Thanks Ann.
-- he looks positively pissed off , too :-)
You'd be too with the weather he was experiencing.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "ann sanfedele"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Chipping Sparrow'
terrific shot, ken
-- he
He is a tough little dude, isn't he?
That is a fine image in every respect.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 11:49 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> Thanks Christine, glad you enjoyed the image.
>
> Kenneth Waller
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/ke
Interesting interview about a (the) Pentax repairman.
http://www.pentaxforums.com/articles/columns/twenty-questions-eric-hendrickson-interview.html
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p
I remember being told about a regulation about not intentionally approaching
a Humpback any closer than 100 yards or so. Its different if they approach
you.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "John"
Subject: Re: PESO: Humpback
Thanks Mark.
"Other birds fly south, why didn't I?..."
Cause he loved Pure Michigan
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Mark C"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Chipping Sparrow'
Excellent - as Ann said, he looks pissed off... "Other bird
I agree. Much of what you say maybe be true.
But must ask. Some percent of used sales not going to fund purchase of brand
new equipment from Pentax. Do you agree?
Some is simply selling to bring dollars. Others could be to fund purchase of
non-Pentax gear.
So if majority of people follow i
Thanks Christine, glad you enjoyed the image.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Christine Aguila"
Subject: Re: PESO - 'Chipping Sparrow'
Gosh, Ken, that’s pretty. The coloring is wonderful, position of bird
nice, no distract
Stumbled into this today:
http://antiquecameras.net/pentaxm42lens.html
It's new to me but maybe others have heard of it. Interesting mix of
info presented about various lenses and some the outbound links are
interesting and useful as well. The link above is to the M42 section of
the site, it
Kim wrote: Good idea, but don't this hurt Pentax in the long run?
Kim,
I don't quite understand what you mean by "hurting Pentax in the long
run"? In a sense, buying any used lens is less profitable for the
company than if one purchased a new lens (which then causes the
retailer to purchase more n
I don't care much for the pose, but the photo is well lit.
It just doesn't really say "dance" to me. This says "DANCE", even if
it's not under the bridge
http://brooklynstreetbeat.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Isadora-Duncan-Photo-Credit-Richard-Termine-1024x787.jpg
On 1/31/2016 4:35 PM, Bob
On 1/31/2016 6:37 PM, Matthew Hunt wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 6:21 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
I wish I could somehow turn gmail's spam filtering off, Firefox does a
pretty good job of rerouting spam, to it's spam folder, it's much more
convenient, and it actually learns what I consider to be s
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 6:48 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> That's the problem with gmail, I believe that it's spam filtering takes
> place before user designed filters.
Like I said, there's a filter option "Never send it to Spam". It does
what it says. It kept Kim's email from going to Spam for me.
I like it. The tiny pine tree to the right adds something.
Rick
On Jan 30, 2016, at 7:15 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20sleepingent.html
>
> Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/Sigma Zoom 70-210mm f.4.0~5.6 DC-II
>
> As usual comments are welcome b
I just checked my junk folder on Gmail and poor Kim had three emails one
of which was a reply to one of my threads. I hope he didn't think I was
being a dick and was just ignoring him.
To clarify, you all know I can be a dick, but that's usually not because
I ignore you.
On 1/31/2016 4:57 P
That's the problem with gmail, I believe that it's spam filtering takes
place before user designed filters. Thunderbird, (I called it Firefox,
my bad), has an adaptive spam filter. If something isn't labeled as
junk, and I think it is, I just mark it as junk and vice-versa, and it
remembers.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 6:21 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
> I wish I could somehow turn gmail's spam filtering off, Firefox does a
> pretty good job of rerouting spam, to it's spam folder, it's much more
> convenient, and it actually learns what I consider to be spam.
What if you create a filter with
Think of how I feel, I log into gmail through their pop interface. I
never see my spam folder unless I log into gmail's web interface, a
procedure I avoid like I would a bill collect from the mob.
I wish I could somehow turn gmail's spam filtering off, Firefox does a
pretty good job of rerout
It might be in your spam folder, and there do exist email servers that
eat suspected spam and don't report it. I know that smashes e-mail
protocols all to hell, but that doesn't stop it from happening. If such
an e-mail was routed through such a server on it's way to you, then
you'd never see
I could tell you but then I'd be required to kill myself.
