On 21 September 2012 22:23, John Celio neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
Shot with my K5 and M* 300mm f4 (at f11):
http://i.imgur.com/VGco5.jpg
Four more photos are in my public album on Picasa:
http://goo.gl/IEpOs
The hazy city is San Francisco.
It was utterly amazing to see this so
On 23 September 2012 02:42, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
We've been keeping my daughter's dog until she got a DC apartment that
would take dogs. She's picking him up next weekend. I sent her these
with the message: Pick him him up soon or he's wearing a dress:
So, a few months back I snapped up a reaaally cheap Sigma 20-40mm/f2.8 – brand
new from Digital Camera Warehouse for like $315 (they look after me well! ☺ ) -
http://www.digitalcamerawarehouse.com.au/prod2549.htm . I thought, what the
hell, I’ll give it a go for that price, and the reviews
The secretions on the skin of many frogs is intended to deter toothed animals
from such nonsense. Some of the critters are poisonous, especially in the
tropical climes. A few are deadly poisonous.
It's a good practice wherever you are to NOT lick a frog or toad, or lick your
hand clean if
Is there a way to tell Lightroom “If you recognize the damn lens, and
you have a correction profile on file for it, just apply the damn
correction already”?
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
It's kind of fun how playing with the curves can bring the colors out though:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8014630906/in/set-72157631601242039
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
The shuttle must
be one of the loudest things ever made.
wait till you see some of Mike Wilson's shirts.
B
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
David Mann
Sent: 23 September 2012 06:47
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject:
It's a good practice wherever you are to NOT lick a frog
Must ... resist ...
B
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Joseph McAllister
Sent: 23 September 2012 08:42
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: PESO: Creature of
I guess because one came out a month or two ago (or when I discovered it).
This one is different, of course. In more ways than one.
I droppered the edge to white, or as close at it would come, upped the exposure
25%, cut the saturation by 50%, and bumped the sharpness 25% (in Apple's
Preview
On Sep 21, 2012, at 9:50 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
An exhibit on display at the Printmaking Center of New Jersey:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16474919
Comments are appreciated.
I'd make a comment, but I think you've got things well in hand.
--
Larry Colen
Hm...
The things they had committed to introduce in 2012 have materialised, so their
status have changed. Other than that it seems pretty non-committal to me.
Hopefully it will be firmed up at the next international fair. Maybe at the
next PMA?
Jostein
Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
I
Tim, make yourself a Develop User Preset with Enable Profile
Corrections on, then select it to be applied in the Import dialogue.
You have to open up the full details view in the import dialogue.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:48 AM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Is there a way to tell
Haha! How awesome would that be?
And another question - is there somewhere you can download lens profiles for
lenses that aren't already included in LR4?
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Tim
Bray
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012
:ooks like it's going to be $1199 at BH. At that price, I'll take one.
Paiul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
That's a really good price. If i were to get one of K5 II, I would
be most tempted by the s.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
:ooks like it's going to be $1199 at BH. At that price, I'll take one.
Paiul
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
The only FAs left are the limiteds. I wonder how this bodes for FF.
Of course, they can work on anything they want and not announce it.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 1:30 AM, John Francis jo...@panix.com wrote:
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:24:59PM -0400, Miserere wrote:
Hey, I hadn't realised Pentax
Yeah, I forgot about that chemical throw until I was processing the
images. I do that periodically.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:21 AM, Chris Mitchell
chris.mitch...@which.net wrote:
On 23 September 2012 02:42, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
We've been keeping my daughter's dog until
That's just the k-5 II isn't it? I didn't see the s version on the site?
But yep, if that's the price, I'll be grabbing one asap too!
Tan. :)
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Paul
Stenquist
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 10:05
Pentax Forums has some listed in this thread:
http://www.pentaxforums.com/forums/pentax-slr-lens-discussion/
If you go to the end of the thread, there is a downloader for various
profiled lenses.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:52 AM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
Haha! How awesome would
There's a very fine finish on that bw rendering, Dave. Very nice!
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:55 AM, David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/djbrooks/8015313410/in/photostream
Playing around with LR BW plug ins
Dave
--
Documenting Life in Rural Ontario.
He looks like he is straining to get out of Deb's grip..
