RE: K10D Manual download

It's been removed from the site as it was a preliminary draft and shouldn't have been put up. You can get it from here: http://www.priyantha.nl/tweakers/index.php?dir=pentax/K10D/samples/ Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jack

RE: Nikons/K10D

I have accurate information that it is smaller than the D80 apart from one dimension where is is about 2mm more. I suspect that it is the width, something to do with the grip size. Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of William Robb

RE: When is it going to end?

Oficial date is Sept 14 Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of cbwaters Sent: 18 August 2006 12:29 To: Pdml@pdml.net Subject: When is it going to end? - Original Message - From: cbwaters To: Pdml@pdml.net Sent: Thursday,

RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body

Raw rules! But in addition to PEF (if they insist on keeping it), please implement compressed DNG properly with full sized embedded JPEG in-camera as an option. Smaller file sizes = faster write times = more shots per card = less time dumping to storage tanks (saves batteries/charge) = also

RE: Printer Recommendations?

That's why the 1800 has one of the highest clogging rates of any of the latest Epson printers! The R2400 is worth every penny, minimal issues, better image quality :) - More money :( You often get what you pay for! Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body

-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Francis Sent: 17 August 2006 17:15 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, Richard Day wrote: Raw rules! But in addition to PEF

RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body

-Discuss Mail List Emne: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body On Thu, Aug 17, 2006 at 12:31:35PM +0100, Richard Day wrote: Raw rules! But in addition to PEF (if they insist on keeping it), please implement compressed DNG properly with full sized embedded JPEG in-camera as an option. PEF, of course

RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body

-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body Nope, the Mamiya ZD, Canon 1Ds mkII and Canon 5D have already solved that. -Adam Richard Day wrote: A By big bright viewfinder! Maybe the K10D has a x3 magnifier in the eyepiece that allows you to see the whole area

RE: Re: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body

Okay, lets see, something you get with 6x7 and not 35mm Mmmm 1) Slow 2) Heavy 3) Huge mirror slap 4) Interchangeable prisms 5) Limited shutter speed range 6) BIG images 7) Large DN (down to film though) ;-) Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL

RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body

That would make AF possibly even faster than any in-lens motor system and makes all the legacy glass have AF as well! The challenge I see is that, apart from wide angle lenses, the sensor wouldn't be able to move anything like far enough! Imagine a 200mm macro range! Richard -Original

RE: Holy Crap -- Pentax 10MP body

Now that's very interesting! A tilt and shift sensor, that would be really neat! Never mind automatic, you could control it with the 4 way control or maybe even the hyper-program wheels. Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vic

RE: K110D - Why bother?

The new software does actually have some advances over the previous issues. The new Photo Lab raw converter does have additional features hidden in the View menu for more options, i.e. lens correction, noise reduction, CA and vignetting, etc., functionallity seems to lay between the full Silkypix

RE: K110D - Why bother?

August 2006 19:04 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: K110D - Why bother? On Aug 11, 2006, at 4:38 AM, Richard Day wrote: Hi Godders, hi Cotty! Heya Richard! Welcome to PDMHell! Didn't realize you were lurking here. :-) The new software does actually have some advances over the previous

RE: RAW converter discussion

PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Godfrey DiGiorgi Sent: 11 August 2006 20:26 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: RAW converter discussion On Aug 11, 2006, at 11:35 AM, Richard Day wrote: ... I do like Silkypix though, as do many others (there's no accounting for taste is there?!). It took me

RE: RAW converter discussion

Just the engine Richard -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark Roberts Sent: 11 August 2006 21:59 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: RAW converter discussion Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: I don't see any reason to shoot you down over