Tanya had problem with a Ricoh lens.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:51 PM
Subject: M42 on istD question
I was going to try out one-two of my screwmounts Monday and i had a
sudden erie
thought of a
problem.
; other ones are too fiddly to remove. They won't get stuck, but they can
> make you sweat trying to get them off...
Right.:-)
Dave
>
> Christian
>
> - Original Message -
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:51 PM
> Su
Hi!
Hi Jim.
Yes mine does to. I just possed the question because for some reason i thought
someone had
a major
battle to get on off.
Quess i must be thinking of another problem and got mixed up.
I have two M42 lenses which I use extremely rarely. Nonetheless I have
both Pentax and 3rd pa
em off...
Christian
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, June 28, 2005 12:51 PM
Subject: M42 on istD question
> I was going to try out one-two of my screwmounts Monday and i had
a sudden erie
> thought of a
> problem.
>
> I seem to, for so
Hi Jim.
Yes mine does to. I just possed the question because for some reason i thought
someone had
a major
battle to get on off.
Quess i must be thinking of another problem and got mixed up.
Thanks for the info. I'll try them now.
Dave
> Dave:
>
> My
The adapter works fine on the *ist-D. Tanya had a problem with a Ricoh
KAR mount lens.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was going to try out one-two of my screwmounts Monday and i had a
sudden erie
thought of a
problem.
I seem to, for some reason, remember a thread a while back about som
Dave:
My Pentax-made adapter, has a little tab in it which I found must be
pressed/moved by a stylus of some sort in order to easily remove the
adapter. I've used it successfully with my isDS with the fisheye and
the 35mm screw mount lenses.
The Manual-Auto sliding switch on Spotmatic era l
I was going to try out one-two of my screwmounts Monday and i had a
sudden erie
thought of a
problem.
I seem to, for some reason, remember a thread a while back about someone having
problems
removing
the mount from the istD. Tanya i think when she caome to GFM.
Am i thinking of anothe
I use the same combination a lot and have never noticed this. Was it very
cold, or your batteries well used?
John Coyle
Brisbane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 06, 2005 6:48 PM
Subject: PZ 28-105 and istD question
He
Gremlins...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Should have added that the lens works
fine on the PZ-1
Dave
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sides of buildings
and shoot foreigners - two things
Should have added that the lens works
fine on the PZ-1
Dave
Hey gang.
Finally am getting over this cold,so i went out on a driving tour yesterday.
For just about all of the 450 odd frames shot so far, i have used either my A
28 or A50
with the
odd Sigma 100-300 or the Pentaz PZ 28-105.
I had the 28-
Jostein wrote:
LOL!
No... If I did, there wouldn't be room for me in the sleeping bag.
But I kept the batteries in there.
Besides, I don't think it was as cold as -10 that night.
More like -2 or -3. :-)
Reminds me... We haven't posted any pics from that trip, have we?
I certainly haven't. Have a
LOL!
No... If I did, there wouldn't be room for me in the sleeping bag.
But I kept the batteries in there.
Besides, I don't think it was as cold as -10 that night.
More like -2 or -3. :-)
Reminds me... We haven't posted any pics from that trip, have we?
Jostein
Quoting mike wilson <[EMAIL PR
Hi,
Jostein wrote:
It's been a while since we've had that low temperatures around here... I
regularly bring my *D when walking to work, and it works fine after half
an hour in the cold, with or without activity along the way. However, I
can't recall if I've used the camera at colder than -10 °C.
Hi Rob.
I did not notice the battery symbol changing,but that does not mean anything
anyway
correct.
I answered Pauls reply as it seems more to my stuation now.It looks like a
setting
issue,as in using
a non AF lens in AF-S mode. Household experiment last night leans that way.
Thanks for your t
> > Paul said:
> If you had the camera set on autofocus, but were trying to focus manually, it
> will
frequently balk. Also, if you have focus verification turned on, the camera
will sometimes
refuse to fire if you're out of focus, even when set on manual focus.
On 27 Dec 2004 at 16:06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Hi all.
>
> Question for our PDML friends using this camera in cold climates.
