Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Mar 8, 2006, at 5:09 PM, Adam Maas wrote:
On the DL, my procedure for metering and using an A* lens:
- Set M mode
- Frame picture (make attempt at composition)
- Pick aperture (choose how much pudding around subject :-)
- Stop down with DOF preview and hold
-
- Original Message - From: Dave Brooks Subject:
Constructive-Destructive critisisim wanted for these photos
http://www.caughtinmotion.com/
Scroll down about 1/2 way to the Whistle Radio link.
I find the spotlight distracting too. If it had more of a linear fall
off and was
Tom C wrote:
I've been this route before... aargh.
Convert to profile sRGB, that'll expand or reduce your working gamut
into the web gamut and it should be exactly the same in appearance.
Don't bother embedding a profile in the web image, it is assumed sRGB
and may be ignored.
-Ryan
Bob Shell wrote:
On Mar 3, 2006, at 4:20 PM, Tom C wrote:
Could it be a function of the background area on the screen being
gray in CS2 whereas it's white in the browser? Well, I just set the
background color in the browser to gray and it did not appear to
make a difference.
No,
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jens Bladt
Subject: RE: Some more new camera speculation
Nop, but appr. 5mm more in each direction!
That ought to count for something - 60% more, actually.
It doesn't count as full frame, which I believe is what you were
implying in
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Look up its specs on the web ... based on the name you provided, it
might be the Olympus MAUSB-5W unit at this page:
http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/198_MAUSB-5W.htm
That's a USB 1.1 spec device. USB 1.1 is not particularly useful with
the data volumes
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Feb 28, 2006, at 9:11 AM, Ryan Brooks wrote:
Look up its specs on the web ... based on the name you provided,
it might be the Olympus MAUSB-5W unit at this page:
http://www.olympus-europa.com/consumer/198_MAUSB-5W.htm
That's a USB 1.1 spec device. USB 1.1
The display of a FF DSLR followed by the *ist D with it's lack of aperture ring
support then the gradual roll-out of aperture ring-less DA lenses and now the
discontinuation of the FA lenses was orchestrated in such a way as to deceive.
If they think that their strategy will have people
Pål Jensen wrote:
- Original Message - From: Jostein [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Um... that's motor selection, continuous or single.
Yes, AF motor selector that is.
The AF point selector is the pad on the back. You set multi point or
singe point on the sliding lever on the right.
Right
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Lately there have been specks in my scanned images as shown in this JPEG:
http://home.earthlink.net/~scbelinkoff/x.jpg
Recently I compared scans of the same image with another scanner and didn't
see the specks. Anyone know what they are? Dust? Dirt? Scanner problem
(maybe
Collin R Brendemuehl wrote:
At 20:14 2005.05.19 -0400, you wrote:
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 00:31:03 +0100
From: Steve Jolly [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: DS caution
Message-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
I JUST purchased a new Apple system (G4 17 Powerbook) and have
iPhoto v5.0.2, still waiting on Tiger arrival. I also use Photoshop
as my photo finishing work. I just want to have a simple interface
to store the photos for reference, organization and quick scan. When
I get picky I pull out
Cotty wrote:
Unless there's any better suggestion, I will book a table for us all at
6.30pm in the Globe Theatre Cafe just along from the London Eye.
http://tinyurl.com/4r9w3
I'd recommend against it. They'll let anyone in there.
-Ryan
I thought it was extra-low as well. See the def here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispersion_(optics)
-Ryan
Graywolf wrote:
The opposite. High (or Extra, or Extreme) dispersion glass requires
less curvature to obtain the same dioter. In a prism the colors would
be spread farther.
graywolf
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is an MV something an enthusiast wants to be using?
I gave one to a friend returning to bw film recently, she likes it.
Built like a MX, which it basically is, but without DOF preview.
-Ryan
I'm on dial-up, so the ability to upload compressed files (like pBase
has), is useful.
