Re: Photography has Ruined Travel? (Har)

2011-11-19 Thread Christine Aguila
Ugh! I agree with you, Tom. In the end, it's just more hooey. In virtually every aspect, photography has enlarged my life and helped create relationships with other people. The camera forces you out into the universe, and every time it does that, new experiences follow, which can only lead to

Re: Photography has Ruined Travel? (Har)

2011-11-16 Thread Bob Sullivan
What I like best is when my traveling companion (wife) asks, 'Where dis you get that picture.' Were we on the same vacation dear??? Regards, Bob S. On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 4:05 PM, William Robb wrote: > On 16/11/2011 1:14 AM, Tom C wrote: >> >> I understand the slant this guy's coming from, but

Re: Photography has Ruined Travel? (Har)

2011-11-16 Thread David J Brooks
The last thing i would think of doing when climbing a trail at GFM with my camera, is giggle. How do i get down, is what i'm thinking. Dave On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 2:14 AM, Tom C wrote: > I understand the slant this guy's coming from, but I still think, all > told, it's idiotic. I think he just

RE: Photography has Ruined Travel? (Har)

2011-11-16 Thread Bob W
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of > William Robb > > > > http://www.cnngo.com/explorations/life/tell-me-about-it/james- > durston-photography-has-ruined-travel-361992?hpt=hp_bn13 [...] > He does have a very good point, which is that if the sole purpose of > y

Re: Photography has Ruined Travel? (Har)

2011-11-16 Thread Larry Colen
On 11/16/2011 2:05 PM, William Robb wrote: I believe I read much the same thing by Susan Sontag when I was a teenager. I don't know if she had an original thought or not. OTOH, to have been that close to a shark and not have seen it because he had his eye to a camera the whole time would have

Re: Photography has Ruined Travel? (Har)

2011-11-16 Thread William Robb
On 16/11/2011 1:14 AM, Tom C wrote: I understand the slant this guy's coming from, but I still think, all told, it's idiotic. I think he just needed something to write. http://www.cnngo.com/explorations/life/tell-me-about-it/james-durston-photography-has-ruined-travel-361992?hpt=hp_bn13 Tom C.

Re: Photography has Ruined Travel? (Har)

2011-11-16 Thread Stan Halpin
On Nov 16, 2011, at 3:10 AM, Bob W wrote: >> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of >> Tom C >> >> I understand the slant this guy's coming from, but I still think, all >> told, it's idiotic. I think he just needed something to write. >> >> http://www.cnngo.com/

RE: Photography has Ruined Travel? (Har)

2011-11-16 Thread Bob W
> From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of > Tom C > > I understand the slant this guy's coming from, but I still think, all > told, it's idiotic. I think he just needed something to write. > > http://www.cnngo.com/explorations/life/tell-me-about-it/james-durston- >

Photography has Ruined Travel? (Har)

2011-11-15 Thread Tom C
I understand the slant this guy's coming from, but I still think, all told, it's idiotic. I think he just needed something to write. http://www.cnngo.com/explorations/life/tell-me-about-it/james-durston-photography-has-ruined-travel-361992?hpt=hp_bn13 Tom C. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDM

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-03-18 Thread P. J. Alling
On 2/13/2011 4:40 PM, frank theriault wrote: On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Bob W wrote: Right! Really showing his Commedia Del Arte roots with this one, which was usually accompanied by a pie in the face from his sidekick Hegel, and a kick up the jacksy from Freddy "Take It Easy" Engels, t

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-15 Thread John Sessoms
From: Scott Loveless On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: > On 2011-02-13 12:23, Bob W wrote: >>> >>> What the hell, it's only the internet. > > http://xkcd.com/386/ I once read, and it might have been from a PDMLer, that the best way to get the right answer to a question on

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-14 Thread Scott Loveless
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:25 PM, Doug Franklin wrote: > On 2011-02-13 12:23, Bob W wrote: >>> >>> What the hell, it's only the internet. > > http://xkcd.com/386/ I once read, and it might have been from a PDMLer, that the best way to get the right answer to a question on the Internet is to post t

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-14 Thread Bob Sullivan
They keep spamming me with emails, 'Come look at our latest feature!' Junk mostly. Regards, Bob S. On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Chris Sheppard wrote: > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:00 AM, David J Brooks wrote: >> On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, William Robb >> wrote: >>> I've been officiall

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-14 Thread Chris Sheppard
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 7:00 AM, David J Brooks wrote: > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, William Robb > wrote: >> I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. >> This is a proud day in my life. >> The place really is run by and for (well, if I say what I think I can be >> sued). >> But there

