sumer lenses will
just have to do. Each to his own.
Alan C
-Original Message-
From: Igor PDML-StR
Sent: Friday, September 16, 2016 6:36 PM
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: Re: 5DmkIV sensor almost as good as K-1
P.J.,
I understand and agree with your point that Paul proficienty and
efficie
P.J.,
I understand and agree with your point that Paul proficienty and
efficiently using the tools he has. And I assume all people on this list
learned and developed some tricks to compensate for the shortcomings of
the cameras we've been using. (I can say that about myself even if maybe
not
On 9/16/2016 7:23 AM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Paul via phone
On Sep 16, 2016, at 1:10 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
P.J. Alling wrote:
To be fair, the Canon has a better autofocus system with more focus
points spread over more of the frame, not to mention much better live
view focusing, faster fra
Doesn't matter. If I was going to change brands now, it wouldn't be to
Canon.
On 9/15/2016 7:22 PM, Larry Colen wrote:
And at $3500 it is less than twice the cost
https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV-versus-Pentax-K-1___1106_1075
--
Science - Questions
Paul via phone
> On Sep 16, 2016, at 1:10 AM, Larry Colen wrote:
>
>
>
> P.J. Alling wrote:
>> To be fair, the Canon has a better autofocus system with more focus
>> points spread over more of the frame, not to mention much better live
>> view focusing, faster frame rate, bigger buffer, a to
P.J. Alling wrote:
To be fair, the Canon has a better autofocus system with more focus
points spread over more of the frame, not to mention much better live
view focusing, faster frame rate, bigger buffer, a touch screen, (which
enables nose focus I would guess), and records video in 4K, all of
To be fair, the Canon has a better autofocus system with more focus
points spread over more of the frame, not to mention much better live
view focusing, faster frame rate, bigger buffer, a touch screen, (which
enables nose focus I would guess), and records video in 4K, all of which
are desirabl
It's probably unfair to compare sensor performance only.
And we all know some glaring (I almost wrote "gloring") shortcomings in
Pentax cameras.
And there are some strengths of them as well.
So, if I had three cameras of a comparable class (AFAIK, 5DmkIV is
somewhat above K-1 in the class, isn
Larry Colen wrote:
And at $3500 it is less than twice the cost
https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV-versus-Pentax-K-1___1106_1075
When you add the D810 to the mix, it squeaks by on score for slightly
better performance at ISO < 100.
Admittedly, the Can
Larry Colen wrote:
>And at $3500 it is less than twice the cost
>
>https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV-versus-Pentax-K-1___1106_1075
Har!
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
And at $3500 it is less than twice the cost
https://www.dxomark.com/Cameras/Compare/Side-by-side/Canon-EOS-5D-Mark-IV-versus-Pentax-K-1___1106_1075
--
Larry Colen l...@red4est.com (postbox on min4est) http://red4est.com/lrc
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailma
11 matches
Mail list logo