Locally, Cord camera has a Tamron Adaptall2 90/2.5.
I've no interest in such, but if anyone else does...
... and if it compares favorably to the others that are
discussed regularly I'll get the price for you.
Sincerely,
C. Brendemuehl
-
'Every one of us
> Locally, Cord camera has a Tamron Adaptall2 90/2.5. I've no
> interest in such, but if anyone else does... ... and if it
> compares favorably to the others that are discussed regularly
> I'll get the price for you.
If anyone is interested, he/she might want to know some details, to
distingu
The old one has metal contruction while the newer one has a more AF look.
Just don't forget the 1:1 extension tube.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
If anyone is interested, he/she might want to know some details, to
distinguish which model it actually is. I think there are at least
two Ta
I just acquired the 90mm 2.8 AF in our mount in January, from B&H.
Awesome lens!
I am quiet please with its speed and performance as a 90mm and as a macro.
It even had a $50 rebate when I bought it!
At 07:34 PM 2/15/2001 +, you wrote:
>Hi, anyone knows, whether the older Tamron 90/
Dear Tiger,
did I read right, you bought the new 2.8 version which goes down to 1:1,
correct?
I am not really sure I want/need that, but one of my concerns is its
manual focus capability. I understand on MF it goes in less than a full
turn (330 deg or so) from infinity to 1:1. The 90/2.5 MF I ha
Not necessarily. It could suggest that the lens is capable of that.
In any event, I'll keep mine (including the matched multiplier and hood)
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 12:11 PM
Subject: FS: Ta
I received a Pentax M 85/2 to replace my stolen Tamron 90/2.5 with. There
was a lot of discussion recently and someone wrote he prefers the Tamron
over the small Pentax, I want to add my two pennies on the handling. Since
I didn't get any pictures back yet, it is just the handling.
I use
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=180060
If I were Joe now, I would be very saddened by having to part with such
a lens... [wink]
I am sorry for posting too many PAWs almost at once :).
Boris
t;>To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
>>Subject: PAW: No Title (Really trying Tamron 90/2.5 I've got)
>>
>>
>>Hi!
>>
>>http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=180060
>>
>>If I were Joe now, I would be very saddened by having to part with suc
16:05
Til: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Emne: RE: No Title (Really trying Tamron 90/2.5 I've got)
Hi Boris
a really nice photo.
Did you ever see my past emails recomending the Tamron SP 90mm Macro twice
for you?
Now you know why
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
&g
J. Hein wrote:
>Hope this is of interest to at least some members.
It was to me. I just picked up one of these (SMC 85/2
"M") about a week and a half ago, and I too like the
long throw of the focus ring. It seems that it makes
it easier to use for portrait pictures. I have so far
been satis
> Hi Joachim.
>
> I think those are very different lenses both in purpose and in
> performance.
> The handling of the 85/2 is great for me, especially on a smallish
> camera as the Program A I own.
> The long throw of the focusing helicoid is very useful when you're
> trying to set the exact point
It seems that these days, my main opportunity to take pictures is while
taking a walk. Last Sunday, instead of going out with my 50/1.4A, I used my
neglected 85/2. You know what? It was just the ticket for the two shots I
took: a man teaching soccer to his small son, and a bird's nest low in a
tre
"J. Hein" wrote:
> ...
>
>
> Since the Tamron is easier to come by, slightly less expensive and
> offers close focusing over the Pentax there is a strong tempation to
> buy it over the Pentax. I wanted to point out that there are areas,
> where the Pentax has a clear edge over the Tamron, which
Boris,
I have seen just the eyes done before and I gotta say that I really
like the amount of face in this one. I also like it not centered.
Quite a compelling photo.
--
Best regards,
Bruce
Monday, April 4, 2005, 9:49:55 PM, you wrote:
BL> Hi!
BL> http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?pho
Title (Really trying Tamron 90/2.5 I've got)
Hi!
http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=180060
If I were Joe now, I would be very saddened by having to part with such
a lens... [wink]
I am sorry for posting too many PAWs almost at once :).
Boris
__
On Apr 5, 2005 12:49 AM, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
>
> http://www.photoforum.ru/rate/photo.php?photo_id=180060
>
> If I were Joe now, I would be very saddened by having to part with such
> a lens... [wink]
>
> I am sorry for posting too many PAWs almost at once :).
>
> Bor
http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com/2012/10/macro-lens-comparision-ta
mron-9025-v.html
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
Is that the Pentax M-100/4 macro you are testing?
You know there are A-100/4 macros & A-100/2.8 macros (my favorite).
Regards, Bob S.
On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Collin Brendemuehl
wrote:
> http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com/2012/10/macro-lens-comparision-ta
> mron-9025-v.html
>
>
>
.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Bob Sullivan
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 4:05 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Macro Lens Comparison: Tamron 90/2.5 vs Pentax-M 100/4
Is tha
>Is that the Pentax M-100/4 macro you are testing?
>You know there are A-100/4 macros & A-100/2.8 macros (my favorite).
>Regards, Bob S.
Of course. But I can only test what I own.
And because these are both affordable and popular I thought a comparison was
in order.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mai
.
-
J.C.O'Connell
hifis...@gate.net
-
-Original Message-
From: PDML [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Collin Brendemuehl
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2012 4:49 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Macro Lens Comparison: Tamron 90/2.5 vs Pentax-M 100/4
>
Quoting Collin Brendemuehl :
http://evangelicalperspective.blogspot.com/2012/10/macro-lens-comparision-ta
mron-9025-v.html
I have the 49 mm version of the Tamron - had it for decades and it's
great with one exception, as mentioned in this thread of a few months
ago:
http://pdml.net/pip
JCO,
This is the 49mm version
Brian,
It does exhibit the center spot issue when I use the flash.
Haven't seen it under natural light yet.
I've not tried using a hood yet.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML,
4:05 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Macro Lens Comparison: Tamron 90/2.5 vs Pentax-M 100/4
>
> Is that the Pentax M-100/4 macro you are testing?
> You know there are A-100/4 macros & A-100/2.8 macros (my favorite).
> Regards, Bob S.
>
25 matches
Mail list logo
