Adobe have just announced the availability of a Beta version
of Lightroom fow Windows. The announcement seems to be a bit
premature - the link in the announcement email doesn't quite
work - but I expect it to be downloadable Real Soon Now (TM).
I'm looking forward to trying this product.
--
John -
After you get to the browser screen that the link in the e-mail takes
you to, click on the link that says "download the Mac beta". You will
sign in, answer a few survey questions, then get to a page with links to
download either the Mac or the Windows beta. I've got it downloaded and
No - that didn't work at the time I tried it - that was a
broken link to a page on the Macromedia web site. It has
now been replaced by a working link to a page on the Adobe
site (and the link now says "Download Macintosh or Windows
Beta"). As I said, the email was alittle premature; they
hadn'
So is anyone experimenting with it yet?
I'd be interested to hear your comments.
I have experimented on and off with Lightroom beta 1 and 2 on Mac OS
X for several months. I'm not wholly convinced one way or the other
yet. It's such a different way of working from my Bridge-Camera Raw-
Photos
Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So is anyone experimenting with it yet?
I've been using the Mac version practically from day one. Meanwhile, my
library has grown to slightly over 10,000 RAW-files (.pef) and some
10,000 scanned pictures (.tif).
The speed is OK on my 2 x 1.8 GHz G5.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> So is anyone experimenting with it yet?
> I'd be interested to hear your comments.
>
> I have experimented on and off with Lightroom beta 1 and 2 on Mac OS
> X for several months. I'm not wholly convinced one way or the other
> yet. It's such a different way of workin
Best be prepared for some kind of 'Elements' type of thing - or just a
high price. Adobe has Photoshop and Elements and then they have the
video editor Premier and you guessed it - Premier Elements. They
seem to like the high priced pro product and the stripped down, low
cost amateur product arr
rey DiGiorgi
> Sent: 19 July 2006 21:46
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Adobe Lightroom for Windows (almost) available now
>
> So is anyone experimenting with it yet?
> I'd be interested to hear your comments.
>
> I have experimented on and off with Lightroom
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 01:46:13PM -0700, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> So is anyone experimenting with it yet?
> I'd be interested to hear your comments.
>
> I have experimented on and off with Lightroom beta 1 and 2 on Mac OS
> X for several months. I'm not wholly convinced one way or the other
John Francis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've just started experimenting with it.
Try the colour -> b/w conversion. It will knock your socks off.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - upd
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
> Godfrey DiGiorgi
> Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 4:46 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Adobe Lightroom for Windows (almost) available now
>
>
> So is anyon
Wednesday, July 19, 2006, 2:33:04 PM, Bob W. wrote:
BW> I've used PS on and off for years (since v3), but never really
BW> invested a lot of time in learning it - it has always seemed to me
BW> like a hydra multiplied by an octopus times several squids crossed
BW> with a multi-limbed dinosaur.
In a message dated 7/19/2006 1:50:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I keep feeling that I'm missing something.
Godfrey
===
I'm missing what Lightroom is supposed to be.
I know Elements, and some of PS. How is Lightroom supposed to be different
and/or better?
Marnie aka
Same here on my old AMD Duron 1800/ 512 RAM. Quite slow to say the least.
I just hope that updateing the thumbnail will be a one-time process
only, if not I'm in trouble ;)
I was amazed at the size of the download... quite small really.
--
Thibault Massart aka Thibouille
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 7/19/2006 1:50:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I keep feeling that I'm missing something.
>
> Godfrey
> ===
> I'm missing what Lightroom is supposed to be.
>
> I know Elements, and some of PS. How is Lightroom supposed
On Thu, Jul 20, 2006 at 05:38:54AM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 7/19/2006 1:50:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I keep feeling that I'm missing something.
>
> Godfrey
> ===
> I'm missing what Lightroom is supposed to be.
>
> I know Elements,
>I played with it on my laptop (P4 / 1.8 / 512 / XP) for awhile this morning,
>but I definitely need more RAM. This site has several short video tutes for
>each module by the likes of Dave Cross, Scott Kelby, and Matt Kloskowski:
>http://www.photoshopuser.com/lightroom/library.html
>Lou
More Tutor
> Subject: Re: Adobe Lightroom for Windows (almost) available now
>
> In a message dated 7/19/2006 1:50:54 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I keep feeling that I'm missing something.
>
> Godfrey
> ===
> I'm missing what Lightroom i
In a message dated 7/20/2006 9:58:44 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To go beyond this (selective touch-up on
just some parts of an image, etc..) you need an image editor
such as Elements, CS, CS2, or some other external program.
=
Huh. Thanks, John. Very clear.
Marnie
--
19 matches
Mail list logo