On 1/31/2016 4:20 PM, John wrote:
On 1/31/2016 3:33 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's not the Sun, it's the glow from the "event" no one is allowed to
talk about.
I know I'm going to regret asking, but you just lost me there. What
"event
Well that explains why I didn't see it back when I took mine :-)
ann
On 1/31/2016 4:34 PM, John wrote:
I think you're about a block too far back. It looks like you were
between Front St & York St.
I think you need to be between Water St & Front St to be able to frame
the Empire State Building
That was the point of Dan's original post- that he doubted it
ann
On 1/31/2016 3:29 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
I didn't notice that they'd stuck the Empire State building in there.
On 1/31/2016 2:52 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
No it isn't
Here is my shot from the same place - believe me, if I coul
I didn't notice that they'd stuck the Empire State building in there.
On 1/31/2016 2:52 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
No it isn't
Here is my shot from the same place - believe me, if I could have
seen the Empire state fromthere it would have been in
https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-F
Just don't get too close to them in a kayak or it might be the LAST item
on your bucket list.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8u-MW7vF0-Y
On 1/31/2016 1:15 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
Neato! Must be amazing to see these creatures live! It’s on my
bucket list! Cheers, Christine
On Jan 30,
Good idea, but don't this hurt Pentax in the long run?
Kim
> If you are wanting a great lens optically and don't mind the
> screwmount AF, this might open up a pathway to potential bargains -
> buying a lens discounted because the SDM is not working & just
> planning on doing the conversion
I don't think so. The K2 also has a self timer lever that the camera in
the video lacks.
On 1/30/2016 7:15 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
K2
On 30 Jan 2016, at 21:08, John wrote:
It's not a KX or KM because it doesn't have the self timer lever.
On 1/29/2016 4:51 PM, Philip Northeast wrote:
Picture
It was good to get out with a camera again yesterday. I was in a dreamy mood,
the morning was gray at first and brightened later. Three of the ten photos
I've posted:
https://flic.kr/p/CJhPAU
https://flic.kr/p/CJpBNv
https://flic.kr/p/DeFGAN
Set of ten photos available @ https://flic.kr/
Well.. ok I was a bit further back and using long lens... hmmm
ann
On 1/31/2016 2:52 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
No it isn't
Here is my shot from the same place - believe me, if I could have
seen the Empire state fromthere it would have been in
https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foo
Thanks Matthew & John. Should have occurred to me to look there,
particularly once it showed up on the PDML Archive.
:\
It was there with this reason: "Why is this message in Spam? It has a
from address in yahoo.com but has failed yahoo.com's required tests
for authentication." No idea why that ha
No it isn't
Here is my shot from the same place - believe me, if I could have seen
the Empire state fromthere it would have been in
https://annsan.smugmug.com/On-the-Road-or-On-Foot/New-York-New-York/i-RNcjf6K/A
ann
On 1/31/2016 1:20 PM, David Parsons wrote:
It's legit.
https://www.googl
Thanks for the replies Ken and Bulent.
I'm glad to learn that my tripod (Manfrotto 3021BPRO) should be
adequate to support the camera. Also, I'm glad I chose the Arca-Swiss
p0 monoball as it appears to be more than adequate for the job.
(Although it is unusual to use a ball head with a view camera
On 31 Jan 2016, at 21:20, John wrote:
>
>> On 1/31/2016 3:33 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>> That's not the Sun, it's the glow from the "event" no one is allowed to
>> talk about.
>
> I know I'm going to regret asking, but you just lost me there. What "event"?
Nobody talks about it.
B
>
>
>>
You're on Gmail. Have you checked your "junk" folder?
From what I've read here before that's the first place you should look
if you're not seeing some of the list messages.
On 1/31/2016 4:02 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
I saw it on the list.
Ch
Well, that google images link certainly show that it's been done to death.
