Luka Knezevic-Strika lukastr...@gmail.com wrote:
Check it out
http://tamoneki.tumblr.com
Great stuff. Thanks for showing.
Hvala lepa.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
Blog : http://the-real-fotoralf.blogspot.com
Audio :
On Feb 12, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
Check it out
http://tamoneki.tumblr.com
Very nice photos. They make me appreciate both your photographic skills, and
California winters.
Luka
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2/13/2012 1:50 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I joined my friend Candice for another Salton Sea trip this weekend. A couple
of my more interesting photos were from the night before, and my trip home this
evening.
An attempt at Japanese calligraphy:
Wow! I'm tempted to get some steel wool myself. No open spaces to
light the fire (no beaches around my home).
Toine
On 13 February 2012 08:50, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I joined my friend Candice for another Salton Sea trip this weekend. A
couple of my more interesting photos were
Wow! I'm tempted to get some steel wool myself. No open spaces
(beaches) to light the fire around my home
Toine
On 13 February 2012 08:50, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I joined my friend Candice for another Salton Sea trip this weekend. A
couple of my more interesting photos were from
When were you in Hawaii?
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
The State Bird of Hawaii:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15151472
Comments and criticisms are welcome.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML
Thanks guys,
glad you enjoyed it
l
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Feb 12, 2012, at 6:55 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
Check it out
http://tamoneki.tumblr.com
Very nice photos. They make me appreciate both your photographic skills, and
California
What would you do with a 50 1.2?
John
I carry it in my bag, always. I have the M version, though. I have no idea how
that compares to the A but it is a solid metal and glass antithesis to the
megapixel and sharpness cult most people belong to. I put it on my K-5 every
now and then to
On 2/9/2012 2:02 PM, John Celio wrote:
I have an A 50mm 1.2 sitting around collecting dust. I don't have good
enough vision to focus manually with my K-5, and I don't trust the
focus indicator, so I rarely use the lens. After yesterday's
discussions of future lenses from Pentax and my discovery
I worked as a translator for an experimental / research semiconductor
fab in the late 90s and they were already quite easily able to
minimize transistors to the exact point where most would still
function but electrons would tunnel randomly across the structure in
some. Most research there went
Just happened to look over my shoulder at the sound of a barking dog
when I saw this light coming through the window, so I figured I'd get
dressed, hustle up my camera and bustle out the door before it faded.
http://www.flickriver.com/photos/walt_gilbert/6869412825/
K-x, K 50/1.4, ISO 100,
_Not using one, but I'll bet no.
On 2/13/2012 1:04 AM, Paul Sorenson wrote:_
Anyone using the Eye-Fi Pro X2 card? Is there a way to shoot raw+jpg
and send only the jpgs out to the network?
-p
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7039/6859508377_57b8d18c54_o.jpg
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
The K 35mm f3.5, (a bitch to focus in dim light even on the view finders
it was designed for), extremely sharp with creamy bokeh. The K version
of the 135mm f3.5 very sharp a bit bulky, (twice as long as the M
version), but available for less than 50 bucks. The M200mm f4.0 also a
bargain
On 2/13/2012 8:53 AM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7039/6859508377_57b8d18c54_o.jpg
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
I don't see any mustang, nice legs though.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 08:59:50 -0500
P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
The K 35mm f3.5, (a bitch to focus in dim light even on the view
finders it was designed for), extremely sharp with creamy bokeh. The
K version of the 135mm f3.5 very sharp a bit bulky, (twice as long
as the M
Thanks, P.J.
I've put them all in a text file and will keep an eye out for them. That
35/3.5 sounds especially appealing, focusing difficulty notwithstanding.
I don't have anything in that focal length, and I'm not too crazy about
the Takumar 28/2.8 I got awhile back, so I could use something
Subash,
The Takumar K 135/2.5 is a bargain grade lens with single coatings. I
found it a fairly poor performer until stopped down to about f/8. The
SMC Pentax-M 135/3.5 is the one to look for.
I have the SMC Takumar 135/3.5 M42 mount lens, it is a terrific performer too.
G
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:25:36 -0800
Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
The Takumar K 135/2.5 is a bargain grade lens with single coatings. I
found it a fairly poor performer until stopped down to about f/8. The
SMC Pentax-M 135/3.5 is the one to look for.
