Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "Larry Colen"
Subject: Re: PESO(s) -- Tree of Egrets
Are you trying to bring us down?
eider that or I'm trying to feather the flames
On July 28, 2016 4:34:20 PM PDT, Ken Waller wrote:
>
Great level of detail!
That is a fascinating and effective image, if not a "pretty" one.
Dan Matyola
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/danieljmatyola
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Jostein wrote:
> Another stacking pursuit.
> K-5, bellows, a 1947-vintage 4X lens scavenged off a Wild Heerbrug
Are you trying to bring us down?
On July 28, 2016 4:34:20 PM PDT, Ken Waller wrote:
>>> > I just try to enjoy the heron now.
>>>
>>> That's just ducky.
>>
>> Except that the final bill can be eye-watering.
>
>I hope this is your swan song on this matter.
Are you
>
>
>Kenneth Waller
>http://www.p
There is a difference between "Photoshop being allowed" and Photoshop
being
used in a less-than-honest method.
Seems to me when Photoshop is allowed it's Katie bar the doors unless very
specific limits are stated.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Origina
> I just try to enjoy the heron now.
That's just ducky.
Except that the final bill can be eye-watering.
I hope this is your swan song on this matter.
Kenneth Waller
http://www.pentaxphotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: PESO(s) -- T
Jostein wrote:
Another stacking pursuit.
K-5, bellows, a 1947-vintage 4X lens scavenged off a Wild Heerbrugg M10
microscope. 200 exposures.
http://www.alunfoto.no/innhold/klegg-horsefly/
That is not the worst photo I've seen this week. If I don't want to seem
a mediocre photographer, I prob
Hmm - it's tales like this that make me glad I resisted the temptation
to upgrade from Win7. It works; it does what I want; I'm leaving well
enough alone...
Also my PC is so low spec that I'm almost certain I'd run into worse
problems than you have.
Cheers
Brian
++
I always try to have a camera close to hand. Fortunately the K-3II with
the 18-250 was in the trunk of the car when we saw this on the door of
the diner:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/ellarsee/28582622726/in/album-72157671685887815/
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://
Just for grins & giggles, another tale of something or other ...
Started the quest for Windoze 10 on my Photoshop computer yesterday
morning at 4:00am. If I'm going to have insomnia I might as well get
some use out of it.
Again following the procrastinators guide, I made an image backup before
s
Alas. :-)
Den 28.07.2016 22.36, skrev Gonz:
Does this WHAM have tenure? If not, fire them! hehe ;)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jostein wrote:
Thanks Gonz!
Not sure if it will pass with the resident Wall Hanging Approbation
Minister... :-)
Jostein
Den 28.07.2016 21.23, skrev Gonz:
Mike,
the X4 indeed an objective lens.
Wild Heerbrugg was a Swiss optical instruments manufacturer.
The microscope it came from is pictured here:
http://m.finn.no/bap/webstore/ad.html?finnkode=63767741&fks=63767741
Note the spotlights above the tray. The 4X is probably included to have
the i
This is an interesting DIY for stacking:
http://www.diyphotography.net/create-an-automated-macro-rail-for-image-stacking/
I do believe I have all the components or something similar...
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:37 PM, mike wilson
wrote:
> That lens gives a very pleasant, relaxing effect. Unli
That lens gives a very pleasant, relaxing effect. Unlike the cleg, as they are
known here.
X4 is an unusual size. This is an objective? Never heard of Wild Heerbrugg
either.
> On 28 July 2016 at 20:08 Jostein wrote:
>
>
> Another stacking pursuit.
> K-5, bellows, a 1947-vintage 4X lens scav
Does this WHAM have tenure? If not, fire them! hehe ;)
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Jostein wrote:
> Thanks Gonz!
> Not sure if it will pass with the resident Wall Hanging Approbation
> Minister... :-)
> Jostein
>
>
> Den 28.07.2016 21.23, skrev Gonz:
>
>> Wow! That is an absolutely stunn
There is a difference between "Photoshop being allowed" and Photoshop being
used in a less-than-honest method.
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 3:27 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
> I came here to also say this. In almost these exact words.
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Paul Stenquist
> wrote:
>
>> Gre
Didn't say it WAS done that way, only that it COULD be done that way.
With "today's super-low-noise sensors" you could use a low flash power
and mask off portions of the Fresnel lens to make the circle of light
illuminating the bird small enough to not light the trees.
I shoot the scene first wi
I came here to also say this. In almost these exact words.
On Wed, Jul 27, 2016 at 4:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> Great pics. But a fork, a spoon and a moon appears to be a photoshop job.
> The tree branches are seen in silhouette but the bird is nicely
> illuminated. By what? Especially agai
> On 28 July 2016 at 00:27 Ken Waller wrote:
>
>
> > I just try to enjoy the heron now.
>
> That's just ducky.
