On Fri, 2005-08-12 at 17:02, Arjuna Anandanatha wrote:
///All you need to do is buy Microsoft Office X (latest version, of
course) and you'll have near 100% compatibility between your Excel
and Word documents on both platforms.
...or use any flavor of the free Open Office suite which is often
4 important non-upgradeable things that would make me choose the
Powerbook:
- more pixels on the screen (1280x854 versus 1024x768)
- a larger screen
- a better video card (only important for 3D work and games but also
makes the OS run smoother)
- DVI video output
Wifi coverage is better on the
On Fri, 2005-08-05 at 09:23, Juan Buhler wrote:
http://www.boozhoundlabs.com/holga-f/
On 8/4/05, Scott Loveless [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Didn't Juan do something like this?
Back in 2000...
http://www.jbuhler.com/HLimited/index.html
:)
It's a good lens. I payed 141 Euros + shipping for mine.
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
Ended Auction:
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7530372848
I got the above lens in the mail today. Certainly the
best $24 lens in my entire life. The sucker is virtually
like new and
(Regardless of the raw vs jpg discussion) using 8 bits formats to store
photographs is just plain stupid.
Why the hell is anyone happy with a 0-255 dynamic range when modern CCDs
do a lot better (0-4095), film does a lot better and our eyes do a lot
better?
This reverence for the holly 8 bits byte
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 15:13, Rob Studdert wrote:
On 22 Jul 2005 at 16:11, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
(Regardless of the raw vs jpg discussion) using 8 bits formats to store
photographs is just plain stupid.
Why the hell is anyone happy with a 0-255 dynamic range when modern CCDs
do a lot
On Fri, 2005-07-22 at 17:03, Rob Studdert wrote:
...
whether 12 bits per colour channel would make make an appreciable visible
difference given the dynamics of current display technology is arguable
(given
the relatively low contrast ratios of even the best TFT displays). I'd be
happy
Shutter lag is my main disappointment with digital cameras.
The two Leica/Panasonic are slow. I tried only one camera
that is acceptable on this, the Sony T3. There may be more,
I don't know. Also a tilt/swivel LCD like the Canon G1 for
waist level shooting would be nice.
Joaquim
On Fri,
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 17:48, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The Ds Slimming Filter.
You're kidding?
My thought, precisely.
They're not kidding. This is one of the playback-post processing in-
camera options. At least, if you use this kind of thing, it makes a
copy of the original and saves
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 15:57, Christian wrote:
Oh, the irony of it all.. Pal, the champion for all things Pentax,
never has anything good to say about the actual products. I, on the other
hand, love the past products, but was tempted by the dark side due to lack
of (in my crystal ball)
On Thu, 2005-07-21 at 16:41, Tom C wrote:
The point is this... How can Pal argue and assure us that Pentax is capable
of/will produce the high end DSLR products we want, when they haven't
produced one that he's willing to purchase?
Won't the 645 Digital high end enough?
William Robb wrote:
Silver imaging is going to take a 100 year turn for the worse very
soon, to the point if you want to shoot the stuff, you'll be coating
your own.
...start a small businesses and sell on Ebay.
Joaquim
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 16:45, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
I'll report on it's fast glass slow focus performance when I put it on
the ME-F tonight.
I finally had the time to test the ME-F with its fast 35-70mm F/2.8 AF
lens. I shot a roll of film and was very pleased:
AF is not fast
Markus Maurer wrote:
Hi Shel
how does a lens influence the saturation of a photo? By different coating?
just wondering ;-)
Light that hits the film/CCD not coming from the subject lowers overall
saturation and contrast. The quality of the black paint inside the lens
barrel influences
Cotty wrote:
On 13/7/05, Mishka, discombobulated, unleashed:
stuff stuffed with cats: http://bonsaikitten.com/
That is pretty sick. Awful.
Don't worry, it's fake.
