On Sep 20, 2013, at 8:25 AM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
Oh this works so well I can't tell you.
In either full manual or A modes, manual focus with focus peaking works
so well. And I'm seeing on mono!
Still fiddling so some results soon.
On 19/9/13, Larry Colen, discombobulated, unleashed:
Considering your prediliction to change systems, it seems
to me that you should be the one called glasshopper.
Changing systems?
My first camera was a Practika. (LTL)
My second camera was a Fujica. (ST605n)
My third, fourth, fifth and
On 19/9/13, Mark C, discombobulated, unleashed:
That looks pretty cool - and you keep full auto-modes? AV / TV/ TAV ?
Cool...
It's really interesting to use. The camera has a range of shutter speeds
and 'A'.
When the camera is set to manual focus, the ISO set to 'Auto' and the
top shutter dial
On 19/9/13, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
It does look cool, and I'm sure I could have some fun with it. I guess
I've come to see photography as a job rather than fun.
This happens to me and video constantly.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |
On 19/9/13, Darren Addy, discombobulated, unleashed:
and suddenly I was having FUN again:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/2729058723/
Love it!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
On 19/9/13, J.C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
why not adapt the pentax 85a f1.4 to a full frame sensor??
Well, I used it on a 1DmII until I sold that camera when I ran out of
money (otherwise I would still have it). That was a 1.3x sensor. I would
love a 1Ds to mount it on. Funds..
On 19/9/13, J.C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
why not adapt the pentax 85a f1.4 to a full frame sensor??
Read that too fast.
Smart arse
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
On 20/9/13, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
John Holmes lives!
LOL
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
On 20/9/13, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
Put a hood on that thing!
Got one - I use a PH-SB for a 67.
http://thumbs3.ebaystatic.com/d/l225/m/mmRZ_pK_5pbTzAhgbq57Kgw.jpg
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--
Oh dear - I thought my cataract was -fixed-
but...
ann
On 9/20/2013 06:16, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 19/9/13, Darren Addy, discombobulated, unleashed:
and suddenly I was having FUN again:
http://www.flickr.com/photos/pixelsmithy/2729058723/
Love it!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Go ahead and buy it. You don't need money. If you get any, you know
you're just going to waste it on food rent other useless stuff.
On 9/20/2013 6:19 AM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 19/9/13, J.C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
why not adapt the pentax 85a f1.4 to a full frame sensor??
On 20 Sep 2013, at 14:59, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
Go ahead and buy it. You don't need money. If you get any, you know
you're just going to waste it on food rent other useless stuff.
I spent a lot of money on booze, birds and fast cars. The rest I just
squandered
George Best
Bob,
Didn't know you were such a keen birder.
How long is your life list.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 20 Sep 2013, at 14:59, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
Go ahead and buy it. You don't need money. If you get any, you know
you're
(;-)
stan
On Sep 20, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Bob Sullivan wrote:
Bob,
Didn't know you were such a keen birder.
How long is your life list.
Regards, Bob S.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:55 PM, Bob W p...@web-options.com wrote:
On 20 Sep 2013, at 14:59, John johnsess...@yahoo.com wrote:
Go
Oh this works so well I can't tell you.
In either full manual or A modes, manual focus with focus peaking works
so well. And I'm seeing on mono!
Still fiddling so some results soon.
http://pdml.posthaven.com/x-e1-plus-a-star-85-slash-1-dot-4
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast,
Cute! Can't wait to see your results.
In the meantime, get yourself some printable labels and print yourself
up a red dot sticker for that camera:
http://goo.gl/Dczqss
:)
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
Oh this works so well I can't tell you.
In
On 19/9/13, Darren Addy, discombobulated, unleashed:
In the meantime, get yourself some printable labels and print yourself
up a red dot sticker for that camera:
http://goo.gl/Dczqss
I would rather have bamboo shoved up my fingernails!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
||
Quoting Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv:
Oh this works so well I can't tell you.
In either full manual or A modes, manual focus with focus peaking works
so well. And I'm seeing on mono!
Still fiddling so some results soon.
http://pdml.posthaven.com/x-e1-plus-a-star-85-slash-1-dot-4
On 19/9/13, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Okay grasshopper. I'm in favor of fun:-)
#like
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
On Sep 19, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 19/9/13, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Grasshopper might understand, but I don't. Why waste good glass on
cameras with small sensors? And I suspect modern Pentax glass is better
than most of those lenses.
On 20/9/13, Brian Walters, discombobulated, unleashed:
There's still time to submit for the October PUG :-)
(Animal Kingdom)
You're on
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__Broadcast, Corporate,
|| (O) |Web Video Production
--www.seeingeye.tv
_
--
On Sep 19, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
Oh this works so well I can't tell you.
In either full manual or A modes, manual focus with focus peaking works
so well. And I'm seeing on mono!
Still fiddling so some results soon.
On 19/9/13, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Grasshopper might understand, but I don't. Why waste good glass on
cameras with small sensors? And I suspect modern Pentax glass is better
than most of those lenses.
The CMOS sensor in the XE-1 is an APS-C at 23.6 X 15.6 mm) 4896 X 3264
On 19/9/13, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
Ah, Grasshopper. I think you begin to understand my fascination with the
Panasonic G1, Olympus E-PL1, Ricoh GXR, and soon Olympus E-M1... And why
I acquired a box of Leica R lenses. :-)
I'm seriously thinking about a Voigtlander 25/4 as a
Grasshopper might understand, but I don't. Why waste good glass on cameras with
small sensors? And I suspect modern Pentax glass is better than most of those
lenses.
