r guy)
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of
>> DagT
>> Sent: 15. juli 2006 11:28
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
>>
>> Great,
after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> DagT
> Sent: 15. juli 2006 11:28
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
>
> Great, m
> And by the way, while there you should have a look at Eirik
> Holmøyviks pictures at the same gallery. (And here: http://
> www.luguber.net )
>
Some very good landscapes and seascapes there.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.ne
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
>> Behalf Of
>> DagT
>> Sent: 14. juli 2006 13:18
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
>>
>>
>> Den 14. jul. 2006 kl. 11.36 skrev Cotty
in large crowds
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> DagT
> Sent: 14. juli 2006 13:18
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: A weird little story of Co
Unless they've stopped recently, Fuji continues to make film that
could be used in the Kodak instant cameras. Among my collection of
odd photo items is a Durst slide printer that used Kodak instant
film. I used to buy the Fuji film for it from B & H after the Kodak
debacle.
Bob
On Jul 1
On Jul 14, 2006, at 1:07 PM, William Robb wrote:
> Interstingly, and a bit closer to home, Eastman Kodak managed to
> run afoul
> of Polaroid's instant print process, not because they copied the
> technology
> (they didn't), but because the court agreed that Polaroid had claim
> on the
> in
frank theriault wrote:
>
> On 7/13/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > True, it was pure luck that I discovered it. That is why have
> > reacted, when it is discover the reactions should be sufficiently
> > hard to discourage others from doing the same.
> >
>
> I'll be interested to see how t
quot;graywolf"
> Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
>
>
> That gets into some strange territory. Copyright in most countries
> protects your image (the photo) from commercial use by others. The
> painting is clearly a derivative work. In some countries derivative
jensbladt248
>
> -Oprindelig meddelelse-
> Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
> DagT
> Sendt: 13. juli 2006 18:08
> Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Emne: A weird little story of Copyright
>
>
> Just to keep your minds off politics .-
56 63 77 11
+45 23 43 85 77
Skype: jensbladt248
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] vegne af
DagT
Sendt: 13. juli 2006 18:08
Til: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: A weird little story of Copyright
Just to keep your minds off politics .-)
During my
P. J. Alling wrote:
>A friend of mine who did some wading into the shallow end of the
>Polaroid patents, came the conclusion that Polaroid had patented the
>process of osmosis, which was the basis for their claim. He was
>astounded that Polaroid won the case.
I was living in Rochester, NY at
.07 skrev William Robb:
>>
>>
>>
>>> ----- Original Message -
>>> From: "graywolf"
>>> Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
>>>
>>>
>>> That gets into some strange territory. Copyright in most countrie
ome very general patents.
>
>DagT
>
>Den 14. jul. 2006 kl. 19.07 skrev William Robb:
>
>
>
>>- Original Message -
>>From: "graywolf"
>>Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
>>
>>
>>That gets into some strange t
That was a Patent issue. Polaroid had some very general patents.
DagT
Den 14. jul. 2006 kl. 19.07 skrev William Robb:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "graywolf"
> Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
>
>
> That gets into some strange territo
- Original Message -
From: "graywolf"
Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
That gets into some strange territory. Copyright in most countries
protects your image (the photo) from commercial use by others. The
painting is clearly a derivative work. In some countries
I grok it.
Tom C.
From: graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2006 10:19:49 -0400
But his heirs and licensees do. In fact they care more than the original
cop
On Jul 14, 2006, at 10:00 AM, graywolf wrote:
> That gets into some strange territory. Copyright in most countries
> protects your image (the photo) from commercial use by others. The
> painting is clearly a derivative work. In some countries derivative
> works are not allow without permission, i
But his heirs and licensees do. In fact they care more than the original
copyright holder because they are only interested in the money.