>
> I looked in the manual to see if it listed a min/max operating temperature
> but i
> did not see anything.
In the English user manual you will find t
If you had the camera set on autofocus, but were trying to focus manually, it
will frequently balk. Also, if you have focus verification turned on, the
camera will sometimes refuse to fire if you're out of focus, even when set on
manual focus.
> Paul said: > Sounds like you were trying to
than -10 °C.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, December 27, 2004 5:06 PM
Subject: IstD question for cold climate users
Hi all.
Question for our PDML friends using this camera in cold climates.
I looked in the manual to see if it listed a min/
Paul said:> Sounds like you were trying to shoot while the buffer was
full.
I thought of that,but i don't remember taking a large amount of shots.One or
two,change
position
slightly,or change the EV, then the problem.
I thought at first it may have been because i was not completly in focus
Sounds like you were trying to shoot while the buffer was full.
> Hi all.
>
> Question for our PDML friends using this camera in cold climates.
>
> I looked in the manual to see if it listed a min/max operating temperature
> but i
> did not
> see anything.
>
> I used the D toda
Hi all.
Question for our PDML friends using this camera in cold climates.
I looked in the manual to see if it listed a min/max operating temperature but
i did not
see anything.
I used the D today in some pretty cool temperature's.(hey its southern
ontario,everyone
thinks -20
is
On 24/11/04, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
> I had a
>filthy sensor made worse when I used a bulb-blower that, unknown to me,
>my 18 month old daughter had been sticking up her nose and sucking snot
>out, and ended up blowing baby snot all over the inside of my camera.
ROTFL!!
Gross
TIMOTHY STARK wrote on 11/23/2004, 7:51 PM:
>
> Have any of the *istD shooters run into the "ccd dust issue" and is it
> really an issue when switching lenses? So when I get one of the
> digital bodies, should I go with a zoom to minimize lens changes? If
> yes does anyone want my FA 24, 35
Very interested in the FA 35 2.0 if you go down the zoom route.
John
-- Original Message ---
From: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:01:59 -0500 (GMT-05:00)
Subject: Re: Gear for Sale/ *istD question
> Timothy,
> I shot
y removed/attached the lenses (just like I do with film
cameras).
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: TIMOTHY STARK <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Gear for Sale/ *istD question
I am an occaisional lurker from Vancouver BC. I have a shelf full of 645 gear I
am no longer using.
T
Hi Tim.
Someone was looking for 645 stuff here not to long ago.They may contact you.
As far as dust on the ccd,some of the istD owners have complained,and i had a
bad problem
with my
D1 but so far not with the D2h.
Zooms actually inhance the problem if they are internal focus,as they tend to
mo
And about that Florida property...
arnie wrote:
dust is definitely an issue
i'll take the 35, 77 and 300
arnie
- Original Message - From: "TIMOTHY STARK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: Gear for Sa
Dust isn't a problem if you're careful. I wouldn't change lenses in a
sandstorm without putting the camera under my coat, but in normal
conditions it's not a problem. Cleaning the sensor is fairly easy as
well. I blow mine off with a sterile ear syringe about once a week or
so. It appears to be
dust is definitely an issue
i'll take the 35, 77 and 300
arnie
- Original Message -
From: "TIMOTHY STARK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:51 PM
Subject: Gear for Sale/ *istD question
I am an occaisional lurker
- Original Message -
From: "TIMOTHY STARK"
Subject: Gear for Sale/ *istD question
Have any of the *istD shooters run into the "ccd dust issue" and is
it really an issue when switching lenses? So when I get one of the
digital bodies, should I go with a zoom to m
I am an occaisional lurker from Vancouver BC. I have a shelf full of 645 gear I
am no longer using.
This includes mint: 300mm 4.0 ED IF and 35mm 3.5
Very clean, no dings or scratches: 55 2.8, 150 3.5
clean with some marking: 645 body, 75mm 2.8 (not LS), 120 film holder.
If anyone wishes to con
> There's another battery in the thing (look at the baseplate) that probably
> helps keep the settings uh...set.
> CW
oboy -- I had to change that one. I guess I should check the settings I'd made
beforehand; the only ones it prompted me to fix were date and time.