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-14 Thread Boris Liberman
On 2/13/2011 6:52 PM, William Robb wrote: A lot of idiots doesn't equal all idiots Boris. There are shades of grey in between black and white, you know. On an idiot scale of 1-10 where 1 is not an idiot at all and 10 is Cotty, you would be a 1.3. Of course on that scale, I would probably be s

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread Cotty
On 13/2/11, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: >Cotty, you would be a 1.3. >Of course on that scale, I would probably be somewhere around >39472394729374845982927 You're being far to generous. To both of us. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/lis

RE: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread Bob W
> From: frank theriault > > On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Bob W wrote: > > > > > >> > Right! Really showing his Commedia Del Arte roots with this one, > which was > >> > usually accompanied by a pie in the face from his sidekick Hegel, > and a kick > >> > up the jacksy from Freddy "Take It Easy

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread John Sessoms
From: frank theriault On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Bob W wrote: > Right! Really showing his Commedia Del Arte roots with this one, which was > usually accompanied by a pie in the face from his sidekick Hegel, and a kick > up the jacksy from Freddy "Take It Easy" Engels, to which old beard

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread frank theriault
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 4:27 PM, Bob W wrote: > Right! Really showing his Commedia Del Arte roots with this one, which was > usually accompanied by a pie in the face from his sidekick Hegel, and a kick > up the jacksy from Freddy "Take It Easy" Engels, to which old beardy would > reply "You sill

RE: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread Bob W
> >> > Grover Cleveland once said, "A man is known by the company he > keeps, > >> and also by the company from which he is kept out." > >> > >> > >> And Groucho Marx once said, "I refuse to join any club that would > have > >> me as a member." > >> > >> I'm not sure, but I think there's a connect

RE: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread John Sessoms
From: "Bob W" Grover Cleveland once said, "A man is known by the company he keeps, > and also by the company from which he is kept out." > > > And Groucho Marx once said, "I refuse to join any club that would have > me as a member." > > I'm not sure, but I think there's a connection between the

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread frank theriault
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Bob W wrote: >> > Grover Cleveland once said, "A man is known by the company he keeps, >> and also by the company from which he is kept out." >> >> >> And Groucho Marx once said, "I refuse to join any club that would have >> me as a member." >> >> I'm not sure, bu

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread John Sessoms
From: David J Brooks On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, William Robb wrote: > I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. > This is a proud day in my life. > The place really is run by and for (well, if I say what I think I can be > sued). > But there are a lot of idiots over there. I went t

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-13 Thread John Sessoms
From: William Robb On 12/02/2011 9:30 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Phil Northeast wrote: > >>> >>> >>> >> at least nobody can accuse Bill of being boring > > Often tedious, but never boring. > ./??/) ..,/?..// ...

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-13 Thread John Sessoms
From: Phil Northeast On 13/02/11 7:19 AM, Larry Colen wrote: On Feb 12, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Jeffery Johnson wrote: I am wondering the same thing Ann... We're talking about Bill. Someone said something that most people consider anywhere from innocuous to mildly annoying and Bill blew a gasket

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread Doug Franklin
On 2011-02-13 12:23, Bob W wrote: What the hell, it's only the internet. http://xkcd.com/386/ -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow

RE: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread Bob W
> > Grover Cleveland once said, "A man is known by the company he keeps, > and also by the company from which he is kept out." > > > And Groucho Marx once said, "I refuse to join any club that would have > me as a member." > > I'm not sure, but I think there's a connection between these two > qu

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-13 Thread frank theriault
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:30 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > Often tedious, but never boring. I've often wondered what the difference is between those two words. I guess I better look them up or something... cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept."  -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pe

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread frank theriault
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Jim King wrote: > Grover Cleveland once said, "A man is known by the company he keeps, and also > by the company from which he is kept out." And Groucho Marx once said, "I refuse to join any club that would have me as a member." I'm not sure, but I think there

RE: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread Bob W
> What the hell, it's only the internet. M! > -Original Message- > From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of > William Robb > Sent: 13 February 2011 16:53 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForu

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread William Robb
On 13/02/2011 8:03 AM, Boris Liberman wrote: Well, one can argue that I am one of the idiots over there, though I don't spend too much time on the forums as of recently. A lot of idiots doesn't equal all idiots Boris. There are shades of grey in between black and white, you know. On an idiot sc