I did kind of like that Heinlein story where copyrights went to the
Galactic Government at the authors death. There were no other taxes
whatsoever since the p
Thank you Jostein, I will pass the info on. It was an interesting
topic of conversation on that night (or maybe we're a boring group :),
so I may do more research in the future, in my spare time...
--s
On 7/14/06, Jostein Øksne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Skye,
>
> You have to check out the l
Yes, they are the only ones who should do that!
--
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
frank theriault wrote:
> On 7/13/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is clearly a case whe
That gets into some strange territory. Copyright in most countries
protects your image (the photo) from commercial use by others. The
painting is clearly a derivative work. In some countries derivative
works are not allow without permission, in others they are. Even the
courts do not seem to un
On Jul 14, 2006, at 4:17 AM, Jostein Øksne wrote:
> Dunno how this changes after the photographer's demise.
Simple, he doesn't care anymore.
Bob
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Den 14. jul. 2006 kl. 11.36 skrev Cotty:
> On 14/7/06, Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> That's pretty arrogant behaviour from the painter. Hope you get the
>> painting destroyed. Make sure that he agrees also to destroy any
>> sketches he made prior to the final painting, and to co
On Fri, 14 Jul 2006, DagT wrote:
> Hah! I can do wonders with an axe .-)
>
> Even more fun: Send three kids with paint into the gallery and go for
> a walk. Just imagine the two boys in the painting coming into the
> gallery and start painting on their own picture.
>
> DagT
Wrong Dag, this will
Hah! I can do wonders with an axe .-)
Even more fun: Send three kids with paint into the gallery and go for
a walk. Just imagine the two boys in the painting coming into the
gallery and start painting on their own picture.
DagT
Den 14. jul. 2006 kl. 12.29 skrev Jostein Øksne:
> Sounds like
Sounds like fun.
Hard to imagine Dag doing it, though...:-)
Jostein
On 7/14/06, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 14/7/06, Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >That's pretty arrogant behaviour from the painter. Hope you get the
> >painting destroyed. Make sure that he agrees also
On 14/7/06, Jostein Øksne, discombobulated, unleashed:
>That's pretty arrogant behaviour from the painter. Hope you get the
>painting destroyed. Make sure that he agrees also to destroy any
>sketches he made prior to the final painting, and to confirm his
>action in writing.
If it was me I'd vand
Hi Dag,
That's pretty arrogant behaviour from the painter. Hope you get the
painting destroyed. Make sure that he agrees also to destroy any
sketches he made prior to the final painting, and to confirm his
action in writing.
Jostein
On 7/13/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just to keep your
Hi Skye,
You have to check out the local copyright laws where you live to be
sure, but I would say that owner X is not allowed to make further
copies unless that is specifically agreed upon. That's basically what
copyright is all about. The buyer only buys the right to own the item,
not to make re
Den 14. jul. 2006 kl. 03.11 skrev [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> In a message dated 7/13/2006 9:13:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> writes:
> One of
> the leading professors in Copyright issues in Norway has stated that
> the painting is illegal, and things seem to be going my way, but
In a message dated 7/13/2006 9:13:43 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL
PROTECTED]
writes:
One of
the leading professors in Copyright issues in Norway has stated that
the painting is illegal, and things seem to be going my way, but it
has been a busy week...
here´s a link with where you can
I'd say it's time to break out the longboat and do some pillaging of your own.
That does suck. I think you're doing the right thing by pursuing him. You may
not get anything other than an apology but you have to protect your work.