(I was rather puzzled by the ne
It will stay, perhaps not after replacing the back-up battery thoug...
Jens
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 10. november 2004 21:52
Til: PDPDML
Emne: Silly *istD question
The ist D has a backup battery, a button CR2016, that is used for
backup. If you look at the bottom of the camera, there's a screw-in
round cover. That's the backup battery.
The manual says "change it once every five years".
Not that I read the manuals either, but hey.
j
--
Juan Buhler
http:
There's another battery in the thing (look at the baseplate) that probably
helps keep the settings uh...set.
CW
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDPDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 3:51 PM
Subject: Silly *istD que
My *istD never lost its settings due to low batteries. I bought it in
february.
You might even be able to back them up using the remote assistent software
from pentax, but I am not sure about this.
Sam
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi!
I've just fixed some bugs in my
It keeps the settings.
Cheers,
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDPDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, November 10, 2004 9:51 PM
Subject: Silly *istD question
> Hi!
>
> I've just fixed some bugs in my code, so I
Hi!
I've just fixed some bugs in my code, so I am in the very special kind of mood
;).
I have set up my *istD. That is, for each of three user presets, I fine tuned it
for my taste. Now, say I remove the batteries and load the new set.
Will my setup be kept? Or will I have to do the setup again?
> Now, say I remove the batteries and load the new set.
> Will my setup be kept? Or will I have to do the setup again?
I wouldn't call that a "silly *istD question" - I'd like to hear the
answer, too.
Fred
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 17:29:31 CST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> But not, apparently, without *any* headgear ...
>
There's gotta be ~some~ headgear...
-frank
--
"Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson
Frank said:
> Well, actually, I was a bit dusty for my Halloween costume last week
> ... Indiana Jones. Wide brimmed hat just so ya'll know I can dress up
without bunny ears or antlers .
But not, apparently, without *any* headgear ...
ERN
Actually, I went as a dust bunny. ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/6/2004 8:21:28 PM >>>
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:00:01 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAI
Welcome to the digital world where a speck on your CCD is your worst enemy
:)
have a look at http://www.bythom.com/cleaning.htm for example,
Sam
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi!
I've shot today some 20 frames. Some of the frames feature the same
kind
On Sat, 6 Nov 2004 17:00:01 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Boris.
>
> Welcome to the wonderfull world of the DSLR and its arch enemy ~dust bunnies~
> (no not
> Frank.lol)
I'm not dusty!
Well, actually, I was a bit dusty for my Halloween costume last week.
I was Ind
Boris.
Welcome to the wonderfull world of the DSLR and its arch enemy ~dust bunnies~ (no not
Frank.lol)
Take a photo of the sky or white wall F 11 or higher,and look at it in PS or what have
you. They will
show up as little dark greyish smudges and always in the same spots.
I heard the D1x was
It's probably a spec of dust on your sensor. Get yourself a sterile ear
syringe from a drug store. Follow the directions in your owner's manual
for cleaning the sensor and blow it off with the ear syringe. Between
cleanings, keep your syringe in the box, so that it stays clean.
Paul
On Nov 6, 20
Boris,
It's very likely a normal thing. :-)
Most likely it's a speck of dust.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Boris Liberman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PDML" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 06, 2004 7:18 PM
Subject: First *ist
PROTECTED]
Sendt: 6. november 2004 19:18
Til: PDML
Emne: First *istD question/confusion
Hi!
I've shot today some 20 frames. Some of the frames feature the same
kind of issue that makes me a bit worried. If certain area of the
picture is just uniform background, there would be a 25x25 pixels
On 6/11/04, Boris Liberman, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Hi!
>
>I've shot today some 20 frames. Some of the frames feature the same
>kind of issue that makes me a bit worried. If certain area of the
>picture is just uniform background, there would be a 25x25 pixels area
>that looks like very big f
Hi!
I've shot today some 20 frames. Some of the frames feature the same
kind of issue that makes me a bit worried. If certain area of the
picture is just uniform background, there would be a 25x25 pixels area
that looks like very big film grain. It looks like a spot you know -
one that begs to be
Yes, and the Pentax Photo laboratory save in 16 bit TIFF which
Photoshop is able to handle.
