.
Regards
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender or the Zetex Group or that they
have been accurately reproduced from their original form.
Zetex
I'm a digest subscriber and have been missing digests since last Friday
(missing 1234, 1235, 1239, 1244, 1245, 1246, 1249, 1252, 1253).
Anyone else experiencing this? Can it be fixed?
Thanks and Regards
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS
images that invites study. It makes me
want to see them in person and see more into your 'view' of them. You may
find a better cropping, but this image talks to me the way it is. I would
not change a thing.
Cesar
Many thanks for the generous comments.
Regards
Jim Brooks
Mike Johnston wrote:
by 2012 the river would be twelve feet long
In January the temperature was 2 degrees C. In August it was 25 degrees C.
If the temperature continues to rise at this rate then I would give the
polar ice caps no more than 5 months. We're all doomed, doomed I say!
Regards
Jim
printing I exposed the face on the left of the shot
for twice the time of the one on the right. Obviously the image stands or
falls on its own merits, and I can see where I might change one or two
things if I shoot it again.
Thanks and Regards
Jim Brooks
).
This shot captures a truly stunning lighting condition, and has been
executed flawlessly.
Congratulations on a superb photograph.
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents
a bit of
a pain (but I can live with it!)
To summarise and to quote Practical Photography: It's good, bloody good, and
I like it!
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents
I am getting off my soapbox.
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender or the Zetex Group or that they
have been accurately reproduced from
lenses (not necessarily to be used together).
Pentax are you listening?
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender or the Zetex Group
Various posters asked How about the A70-210/4?
Well, as some have already written, it's a fabulous lens. Nice handling and
build, very sharp indeed, and pleasant rendering of out-of-focus backgrounds
(and sometimes subjects but that's nothing to do with the lens!). In my
experience with it the
Francis Tang wrote:
I thought my ME Super was screwy too before I realised the noise was from
the strap lugs.
It's always good to know that someone else has felt that heartstopping
moment, followed by an overwhelming sense of relief...
... when they realise their ME Super has rattly strap lugs.
Anders Werholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] asked:
Is this normal for a ME Super...?
Try again with the strap lugs removed, or held tightly to prevent them from
moving.
Hope this helps - good luck.
Regards
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS
Aaron Reynolds wrote:
Jim, perhaps you should loan your sig file to Mafud? ;)
Aaron - are you sure that was me? ;D
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated
John Mustarde wrote:
BTW, (which BTW stands for BTW)
... and I thought it was short for convenience.
Regards
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from
can easily choose spot or CW metering and use compensation. Truly
the best of all worlds and far better than the ME super with CW only (how
much bias is given to the central area?, how big is the central area? I
don't know!)
Regards
Jim Brooks
Tom C wrote Imagine how boring the list would be if we all agreed with each
other!
Yes, you're right!
Jim (tic)
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender
rotating the
dial through the extreme speeds ie to go from A to 1/60s on the MZ5n you
have to run through all the speeds from 1/2000s down to 1/60s - not a big
deal but the MZ-S offers an improvement.
Hope my ramblings make some sense.
Regards
Jim Brooks
Hi
Just got back the first results from this lens. The sharpness, contrast and
colour are FANTASTIC. They just blow the 80-320 zoom away!
TTFN
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume
I wrote: they need to launch a robocamera Canon clone with an
exposure mode selector dial.
or should they just spend more on advertising???
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You
Mike wrote:
P.S. You know why cameras don't come in a choice of ten colors? Because no
one would ever actually buy one. Photographers would be totally paralyzed
arguing endlessly over which color was best. gg
Nokia were on the right track with their clip-on covers for mobile phones.
Now there's
it Pentax? Imagine an MZ-S with the 80~320 mounted on it. What a
mismatch!
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender or the Zetex Group
and MZ-S. Damn!
Regards
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender or the Zetex Group or that they
have been accurately reproduced from
a smidgen of thread locker) and the lens is as good as
new.
