I have been receiving back a few orders this week. I was very apprehensive
when I had three separate brides all order 20x30 inch prints from me, and
was really worried about the results.
Well, tv talked me through the resizing process, and I am happy to say that
these are quite possibly the best
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote on 9/14/2004, 2:12 PM:
>
> I have been receiving back a few orders this week. I was very
> apprehensive
> when I had three separate brides all order 20x30 inch prints from me, and
> was really worried about the results.
>
> Well, tv talked me through the res
If it were about my own wedding, I would definitely have preffered
William Robb's Tachihara instead of sharpened phony pixels.
But as long as your clients are happy, more power to you !
Tanya Mayer Photography wrote:
Who would've thought? 20x30 inch, 300 dpi prints from a 6.1mp camera?!?!
Larger
I thought it was cute, looked at it several times, determined I didn't know
what to think about it, or DO about it, so I put it on my desktop.
A couple of weeks later I opened it up again, and it did the same thing it
did before, inexplicably expand to an ever larger object, always with sharp
ed
This one time, at band camp, "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, tv talked me through the resizing process, and I am happy to say that
> these are quite possibly the best prints I have ever produced.
What process did you use?
Kind regards
Kevin
-
__
Well, the lesson was that you can print it as large and sharp as you
want, but it won't have more real information than 4 pixels could have.
Keith Whaley wrote:
I thought it was cute, looked at it several times, determined I didn't
know what to think about it, or DO about it, so I put it on my d
Tan, it helps that your photos are amazing to begin with.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 12:12 PM
To: Net [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: BG prints - *istD style
I have been receiving back a few orders
Caveman wrote:
Well, the lesson was that you can print it as large and sharp as you
want, but it won't have more real information than 4 pixels could have.
Okay, I got that right off...
That I was supposed to derive something more out of it!
Okay, I thought my brain took a vacation! (It's been thr
I read it, I cared, and I believe I thanked you for posting it.
Thanks again.
Dan M
Caveman wrote:
I also remember posting some time ago a 4 pixels image that enlarges
well to any size, all with nice sharp edges. Nobody cared. So maybe I
should sign "Cavewoman", then you guys will pay attention.
PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2004 6:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: BG prints - *istD style
I also remember posting some time ago a 4 pixels image that enlarges
well to any size, all with nice sharp edges. Nobody cared. So maybe I
should sign "Cavewoman", the
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2004 6:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BG prints - *istD style
Tan, it helps that your photos are amazing to begin with.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, Se
From: "Tanya Mayer Photography" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 4:56 PM
Subject: RE: BG prints - *istD style
>
> *blush*
>
> Thanks Dave! That is so cute, but remember, you guys have never seen just
> how much cra
(the untechnical)
Tanya Mayer Photography
Qld, Australia
www.tanyamayer.com
Ph +61 (07) 49831247
Mobile +61 0429831247
-Original Message-
From: Dave Madsen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, 15 September 2004 6:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BG prints - *istD style
Tan, i
On Wed, 15 Sep 2004 19:30:00 -0400, Graywolf wrote:
>Repeatedly increasing or decreasing the size by about 10% until you have
>an image the size you want.
>
>--
>
>Illinois Bill wrote:
>
>> And the trick is?
I tried this with Photoshop CS and I have to say I prefer the single
step enlarged imag
Just use Genuine Fractals trial version, good up to 20 images (then it
stops). For really big prints (and even upsizing to e.g. 400 dpi Noritsu
prints at 30x40cm), it works better than just plain bicubic. Or at
least use Lanczos interpolation (in freeware IrfanView), it's quite better than
just bic
Did some testing too after the discussion. I couldn't see any advantage
to the many step approach - except the adition of artifacts (or maybe
this is the whole advantage - if you can mistake them as being "details").
Leon Altoff wrote:
I tried this with Photoshop CS and I have to say I prefer th
Yeah, I throw all of my crap away, too, but I don't have anything left when
I'm done.
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Tanya Mayer Photography [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BIIIIG prints - *istD style
D]
Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2004 3:56 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BG prints - *istD style
*blush*
Thanks Dave! That is so cute, but remember, you guys have never seen just
how much crap I also throw away!
Well, tv has, but he insists that it is "normal"...
--
Using M2, Op
18 matches
Mail list logo