I have the SMC Takumar
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 3:00 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
Now *here's* an idea for a K-01 accessory add-on for those who want to
go really retro:
An attachment that fits onto the rear LCD with a 45-degree mirror that
reflects the LCD image up onto a horizontal ground
On 13 February 2012 14:30, Subash pdml.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:25:36 -0800
Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
The Takumar K 135/2.5 is a bargain grade lens with single coatings. I
found it a fairly poor performer until stopped down to about f/8. The
SMC Pentax-M
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:30 AM, Subash pdml.l...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:25:36 -0800
Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
The Takumar K 135/2.5 is a bargain grade lens with single coatings. I
found it a fairly poor performer until stopped down to about f/8. The
SMC
Nice filly there...
;-)
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com
Sent: February 13, 2012 2/13/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: OT PESO -
Hi All,
Every So Often, when I see a message with Two pesos,
I recall one of the poems by Joseph Brodsky, 1867, (from his Mexican
Divertimento), that refers to two pesos.
This morning I managed to find it in English:
(p. 89 of Collected Poems in English)
http://goo.gl/R8sSG
Nocturnal gardens
It took me a while but i did see the car.
Dave
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7039/6859508377_57b8d18c54_o.jpg
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Very nice
Dave
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 9:55 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika
lukastr...@gmail.com wrote:
Check it out
http://tamoneki.tumblr.com
Luka
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I joined my friend Candice for another Salton Sea trip this weekend. A
couple of my more interesting photos were from the night before, and my trip
home this evening.
An attempt at Japanese calligraphy:
Super
Dave
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:43 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA*50mm-135@135mm, 1/125s, f/2.8, ISO400.
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 2/13/2012 7:53 AM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7039/6859508377_57b8d18c54_o.jpg
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
Not much to dislike about this photo, save for the fact that it wasn't
taken by me.
-- Walt
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Stumbled upon this the other day in a Scott Kelby book I was browsing
at a warehouse club store maybe some of you have seen it? It's a
utility that will extract the jpeg preview from RAW files.
Interesting, I thought. Works with the DNG files, looking forward to
seeing if it will conjure the
Dan,
Good job getting that all in focus.
I usually miss on some of it.
I wish the bottom was not cropped so close.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:07 AM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=15160832
Comments and criticisms are
Worth the effort Walt! Regards, Bob S.
2012/2/13 Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com:
Just happened to look over my shoulder at the sound of a barking dog when I
saw this light coming through the window, so I figured I'd get dressed,
hustle up my camera and bustle out the door before it faded.
Yes, I use that card, and *yes* you can select what gets xfer'ed.
PJ: you lose that bet. :)
I use the card for wireless tethering. I configure it to send only
JPGs, then I configure the K20D to do RAW normally and RAW+JPG when
the RAW button is pushed. I also configure the JPEG settings to
on 2012-02-12 23:04 Paul Sorenson wrote
Anyone using the Eye-Fi Pro X2 card? Is there a way to shoot raw+jpg and send
only the jpgs out to the network?
i'm not using one, but i understand that you can set the card to do exactly
that; a quick look at a few posts in the forums at e.g.
Is that a laser in the first one? Neat!
That second shot: wowza!
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
I joined my friend Candice for another Salton Sea trip this weekend. A
couple of my more interesting photos were from the night before, and my trip
home
Well, procrastinating on other things (it's tough to get going on a
Monday morning) has allowed me the time to test the styled jpeg
question... and it works. So, if you shoot RAW, with one of the
picture style modes selected (monochrome, vibrant, portrait, etc), you
can extract that styled
On 2/13/2012 9:54 AM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Thank you, Bob!
I wish I'd cranked up the ISO just a smidgen and gotten a faster shutter
speed. Unfortunately, I was in too much of a hurry trying to get out
there before the sun came up higher and ruined the colors. Still, I
think it came out fairly
Subash,
The K135/2.5 is a poor man's A*135/1.8.
It's the best of the 135's (w/o including the A*135/1.8).
Long ago I ran a test on 135's on film.
Don't bother with the Takumar 135/2.5 (multicolored distance scale),
It is the weakest by far.
Regards, Bob S.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:17 AM, Subash
Thanks to all who looked!
Dave, Ann, Kenneth, Dan, Paul, Frank, I appreciate the kind words.