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread Boris Liberman
Well, one can argue that I am one of the idiots over there, though I don't spend too much time on the forums as of recently. I think it is actually quite sad, because, Bill, if you wanted to leave, you could have done so whereas being banned probably means that someone burned their nerve cells

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread David J Brooks
iew.:-) Dave > -Original Message- > From: David J Brooks > Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net > Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 06:00:53 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums > > On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:54

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread drd1135
what a good way of saying I shoot Jpegs and can't use PS. -Original Message- From: David J Brooks Sender: pdml-boun...@pdml.net Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 06:00:53 To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Reply-To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums On Sat, F

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread David J Brooks
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 12:54 PM, William Robb wrote: > I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. > This is a proud day in my life. > The place really is run by and for (well, if I say what I think I can be > sued). > But there are a lot of idiots over there. I went to the pentax forum for a

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-13 Thread Cotty
On 12/2/11, William Robb, discombobulated, unleashed: >I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. >This is a proud day in my life. >The place really is run by and for (well, if I say what I think I can be >sued). >But there are a lot of idiots over there. Probably a good thing - never been on

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-13 Thread Larry Colen
accuse Bill of being boring >> >> Often tedious, but never boring. >> > > ./´¯/) > ..,/¯..// > .// / > ./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`•¸ > ../'/...//.../¨¯\ > ('(...´(..´..,~/'...') >

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-13 Thread Dario Bonazza
../´¯/) ...,/¯..// ..// / ../´¯/'...'/´¯¯`•¸ .../'/...//.../¨¯\ .('(...´(..´..,~/'...') ..\.\// ...''...\.. _.•´ .\..( ...

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-12 Thread William Robb
On 12/02/2011 9:30 PM, Larry Colen wrote: On Feb 12, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Phil Northeast wrote: at least nobody can accuse Bill of being boring Often tedious, but never boring. ./´¯/) ..,/¯..// .// / ./´¯/'..

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-12 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 11:59 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums Naughty! what did you do? I guess we better not ask lol ann William Robb wrote: I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. This is a proud day in my life. The place really

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-12 Thread Larry Colen
On Feb 12, 2011, at 1:50 PM, Phil Northeast wrote: >> >> >> > at least nobody can accuse Bill of being boring Often tedious, but never boring. -- Larry Colen l...@red4est.com sent from i4est -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-12 Thread Steven Desjardins
Oh, Bill's just a big grumpy-muffins. Of course, the PDML is mostly grumpy old guys so we understand. Or more likely, we just forget faster. What are we talking about? On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 3:19 PM, Larry Colen wrote: > > On Feb 12, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Jeffery Johnson wrote: > >> I am wonderi

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-12 Thread Christian
On 2/12/2011 2:10 PM, William Robb wrote: On 12/02/2011 12:33 PM, Jim King wrote: Grover Cleveland once said, "A man is known by the company he keeps, and also by the company from which he is kept out." You might have just insulted every member of this mail list.. In context of course

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-12 Thread Phil Northeast
On 13/02/11 7:19 AM, Larry Colen wrote: On Feb 12, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Jeffery Johnson wrote: I am wondering the same thing Ann... We're talking about Bill. Someone said something that most people consider anywhere from innocuous to mildly annoying and Bill blew a gasket. Bill then called t

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-12 Thread Thibouille
LOL. Yes LOL... it will end up like DPR , IMHO The problem is mostly with incapable admins (and idiots but those are everywhere aren't they ?) it seems to me. 2011/2/12 William Robb : > I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. > This is a proud day in my life. > The place really is run

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-12 Thread Bob Sullivan
Good for you Bill! Now if you can just be patient with our intellectually handicapped... Regards, Bob S. On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:54 AM, William Robb wrote: > I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. > This is a proud day in my life. > The place really is run by and for (well, if I say w

Re: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-12 Thread Larry Colen
On Feb 12, 2011, at 10:09 AM, Jeffery Johnson wrote: > I am wondering the same thing Ann... We're talking about Bill. Someone said something that most people consider anywhere from innocuous to mildly annoying and Bill blew a gasket. Bill then called the guy on it, probably calling the guy

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-12 Thread William Robb
On 12/02/2011 12:33 PM, Jim King wrote: Good on you, Bill. I agree that there are a lot of blithering idiots over there. Yeah, I snapped at one of the most blithery ones. If a person doesn't want to get called out for sucking on toad nipples, why in the world would he publicly suck on toa