Joaquim
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 12:54, Stephen Moore wrote:
So does one meter the scene before or after the
ND is in place, i.e., adjust exposure for the
desired medium tone, put the filter in place, and
then slow the shutter by 2 stops? Or simply meter
through the filter and use the desired shutter
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 18:04, Charles Braswell Jr wrote:
On another (kinda) unrelated topic, I found that the DS seemed to take
forever to process the image after the longer shutter speed elapsed.
I can't help with the question about the longer processing time after
exposure, I haven't
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:32, William Robb wrote:
We've seen what you do to countries that you consider a threat.
or not
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 23:48, Tom Reese wrote:
Mr. Brooks, you have a far better chance of seeing me in bunny ears than
with a digital camera.
VIVA LA FILME!!!
The D or DS do not look or feel like digital cameras at all. Doesn't
your thumb search for the film advance lever when you use one?
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:12, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
This is for those of you who purchased an istDs: Why did you choose it over
the istD? Availability? Price? Size? Features? Which features?
Availability, price, size, more reliable SD cards.
Featurewise the D is better (multiple WB
John Francis wrote:
On Sat, Jul 09, 2005 at 09:13:02PM +0100, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
I have failed to post this for quite a while: I was watching the
Confederations Cup (football, for those who don't know) and was amazed
to see huge ads on the pitch for FujiFilm.
I thought it was
Dear William,
Do you also sell split image + microprism screens fot the *ist and *ist DS?
If so, please give me a price for 1, for 5 and for 10.
Regards,
Joaquim Carvalho
addressed to the list:
From: Joaquim Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: 2005/07/08 Fri PM 02:17:28 GMT
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry for the confusion I caused a while ago with the BCCing to the list
that made your filters fail.
Anyway, here is the reply from precision optics. I'm now contacting
Keoptics and will keep you informed.
Dear Joaquim,
I am currently involved in a cooperative venture to produce manual
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The D and DS models both have user interchangeable focusing screens.
Pentax does not offer a screen with a split image focusing aid ...
there are reasons for this. A German company, http://www.tekade.de,
offered such a screen (custom made by taking a screen from
service, please let me know.
Best regards,
Rachael Katz
Katz Eye Optics
(916) 361 - 2143 Office
www.keoptics.com
Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
Sorry for the confusion I caused a while ago with the BCCing to the
list that made your filters fail.
Anyway, here is the reply from precision optics. I'm
I remembered I have a K 135mm 3.5 :) I had a look, the link
between the focus ring and the part that does the focus can
not be at the front of the lens, it's also not under the rubber
focus ring cover so it must be to the back of the focusing scale.
Lokking at the http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/
Take the best pictures you can. Try to make the item look good, not by
hiding detail but by good framing, good lighting and good color balance.
I normally shoot against a white background with +.5 exposure
compensation so the object will blend nicely into the white webpage
background. Don't put up
On Thu, 2005-07-07 at 01:56, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
When I receive the autofocus lens I'll report on how it works.
I just got the 35-70 F2.8 I bought on Ebay.
It's a fast K quality zoom lens made of real metal and plenty of clean
SMC covered glass. It has an electric motor inside I can really
This is an auction I did for an average condition SFXn with a non
working pop-up flash.
I got 104.95 USD for it and very good feedback.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItemitem=7517877667
Thibouille wrote:
That would be really, really kind of you.
I have a couple things to list but
Jon M wrote:
Can you upload some pictures of the disassembly?
http://jon.beigetower.org/photography/135/135exposed.jpg
No screws under the bezel.
Just noticed there's several small screws around the
diameter of the barrel just underneath the focusing
ring - close enough to the edge
I like the way this list goes off-topic like a car going off the road
and then back on after a couple of miles and without any major bumps. I
guess photography opens people's minds.
I'm happy, I've been the whole morning playing with my
new ME-F
It was the first SLR autofocus camera, even if only one
lens was made for it, I never understood how some people
can say it wasn't.
It is a great camera: when using common lenses it is
exactly the same as an ME Super but with a
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 14:09, Don Sanderson wrote:
Don't be too picky about the old foam, just get it smooth
enough to hold a new piece.