A few thoughts about some comments:
Sun Feb 12 13:11:34 EST 2012
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Yes it is very nice, and coming from someone who loathes baby photos (me
, not Dave) you can take that as a
Incredible and extremely interesting!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/2012 1:50 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
I joined my friend Candice for another Salton Sea trip this weekend. A
couple
on 2012-02-13 06:01 Walt Gilbert wrote
Which raises a question: Are there any really stellar manual primes that go for
paltry sums along the lines of the M 50/2?
not completely sure how to parse your question, but there are certainly
bargains on old equipment, essentially, in capitalist
Smashing!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7039/6859508377_57b8d18c54_o.jpg
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
--
PDML
Well caught and expertly rendered!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:01 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
Super
Dave
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 5:43 PM, DagT li...@thrane.name wrote:
the smc k135/2.5 ( not the takumar 135/2.5) is a killer sharp lens.
jco
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Subash
Sent: Monday, February 13, 2012 9:17 AM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: What would you do with a 50 1.2
On Mon, 13 Feb
That is an excellent gallery. I enjoyed it very much, but it looks
damn cold there!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:30 AM, Luka Knezevic-Strika
lukastr...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks guys,
glad you enjoyed it
l
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 9:37
I am still here. We return to New Jersey Friday.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
When were you in Hawaii?
On Sat, Feb 11, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 11:36:46 -0500
JC OCONNELL hifis...@gate.net wrote:
the smc k135/2.5 ( not the takumar 135/2.5) is a killer sharp lens.
thanks, JCO (and Bob and Eric). the lens is in the bag :)
subash
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Nice car too.
Good angle to shoot from for the car.
It appears the car is lowered somewhat from stock, making her look really
big in her pose, then again she might be a tall lady.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: David Savage
Thanks, Bob.
There was an ugly dead leaf just below the best flower on the bush!
I'll check the original, however, and see if I can add a little there,
or if I can clone out part of the undesirable matter.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at
That is a very different and compelling sunset. Well seen, and well executed.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
2012/2/13 Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com:
Just happened to look over my shoulder at the sound of a barking dog when I
saw this light coming through the
On 2/13/2012 10:35 AM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-02-13 06:01 Walt Gilbert wrote
Which raises a question: Are there any really stellar manual primes
that go for
paltry sums along the lines of the M 50/2?
not completely sure how to parse your question, but there are
certainly bargains on
thanks
it was unusually cold for a week at -10 to -20 celsius.
now it's not so bad, but we still have snow :)
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Thank you, Dan!
I figure if you have be up early enough to see the sun come up, it ought
to look something like that.
-- Walt
On 2/13/2012 10:42 AM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
That is a very different and compelling sunset. Well seen, and well executed.
Dan Matyola
on 2012-02-13 09:46 Walt Gilbert wrote
I just found an A 50/1.7 for $45. I'm not positive, but if I'm not mistaken,
they've been going for a bit more than that lately on eBay.
yeah, that's right
Of course, if I had it, it would be my 3rd 50mm prime lens between my K 50/1.4
and my M 50/2. Is
On 2/13/2012 11:30 AM, steve harley wrote:
on 2012-02-13 09:46 Walt Gilbert wrote
I just found an A 50/1.7 for $45. I'm not positive, but if I'm not
mistaken,
they've been going for a bit more than that lately on eBay.
yeah, that's right
Of course, if I had it, it would be my 3rd 50mm prime
On Feb 13, 2012, at 8:02 AM, Bruce Walker wrote:
Is that a laser in the first one? Neat!
Yup, it's a green laser. IIRC 20mW
The only problem being that the beam is too narrow when it hits. I need to do
something that'll just spread the beam a tiny bit.
That second shot: wowza!
Thanks.
The 1.7 50's are the sharpest of the three designs and have the flattest
field of focus, not as flat as a dedicated copy lens, but they're the
recommended lens for use with the Pentax Auto bellows, that is if you
can't find one of the dedicated bellows lenses of course.
On 2/13/2012 11:46 AM,
50mm lenses are way too short to use on bellows, they only allow
super high magnifications, general purpose macro is out of the
question with them, thats why most dedication bellows lenses are
100mm not 50mm.
jco
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
Larry,
Just in case: be careful with those experiments.
If any aircraft (airplane, helicopter,..) will be flying by or somebody
else would report that, you could be in BIG TROUBLE.
I remember reading about some recent law that make pointing a laser in
the sky near an aircraft a criminal
On 2/13/2012 11:25 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Larry,
Just in case: be careful with those experiments.
If any aircraft (airplane, helicopter,..) will be flying by or somebody
else would report that, you could be in BIG TROUBLE.
You will note that I was aiming the laser at a hillside.
I
On 13/2/12, Igor Roshchin, discombobulated, unleashed:
I remember reading about some recent law that make pointing a laser in
the sky near an aircraft a criminal offense, borderlining terrorism.
The only things flying high in those hills are some of the residents and
I suspect the neighbours
I have an auto bellows M in the original box, /you/ can argue with the
instruction booklet.
On 2/13/2012 1:45 PM, JC OCONNELL wrote:
50mm lenses are way too short to use on bellows, they only allow
super high magnifications, general purpose macro is out of the
question with them, thats why
I'll take all the A50 f1.7s that I can get for $45, all day long.
