On 23/11/04, Sylwester Pietrzyk, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Can I be your cashier then? I promise I'll make just right use of money for
>your campaign ;-)
Yeah but you're a damned Neeekon shooter now.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http:
Cotty wrote on 22.11.04 22:44:
> Lon, I hereby promote you to Manager of my Campaign. Start tomorrow ;-)
Can I be your cashier then? I promise I'll make just right use of money for
your campaign ;-)
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
On 22/11/04, Lon Williamson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Whell, hell, I'm voting for insanity.
>Just like this last USA election.
>You'll prolly win, to, Cotty.
>I always pictured you a sharp but "nice" politician.
Lon, I hereby promote you to Manager of my Campaign. Start tomorrow ;-)
Cheer
Whell, hell, I'm voting for insanity.
Just like this last USA election.
You'll prolly win, to, Cotty.
I always pictured you a sharp but "nice" politician.
Cotty wrote:
Only if you own only Nikon glass and no Pentax glass. If you're on
this
list I'd assume the reverse is more likely to be true.
I
Frantisek wrote on 22.11.04 0:36:
> Czesc Sylwek,
Dobry den Frantisek,
> Yes, I have compared it to something else ;-)
I am sure it was another SLR camera, not just something else ;-)
> I have been using D70 since it first came out, and before, I used LX
> and AF "pro"/semi-pro film bodies from
SP> Dark? Have you ever compared it to anything else? Or are you writing
SP> this based on heard rumours? I have compared it directly to VF in *istD
Czesc Sylwek,
Yes, I have compared it to something else ;-)
I have been using D70 since it first came out, and before, I used LX
and AF "pro"/semi-
On Nov 21, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Frantisek wrote:
It has some quirks though - small viewfinder, small
viewfinder, small viewfinder, small viewfinder, small viewfinder,
dark porroprism, dark porroprism, ugly viewfinder, ugly viewfinder.
Dark? Have you ever compared it to anything else? Or are you writi
Well, D70 has some nice controls, the image quality is good. It is
responsive. AF is good but only using the central point (other points
suck big time). It's not entirely up to sport photography, sadly,
because the predictive AF doesn't track the active subject that well, time to
time it just refo
That should be "think", but hey it was spelled correctly.
Peter J. Alling wrote:
I sometimes thing people on this list have unlimited funds.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Peter J. Alling"
Subject: Re: D70 vs DS
Only if you own only Nikon glass and
The latter I think...
Cotty wrote:
Only if you own only Nikon glass and no Pentax glass. If you're on
this
list I'd assume the reverse is more likely to be true.
It's amazing how they forget this, isn't it.
I claim special exemption.
Or insanity.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O)
I sometimes thing people on this list have unlimited funds.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Peter J. Alling"
Subject: Re: D70 vs DS
Only if you own only Nikon glass and no Pentax glass. If you're on this
list I'd assume the reverse is more lik
- Original Message -
From: "Cotty"
Subject: Re: D70 vs DS
I claim special exemption.
Or insanity.
Special insanity.
William Robb
>> Only if you own only Nikon glass and no Pentax glass. If you're on
>> this
>> list I'd assume the reverse is more likely to be true.
>>
>
>It's amazing how they forget this, isn't it.
I claim special exemption.
Or insanity.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pasti
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling"
Subject: Re: D70 vs DS
Only if you own only Nikon glass and no Pentax glass. If you're on
this
list I'd assume the reverse is more likely to be true.
It's amazing how they forget this, isn't it.
William Robb
On Nov 20, 2004, at 2:44 AM, Alan Chan wrote:
And worse of all, his D70 has back-focus problem so he has no choice
but to accept slightly out-of-focus pictures from time to time.
Another friend's D70 has misaligned viewfinder which makes the grid
screen useless.
Wow! So I'd be soo afraid to buy
al Message -
From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:40 AM
Subject: Re: D70 vs DS
David Zaninovic wrote on 19.11.04 16:18:
D70 body is $899 at the Wolf Camera.
I wonder how does D70 compare to the
A friend of mine is a long time Nikon user and have F90X & FA, but has been
unable to manual focus with the D70 because of the viewfinder. And worse of
all, his D70 has back-focus problem so he has no choice but to accept
slightly out-of-focus pictures from time to time. Another friend's D70 has
Sam Jost reported:
the *istD just 'feels' better in hand, even the proud D70
owner said so.
I held the D70 and had a play for a little while... In my hands it felt
better than the *istD (deeper grippy bit), but not on par with the *ist
D with grip attached.
The viewfinder seemed not too bad to
If the DS was $700 it would be a clear winner, but at this price D70 looks
better to me.
Maybe the price will go down soon.
- Original Message -
From: "Sylwester Pietrzyk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 10:40 AM
PZ-1 like way the *ist D works is simply the best!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Sam Jost [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 19. november 2004 19:01
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: Re: D70 vs DS
A few days ago I had the
;pentax list" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 6:52 PM
Subject: Re: D70 vs DS
On 19/11/04, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
All you need is a DS or D for parts, and a thousand dollars or so and you
could
graft the veiwfinder from the Pentax onto the Nikon just like yo
On 19/11/04, Graywolf, discombobulated, unleashed:
>All you need is a DS or D for parts, and a thousand dollars or so and you
>could
>graft the veiwfinder from the Pentax onto the Nikon just like you do
with the
>lenses. That is plus the D70 of course.
But what an ugly brute! I'm thinking of de
> D70 body is $899 at the Wolf Camera.
> I wonder how does D70 compare to the DS considering that it is at the same
> price. Are
the
Nikon autofocus lenses really that much more expensive than Pentax ?
I doubt it. I have the 80-200 and 35-70 f2.8 that i bought used for $900. 00
and $700.00
C
Steve Desjardins wrote:
The D70 appears to be the darling of the photomags, and seems to be
better than the Rebel D. Pop Photo just gave a nice write-up to the DS,
which I got to read while spending 7 quality hours in newstands in
Charlotte ariport last weekend.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/2004
Ah, Cotty, Cotty, you are the type of guy who knows that is not true.
All you need is a DS or D for parts, and a thousand dollars or so and you could
graft the veiwfinder from the Pentax onto the Nikon just like you do with the
lenses. That is plus the D70 of course.
graywolf
http://www.graywolf
On 19/11/04, Steve Desjardins, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Pop Photo just gave a nice write-up to the DS,
>which I got to read while spending 7 quality hours in newstands in
>Charlotte ariport last weekend.
LOL. Steve, you are a master of irony.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | P
On 19/11/04, David Zaninovic, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The only problem with D70 is small viewfinder, can this be fixed somehow ?
Sure, with a hundred D+M people and a half a million dollars.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottys
The D70 appears to be the darling of the photomags, and seems to be
better than the Rebel D. Pop Photo just gave a nice write-up to the DS,
which I got to read while spending 7 quality hours in newstands in
Charlotte ariport last weekend.
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/19/2004 10:18:16 AM >>>
D70 bod
David Zaninovic wrote on 19.11.04 16:18:
> D70 body is $899 at the Wolf Camera.
> I wonder how does D70 compare to the DS considering that it is at the same
> price.
D70 has much more advanced photographer-oriented features than Ds. Other
main differencies below.
> Are the Nikon autofocus lenses
D70 body is $899 at the Wolf Camera.
I wonder how does D70 compare to the DS considering that it is at the same
price. Are the Nikon autofocus lenses really that much
more expensive than Pentax ? What about third party lenses, is there a
difference in price between third party lens for Nikon an
30 matches
Mail list logo