I thought they all supported jpegs, which are already compressed.
thanx
dk
Village Idiot wrote:
I think that Pentax's long-term strategy (if you can call it that) is becoming
clear. Overall, they did their development in order of low-end to high-end
format. First they did the point and shoot cameras. The 35mm came next (but
reversing their low-to-high strategy by
Peter J. Alling wrote:
To keep
that they will have to have a perceived quality and similar feature
set to the upcoming Canon 16mp
DSLR and a price closer to the current Kodak 14[x].
Upcoming... I think you mean here.
-Ryan
Marco Alpert wrote:
Hope this isn't old news, but:
http://www.steves-digicams.com/pr/pentax_03152005_645d_pr.html
Whooo hoo! Great news.
-Ryan
Enjoy!
Doe aka Marnie :-)
Very useful.. Thank you.
-Ryan
Rob Studdert wrote:
http://www.mittoni.com.au/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/1183
On the same site:
http://www.mittoni.com.au/catalog/product_info.php/products_id/1238?sID=16a333c707fd8b43039b7fe9f6686cda
Since the ist can take a microdrive, it should take this, no?
-Ryan
McRae, Max MS wrote:
I have a tale of woe to tell:
I have a scuba tank with a decant valve and hose that I thought would be
ideal to clean my dusty *istD sensor with.
Is it possible you froze it? There's no protective film, just a
coating, which likely means replacing the sensor.
Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
I use AA NiMh rechargeables.
My charger says output 900 mA MAX, so it's a maximum
of 900mA per hour.
My question is: if I put 4 AAs to charge, this output
splits in four? or 4 batteries receive 900 mA each?
Regards
Are you reading this on the wall wart or the
Yup.
I've got family members who worked at Kodak. Ektar was killed due to
cost/line consolidation.
What a wonderful film. Royal Gold 25 was equivalent.
(still got several hundred rolls of APX25 in 35 and 120 in the fridge,
though)
-Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff
Frantisek wrote:
RW This morning, though, I stopped to do some shooting on
RW my way to work, and the camera came up with an
RW exposure of f/4.8 at 1/420. One can't adjust such
RW things on this model. Changing the film speed changed
RW the shutter speed, but I couldn't get a smaller
RW
I'm using a G5 PowerMac with a 23 Cinema HD display, both of which I
bought refurbished on the Apple store - saving a couple of hundred bucks
each, but getting full warranty- and they appear as new goods to me.
The 30 is absolutely wonderful, and word is that a 40 is coming
soon.The only
Amita Guha wrote:
Now that I'm in the planning stages of this...will I make a tasty target for
muggers if I carry around my Lowepro Offroad (fits 1 body/2 lenses plus
external pouches)? I've been hearing about muggings at gunpoint and such
over there. Nate's carrying his Adorama Slinger.
I
Herb Chong wrote:
the 1Ds does lock on a subject and track its motion provided that it
stays under any one of the focus points. it will track a moving bird
or football player provided that you aim the camera roughly aimed
correctly. no Pentax camera does this well enough to really useful,
but
*Idea* Ryan Brooks is shortly visiting London and I wanted to catch up
with him to say hi - Ryan, what about meeting up in town and going to the
Tate?? I wonder if they do a late evening? I'm free all day the 4th and
5th of Jan, plus 8th and 9th (sat sun) so what say ye?
The 5th works for me
Cotty wrote:
Ryan, I tried emailing you a couple of times but no response - it may be
because you're busy, but just in case, can you please acknowledge this?
TA!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
Don Sanderson wrote:
http://www.donsauction.com/PDML/IMGP2572small.jpg
Uncoated(?) Russian HELIOS-44M-4 58/2 lens.
Cost me a whole $14.67 US, shipped from Australia.
Sun in the upper left corner of the frame.
I figured it would flare like crazy, surprise.
Great portrait length on the D.