Nevertheless, at least someone has found a way to squeeze a few drops of bad
taste from the image of an enormous phallus penetrating a vesica piscis:
http://danceasart.photoshelter.com/image/IDj5jMvVsPnI
B
> On 31
I think you're about a block too far back. It looks like you were
between Front St & York St.
I think you need to be between Water St & Front St to be able to frame
the Empire State Building inside the bridge supports the way the
photographer in Dan's found image did. To get the angle right, you'
On 1/31/2016 3:33 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
That's not the Sun, it's the glow from the "event" no one is allowed to
talk about.
I know I'm going to regret asking, but you just lost me there. What "event"?
On 1/31/2016 1:06 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Call me sad, but I've just been on Google maps a
Plug these numbers into Google Maps search bar:
40.702820, -73.989601 & access street view.
DUMBO means Down Under the Manhattan Bridge Overpass. I found that out
using TinEye to search and see if I could find the original of the image.
It doesn't look like the sun is setting in the north to me.
I use Gmail, and Kim's message showed up in my PDML folder, with a notice:
"This message was not sent to Spam because of a filter you created."
I have a filter that prevents PDML email from going to Spam. I created
it a while ago, when several members' emails were all going to Spam.
On Sun, Jan
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:42 PM, Brian Walters wrote:
> I saw it on the list.
>
> Cheers
>
> Brian
It is now showing up in the PDML archive, but I haven't seen in in my
email yet. So, as an I.T. guy, I'm interested in how some people could
see this on the list and some people (like me) would NOT
Good idea, but don't this hurt Pentax in the long run?
Kim
> If you are wanting a great lens optically and don't mind the
> screwmount AF, this might open up a pathway to potential bargains -
> buying a lens discounted because the SDM is not working & just
> planning on doing the conversion befo
I saw it on the list.
Cheers
Brian
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016, at 07:40 AM, Darren Addy wrote:
> Where did this reply from Kim Tang come from?
> I didn't receive it and it isn't showing up in the PDML archives.
> https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/
>
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:20 PM, John
On 31/1/16, David Parsons, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Further back gets the buildings in the right perspective, but the
>camera car shifted to the side so you can't see it in the street view.
More height would do it - original photograph standing on step ladder?
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
Where did this reply from Kim Tang come from?
I didn't receive it and it isn't showing up in the PDML archives.
https://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 2:20 PM, John wrote:
> Probably not as much as the problems with SDM lenses did.
>
> On 1/31/2016 1:41 PM, Kim Tang
That's not the Sun, it's the glow from the "event" no one is allowed to
talk about.
On 1/31/2016 1:06 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
Call me sad, but I've just been on Google maps and then Google streetview. If
you put yourself on Washington Street between Water St and Front St you can see
that view,
On 31/1/16, Bob W-PDML, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Good job I tidied up a bit:
>
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/31/tim-peake-photographs-
london-space-social-media#img-1
Some people just have money to burn!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |W
Further back gets the buildings in the right perspective, but the
camera car shifted to the side so you can't see it in the street view.
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 1:25 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 31/1/16, David Parsons, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>It's legit.
>
> Crucially the ESB is visible
On 31/1/16, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Hi!
>
>Here is a pic for you.
>
>http://pentax-ways.blogspot.co.il/2016/01/2016-03-street-circus.html
>
>Please be brutal and honest... Or both...
Good photograph Boris but I have no idea what the photographer wants me
to see ;-)
--
Che
On 1/31/2016 1:25 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 31/1/16, David Parsons, discombobulated, unleashed:
It's legit.
Crucially the ESB is visible in the middle arch, although I suggest a
bit further back than you location Dave
I think if you correct for the keystone effect and crop it correctly you
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Christine Aguila wrote:
> Must be amazing to see these creatures live!
It is indeed amazing. I am always thrilled when one breaches near our
boat. I go out every year, at least twice, and the experience never
becomes routine.
Thanks for looking, Christine.
Dan
Probably not as much as the problems with SDM lenses did.
On 1/31/2016 1:41 PM, Kim Tang wrote:
Good idea, but don't this hurt Pentax in the long run?
