I can't wait to get my LX. Stop it now; bad Cotty, down boy:-)
Malcolm
Malcolm, have you spotted one???
Cotty
___
Personal email traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
MacAds traffic to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Check out the UK Macintosh ads
:-)
Malcolm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Cotty
Sent: 15 December 2001 18:58
To: Pentax List
Subject: RE: Shipping a camera abroad/Airport postal scanners fogging
film.
I can't wait to get my LX. Stop it now; bad Cotty, down boy
Before anyone says my camera is irreplaceable, I know of people who have
given up music as a result of losing their instrument. I am very fond of my
MX, but it is the film which has been shot on it which is my reference
point, not the camera itself.
That's me done :-)
Well said, Malcolm.
I've never had any problems running film through the X-rays here (carry on),
I wouldn't worry about it...
Norm
LeviL wrote:
The place I will have to get through an X-ray is in Germany. I assume
thay have film certified equipment too, but it is worth a try.
-
This message is from the
From: Joseph Tainter [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
The new thing is that ever since September I have always been
denied
hand inspection of film. The only ones they will inspect are when I am
carrying ASA 3200. Not like before when I could claim that it is within
the
guidelines
- Original Message -
From: LeviL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:25 AM
Subject: RE: Airport Postal Scanners Fogging Film
In the U.S., FAA regulation still gives you the right to request hand
inspection. The problem is in the rapid
- Original Message -
From: Ken Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 1:03 AM
Subject: Re: Airport Postal Scanners Fogging Film
Print this out and use this next time. It's their own regulations.
THIS DATA CURRENT AS OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER
:
- Original Message -
From: LeviL [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 12:25 AM
Subject: RE: Airport Postal Scanners Fogging Film
In the U.S., FAA regulation still gives you the right to request hand
inspection. The problem is in the rapid turnover
Scanners Fogging Film
In the U.S., FAA regulation still gives you the right to request hand
inspection. The problem is in the rapid turnover of low-wage workers in
screening jobs. They often don't know this.
Just to be nit-picking, I don't believe that it is a right. The FAA
has
Just to be nit-picking, I don't believe that it is a
right. The FAA
has guidelines that do allow handchecking, but they are free at
any time to
suspend those guidelines. I also believe that it is left to the
discretion
of the checker as to if they will allow it or not. My advise is to
Levente -Levi- Littvay wrote:
And do not expecta ny cooperation. Back in August when I came to Lincoln
I told then that I will have a guitar with me that might not fit through
the X-ray. A guitar is NOT something you'd want to check. [...]
So they told me to get a soft case and come out
Cotty, Glen and everyone,
I hear what you both say, but the lottery element, will it or won't it
arrive, do I pay duties or not(?) is just not good business.
Glen: I understand your situation rather better as my wife is a talented
viola musician, I can insure my camera and if it was lost I
Glen: I understand your situation rather better as my wife is a talented
viola musician, I can insure my camera and if it was lost I could buy
another. Like for like with instruments not possible - money is
not the only
issue.
Before anyone says my camera is irreplaceable, I know of people
Hello
I just exchanged a round of e-mails with BHPhoto. Thay say they ship
fedex who does not X-Ray nor do they Antrax deconteminate. I am a little
worried about the cost of an international package though. Anybody has
experience how much shipping is to Europe through them.
I have read
you can look up fedex international shipping costs on their web-site
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
The new thing is that ever since September I have always been denied
hand inspection of film. The only ones they will inspect are when I am
carrying ASA 3200. Not like before when I could claim that it is within the
guidelines to have it inspected by hand.
Cesar
In the U.S., FAA regulation still gives you the right to request hand
inspection. The problem is in the rapid turnover of low-wage workers in
screening jobs. They often don't know this.
Can you site this? So at least I can arm my self with a printout. :))
Overseas - forget it. No hand
Print this out and use this next time. It's their own regulations.
THIS DATA CURRENT AS OF THE FEDERAL REGISTER DATED SEPTEMBER 28, 2001
14 CFR - CHAPTER I - PART 108
View Part
ยง 108.17 Use of X-ray systems.
(a) No certificate holder may use an X-ray system within the United
States to
I know we've touched on this in the last few months. I didn't pay a whole
lot of attention then. I saw this ALERT on the Fuji Film
site. You'll need Acrobat Reader to view it. The part that is especially
frightening is:
New scanning at airports can fog unprocessed film.
The new USPS
has anybody tried carrying the film in their pockets through the gate,
rather than in baggage? Is the metal in the film canisters too much? If it
was then perhaps they could be persuaded to allow it not to be scanned.
Regards,
/\/\ick...
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Airport Postal Scanners Fogging Film
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:15:32 -0500
In a message dated 12/11/2001 11:45:03 AM US Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
New scanning at airports can fog unprocessed film.
The new USPS scanners, when put in effect will fully
They were'nt letting anything other than keys go through without getting
scanned at DIA, Dulles or Paris-CDG.
From: Mick Maguire [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Airport Postal Scanners Fogging Film
Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2001 13:34:51 -0500
has
The NPH is good stuff, I've shot a bunch of it rated at 320 ISO.
Robert
snip...
my order for NPH 400 and NPZ 800.
Anyone have any opinions on either film?
Thanks again,
Delano
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the
On Tuesday, December 11, 2001, at 03:28 PM, Robert Payne wrote:
The NPH is good stuff, I've shot a bunch of it rated at 320 ISO.
I also quite like NPH. It's a nice, low contrast, good skin tone film,
with very fine grain for a 400 ISO. Don't expect vibrant, punchy
colours: NPH is quite
24 matches
Mail list logo