Except that the final bill can be eye-watering.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Larry Colen"
> Subject: Re: PESO(s) -- Tree of Egrets
>
>
> >
> >
> > P.J. Alling wrote:
John wrote:
>You could probably do it with a Better Beamer.
>
>http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/review/better-beamer-flash-extender-review/
Not without illuminating at least part of the tree. I mean, the Better
Beamer narrows down the field illuminated by the flash a lot, but it
can't be *that*
Thanks Gonz!
Not sure if it will pass with the resident Wall Hanging Approbation
Minister... :-)
Jostein
Den 28.07.2016 21.23, skrev Gonz:
Wow! That is an absolutely stunning, amazing photo! Print it and frame it!
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Jostein wrote:
Another stacking pursuit.
If this was a flash job you'd probably spot it by glints of certain
portions of the branch underneath the bird.
But I don't agree with Paul either. I think this is done by selective
dodging. The main reason I think so is that the contrast in the plumage
looks unnaturally harsh, as it would be
Wow!
- Marco
> On Jul 28, 2016, at 12:08 PM, Jostein wrote:
>
> Another stacking pursuit.
> K-5, bellows, a 1947-vintage 4X lens scavenged off a Wild Heerbrugg M10
> microscope. 200 exposures.
>
> http://www.alunfoto.no/innhold/klegg-horsefly/
>
> Jostein
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
There are many stunning images, but the PHOTOGRAPHIC quality displayed
here is quite low. There are only a couple of them that actually appear
to have something within the frame in focus.
I wouldn't want to be one of the judges trying to choose winners &
losers based on what is displayed on that
You could probably do it with a Better Beamer.
http://www.digitalcamerareview.com/review/better-beamer-flash-extender-review/
On 7/27/2016 5:07 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Great pics. But a fork, a spoon and a moon appears to be a photoshop
job. The tree branches are seen in silhouette but the bi
Wow! That is an absolutely stunning, amazing photo! Print it and frame it!
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Jostein wrote:
> Another stacking pursuit.
> K-5, bellows, a 1947-vintage 4X lens scavenged off a Wild Heerbrugg M10
> microscope. 200 exposures.
>
> http://www.alunfoto.no/innhold/klegg
Another stacking pursuit.
K-5, bellows, a 1947-vintage 4X lens scavenged off a Wild Heerbrugg M10
microscope. 200 exposures.
http://www.alunfoto.no/innhold/klegg-horsefly/
Jostein
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from
On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 15:24:17 -0400 (EDT) Igor PDML-StR wrote:
>
>Several PDMLers have purchased PDML calendars from Lulu recently.
>I was wondering, - how quickly did you receive it after the order was placed?
I ordered (from the Netherlands) and got a 4 to 7 workdays production/delivery
estimate
Well walked and seen! :-)
Jostein
Den 28. juli 2016 14.58.30 CEST, skrev Godfrey DiGiorgi
:
>Seen on a walk around the neighborhood...
>
> https://flic.kr/p/KsXR5e
>
>enjoy!
>G
>
>The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate
>it.
--
Sent from my Android device with K
And yes the tamron are ring type ultrasonic motors similar to what
canon uses. I hope that clears some confusion. The DC motor in my
20-40 is a little poky but it feels solid and reliable. I can't say
the same about my 60-250
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/
You won't see another lens use the SDM motor that was in the 17-70,
60-250,50-135, 16-50, etc ever again. They revived the branding for
the tamron lenses, which frankly was a serious mistake and has led to
a lot of confusion. The motors are built by tamron in those lenses and
are comparable to the
Stan,
You raised an interesting question.
The thought of the ultrasound being heard by some animals/birds had
crossed my mind before. I had not got to read about that actual design of
the motor until your post nudged me.
Prior to that I was somewhat dismissing "ultrasonic" assuming it could'
On Thu, Jul 28, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Gonz wrote:
> > Is the mistake in the caption to "Northern Lights over Jokulsarlon,
> > Iceland", where a couple is
> > mentioned as looking at the lights and I can see no people in the frame?
>
I thought it was labeling the "lights" over Antarctica as Aurora Bo
Huge Filaprom - "can be partially seem" should be "can be partially seen"
A Fork, a Spoon and a Moon "sits atop of a branch" should be "sits atop a
branch" or "sits on top of a branch"
In the Seven Magic Points Rune, the first comma of the first sentence
should not be there.
There are a few other,
I went to Wikipedia to see if they could tell me what an ultrasonic motor is,
how it works, and whether it can be heard.
That last point was my first question actually. Seeing the term “ultrasonic”
triggered the thought that the sonic may be “ultra” with respect to human
hearing, but maybe bird
Seen on a walk around the neighborhood...
https://flic.kr/p/KsXR5e
enjoy!
G
The trouble with being punctual is that nobody's there to appreciate it.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the
35 matches
Mail list logo