I'm afraid that by sharing lenses a tiny bit of that foam will end up on
the CCD of my DS.
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 16:56, Powell Hargrave wrote:
The two highest scores I've seen so far is one of 29.3 and one of just
over 20. Both Canadians. Not on this list.
How much would Bill Gates score?
On Wed, 2005-07-06 at 18:14, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Joaquim Carvalho
Subject: Re: another survey
How much would Bill Gates score?
Probably the same as Steve Jobs
Well, from my imagination I entered their data and I got this:
CATEGORY
Adjusting lens infinity focus is easy: you just untighten 4 screws and
adjust the lens maximum focus angle in relation to the focus ring
maximum angle.
The location of these 4 screws varies from lens to lens, I know that on
an M 50mm 1.7 they are on the front of the lens, around the element
Don Sanderson wrote:
Get all the foam off, just don't worry about the old
adhesive, it won't hurt anything and it requires using
solvent near the screen. That's scary! ;-(
Made it! It took over three hours and 20 wooden toothpicks, now I'll go
to sleep but I'm afraid I'll dream of sticky
Brian Walters wrote:
I suspect that the commercial failure of the ME-F with its autofocus
lens is what set Pentax back in the autofocus race. After the ME-F
they went back to manual focus systems in the P series and were not
ready to meet the challenge of the Minolta 7000.
Can't understand
Jon M wrote:
Just got that bezel off at last - there's no screws
under it. Anybody had one of these apart to know
exactly what I'm looking for here?
It's something that works as a clutch transmiting the rotation from
the focus ring to the focus helicoid.
This page explains how to do it on
Sorry to post again but I'm very intrigued with this, I do not have
experience with true macro lenses, I want your comments on this:
A guy that does lens repairs showed me a Pentax 35-70mm macro lens
modified to do 1.6:1 magnification without rings, more than any standard
Pentax lens can do. I
Here you'll find a tool for doing that and a little more:
http://fedora.redhat.com/download/
...sorry, couldn't resist.
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 14:55, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Gang ...
I'm running Win XP (Home) on a machine that's a little more than a year
old. It's been said that cleaning
Steve Desjardins wrote:
I'll second that, although I bought my SP500 in 72. I sitll love the
needle.
I am getting right fond of the DS, however.
If there was a way to add software modules to the *ist firmware like
on the Pentax EI-2000 and EI-200 Digita OS cameras the DS would
:)
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 17:08, Juan Buhler wrote:
Most street photographers in the last 10 years or so have taken the
picture of two or maybe more people talking on a cellphone.
This is my take on it:
http://photoblog.jbuhler.com/index.php?showimage=160
(ist D, A35-70/4)
Just thought
Not too bad:
FOOD
1.3
MOBILITY
0.2
SHELTER
0.8
GOODS/SERVICES
1.1
TOTAL FOOTPRINT
3.4
PHOTOGRAPHIC EQUIPMENT ???
IN COMPARISON, THE AVERAGE ECOLOGICAL FOOTPRINT IN YOUR COUNTRY
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 15:34, Jens Bladt wrote:
Just because I don't have no car (a have a shared car - 30 people sharing 5
cars)
Interesting, can you share a picture of it?
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 19:22, Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Aye, as if everyone has one. This is not an MX you can have for 50
quid or LX for 120
I could never find an LX for 120 USD, they are selling for a lot more on
Ebay.
On Tue, 2005-07-05 at 19:23, Don Sanderson wrote:
I hate having my questions drive the price up just because
I know which ones to ask!
Don
I have a trick for that: mix it with a couple of stupid questions, like
asking if an M lens can autofocus, the seller will always avoid showing
those
I'm feeling happy. This morning I got the F 70-210mm 4.0-5.6 zoom I
bought on Ebay and did some preliminary tests. It is very very good:
- even wide open at 210mm it clearly outperforms the *ist CCD
- it focuses fast!
MX
Joaquim
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Hi Gang ...
