On Jul 25, 2010, at 14:45, P. J. Alling wrote:
No what they are saying is that they own your work, and since you bought the
over priced ticket to begin with, you're paying them for the privileged of
them owning your work.
I believe that this type of document is aimed more at the pro who
If the photographer got in with press credentials, they didn't buy a
ticket, and generally would have separate restrictions than the
general public who did buy a ticket.
As for schmoes, the tickets have wording on them that state the terms
and conditions, and by paying the ticket cost and
If the photographer got in with press credentials, they didn't buy a
ticket, and
generally would have separate restrictions than the general public who did
buy a ticket.
As for schmoes, the tickets have wording on them that state the terms and
conditions, and by paying the ticket cost and
From: William Robb
This isn't business, it's usury.
Actually, I think involuntary servitude comes closer to the mark.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
From: Bob Sullivan
This stuff has been a problem for a long time.
I'm a fan of the Chicago Bears Football team.
At an outdoor art fair, I found a bunch of 1960's photos of Chicago
Bear players.
I bought several and talked to the old guy selling them.
He turned out to be the photographer.
George
Ya, same reason why sharks don't eat lawyers, professional courtesy...
On Sun, Jul 25, 2010 at 8:53 AM, John Sessoms jsessoms...@nc.rr.com wrote:
From: Bob Sullivan
This stuff has been a problem for a long time.
I'm a fan of the Chicago Bears Football team.
At an outdoor art fair, I found a
Paul,
What you are referring to is the item 2), - about the photographer
selling merchandise with the photos. That part is understood.
Even without such a form signed, (and it is not always on the
back of the ticket) I wouldn't try to produce and sell,
say, calendars with the band photo.
The
On Jul 25, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Paul,
What you are referring to is the item 2), - about the photographer
selling merchandise with the photos. That part is understood.
Even without such a form signed, (and it is not always on the
back of the ticket) I wouldn't try to
No what they are saying is that they own your work, and since you bought
the over priced ticket to begin with, you're paying them for the
privileged of them owning your work.
On 7/25/2010 3:38 PM, P N Stenquist wrote:
On Jul 25, 2010, at 10:25 AM, Igor Roshchin wrote:
Paul,
What you are
You may remember me posting an ugly copyright release form from
one of the swing-dance events last year:
http://www.mail-archive.com/pdml@pdml.net/msg509934.html
(It was noted then that there is a similar rule Burning Man - but
at least there is a reasonable motivation there, and as far as I
All they are saying is they don't really want people to take pictures for
them.
William Robb
--
From: Igor Roshchin s...@komkon.org
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 3:14 PM
To: PDML@pdml.net
Subject: About awkward copyright releases
You may
What they are saying is that they don't want you making money at their expense,
without them getting a part of it. It's called business.
From: William Robb war...@gmail.com
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List pdml@pdml.net
Subject: Re: About awkward copyright releases
Message-ID
No biggie. I'd find other venues/events/people to photograph.
If they want to PAY me to take the photos as work for hire, I'd charge
them both a day rate and a fee for releasing the copyright to them.
From: Igor Roshchin
You may remember me posting an ugly copyright release form from
one of
On 25/07/2010, Jerry in Arizona glewis4...@yahoo.com wrote:
What they are saying is that they don't want you making money at their
expense,
without them getting a part of it. It's called business.
That's not business it's slavery, they want the photographers work at no cost.
--
Rob
--
From: Jerry in Arizona
Subject: Re: About awkward copyright releases
What they are saying is that they don't want you making money at their
expense,
without them getting a part of it. It's called business.
I like to think that business
That's normal. The photographers are at the concert to shoot for a specific
publication that has been granted press credentials. The publication pays the
photographer. But rights to merchandising photos of the band are retained by
the band and its marketing agency. They have to protect their
in Arizona
Subject: Re: About awkward copyright releases
What they are saying is that they don't want you making money at their
expense,
without them getting a part of it. It's called business.
I like to think that business involves good for each party, not just for one
party.
This isn't
:
--
From: Jerry in Arizona
Subject: Re: About awkward copyright releases
What they are saying is that they don't want you making money at their
expense,
without them getting a part of it. It's called business.
I like to think that business involves good for each
18 matches
Mail list logo