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-12 Thread Jim King
On Sat, 12 Feb 2011 11:54:22 -0600, William Robb wrote: > I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. > This is a proud day in my life. > The place really is run by and for (well, if I say what I think I can be > sued). > But there are a lot of idiots over there. Good on you, Bill. I agree t

RE: HAR!!! Banned from Pentax Forums

2011-02-12 Thread Jeffery Johnson
I am wondering the same thing Ann... -Original Message- From: pdml-boun...@pdml.net [mailto:pdml-boun...@pdml.net] On Behalf Of Ann Sanfedele Sent: Saturday, February 12, 2011 11:59 AM To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List Subject: Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums Naughty! what did you do? I

Re: HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-12 Thread Ann Sanfedele
Naughty! what did you do? I guess we better not ask lol ann William Robb wrote: I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. This is a proud day in my life. The place really is run by and for (well, if I say what I think I can be sued). But there are a lot of idiots over there. -- PDM

HAR!!! Banned from PentaxForums

2011-02-12 Thread William Robb
I've been officially banned from PentaxForums. This is a proud day in my life. The place really is run by and for (well, if I say what I think I can be sued). But there are a lot of idiots over there. -- William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listi

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-31 Thread Subash
On Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:15:28 -0400 David J Brooks wrote: > Womderful series of photos. > > This one i like a lot. > > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD#5374129055267831010 thanks Dave, appreciate it... regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-29 Thread David J Brooks
attempt at a pictorial narrative of > that experience. :) it was an eight days trip, though the actual trek > was for five days, covering 75km. we trekked from a place called > sankhri, approximately 6200 ft, to a place called har ki dun, at about > 11,600 ft. > > had taken exte

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-27 Thread Subash
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 1:53 AM, Luiz Felipe wrote: > Very, very interesting photos - looks like your trip was really good. Make > mine the Little Well Wisher, but the sunset at sankhri is impressive and the > whole gallery makes me dream about getting on the road. Another great image > is swargaro

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-27 Thread Subash
On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:10 AM, wrote: > In a message dated 8/26/2009 2:54:04 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > pdml.l...@gmail.com writes: > > What a beautiful place. Sigh. Some very nice shots there. Not going to > tell you what to "kick out" and what to keep. One suggestion -- the people > sho

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-27 Thread Luiz Felipe
6200 ft, to a place called har ki dun, at about 11,600 ft. had taken extensive tips from dave savage to try and do some star trails photography but, as it turned out, it was the monsoon season and it was mostly cloudy. it is a rather large collection (30) and i realise one ought to be ruthlessly

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-27 Thread Eactivist
ft, to a place called har ki dun, at about 11,600 ft. had taken extensive tips from dave savage to try and do some star trails photography but, as it turned out, it was the monsoon season and it was mostly cloudy. it is a rather large collection (30) and i realise one ought to be ruthlessly deletin

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-27 Thread Subash
On Thu, 27 Aug 2009 21:23:59 +1000 Derby Chang wrote: > > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# > Holy cow. That is an amazing set. Most humbled. Derby, Carlos and David Mann, thanks for all your kind comments. regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdm

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-27 Thread Derby Chang
sankhri, approximately 6200 ft, to a place called har ki dun, at about 11,600 ft. had taken extensive tips from dave savage to try and do some star trails photography but, as it turned out, it was the monsoon season and it was mostly cloudy. it is a rather large collection (30) and i realise one

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-27 Thread David Mann
On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:53 PM, Subash wrote: do tell me what you think: http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# What a beautiful place. I need to do some more back-country expeditions. Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net t

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-27 Thread Carlos R
Excellent work, Subash. A very nice gallery. Carlos -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow the directions.

Re: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 16:47:41 -0600 "William Robb" wrote: > They are certainly higher than mine. Great gallery. you are being too nice Bill, but thanks. appreciate it. :-) regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net to UNSUBSCRI

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:10:29 +0100 "Chris Mitchell" wrote: > Superb gallery Subash. I can't help thinking of the health and safety > implications of the first shot! And the well-wisher is lovely... > > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# thanks for the nice words Chris. totally agree w

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 20:34:23 +0100 "Bob W" wrote: > > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# > Really excellent gallery Subash - very enjoyable. I'm jealous of the > trek too - I'll get there someday before too long. glad you liked it Bob. there are any number of absolutely amazing trails

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 21:30:39 +0200 Toine wrote: > Lots of great photos and a pleasant watch, > Thanks for sharing > > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# thanks for the nice words Toine. appreciate it. regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mai