Another Pentax list member and I were talking and comparing what gear we
now have. Over the years we've known one another a lot of cameras and
lenses have passed through our hands. While looking at my list I began
thinking which, of all my
A guy that does lens repairs showed me a Pentax 35-70mm macro lens
modified to do 1.6:1 magnification without rings, I was curious about
the thing so I took it home to make some tests.
I took a close-up picture of the MX speed selector, please have a look,
any comments welcome.
Anyone knows how? I tried and I'm confused, it only fires some of the times.
Boris Liberman wrote:
What is PESO ?
What is GESO ?
Picture Every So Often
Gallery Every So Often
I thought Peso some place in Mexico where some of you had been taking
pictures :)
...well, I'm new to this list
Submissions for July start or end in July?
Jerome Reyes wrote:
http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/05jul
More than 1/2 of the shots were taken with an ist-D (over 60% if you count
the -Ds). Not sure if that's a first, but I found it interesting
nonetheless.
- Jerome
The bokeh is smoother on the near out of focus than on the far, the
Pentax 70-210mm does it the other way around. I actually like the out of
focus leaves though.
The second picture is stronger of course but for a reason, that women is
asking: why the hell is that guy pointing that long lens at
through the viewfinder. This morning on the subway I took close
up pictures of interesting people just handling the camera as if it was
something else. Now I wish I had film in the camera.
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:13, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jun 30, 2005, at 8:57 AM, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
I
Ain't those illegal?
Jostein wrote:
Hi gang,
http://www.fotocommunity.com/pc/pc/cat/3479/display/3436741
Tell what you think.
Cheers,
Jostein
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Dictionary
pho·tog·ra·phy (fə-tŏg'rə-fē) pronunciation
n.
1. The art or process of producing images of objects on
photosensitive surfaces.
I just received the brand new Minox B I bought cheap from Ebay and
I'm feeling very excited.
Checked the meter sensitivity against my DS and the Minox is
overexposing by a full F stop, or I guess the DS may be underexposing
a bit: without exposure compensation no areas on my photos ever reach
Look at the diaphragm blades, is there any oil on them? There shouldn't
be.
The diaphragm has to close very quickly when the camera takes a picture.
Set the aperture ring to F22. Push and release the diaphragm lever, how
long did it take to close?
If there's oil on the blades a good camera repair
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 19:23, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
Set the aperture ring to F22. Push and release the diaphragm lever, how
long did it take to close?
You can do this with the lens on the camera using the DOF preview button
The equivalent to grain in the digital world for me is pixel noise, not
pixel edges. I too prefer the grain but probably for the same reasons I
prefer the crack noises of old LPs to MP3 compression distortion.
On Thu, 2005-06-30 at 17:39, Bob Blakely wrote:
Yes and no. Much of an image is the
Tim Øsleby wrote:
When using the DOF preview button at my Ds I hear a the same sound as usual,
the only thing happening is the regular sound, the image in the viewer
doesn’t change.
If you're not using the lens in the A mode you must put the camera
manual Manual mode, in any other mode the
Ebay scams 101
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 10:49, Anthony Farr wrote:
If you look at the sellers profile, you'd see that all feedback comments are
like:
???**,,,??. To be fair, it could just be that eBay pages don't
support oriental characters when they are being referred into occidental
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 14:55, Mark Roberts wrote:
Tim Øsleby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thank you Mark, You are a prim(e)rose :-)
Have thanked you off list, but want to express my gratitude public too.
I am impressed. Impressed by two things. First the thing that you have made
time to test
down (there no huge prices like in
the US) but selling is also more difficult.
2005/6/29, Joaquim Carvalho [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Congratulations, that was a very good buy, the SFX by itself is worth
100 Euros if you make the auction carefully.
On Wed, 2005-06-29 at 18:13, Thibouille wrote
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Joaquim Carvalho
Subject: Re: Porto street shots (?)
Never been to Russia but I was in Poland last year and it is a
photographer's dream.
So they don't arrest you any more for pointing your camera at the
wrong things?
Honestly I
Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Joaquim Carvalho
Subject: Re: Porto street shots (?)