Finding one for that price is like finding a $50 bill on the ground.
Whether the aperture ring turns smoothly when you get it, is a whole
'nuther question.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 2/13/2012 2:00 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I'll take all the A50 f1.7s that I can get for $45, all day long.
Finding one for that price is like finding a $50 bill on the ground.
Whether the aperture ring turns smoothly when you get it, is a whole
'nuther question.
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
Quoting Christine Nielsen ch...@inielsen.net:
Stumbled upon this the other day in a Scott Kelby book I was browsing
at a warehouse club store maybe some of you have seen it? It's a
utility that will extract the jpeg preview from RAW files.
Interesting, I thought. Works with the DNG files,
Mm, first rate. -T
2012/2/13 Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com:
Just happened to look over my shoulder at the sound of a barking dog when I
saw this light coming through the window, so I figured I'd get dressed,
hustle up my camera and bustle out the door before it faded.
Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/2012 2:00 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I'll take all the A50 f1.7s that I can get for $45, all day long.
Finding one for that price is like finding a $50 bill on the ground.
Whether the aperture ring turns smoothly when you get it, is a whole
'nuther
Thanks much, Tim!
-- Walt
On 2/13/2012 3:16 PM, Tim Bray wrote:
Mm, first rate. -T
2012/2/13 Walt Gilbertldott...@gmail.com:
Just happened to look over my shoulder at the sound of a barking dog when I
saw this light coming through the window, so I figured I'd get dressed,
hustle up my camera
On Feb 11, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 11/2/12, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
I thought the GoPro was all the rage for that sort of thing nowadays... :-)
http://gopro.com/cameras/hd-surf-hero-camera/
It is - and I will get one at some point - but I can hardly look cool
On 13 February 2012 22:02, P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/2012 8:53 AM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7039/6859508377_57b8d18c54_o.jpg
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
I don't see any mustang, nice legs though.
And she just turned 18...
:-)
DS
On 13 February 2012 22:37, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Nice filly there...
;-)
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From:
;-)
DS
On 13 February 2012 22:56, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
It took me a while but i did see the car.
Dave
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
On 13 February 2012 23:11, Walt Gilbert ldott...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2/13/2012 7:53 AM, David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7039/6859508377_57b8d18c54_o.jpg
Enjoy.
Cheers,
Dave
Not much to dislike about this photo, save for the
Thanks Dan.
Cheers,
Dave
On 14 February 2012 00:35, Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com wrote:
Smashing!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 8:53 AM, David Savage ozsav...@gmail.com wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
David Savage wrote:
G'day All,
Another one from the weekend:
http://farm8.staticflickr.com/7039/6859508377_57b8d18c54_o.jpg
Mustang Sally?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
She is quite tall. About 5' 8/5' 9 in flats well over 6' in heels.
Cheers,
Dave
On 14 February 2012 00:40, kwal...@peoplepc.com wrote:
Nice car too.
Good angle to shoot from for the car.
It appears the car is lowered somewhat from stock, making her look really
big in her pose, then again
Tall is good. And since she's 18, I guess I can take solace in the fact
that I'm just a dirty old man rather than a full-blown perv.
Giggity-giggity.
-- Walt
On 2/13/2012 5:23 PM, David Savage wrote:
She is quite tall. About 5' 8/5' 9 in flats well over 6' in heels.
Cheers,
Dave
On 14
On 13/2/12, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sex in a bed
And you call yourself a Californian?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
-- http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On 14 February 2012 07:27, Cotty cotty...@mac.com wrote:
On 13/2/12, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Sex in a bed
And you call yourself a Californian?
He didn't specify who's bed though...
DS
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
Sex in a bed
And you call yourself a Californian?
He didn't specify who's bed though...
Who's on second.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the
Basicly it's ice on a lake. Maybe air bubbles rising during the
formation of the ice sheet. Maybe the rising air pushes hotter water
to the surface. It looks like clouds from above.
Toine
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 10:22 AM, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
Fascinating.
On 12 February 2012 23:22, Toine to...@repiuk.nl wrote:
http://www.repiuk.nl/index.php/blog-mainmenu-97/213-iceclouds
Toine
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 1:43 PM, Mark Roberts
postmas...@robertstech.com wrote:
The most common problem with the A50/1.7 is the stuck/notchy aperture
ring. If that's OK you'll be golden.
Yes.
I had two of them. Pentax cheapened the aperture mechanism on the
A50/1.7 by using a plastic aperture
You're doing it wrong. Sex in a bed, take pictures of it with a camera.
Yeah, but this time be sure to use high def this time.