Re: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:56:11 -0500 "Christine Aguila" wrote: > stunning! > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD#5374131080443090626 > > Very Cute! > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD#5374128361649948482 > > Hi Subash: Great to see your pictures. Especially liked the two > ab

Re: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:23:10 -0400 "Ken Waller" wrote: > Nice photographic memories from your trek. > > I especially liked 'Sunset at Sankhri' > > > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# thanks Ken. appreciate it. regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 10:03:38 -0700 Larry Colen wrote: > I didn't see any bad ones to delete. If I did that hike I'd have to be > pretty ruthless to cut things down to 30. > > > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# hi Larry, thanks for the nice words and for taking a look. :) regards, s

Re: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Christine Aguila
. cheers, christine - Original Message - From: "Subash" Subject: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos hi, pictures from my first trek in the himalayas, which turned out to be an amazing experience. this is an attempt at a pictorial narrative of that experience. :) it was an

Re: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread William Robb
- Original Message - From: "Subash" Subject: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos it is a rather large collection (30) and i realise one ought to be ruthlessly deleting the bad ones but, to give a slightly different spin on bill robb's words, i guess my standards

RE: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Chris Mitchell
0:54 > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos > > hi, > > pictures from my first trek in the himalayas, which turned out to be > an amazing experience. this is an attempt at a pictorial narrative of > that experience. :) it was an eight days tr

RE: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Bob W
> > pictures from my first trek in the himalayas, which turned > out to be an amazing experience. this is an attempt at a [...] > > do tell me what you think: > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# > > regards, subash > Really excellent gallery Subash - very enjoyable. I'm jealous o

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Toine
rip, though the actual trek > was for five days, covering 75km. we trekked from a place called > sankhri, approximately 6200 ft, to a place called har ki dun, at about > 11,600 ft. > > had taken extensive tips from dave savage to try and do some star > trails photography but, as it turn

Re: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Ken Waller
Nice photographic memories from your trek. I especially liked 'Sunset at Sankhri' Kenneth Waller http://www.tinyurl.com/272u2f - Original Message - From: "Subash" Subject: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos hi, pictures from my first trek in the himalayas, which

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Larry Colen
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 03:23:45PM +0530, Subash wrote: > > it is a rather large collection (30) and i realise one ought to be > ruthlessly deleting the bad ones but, to give a slightly different > spin on bill robb's words, i guess my standards are rather low :-) > > do tell me what you think:

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:44:05 -0400 Paul Stenquist wrote: > > Lots of nice shots here. A fascinating photo essay. Thanks for > > sharing. > Paul > >> http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# thanks for looking and the nice words, Paul. much appreciated. regards, subash -- PDML Pentax-Di

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 11:05:43 -0400 ann sanfedele wrote: > For me the standouts are the little well-wisher, the tight shot of > the lavander blossom > and the mountain peak and the two women talking thanks for looking Ann. those are some of my favourites too.. :) > > I"m sure that was a fasc

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
thanks cotty, feels nice to be back :). like i said it was an amazing experience. we are already thinking of longer, better treks next year... :-) regards, subash On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 12:32:21 +0100 Cotty wrote: > >http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# > > Hi Subers - welcome back. Loo

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
On Wed, 26 Aug 2009 08:14:09 -0500 Bob Sullivan wrote: > Fasinating and beautiful. > Loved the orchid and flowers you caught, > plus that 20,000 ft. mountain face was something else! > Thanks for the vicarious trip in the Himalayas. > > http://picasaweb.google.co.in/pdml.live/HKD# thanks Bob. t

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Paul Stenquist
actual trek was for five days, covering 75km. we trekked from a place called sankhri, approximately 6200 ft, to a place called har ki dun, at about 11,600 ft. had taken extensive tips from dave savage to try and do some star trails photography but, as it turned out, it was the monsoon season

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread ann sanfedele
azing experience. this is an attempt at a pictorial narrative of that experience. :) it was an eight days trip, though the actual trek was for five days, covering 75km. we trekked from a place called sankhri, approximately 6200 ft, to a place called har ki dun, at about 11,600 ft. had taken extensive

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Bob Sullivan
himalayas, which turned out to be > an amazing experience. this is an attempt at a pictorial narrative of > that experience. :) it was an eight days trip, though the actual trek > was for five days, covering 75km. we trekked from a place called > sankhri, approximately 6200 ft, to a pl

Re: GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Cotty
ive days, covering 75km. we trekked from a place called >sankhri, approximately 6200 ft, to a place called har ki dun, at about >11,600 ft. > >had taken extensive tips from dave savage to try and do some star >trails photography but, as it turned out, it was the monsoon season >

