> Sorry guys but you really cant do serious
> Architechure with any pentax cameras or
> Lenses because you need full camera movements
> That only a view camera can provide for architecture.
> Its amazing what you can do with a view for that.
> jco
I thought tilt/shift lenses were designed to perfo
> There are only a few adapters for Canon FD series lenses and none
> give full functionality.
Yes, adapters exist, but stop-down metering is not convenient. Plus, there is
either teleconversion and light loss, or loss of infinity focus. So I will buy
some lenses for the DSLR.
> Go for the FA35
For those who want a "real life" example of the K100D SR in action, one chap
did a rather tongue-in-cheek test, shooting on the move from his lawnmower(!).
The before/after comparison shots are dramatic:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/read.asp?forum=1036&message=19647176
Same guy did some nigh
> You can probably afford the 40 limited. It's very cheap (About 2/3rds
> the cost of a new FA 35/2 here in Canada)
> The Sigma's not worth the money. The Tamron is, but the SMC-DA 16-45 f4
> goes for similar (or less) cost and is a better option IMHO. The 18-55
> is actually decent (unlike the
> You can probably afford the 40 limited. It's very cheap (About 2/3rds
> the cost of a new FA 35/2 here in Canada)
If you mean the 43/1.9, it's currently US$370 after rebate at B&H online, while
the FA 35/2 is US$300 (but out of stock). Does your Canadian store have a
website? I'd like to take a
Hi everyone,
I'm new - been lurking for a few days. I currently use film-based equipment
(Canon A1 and Rollei compact point-and-shoot), but am considering going
digital.
I shoot mostly landscapes and architecture, and prefer a wide-angle lens. With
the compact I usually use the wide end (38mm) an
6 matches
Mail list logo