Looks
Ditto, but the room with the fan is my favorite. Great shot.
-Ryan
Peter J. Alling wrote:
Ann I really like this one. I can feel the clammy air.
Ann Sanfedele wrote:
Just started putting some old black and whites up
on photo net -
here is one:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2915425
John Francis wrote:
Not the *entire* reason :-) I bought them because they fit in
the pre-existing flashlight(s). And 2500 mAh should be enough
for short-term emergency use; a fully-charged 2500mAh cell is
more use than a well-past-it's-shelf-life chemical cell that
has been in the flashlight
frank theriault wrote:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2004 17:39:26 -0500, Amy Hughes
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay, so the 77 is a bit long on the *istD to shoot my cats in the
window. A more interesting picture might be of me in the position I had
to be to get this shot :-) Anyway, it's cropped portrait
Jostein wrote:
Um...
Are you sure resolution has anything to do with this? I thought the
number of bits at any given pixel describes how many distinct levels
of illumination that pixel can distinguish. The extra bits of colour
depth gives more exposure latitude, but does it alter the resolution?
I
Pål Jensen wrote:
Usually Pentax put prices on the products on their japanese web site. Not for this
one. Its probably among the products that if you have to ask you can't afford it!
http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/products/telescope/big/sun/
Pål
I've got the 105SD, which appears to be one of
Patrick Genovese wrote:
I use an MZ-S plus battery grip an my only gripe with it it the
battery consumption.
Are there any solutions ? mods etc..
How about NIMH batteries, I know the manual says you should'nt run it
off rechargeable batteries.
I've run mine off of NiMH batts since day 1 (I
Patrick Genovese wrote:
I assume you have the battery grip... Some quesitons:
1. What NiMH batteries do you use i.e. ( mAh) ?
I started with 1800mAh and now am on 2100mAh... I upgraded for since I
use them in my flash as well- not for extra life in the grip.
2. How many rolls of film do you
Hey Tom and all,
I modified a 67-K adapter to 67EF and have used the 800ED/6.7, 200
and 55-100mm with great success... fyi,
-Ryan
tom wrote:
That would be cool...
-Original Message-
From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 6:17 AM
To: pentax list
Yup, it's more fun on the digital slr though.
-Ryan
tom wrote:
800/6.7 for 6x7? Holy frijole.
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 10, 2004 4:20 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: long glass
Hey Tom and all,
I modified a 67-K
all day.
-Ryan Brooks
Jon Glass wrote:
on 12/27/03 12:15 PM, Ryan Lee at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I checked again Alan, it's still got 2 days to go? And about 'working
fine'..hmmm- I read something in the mail archive about someone with that
camera who wasn't really able to take pictures with it because the
: Is there likely to be something
happening to update the 67? With the rebate on the body and lenses, I'm
wondering if there's going to be an AF body soon... (not that I care, but it
might lower the 67II prices)
Thanks for the enablement help!
Ryan Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net
Wow.. thanks!
-R
- Original Message -
From: J. C. O'Connell [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, February 25, 2002 10:51 PM
Subject: RE: 6x7 Question
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
And the 6mp Contax full-frame is real:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02022505contaxndigitalinhand.asp
-R
- Original Message -
From: Shel Belinkoff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Pentax List [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 12:37 AM
Subject: Sigma SD9 w/Foveon Chip
The
the A)
Pentax FA 28-70mm F/2.8 AL Zoom
Pentax SMC A 50mm F/1.2
Pentax SMC FA 80-200mm F/2.8 ED IF
Feel free to contact me via email to help finance your D30, D1x, et al.
-Ryan Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=114906
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List
anyone
recommend a shop where I could get a 10/10 condition one to save?
It'll be interesting to see how many pictures I end up taking with the LX
vs. my 5n.
Thanks again,
Ryan Brooks
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.photo.net/photodb/folder?folder_id=113369
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss
101 - 147 of 147 matches
Mail list logo