But I see you admire William Wegman
ann
On 9/22/2012 21:42, Steven Desjardins wrote:
We've been keeping my daughter's dog until she got a DC apartment that
would take dogs. She's picking him up next weekend. I sent her these
with the
Yeah, well none of that seemed to bother HCB too much, did it?
;-)
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: P. J. Alling webstertwenty...@gmail.com
Sent: September 23, 2012
Well it's IIIc and
Reminds me of Enzo Ferrari, who said (paraphrasing liberally) that by the time
one can afford to buy his cars they are too old to enjoy them.
cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Bob W
I used my IIIc quite a bit and my IIIf, which is basically the same, was used
extensively. Still use it from time to time. It's just a matter of getting
accustomed to it. I even progressed to the point where I could load it while
walking. A loud shutter on a Barnack Leica is a sign that a CLA
Well, it was quiet, but it's almost impossible for a focal plane shutter
to be more quiet than a well made leaf shutter...
On 9/23/2012 10:20 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
I used my IIIc quite a bit and my IIIf, which is basically the same, was used
extensively. Still use it from time to time.
Apparently blood and guts...
On 9/23/2012 1:17 AM, Bob W wrote:
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Bruce Walker
Or: How I Spent My Saturday
Sorry to hit'n'run, but I just had to share this before I go and crash
for the day. I was on-set all day during
Actually, Debbie bought this little hat in the pet section as a toy
for Lukas. (He loves little toys and collects them all on his bed.) I
put the hat on him and he just left it on. He was actually seriously
enjoying the attention when I took the shot.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Ann
The K5 IIs is 1299, $100 USD more than the K5II. Still a good price.
Being the bottom feeder I am, of course, I note the K5 is $879.
That's a tempting upgrade from my K7.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:59 AM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
That's just the k-5 II isn't it? I didn't see the
Of course, if I had the money I'd order one in a minute with some
bleedingly sharp lens.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:31 AM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, it was quiet, but it's almost impossible for a focal plane shutter to
be more quiet than a well made leaf shutter...
OK, I found three lying around. Just let me know.
Of course, guys, we could always see how many of these things we could
send to Ann. :-)
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:03 PM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Ann Sanfedele
Here :-)
It's actually a nice shot of a cliche scene.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
It's kind of fun how playing with the curves can bring the colors out though:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8014630906/in/set-72157631601242039
--
Larry Colen
Doug Brewer wrote:
On 9/21/12 9:26 PM, Mark Roberts wrote:
So I haven't been able to get out and actually do any photography for
far too long. But today I sat down and did something I also haven't
done in far too long: printing. Made a few prints for myself and one
for the faculty art exhibit
But if the autofocus on the K5 II is as good as reported, the extra few hundred
are well worth it.
On Sep 23, 2012, at 11:13 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
The K5 IIs is 1299, $100 USD more than the K5II. Still a good price.
Being the bottom feeder I am, of course, I note the
From: Igor Roshchin
I am surprised why nobody on this list has mentioned the new Pentax lens
roadmap yet. It shows among the images in one of the links that
Brian [Walters] has posted:
On Sep 23, 2012, at 8:24 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
It's actually a nice shot of a cliche scene.
Thanks.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:53 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
It's kind of fun how playing with the curves can bring the colors out though:
Print em big, set up a stand at the next street festival,. you'll sell
dozens...
On 9/23/2012 3:53 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
It's kind of fun how playing with the curves can bring the colors out though:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/8014630906/in/set-72157631601242039
--
Larry Colen
I have been thinking about doing that for a swhil, but
what I am not sure is whether the profiles for zoom lenses take into
account difference in the correction for different focal lengths.
It might be easy to check, it just wasn't a priority for me.
Does anybody know that for sure?
Igor
Sun
Sun Sep 23 12:02:48 EDT 2012
John Sessoms wrote:
From: Igor Roshchin
I am surprised why nobody on this list has mentioned the new Pentax
lens
roadmap yet. It shows among the images in one of the links that
Brian [Walters] has posted:
It makes me sooo angry when the ketchup bottle spurts!
- Original Message -
From: Bruce Walker bruce.wal...@gmail.com
To: Pentax Discuss Mailing List PDML@pdml.net
Cc:
Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2012 9:24 PM
Subject: PESO - Tasha and Friend
Or: How I Spent My Saturday
Sorry to
Scratch that..
Yes, if properly created, profiles can contain information for
different focal lengths, as well as different apertures.