Tom Reese
From: DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In a program
> ab
I hope you win. I remember when you posted your picture, which is
wonderful.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of DagT
> Sent: 13 July 2006 17:08
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: A wei
Den 13. jul. 2006 kl. 20.31 skrev mike wilson:
> DagT wrote:
>
>> Den 13. jul. 2006 kl. 18.16 skrev Charles Robinson:
>>
>>
>>> On Jul 13, 2006, at 11:08, DagT wrote:
>>>
>>>
Just to keep your minds off politics .-)
>>>
After some detective work, and help from the Norwegian communi
DagT wrote:
> Den 13. jul. 2006 kl. 18.16 skrev Charles Robinson:
>
>
>>On Jul 13, 2006, at 11:08, DagT wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Just to keep your minds off politics .-)
>>>
>>
>>>After some detective work, and help from the Norwegian community at
>>>www.foto.no, I found the painter, and he admitted that
DagT wrote:
> Just to keep your minds off politics .-)
>
> During my holiday I was reading and listening to music but had the TV
> on (and sound off), just in case there was a weather forecast.
> Suddenly something known caught my attention on the TV. In a program
> about some opera semin
Wow.
Talk about right place, right time.:-)
Makes my problem with kids stealing my thumbnails and putting them on
webshots,seem minor.
Dave
> Just to keep your minds off politics .-)
>
> During my holiday I was reading and listening to music but had the
That reminds me. I don't know the legal answer (logically or morally I
know my own answer, which is "no for life, yes for death") so I have
to ask the question:
Last night at a local photo club meeting, one of the new members
brought up a question similar to the situation below, with one
differenc
On 7/13/06, Tom C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is clearly a case where one artist should respect the intellectual
> property rights of another. How would he like it if someone took a picture
> of his painting and started marketing reproductions of it?
I know that museums and art galleries t
On 7/13/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> True, it was pure luck that I discovered it. That is why have
> reacted, when it is discover the reactions should be sufficiently
> hard to discourage others from doing the same.
>
I'll be interested to see how this turns out (in your favour, I hope!).
st
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:42:08 +0200
True, it was pure luck that I discovered it. That is why have
reacted, when it is discover the reactions should be sufficiently
hard to discourage others from doing the same.
DagT
Agreed.
Tom C.
From: DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: A weird little story of Copyright
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:42:08 +0200
True, it was pure luck that I discovered it. That is why have
reacted, when
e can do
> that with anyone's work at any time and no harm is done, except
> when the owner of the original image accidentally finds out!
>
> Tom C.
>
>
>> From: "Tom C" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> To
Den 13. jul. 2006 kl. 18.16 skrev Charles Robinson:
> On Jul 13, 2006, at 11:08, DagT wrote:
>
>> Just to keep your minds off politics .-)
>>
>
>> After some detective work, and help from the Norwegian community at
>> www.foto.no, I found the painter, and he admitted that he had
>> downloaded my
He seems like a good enough painter to me. I certainly recognised his
work to be a copy of yours (and of course, you recognised it too).
--s
On 7/13/06, DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> After some detective work, and help from the Norwegian community at
> www.foto.no, I found the painter, and
il List
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: A weird little story of Copyright
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 10:22:05 -0600
He may not have been a very good painter but he's good enough to make it
obvious that it's a copy of your work. I hope you at least get some degree
of compensation without too much
the basis, is
plain backwards.
Tom C.
From: DagT <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: A weird little story of Copyright
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 18:08:03 +0200
Just to keep your minds off politics .-)
During my holiday I
On Jul 13, 2006, at 11:08, DagT wrote:
> Just to keep your minds off politics .-)
>
> After some detective work, and help from the Norwegian community at
> www.foto.no, I found the painter, and he admitted that he had
> downloaded my picture and used it, but he refused to take the picture
> down
On Thu, 13 Jul 2006, DagT wrote:
> the painting is illegal, and things seem to be going my way, but it
> has been a busy week...
>
> here?s a link with where you can see the pictures:
> http://www.nrk.no/nyheter/distrikt/nrk_sogn_og_fjordane/1.708983
Wow. I think I have seen the picture before. G
Just to keep your minds off politics .-)
During my holiday I was reading and listening to music but had the TV
on (and sound off), just in case there was a weather forecast.
Suddenly something known caught my attention on the TV. In a program
about some opera seminar in western Norway a si
51 matches
Mail list logo
