Spain!
For those who celebrate them, have a Happy Christmas, back to listening to
rants, raves, bleats and moans next year!
Play nicely while I'm gone
John Coyle
Brisbane,
Hmmm. Not sure about this one. It's certainly interesting and well rendered.
The jury is still out:-).
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]
G'day All,
One from this evening (~130KB)
On Nov 29, 2007 7:46 PM, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stop making so much aggravating sense.
Regards,
Bob...
-
Note: No trees were killed in the sending of this message,
but a large number of electrons were terribly
any chance we can see these photos?
David J Brooks wrote:
After reading a few of the latest Pentax Gallery threads, i decided to
enter two of my best like photos, as decided by me and others
comments.
I checked the site today and they have been rejected.
At least i have my original four
hello guys, thank you everyone very much for the congrats. Yes Ann, I
am a smugmugger, it's a lovely little site although I am sure I don't
use it to its full potential (too lazy and no programming skills).
Mark, I looked pretty hard for the fans, especially after I recognised
one of Jay Taylor's
On Nov 30, 2007 1:55 AM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Based on list comments I have made some alterations:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5294a.htm
Original:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5294.htm
I like the first one; it looks more real.
;-)
Seriously, lovely shot,
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9763.jpg
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
Foreground area appears very murky on my monitor..of course. :)
I really can't see what the dark area holds, but a 'think' the bottom
might benefit from a crop.
Tough exposure, for sure!
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more
On Nov 30, 2007 9:48 PM, Christian [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Savage wrote:
Snowballs chance.
Wouldn't that be a Buckley's chance on your side of the world? My
father-in-law's racing catamaran was named Buckley's
Yeah, but I have my strine translator running today for the benefit
G'day All,
One from this evening (~130KB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9880.jpg
Just a bit of goofing around.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
David Savage wrote:
On Nov 30, 2007 4:44 PM, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As my wife and I are off to Egypt and Spain!
For those who celebrate them, have a Happy Christmas, back to listening to
rants, raves, bleats and moans next year!
Sounds like fun. Have a good one.
Play
Ditto. I find flickr and picasa equally slow.
Paul
On Nov 30, 2007, at 3:29 AM, Jaume Lahuerta wrote:
Oh, download speed...
In this case I don't find it significantly different to flickr, for
instance.
- Mensaje original
De: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss
I think that this shot is greatly improved as well by your new crop.
Very nice.
Paul
On Nov 30, 2007, at 1:55 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Based on list comments I have made some alterations:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5294a.htm
Original:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5294.htm
--
From: keith_w [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/29 Thu PM 10:43:57 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT - Yet Another Bike Accident
Bob W wrote:
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
Sigh...
Luckily I wasn't hurt, other than
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/29 Thu PM 04:46:12 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net
Subject: OT - Yet Another Bike Accident
http://knarfinthecity.blogspot.com/2007/11/accident-aftermath.html
Sigh...
Luckily I wasn't hurt, other than the usual
From: Cotty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/30 Fri AM 07:54:09 GMT
To: pentax list PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Denied
On 29/11/07, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's disappointing to have rejects because it feels like it's going
for the balls of one's own creativity.
Mark!
Seems appropriate to post some Vivitar series 1 pics. That lens sure
does handle well.
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc/07_12/07_12_rainyday/index.htm
D
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://members.iinet.net.au/~derbyc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Oh, download speed...
In this case I don't find it significantly different to flickr, for instance.
- Mensaje original
De: Boris Liberman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Para: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Enviado: viernes, 30 de noviembre, 2007 5:37:42
Asunto: Re: On images posted to Picasa
Congratulations skye
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please
In a message dated 11/29/2007 10:58:45 P.M. Pacific Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jeez, don't you just hate it when you screw up a reply...
Based on several comments of list members I have made some
alterations:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5295a.htm
Original:
On Nov 30, 2007, at 14:32, P. J. Alling wrote:
Problems.
In every case the exposure was underexposed
until f4.0 then exposures were identical for each stop to f22.
(These f
stops were controlled from the camera body. The green button was
pretty
much dead on every time).
I find
On Nov 25, 2007 7:58 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Back to Baylands today to eat
my lunch by the water.
Gulls flocked to wait for crumbs.
Steel gray sky on water.
They got nothing.
Made a few photos.
http://homepage.mac.com/ramarren/photo/PAW7/48b.htm
Comments and
Congrats, skye !
I see you are also a smugmugger - nice site, isn't it?
ann
skye pdml wrote:
Just a small announcement - a couple of my photos were recently
accepted for a local book.
Are you sure? Maybe you said something like that and it's been
paraphrased.
frank theriault wrote:
On Nov 29, 2007 7:46 PM, Bob Blakely [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stop making so much aggravating sense.
Regards,
Bob...
-
F-YOU, PJ!
:-) (just in case)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
P. J. Alling wrote:
Hah! Play nicely he says. What list does he belong to?
John Coyle wrote:
As my wife and I are off to Egypt and Spain!