I now recalled the problem I had: profile for Pentax 17-70 is not available.
Profile for Pentax 18-250mm is not available either, but I think one
might be able
Checking the results I get from adjusting shots with the DA* 16-50,
I'd be willing to bet cash that focal length is taken into
consideration. The visible adjustment is much larger for 16mm than
50mm. I pretty much always apply the lens corrections.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 12:35 PM, Igor Roshchin
Sent a couple of messages that didn't show up.
--
Don't lose heart, they might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthly search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Pull quote about Pentax, in fact pretty much the entire report about
Pentax...
Oh, god, poor Pentax. They invented the SLR, though you would never
know it. Their cameras have always been excellent. Their lenses have
always been excellent. Their marketing? Face-palm! Pentax had but a
fraction
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly impacted
the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you tell that sensor resolution rather than
something else was the key factor?
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est
--
PDML
On 9/23/2012 1:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly impacted
the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you tell that sensor resolution rather than
something else was the key factor?
--
Larry Colen
It is amazing that you can get such large prints from the small HP printer
shown on the right of your desk!
But seriously, it is also always amazing to see the quality of your work as a
photographer and printer. Even though it is a picture of the prints, displayed
at typical internet
On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/23/2012 1:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly
impacted the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you tell that sensor resolution rather
than something
On Sep 23, 2012, at 1:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/23/2012 1:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly
impacted the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you
I notice it when I go to 1:1 view in LR. I see much more camera blur
with my K-5 than I ever did with my K100D Super, and nothing changed
in my technique between cameras.
I also notice it in file sizes. 25MB is much heavier on my computer
and memory cards than 10MB was.
Realistically, since 99
From: David Mann
On Sep 22, 2012, at 9:23 AM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
Shot with my K5 and M* 300mm f4 (at f11):
http://i.imgur.com/VGco5.jpg
What a fantastic photo and it must have been a real experience. I
had a poster of the shuttle on my wall when I was a kid.
On 9/23/2012 1:20 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
On Sep 23, 2012, at 10:09 AM, P. J. Alling wrote:
On 9/23/2012 1:08 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly impacted
the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you tell that
It's also illegal in California.
From: Joseph McAllister
The secretions on the skin of many frogs is intended to deter toothed
animals from such nonsense. Some of the critters are poisonous,
especially in the tropical climes. A few are deadly poisonous.
It's a good practice wherever you are
That means just about any lens that can fit a Leica ... ;-)
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 8:15 AM, Steven Desjardins drd1...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, if I had the money I'd order one in a minute with some
bleedingly sharp lens.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:31 AM, P. J. Alling
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 5:48 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
You are very good at what you do. As a matter of fact, when I am
photographing still lifes of found objects, I often think about how you would
shoot it. But just as I get constantly teased about my photos of disrobed
Interesting shot!
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Daniel J. Matyola danmaty...@gmail.com
Sent: September 22, 2012 9/22/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO: Artists'
Cliche or not it's a beautiful photo.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Larry Colen l...@red4est.com
Sent: September 23, 2012 9/23/12
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: PESO
Beautifully rendered and I like the photo too. A real feeling of anticipation.
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: David J Brooks pentko...@gmail.com
Sent: September 23, 2012 9/23/12
To: Pentax
On 9/23/2012 1:41 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
From: David Mann
On Sep 22, 2012, at 9:23 AM, John Celio
neo.venator.com+p...@gmail.com wrote:
Shot with my K5 and M* 300mm f4 (at f11):
http://i.imgur.com/VGco5.jpg
What a fantastic photo and it must have been a real experience. I
had a poster of
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
In real world experience, how often has the sensor resolution directly
impacted the quality of your photos?
What were the situations? How did you tell that sensor resolution rather than
something else was the key factor?
On 22/09/2012 10:49, Bob W wrote:
Not all hawks are solitary hunters, as I've just discovered. Yesterday when
I was down by the Cutty Sark I saw an enormous raptor fly over it and land
on a nearby roof. It was smaller than a buzzard and had a distinctive white
marking at the base of the tail,
I didn't think anything even vaguely sexual was illegal in California,
Portland OR., maybe, unless the frog enjoys it.
On 9/23/2012 1:47 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
It's also illegal in California.
From: Joseph McAllister
The secretions on the skin of many frogs is intended to deter toothed
On 23/09/2012 10:10, Bob W wrote:
The shuttle must
be one of the loudest things ever made.
wait till you see some of Mike Wilson's shirts.