Never been to Russia but I was in Poland last year and it is a
photographer's dream.
So they don't arrest you any more for pointing your camera at the
wrong
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 12:42, frank theriault wrote:
I wasn't defending the law, Tom, I was just saying that it would be
easily enforceable is all.
No it wouldn't, people would just start using 85mm (the longest legal
lens) lenses on top of a few 1.7x (the maximum allowed) tele-converters
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 13:39, William Robb wrote:
And yes the propose CA ordinance I mentioned was an anti-paparazzi one. I
do still wonder why it was the paparazzis fault that Diana's driver was
doing 100+ mph in city streets?
Probably because the paparazzi were going 105+.
Let's not
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 13:54, Chad wrote:
I still have great reservations about shipping expensive gear
overseas. Does anyone on this list have experience with such matters?
Just pack it well: put it inside a closed plastic bag, wrap it in
something soft then put it inside a hard cardboard box.
On Tue, 2005-06-28 at 06:47, DagT wrote:
Just to keep you going.
http://www.foto.no/cgi-bin/bilder/vis_bilde.cgi?id=182348
http://x64.com/joaquim/photo/photo03
These people were minding their own business and I wouldn't want to
interrupt them,
this would not have been possible with a noisy eye level SLR and a lens
much shorter
than 200mm
I'm getting Error 404 Not Found...
Sorry, fixed it
How acceptable is it to take pictures of people without asking for
permission?
On Sun, 2005-06-26 at 14:35, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
Some Porto street shots (?) taken with the SMC FA 80-320mm F4.5-5.6
mostly at 320mm (480mm on the *ist DS) F6.8 1/500 200 ASA
http://x64.com/joaquim/photo
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:22, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
I wasn't going to comment on the photos, but since a discussion of sorts
has opened up around them maybe I can add a thought or two. One of the
biggest problems I see when using long lenses is that the photographer
loses contact - or never
On Mon, 2005-06-27 at 15:49, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the Porto shots, it is amusing that in this one the subject has spotted
the sniper.
http://x64.com/joaquim/photo/photo03/index-Pages/Image19.html
The father hasn't, he kept talking to the woman woman on the left, the
kid I don't
William Robb wrote:
OTOH, the USA is becoming eerily like old Soviet Russia from this
photographers perspective.
Never been to Russia but I was in Poland last year and it is a
photographer's dream.
David Savage wrote:
The second thing I was drawn to, is that you managed to catch a single
drop of melted ice cream. For some weird reason I think that's pretty
neat.
Paul, you could make full size a crop of the drop of melted ice cream so
we can check that
it really is one and the quality
Some Porto street shots (?) taken with the SMC FA 80-320mm F4.5-5.6
mostly at 320mm (480mm on the *ist DS) F6.8 1/500 200 ASA
http://x64.com/joaquim/photo/photo03
These people were minding their own business and I wouldn't want to
interrupt them,
this would not have been possible with a noisy
Daniel Liu wrote:
Weird, in some ways it's better than the DS. bigger screen, auto iso,
you can choose cont. AF in any non-preset mode.hope the ds gets a
firmware update.
We should push for that.
Does Pentax have any costumer feedback form?
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist with the central LED switched
off (an option on the settings menu)
Cory Papenfuss wrote:
How is that? I'll try it, but I'm just wondering how it's
easier... less distraction while you twiddle to find the green hex?
Right
-Cory
On Fri, 24 Jun 2005, Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
It's a lot easier to use the focus assist with the central LED
switched off
I like this lens very very much but I guess I don't need three. Ebay
auction #7521036745
In excelent condition but when it is put vertically the focus/zoom ring
will slowly go up/down.
(the three of them are like this, as someone said on this list, it's on
the nature of this zoom)
On Wed, 2005-06-22 at 16:19, John Francis wrote:
Another surprisingly good performer is the Pentax 1.7x AF adapter.