Paul via phone
On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:07 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Steve Cottrell
Okay grasshopper. I'm in favor of fun:-)
Paul via phone
On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 19/9/13, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Grasshopper might understand, but I don't. Why waste good glass on
cameras with small sensors? And I suspect
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 03:07:41PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 1:25 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
Oh this works so well I can't tell you.
In either full manual or A modes, manual focus with focus peaking works
so well. And I'm seeing on mono!
Paul via phone
On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 19/9/13, Paul Stenquist, discombobulated, unleashed:
Grasshopper might understand, but I don't. Why waste good glass on
cameras
I was speaking of the A85/1.4. I wouldn't trade my DA 50-135/2.8 for it. Except
perhaps to sell it.
Paul via phone
On Sep 19, 2013, at 6:44 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 3:24 PM, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
On 19/9/13, Paul Stenquist,
That looks pretty cool - and you keep full auto-modes? AV / TV/ TAV ?
Cool...
Mark
On 9/19/2013 4:25 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
Oh this works so well I can't tell you.
In either full manual or A modes, manual focus with focus peaking works
so well. And I'm seeing on mono!
Still fiddling
It does look cool, and I'm sure I could have some fun with it. I guess I've
come to see photography as a job rather than fun. My bad, but inescapable
perhaps.
Paul via phone
On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:09 PM, Mark C pdml-m...@charter.net wrote:
That looks pretty cool - and you keep full
Oops, missed a Zero. My first Pentax was the K200D (not K20D, which
was then too rich for my blood).
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:23 PM, Darren Addy pixelsmi...@gmail.com wrote:
I guess I've come to see photography as a job rather than fun. My bad, but
inescapable perhaps.
This is true, but
I guess I've come to see photography as a job rather than fun. My bad, but
inescapable perhaps.
This is true, but sad nonetheless. I was a professional wedding and
portrait photographer and that (in time) kicked the crap out of the
fun in it for me for a very long time. It came back when I
On Sep 19, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
And I’m terribly sorry, Paul, but Leica Summicron-R, Summilux-R, and
Elmarit-R lenses make even the best modern Pentax lenses seem like … Oh,
let’s not start that nonsense. ]’-)
But you did:-). On the M9 I'm sure
Forgive me for not know this, but Godfrey do you have a gallery (or
something) that contains images taken with these lenses that make
even the best modern Pentax lenses seem like … Oh, let’s not start
that nonsense? I would love to see them and judge for myself.
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 7:24
A nice toybox to be sure.
Paul via phone
On Sep 19, 2013, at 8:24 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi godd...@me.com wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 5:02 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
And I’m terribly sorry, Paul, but Leica Summicron-R, Summilux-R, and
Elmarit-R lenses make even the best
On 9/19/2013 5:32 PM, Steve Cottrell wrote:
On 19/9/13, Darren Addy, discombobulated, unleashed:
In the meantime, get yourself some printable labels and print yourself
up a red dot sticker for that camera:
http://goo.gl/Dczqss
I would rather have bamboo shoved up my fingernails!
Better
I think that's cool. I am serious considering a Fujifilm camera, so good
to know. (Also an Oly and a Panny.) Heh.
Marnie aka Doe :-)
In a message dated 9/19/2013 1:27:26 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
co...@seeingeye.tv writes:
Oh this works so well I can't tell you.
In either full
On Sep 19, 2013, at 5:14 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
It does look cool, and I'm sure I could have some fun with it. I guess I've
come to see photography as a job rather than fun. My bad, but inescapable
perhaps.
Best thing I did for my photography was to get out of it
On Sep 19, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
A nice toybox to be sure.
Yes, and much of it sourced very inexpensively. The Leica R stuff, for
instance, cost me less than a middle price Pentax lens. They're lenses made in
'65 to '82, top notch quality. Pick one up
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:52:37PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 5:14 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
It does look cool, and I'm sure I could have some fun with it. I guess I've
come to see photography as a job rather than fun. My bad, but inescapable
why not adapt the pentax 85a f1.4 to a full frame sensor??
On 9/19/2013 6:16 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Grasshopper might understand, but I don't. Why waste good glass on cameras with
small sensors? And I suspect modern Pentax glass is better than most of those
lenses.
Paul via phone
On Sep
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:59:34PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 5:41 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
A nice toybox to be sure.
Yes, and much of it sourced very inexpensively. The Leica R stuff, for
instance, cost me less than a middle price Pentax
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 10:01:12PM -0400, J.C. O'Connell wrote:
why not adapt the pentax 85a f1.4 to a full frame sensor??
LOL!
On 9/19/2013 6:16 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
Grasshopper might understand, but I don't. Why waste good glass on cameras
with small sensors? And I suspect modern
Darren,
You cannot judge the quality of lenses by the work I publish on-line. Just as I
cannot judge the quality of YOUR lenses by the work you show. The resolution of
on-line images is too low for that, the photographs were not intended to
exhibit a lens' quality in the first place, etc etc.
On Sep 19, 2013, at 7:00 PM, Larry Colen l...@red4est.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 19, 2013 at 06:52:37PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Sep 19, 2013, at 5:14 PM, Paul Stenquist pnstenqu...@comcast.net wrote:
It does look cool, and I'm sure I could have some fun with it. I guess I've
come to
On 19/09/2013, Steve Cottrell co...@seeingeye.tv wrote:
Oh this works so well I can't tell you.
In either full manual or A modes, manual focus with focus peaking works
so well. And I'm seeing on mono!
Still fiddling so some results soon.
47 matches
Mail list logo