Catherine says you're in trouble, now
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
David Mann
On 23/09/2012 19:04, P. J. Alling wrote:
Sent a couple of messages that didn't show up.
Sometimes we're lucky like that.
--
No fixed Adobe
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link
Stan Halpin wrote:
It is amazing that you can get such large prints from the small
HP printer shown on the right of your desk!
I am the Doctor Who of printing! ;-)
But seriously, it is also always amazing to see the quality of
your work as a photographer and printer. Even though it is a
I'll give them a little license, with the instant return mirror, Asahi
essentially invented the modern SLR. I have an Alpa Reflex, (type II,
Badged Bolsey Reflex), that is really quite crude with an non instant
return mirror and waist level thru the lens viewing, no prism.
Believe me Pentax
On 9/23/2012 11:10, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Actually, Debbie bought this little hat in the pet section as a toy
for Lukas. (He loves little toys and collects them all on his bed.) I
put the hat on him and he just left it on. He was actually seriously
enjoying the attention when I took the
Don't know for sure, but the description points more towards the ability to
image a sphere, though I am sure a soft or firmware algorithm must be run on
the data to merge the edges properly.
I guess the shooter is included in the 'edge' eh?
On Sep 22, 2012, at 00:19 , Walt wrote:
That's
I’ve been super happy with the K5. At this point it’s hard to believe
the IIs is going to be a cost-effective upgrade. On the other hand,
that Sony RX100 looks very tempting... -T
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 5:04 AM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
:ooks like it's going to be $1199 at
It’s a big deal for me, but that’s because I’m impatient and have a
short attention span and often fail to take enough time to compose
properly. So I have to do a lot of cropping. Thus, more pixels are a
win. -T
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 10:08 AM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
In real
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
Mark Roberts
[...]
Thanks Stan. Sometimes I fear that printing is becoming a lost art.
Most photo contests now want a medium size JPEG rather than a print.
(The last one I entered that asked for people to send prints
Add to the mix the K30 for $680 USD on Amazon, with a faster AF than
the K5. The K7 and some others may be leaving home.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:33 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
I’ve been super happy with the K5. At this point it’s hard to believe
the IIs is going to be a
Mostly she's holding him so I can get a picture. I have a large
collection of blurred ones.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:04 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
On 9/23/2012 11:10, Steven Desjardins wrote:
Actually, Debbie bought this little hat in the pet section as a toy
for Lukas.
The ultimate self portrait.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 3:12 PM, Joseph McAllister pentax...@mac.com wrote:
Don't know for sure, but the description points more towards the ability to
image a sphere, though I am sure a soft or firmware algorithm must be run on
the data to merge the edges
A fixed lens camera, basically the functional equivalent of a 1960's
1970's rangefinder, (some of those had extremely good lenses even though
they were fixed), for about $3000, doesn't sound like a great option. I
think if you're getting less you should pay less.
On 9/23/2012 3:33 PM, Tim
Tim Bray wrote:
Ive been super happy with the K5. At this point its hard to believe
the IIs is going to be a cost-effective upgrade.
Unless you're really limited by the autofocus of the K-5 (I'm not) I'd
guess you're probably right and the IIs won't make much sense as an
upgrade. Given that
The RX1 with the FF sensor is the $2800 one. The RX100 has a one inch
sensor for about $650.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:01 PM, P. J. Alling
webstertwenty...@gmail.com wrote:
A fixed lens camera, basically the functional equivalent of a 1960's 1970's
rangefinder, (some of those had extremely
Reviewers of the RX100 rave over the image quality but say there are
obvious user-interface control botches. I’m thinking that when the
V2 comes out, I will have been on the Canon S90/100 pocket-cam bus for
several years, will be seriously tempted.
The RX1 looks ultra-cool, but yeah, like P.J.
Yep, Exacta make non-return SLRs at least a decade before Pentax made
autoreturn SLRs.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:34 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think that Pentax invented the slr.
I thought that the Asahi innovation with the Pentax camera (it was
Seriously, I suspect Pentax only now has the support (Ricoh as opposed
to Hoya) to pursue FF. It just wan't ready (maybe no even close) by
the time Photokina rolled around.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 12:40 PM, Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org wrote:
Sun Sep 23 12:02:48 EDT 2012
John Sessoms wrote:
I enjoy taking photos of brambles and woods, and these combine a low
magnification level with lots of detail. The differences in resolution
between sensors, and between MF film and sensors, is quite apparent even
in small prints. The lower the resolution, the more the details merge
together.