Yes but you need to have pretty fast lenses to use it
Here's a shot from this weekend (AF adapter + A300/2.8):
URL:http://panix.com/~johnf/temp/justin.jpg
Fantastic
Thibouille wrote:
Yes the DS definitely does NOT control wireless flash with its popup.
For the 1st time I fell I should have bought a D :(
Any hope that this will be fixed via a firmware update?
I had 2 Canon cameras and I didn't like P-TTL at all so for me the real
advantage of the
Is anyone aware of any project for running third party software on the
*ist D / DS ?
Any info about its processor and operating system?
third party software)
I searched the web for any info on the *ist D / DS but couldn't find
anything
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 12:50, Steve Jolly wrote:
Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
Is anyone aware of any project for running third party software on the
*ist D / DS ?
Any info about its processor
I guess you can say it's good or bad depending on what you compare it
to. Compared to most consumer zooms the crops you took with it are
actually good. It's also fast and without the batteries it's only about
500g and not too large. It's also a very interesting piece of
photography history.
From
On Tue, 2005-06-21 at 13:59, Collin Brendemuehl wrote:
I have 2. A35/2 A100/2.8.
I find lots of edge frigning with them. At any aperture.
Better with flash than outside. In fact, really decent with
flash. But outside pics are noticably softer with the fringing.
Is it purple fringing? If
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 13:33, William Robb wrote:
This is starting to turn into a religious discussion.
It was promised to be just a simple question, IIRC.
You're right. I won't say anything else about this subject.
Are you keeping it or do you want to sell/swap it?
Steve Jolly wrote:
Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
I think I've seen it, there was only this one, no?
http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/zooms/medium/AF35-70f2.8.html
I mean your pictures do not look worse to me than the ones I take
with my F
Thibouille wrote:
They offer wireless TTL, P-TTL and HS TTL.
Sorry to ask the basics but I don't have experience with advanced flashguns:
Wireless TTL - what is it and how does it work?
P-TTL - Is this a pre-flash for setting exposure like Canons do?
HS TTL - what is the max sync speed?
Thibouille wrote:
Wireless TTL - what is it and how does it work?
you get TTL without the need for cords everywhere. eg you can just
have the flash in your hand and body in other hand you still have TTL.
How do the camera and the flash comunicate? Radio signals? Or does the
external flash
This dog was named Sebastian eight years ago by a
three year old probably inspired by the Little Mermaid
movie.
He's very playful, when his batteries are fully charged
he gives the *ist DS autofocus a very hard time.
Here are some photos I took on the beach.
http://x64.com/joaquim/photo/photo02
Now that Macs have reasonable prices and a secure viruseless OS why does
the majority of people keep buying one Windows PC after another and
won't even consider them as an alternative?
(I don't want to start a Mac vs PC discussion, just asking because I'm
curious)
Michael Spivak wrote:
I've been trying all of them... the best one for me is Mozilla Firefox
Quick (you you know some trick that i can teach you)
Mozilla / Firefox is the first choice for me too, on every OS.
Firefox is quicker but the standard Mozilla can also be used for pop3
Email,
Frantisek wrote:
JC Neutral gray is not always 80/80/80
JC Let me explain:
[...]
Ugh ogh... So with your example, you would calibrate everything to
look good only in your room with reddish walls.
I didn't mean everything, just the monitor.
On a printed picture medium gray is RGB
Frantisek wrote:
That's great :) Pismo /G3 firewire (it's the same one, no?) or early
G4 Ti are a NB I would be probably looking for soon.
Yes, Pismo is the same as Powerbook G3 Firewire.
If you buy a Ti, the early ones are for several reasons not very good or
very reliable, you should
??? I find it good, even at 70mm 2.8
Steve Jolly wrote:
Yep, this is the lens from Pentax's abortive 1981 attempt to get a
jump on the autofocus SLR market. The lens is awful wide open and
mediocre stopped down, at all focal lengths. It weighs a ton, the
autofocus is only compatible with
David Savage wrote:
I use IE most of the time. I use Firefox when I feel like a bit of a change.
What makes you go back?
1 - 100 of 163 matches
Mail list logo