GESO: Har ki dun trek photos

2009-08-26 Thread Subash
, approximately 6200 ft, to a place called har ki dun, at about 11,600 ft. had taken extensive tips from dave savage to try and do some star trails photography but, as it turned out, it was the monsoon season and it was mostly cloudy. it is a rather large collection (30) and i realise one ought to be

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread Doug Franklin
Mark Roberts wrote: > Doug Franklin wrote: > > Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster > > http://www.venganza.org/ > > Ah, I see you too have been touched by His noodly appendage! Though a true believer, I avoid His noodly appendage at all costs. :-) -- Thanks, DougF (KG4LMZ) -- PDML Pentax

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread keith_w
Bob W wrote: >> mike wilson wrote: >>> It's a pity WR is not here to see what we just missed. >> Let's all sign up and confuse the Har! out of him next year >>> http://www.yarr.org.uk/talk/ >> WR? Will Robb? >> >> keith whaley >

RE: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread Bob W
They used to hang pirates from a dock a few hundred yards from where I live. In fact, an ancestor of my brother-in-law was hanged here as a pirate, so I will stroll past later this evening, utter a special "Har!" and keelhaul a pint of something piratical in The Pilot in his memory.

RE: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread Bob W
> > mike wilson wrote: > > It's a pity WR is not here to see what we just missed. > Let's all sign up and confuse the Har! out of him next year > > > > http://www.yarr.org.uk/talk/ > > WR? Will Robb? > > keith whaley That be Cap'n

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread mike wilson
keith_w wrote: > mike wilson wrote: > >>It's a pity WR is not here to see what we just missed. Let's all sign up and >>confuse the Har! out of him next year >> >>http://www.yarr.org.uk/talk/ > > > WR? Will Robb? > > keith wha

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread keith_w
mike wilson wrote: > It's a pity WR is not here to see what we just missed. Let's all sign up and > confuse the Har! out of him next year > > http://www.yarr.org.uk/talk/ WR? Will Robb? keith whaley -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdm

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread David Savage
On 9/20/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Doug Franklin wrote: > > I feel compelled to post the following link due to the "pirate > connection": > > > > Church of the Flying Spaghetti Monster > > http://www.venganza.org/ > > Ah, I see you too have been touched by His noodly appendag

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread Mark Roberts
Doug Franklin wrote: > David Nelson wrote: > >> David Savage wrote: >>> Isn't it "Arr" as in "Arr me hearty" >> Actually, there's Arr, Yarr and Harr, all with subtly different meanings >> that wouldn't be evident to a landlubber. > > I feel compelled to post the following link due to the "

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread mike wilson
> > From: David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/09/20 Wed PM 12:46:37 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"? > > At 09:28 PM 20/09/2006, mike wilson wrote: > > > From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROT

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread Doug Franklin
David Nelson wrote: > David Savage wrote: >> Isn't it "Arr" as in "Arr me hearty" > > Actually, there's Arr, Yarr and Harr, all with subtly different meanings > that wouldn't be evident to a landlubber. I feel compelled to post the following link due to the "pirate connection": Church of the F

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread David Savage
At 09:28 PM 20/09/2006, mike wilson wrote: > > From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: 2006/09/20 Wed AM 11:47:54 GMT > > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > > Subject: Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"? > > > > On 9/20/06, mi

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread mike wilson
> > From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/09/20 Wed AM 11:47:54 GMT > To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" > Subject: Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"? > > On 9/20/06, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It's a p

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread Cotty
On 20/9/06, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed: >It's a pity WR is not here to see what we just missed. Let's all sign >up and confuse the Har! out of him next year > >http://www.yarr.org.uk/talk/ Arrr, he be back. -- Cheers, Cotty ___/\__ || (O)

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread mike wilson
> > From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: 2006/09/20 Wed PM 12:11:25 GMT > To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List > Subject: Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"? > > David Nelson wrote: > > David Savage wrote: > > > >> Isn't it "Arr&q

Re: OT Wot, no "Har!"?

2006-09-20 Thread Mark Roberts
David Nelson wrote: > David Savage wrote: > >> Isn't it "Arr" as in "Arr me hearty" > > Actually, there's Arr, Yarr and Harr, all with subtly different meanings > that wouldn't be evident to a landlubber. Damn! Missed it this year! And me being a Pastafarian and all... http://www.venganza.o

  1   2   >