I like it.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 2:22 PM, knarftheria...@gmail.com
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Interesting shot!
Cheers,
frank
What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof. --
Christopher Hitchens
--- Original Message ---
From: Daniel J. Matyola
Wonderful shots, although the push-push leaves me with a funny feeling in gut.
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 12:17 PM, frank theriault
knarftheria...@gmail.com wrote:
Is that a contact sheet or just four photos displayed on the same page?
cheers,
frank
On 9/20/12, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com
I suspect the RX1 is an experiment. The Fuji X100 was a success, but
that was about $1100. I wonder how far the RX1 will fall in terms of
street price.
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 4:20 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
Reviewers of the RX100 rave over the image quality but say there are
On 9/23/2012 11:23, Steven Desjardins wrote:
OK, I found three lying around. Just let me know.
Of course, guys, we could always see how many of these things we could
send to Ann. :-)
I could put them in my hair and play MEdusa
ann
On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 11:03 PM, John Sessoms
Welll...
MY friend had a cord to lend me to check out the monitor...
everything hooked up fine... except, when I connected the monitor to
the C521 a message appeared on the screen that said Cannot display in
this video mode. (don't shoot me if I didn't get those exact words right)
My wild
It's possible that your computer is trying to display in a mode the
monitor can't handle as well.
On 9/23/2012 6:00 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Welll...
MY friend had a cord to lend me to check out the monitor...
everything hooked up fine... except, when I connected the monitor to
the C521 a
I should have sent this link on Friday, but I was otherwise obsessed.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/190728387378?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
and just for your amusement - a non photo item I suspect will sell
http://www.thrane.name/Pictures/PAW/files/page7-1000-full.html
K-5, DA21mm, 1/160s, f/11, ISO400.
DagT
http://www.thrane.name/
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
That's my plan Mark! :) The K7 that I carry around as my backup will now go
on the shelf as a display camera with all of my old bodies and my current K5
will become my second body. I am shooting more weddings again now and need
to shoot with two bodies anyways. Looking forward to taking a
Awesome! Thanks Dave.
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of
David Parsons
Sent: Sunday, September 23, 2012 11:17 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Lightroom lens corrections
Pentax Forums has some listed in this thread:
On 9/23/2012 18:09, P. J. Alling wrote:
It's possible that your computer is trying to display in a mode the
monitor can't handle as well.
Yup - that's what the monitor told me I think
On 9/23/2012 6:00 PM, Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Welll...
MY friend had a cord to lend me to check out the
I believe I have acquired a reputation. ;-)
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 6:06 PM, Ann Sanfedele ann...@nyc.rr.com wrote:
I should have sent this link on Friday, but I was otherwise obsessed.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/190728387378?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
and just for
Same here. I need two bodies, and i'm currently using a K7 as a backup. But my
K7 will go on ebay rather than the shelf.
Paul
On Sep 23, 2012, at 6:23 PM, Tanya Love tanyal...@bigpond.com wrote:
That's my plan Mark! :) The K7 that I carry around as my backup will now go
on the shelf as a
A pair of 'em, leading the pack:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16478894
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16478893size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
That's good shot. You can visually follow the queue, but the front
four look pretty serious (for sheep).
On Sun, Sep 23, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16478893size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
What do you think they would go for on ebay? Do you think its worth trying
to sell them? I have never sold off an old body, I still have every body I
have ever owned (except for the Pz-1p that took a cliff dive!). I am much
too hard on my gear to try and sell it. All of my bodies are banged up
From: Ann Sanfedele
Welll...
MY friend had a cord to lend me to check out the monitor...
everything hooked up fine... except, when I connected the monitor to
the C521 a message appeared on the screen that said Cannot display in
this video mode. (don't shoot me if I didn't get those exact
with the 6MP istDS, when using sharp lenses, I get pixelation
of diagonals at high magnifications. More MP would alleviate this
situation.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On
phew - for a moment I thought it would be NSFW :-)
ann
On 9/23/2012 19:07, Paul Stenquist wrote:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=16478893size=lg
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit
1 - 100 of 115 matches
Mail list logo