For those who celebrate them, have a Happy Christmas, back to
I like the composition, but it's a bit murky on my monitor.
David Savage wrote:
(Forgot the details)
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9763.jpg
K10D, FA 31mm f1.8 Ltd., 1/5, 1/8
Congrat's.
The photos look fine at my end.
Well done.
Dave
On Nov 29, 2007 7:07 PM, skye pdml [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just a small announcement - a couple of my photos were recently
accepted for a local book.
On 29/11/07, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's disappointing to have rejects because it feels like it's going
for the balls of one's own creativity.
Mark!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
On Nov 30, 2007 4:44 PM, John Coyle [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As my wife and I are off to Egypt and Spain!
For those who celebrate them, have a Happy Christmas, back to listening to
rants, raves, bleats and moans next year!
Sounds like fun. Have a good one.
Play nicely while I'm gone
May I try it for you?
Descartes' version: Common sense is the best distributed thing in the world.
Thibouille's version: Stupidity and ignorance are the best distributed
things in the world.
It seems to work pretty well like that, thank you :)
I don't know what you're thinking about,
From: Inner Focus [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2007/11/29 Thu PM 10:35:57 GMT
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Pentax K20D and K200D
- Original Message
From: Thibouille [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Sent: Thursday, November
I just noticed that the selectable lenses in the Pentax Photo Gallery
now includes the K lenses and then some...
Bong
--
Bong Manayon
http://www.bong.uni.cc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
Big improvement here, IMO. A much nicer composition. Well done.
Paul
On Nov 30, 2007, at 1:54 AM, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Jeez, don't you just hate it when you screw up a reply...
Based on several comments of list members I have made some
alterations:
http://www.daytonphoto.com/PAW/bkd_5295a.htm
(Forgot the details)
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9763.jpg
K10D, FA 31mm f1.8 Ltd., 1/5, 1/8 1/13 @ f16, ISO 100. 3 bracketed
frames layered masked in PS.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML
Nice composition. A tough exposure job here with the bright sky and dark
ground. I think you handled it about as well as you could in a single exposure.
A two exposure composite here might have been stunning.
Paul
-- Original message --
From: David Savage [EMAIL
What Paul said. While the graphics are interesting the tilt does kinda
make me want to vomit... :-)
--
Christian
http://photography.skofteland.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hmmm. Not sure about this one. It's certainly interesting and well rendered.
The jury is still out:-).
Paul
You missed the corner on the low end. It could be cropped I suppose...
David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
One from this evening (~130KB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9880.jpg
Just a bit of goofing around.
Cheers,
Dave
--
The difference between individual
You somehow need to open up the foreground a little. It looks like an
interesting texture, but is a bit too dark on my monitor.
David Savage wrote:
(Forgot the details)
G'day All,
Another from this evening (a little more conventional this time, ~160KB):
On Nov 30, 2007 8:36 AM, David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day All,
One from this evening (~130KB)
http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/Misc/Images/K10D/_IGP9880.jpg
Just a bit of goofing around.
How come the water isn't pouring out the right-hand side?
;-)
cheers,
frank
ps: I don't
On Nov 28, 2007 10:57 PM, Juan Buhler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
Coming out of my usual lurking to send a link to my own site... How nice,
huh?
I have completely changed the galleries in my site, leaving behind
about seven years of static html generated by csh/awk scripts. I made
On Nov 29, 2007 10:58 PM, Bruce Dayton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Juan,
Your photography is always very impressive. The layout and navigation
work just fine - clean and simple. I found it very curious as I went
through all the images, that every single shot is horizontal
orientation. Is
On Nov 30, 2007 9:43 AM, frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I hate you.
cheers,
frank
;-)
ps: seriously great stuff as always, Juan!
Seen in a sign at a cheap, hole in the wall, great food restaurant in
Buenos Aires: Your envy is the motor of my progress.
Not the case here
On Nov 30, 2007, at 10:18, Bruce Dayton wrote:
Always good to reply to yourself. It is interesting to note that
several have commented on the foreground being murky. On my monitor
it is dark, but just fine - no murkiness - I can see the details.
Now my monitor is
calibrated and I don't
David - what Jack said
ann
Jack Davis wrote:
Foreground area appears very murky on my monitor..of course. :)
I really can't see what the dark area holds, but a 'think' the bottom
might benefit from a crop.
Tough exposure, for sure!
Jack
--- David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
G'day
Photoshop Image Rotate Canvas Arbitrary 34 deg CCW OK
Just trying to help.
8-)
Cheers
Brian
++
Brian Walters
Western Sydney Australia
http://members.westnet.com.au/brianwal/SL/
Quoting David Savage [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
G'day All,
One from
- Original Message -
From: Bob W
Subject: OT: JFK on cycling, to cheer up the accident prone
I have just discovered the following quotation:
Nothing compares with the
simple pleasure of a bike ride
John F Kennedy
Coming from a man who shagged Marilyn Monroe, and thought 'first
1 - 100 of 102 matches
Mail list logo