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Feb 11, 2012, at 2:05 PM, Cotty wrote:
On 11/2/12, AlunFoto, discombobulated, unleashed:
On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 4:16 PM, Brian Walters apathy...@lyons-ryan.org wrote:
I came across that utility some time ago. It looked nifty but I
found I never seemed to need the low quality embedded JPGs, so
eventually I uninstalled. The Pentax utility software will do the
same thing if I
try shooting someething the size of say, a camera, with a 50mm on a bellows,
you cant.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of P.
J. Alling
Sent: Monday, February 13,
On 2/13/2012 8:24 PM, JC OCONNELL wrote:
try shooting someething the size of say, a camera, with a 50mm on a bellows,
you cant.
I shoot snow crystals with a 50mm on a bellows, reverse mounted lens
preferred. Those crystals are a lot smaller than a camera. Who'd want to
take a macro picture of
On Feb 13, 2012, at 9:30 AM, Subash wrote:
On Mon, 13 Feb 2012 06:25:36 -0800
Godfrey DiGiorgi gdigio...@gmail.com wrote:
The Takumar K 135/2.5 is a bargain grade lens with single coatings. I
found it a fairly poor performer until stopped down to about f/8. The
SMC Pentax-M 135/3.5 is the
That's pretty funny-
I googled Christwire and found a page on Landover Baptist that was all
upset about a Christwire story.
Too bad I didn't stick around long enough to discover it is another parody site.
Cheers
Mike
On Feb 12, 2012, at 6:38 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Love it! A
Gze Frank,
Think you could teach me what you don't know?
Cheers
Mike
On Feb 12, 2012, at 6:09 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
That's pretty scary. Way too much responsibility on me, since I basically
don't know what the hell I'm doing when I process a photo or convert it to
bw.
The bottom bracket on my work bike gave out. Even worse, it's seized
in the BB holder. Since getting it out is taking a long time, I
decided to get my road bike, a lovely mid-nineties Marinoni, together
and on the road. I took it to my friend Malcolm, frame builder and
bike mechanic
nothing wrong with high magnification macro, but its not
general purpose macro which includes both high and medium
and lower magnification work.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net
On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
I've put them all in a text file and will keep an eye out for them. That
35/3.5 sounds especially appealing, focusing difficulty notwithstanding. I
don't have anything in that focal length, and I'm not too crazy about the
Takumar 28/2.8 I
On Feb 14, 2012, at 4:06 PM, frank theriault wrote:
The bottom bracket on my work bike gave out. Even worse, it's seized
in the BB holder. Since getting it out is taking a long time, I
decided to get my road bike, a lovely mid-nineties Marinoni, together
and on the road. I took it to my
On 2/13/2012 10:32 PM, David Mann wrote:
On Feb 14, 2012, at 3:20 AM, Walt Gilbert wrote:
I've put them all in a text file and will keep an eye out for them. That 35/3.5
sounds especially appealing, focusing difficulty notwithstanding. I don't have
anything in that focal length, and I'm not
http://tamoneki.tumblr.com
Awesome set, counting my lucky stars I'm not enduring that winter. I'm
a cold weather wimp, for sure.
--
Doug Lefty Franklin
NutDriver Racing
http://NutDriver.org
Facebook NutDriver Racing
Sponsored by Murphy
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On Feb 13, 2012, at 8:38 PM, David Mann wrote:
On Feb 14, 2012, at 4:06 PM, frank theriault wrote:
The bottom bracket on my work bike gave out. Even worse, it's seized
in the BB holder. Since getting it out is taking a long time, I
decided to get my road bike, a lovely mid-nineties
On 2012-02-13 9:17, Subash wrote:
PJ, any idea what's the k135/2.5 is like? just came across one in very
good shape for about $50. i like k lenses so will most probably buy it
anyway but it'd be nice to know :)
It's frackin' great! I haven't used mine in a while, but I recall it as
having a
On 2012-02-13 11:06, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Subash,
The K135/2.5 is a poor man's A*135/1.8.
It's the best of the 135's (w/o including the A*135/1.8).
That's kinda like saying that gold is a poor man's platinum.
--
Doug Lefty Franklin
NutDriver Racing
http://NutDriver.org
Facebook NutDriver
On 2012-02-13 11:36, JC OCONNELL wrote:
the smc k135/2.5 ( not the takumar 135/2.5) is a killer sharp lens.
I have both, and agree wholeheartedly. The SMC-K 135/2.5 will cut you,
it's so sharp. Like the FA* 200/2.8 (oh God I used to love eBay).
--
Doug Lefty Franklin
NutDriver Racing
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