Apologies if this is common knowledge but it saved me a trip to the repairer
so it may help someone out there!
Regards
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible
Rob Brigham wrote:
Personally I would like MZ-5N with updated AF. I would not normally
dream of spending £1000 on a body, but got into the idea of buying a
flagship which had absolutely everything I could ever want and would
last forever. Unfortunately the MZ-S is not quite this, so I am
was
solid and probably better made than the Russian Zenits, but the MEsuper and
A50/1.7 lens have that intangible feel that only comes from superb build
quality.
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should
One of the advertisers in this week's UK Amateur Photographer magazine said
31mm 1.8 Ltd, 23mm 1.9 Ltd - Coming soon - watch this space
Bye for now.
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should
Glenn
Just a tip that you probably know already:
Remove the 1A filter (if you have one fitted), as the flat glass surface can
reflect light sources such as streetlight, directly towards your subject!!!
The curved front element reduces this risk dramatically.
Good luck.
Jim Brooks
Chris wrote my 24-50 zoom does a pretty good job
Chris - how do you find your 24-50?
Jim Brooks
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender or the Zetex
Qu?
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender or the Zetex Group or that they
have been accurately reproduced from their original form.
Zetex accepts no
Thanks to those that responded on this subject. Due to the hideous weather
we're having at the moment, I will look seriously into the miniature
landscape options (including macro) suggested by a few list members. On the
really rainy days I have been looking for the Magnum Landscape book
suggested
"The quietest Pentax model I have experience with is the ME Super, which
makes a subdued "snick" upon being fired.
- MCC"
Am I the only one who finds the MZ models extremely quiet? Certainly when I
need to take pictures unobtrusively (eg at theatre dress rehearsals) I
choose the MZ5n in
Monitor: 2' colour LCD
Wow, that's a very big screen for a supposedly portable device :)
Perhaps it folds out.
James Brooks :)
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated
Peter Smith asked:
"is there a UK member who has had a better experience with household
insurance"
Well, I had an Olympus mju1 stolen in Stockport town centre some time ago.
Also a very nice Olympus Trip 35 was stolen from my car while it was parked
in Oldham town centre. I am lucky enough never
I am doing a City Guilds Photography course. One of the current projects
is to prepare a set of landscape photographs. Given that much of the
countryside is out of bounds due to the Foot Mouth crisis rampaging
through the UK, does anyone have any suggestions for possible subjects
(architecture
Hello Again
Bob Walkden rightly wrote "Prestons in Harrogate is the best provincial
shop"
Sadly this shop is closing down. Large posters are displayed on the windows
announcing a "retirement sale". Some Pentax items on display include a
FA28-70/4 (now rather difficult to find new), and various
Chris wrote:
Yup. If the lens is on "A" and you're controlling the aperture throughthe
body then it's not an issue. If you're turning the aperture ring, then the
aperture on the body will not match the aperture on the display,and the
display will be correct. The lens will open up to the
I have this lens, and the FA28-70/4, and by comparison the A24-50 seems much
more prone to flare than the newer lens. However the build quality and
"feel" of the A is wonderful, making it a pleasure to use with the MEsuper.
Likes: Build, feel, well matched to MEs, overall sharpness
Dislikes:
Hi
I thought that the current model was the MZ5, which would make the MZ5N a
new release???
Regards
James
E-MAILS are susceptible to interference. You should not assume that
the contents originated from the sender or the
Thanks to those who suggested the nomail option for subscribing without
receiving stacks of mail each day. Looks like a great way to stop feeling
guilty about lurking :-) Now that I can relinquish my membership of Lurkers
Anonymous, I'll introduce myself:
I'm an "enthusiastic amateur" using
Dear PDML
I'm not a subscriber - unfortunately I use my works PC to view the
archives but I cannot participate until I get a PC at home (I guess that
makes me a lurker!). However, being highly impressed with the content of
the list, I am subscribing, sending this message, then unsubscribing.
40 matches
Mail list logo