Kim
If you are wanting a great lens optically and don't mind the
screwmount AF, this might open up a pathway to potential bargains -
buying a
Call me sad, but I've just been on Google maps and then Google streetview. If
you put yourself on Washington Street between Water St and Front St you can see
that view, albeit without the somewhat mysterious phenomenon of the sun
apparently rising or setting in the north. But it's in a district
What's wrong is the proportion of the Empire state to the arch it is
under... also at this point more taller buildings are in the way
But it does make me want to grab my DA 55-300 and head to Brooklyn...
Maybe I'll do it tomorrow
ann
On 1/31/2016 2:59 PM, ann sanfedele wrote:
Well.. ok I was
Ann, is this view even possible?
http://themetapicture.com/photogenic-nyc-view/
or just another photoshop?
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, ple
Agreed; A sharp image somewhat limited by a very close crop.
J
- Original Message -
From: "Mark C"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Saturday, January 30, 2016 7:39:10 PM
Subject: Re: PESO -- A Frame overlooking Deer Lake.
Nice! Colors and composition are excellent.
On 1/30/2016 6:
Which means that the photograph is not so good...
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 8:27 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
> On 31/1/16, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>>Hi!
>>
>>Here is a pic for you.
>>
>>http://pentax-ways.blogspot.co.il/2016/01/2016-03-street-circus.html
>>
>>Please be brutal an
>From our Whale Watch Thursday:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18180680&size=lg
K-5 IIs, DA 18-135 zoom
Comments are invited and appreciated.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdm
On 31/1/16, David Parsons, discombobulated, unleashed:
>It's legit.
Crucially the ESB is visible in the middle arch, although I suggest a
bit further back than you location Dave
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
__
It's legit.
https://www.google.com/maps/@40.7029836,-73.9895968,3a,75y,354.23h,95.87t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1sSteR_VZMWJQK9fsWUNG-qA!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 12:33 PM, Daniel J. Matyola
wrote:
> Ann, is this view even possible?
> http://themetapicture.com/photogenic-nyc-view/
>
>
Hi!
Here is a pic for you.
http://pentax-ways.blogspot.co.il/2016/01/2016-03-street-circus.html
Please be brutal and honest... Or both...
--
Boris
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the lin
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Bob W-PDML wrote:
> it's in a district called Dumbo, so what do I know?
LOL. MARK!
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from th
Good job I tidied up a bit:
https://www.theguardian.com/science/2016/jan/31/tim-peake-photographs-london-space-social-media#img-1
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and
Neato! Must be amazing to see these creatures live! It’s on my bucket list!
Cheers, Christine
> On Jan 30, 2016, at 1:38 PM, Daniel J. Matyola wrote:
>
> http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18180085&size=lg
> Comments are invited
>
> Dan Matyola
> http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/dani
Still a dramatic shot of the water! Cheers, Christine
> On Jan 30, 2016, at 10:47 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>
> Just one more shot from Deer Lake.
>
> I took a number of vertical and horizontal images of this and as I didn't
> have a tripod, and there was no convenient support to lean up agains
A Lovely old tree! The theme for this year’s Earth Day 4/22 is Trees! Cheers,
Christine
> On Jan 30, 2016, at 6:15 PM, P.J. Alling wrote:
>
> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/1604247/PESO/PESO%20--%20sleepingent.html
>
> Equipment: Pentax K-5II w/Sigma Zoom 70-210mm f.4.0~5.6 DC-II
>
>
Most are probably aware, but I wanted to remind everyone that a bad
SDM does not make a lens worthless. Besides getting the SDM repaired,
you can also convert the lens to a regular screw drive AF. Most who
have experience with a converted SDM lens say that it actually focuses
slightly faster than S
Amusing... :-)
I have the 2012 mini with 2.6Ghz i7 quad-core, 16G RAM, and 1T SSD fitted
internally. I keep 300-400G free space on it; all my data and my accounts are
stored on fast external drives (USB3 or Thunderbolt connections). It's a very
fast little machine this way.
G
> On Jan 30, 20
Just for Ann.
A Zebra Dove, the smaller of the two mourning doves that are found
everywhere in Hawaii and fill the air will their constant cooing:
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=18180393&size=lg
K-5 IIs, DA 18-135 zoom
Comments are invited.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/
66 matches
Mail list logo