DagT
På 9. jan. 2004 kl. 18.07 skrev J. C. O'Connell:
Does the istD RAW file contain 36 bit color images and
if so, can they be converted to 48 bit TIFFS for use
in photoshop?
JCO
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
280T works in TTL mode :)
That's great news for me, CB!
John `:^ )
On Monday, Oct 6, 2003, at 14:49 America/New_York, Cotty wrote:
Pass. Isn't there a company called Lyson or something that specialises
in
blacks for printers?
See http://www.lyson.com/products/smallgamutframe.html
This is a framed web site, so if you want the navigation menu, you have
to go to
hi guys
I had a bit of trouble loading the action into the action folder and getting
it to run. When I finally did it worked fine. I'm still using PS6.
Thanks again for sharing that Tom.
Butch
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hesse (Demian)
Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>on 07.10.03 0:24, Mark Roberts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>> Or some new HP printers, which can use cartridges with 3 shades of gray
>>> inks. And ink have claimed durability of 73 years :-)
>>
>> I heard about those. Sound very interesting. Got
on 07.10.03 0:24, Mark Roberts at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Or some new HP printers, which can use cartridges with 3 shades of gray
>> inks. And ink have claimed durability of 73 years :-)
>
> I heard about those. Sound very interesting. Got a model number?
7660, 7760, 7960 - all print at maxim
On 6 Oct 2003 at 12:30, tom wrote:
> Here's the b/w conversion action I use:
>
> http://www.bigdayphoto.com/BWTERM.atn
Hi tv,
What version of PS was that action created under? Opening under PS7 creates a
program error.
Cheers,
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +
I think I started the hp rumor a while back, it was a
grey ink refill for their 3 colour carts. Tho the
epson 2200 does have a dual black ink set ( 7 carts in
the printer ) that works well.
--- Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >
Sylwester Pietrzyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >on 05.10.
Here's the b/w conversion action I use:
http://www.bigdayphoto.com/BWTERM.atn
tv
on 05.10.03 22:53, Brendan at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Cotty you ned to try a print on a 2200 with the 2
> black inks :-)
>
Or some new HP printers, which can use cartridges with 3 shades of gray
inks. And ink have claimed durability of 73 years :-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
D]>
Sent: Sunday, October 05, 2003 3:57 PM
Subject: Digital B+W printing (was: Re: My first *istD question(s)
> I saw absolutely no difference between a desaturated colour image printed
> in best colour, and greyscale. None. You'd think there would be some loss
> of quality switch
Cotty you ned to try a print on a 2200 with the 2
black inks :-)
Also there are a fewphotoshop B&W filters and actions
that do a very good job converting the images.
--- Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/10/03,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> disgorged:
>
> >> -is there a B&W setting and if so anyon
I've had a lot of luck using photoshop's quadtone setting and then
printing in color. Not exactly black and white, but monotone, and I
find they look pretty good.
There's an article detailing the procedure at the Luminous Landscape,
here's the link:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/tutorials
On 5/10/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>> -is there a B&W setting and if so anyone try it.
>
>No B&W setting. Thats what desturation is for in Photoshop
I've tried all the different ways of printing mono from digital files,
and you know what? I've settled on converting to greyscale and printin
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: My first *istD question(s)
>
> Just wondering if Bill Robb or anyone else with the *istD
> has tried:
> -shooting and printing a shot ISO 800 or above.
Yes. At 800 it is very good, at 1600 it is sligh
Just wondering if Bill Robb or anyone else with the *istD
has tried:
-shooting and printing a shot ISO 800 or above.
-trying TTL - P-TTL flash with an AF280T or above.
-is there a B&W setting and if so anyone try it.
More to come.
Yes it will. You as an owner of many srcrew mount lenses can really be
happy with the *ist D!
Arnold
J. C. O'Connell schrieb:
Does anybody know if the *istD will work in
aperture priority mode with a screwmount lens
mounted via the adapter? (lens pre-stopped down of course)
JCO
69 matches
Mail list logo
