Thanks for the replies.
The camera itself is in fine working order. It's just that I've
recently seen more and more hot pixels (and they're really not that
bad, just usually right where I don't need them). I normally shoot
JPG and do minimum PP via an older version of Photoshop Elements.
Maybe t
If you were using your K100D actively throughout all these 4 1/2 years,
then it might be a good idea to replace it anyway...
On 6/21/2011 17:07, Ed Keeney wrote:
I have a K100D that is now 4 1/2 years old with about 14000 images
taken. I've noticed more and more hot pixels being recorded on my
I've got a 3.5 year old K100DSuper with 38,909 actuations and it's
going strong. It doesn't have all the bells and whistles of newer
models, but it's still rock solid.
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 3:24 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> As a footnote to all this, 14,000 images isn't excessive. You should be
On Jun 21, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Paul Stenquist wrote:
> As a footnote to all this, 14,000 images isn't excessive. You should be able
> to go well beyond that. Most of my Pentax DSLRs went well beyond 20,000, and
> all were still in excellent condition.
My K100Dsuper has something on the order of
On 2011-06-21 15:24, Paul Stenquist wrote:
As a footnote to all this, 14,000 images isn't excessive. You should be able to
go well beyond that. Most of my Pentax DSLRs went well beyond 20,000, and all
were still in excellent condition.
For sure. My K10 has about 22,000 on it right now, and s
As a footnote to all this, 14,000 images isn't excessive. You should be able to
go well beyond that. Most of my Pentax DSLRs went well beyond 20,000, and all
were still in excellent condition.
Paul
On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:03 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> NO. Definitely buy a new camera. There
NO. Definitely buy a new camera. There is no hope in trying to save
this one. A K5 would work much better.
(You're welcome.)
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:07 AM, Ed Keeney wrote:
> I have a K100D that is now 4 1/2 years old with about 14000 images
> taken. I've noticed more and more hot pix
Ah! I didn't know this about Lightroom. Good to know. Thanks, Ed, for
asking the question. Cheers, Christine
- Original Message -
From: "Charles Robinson"
To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List"
Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2011 12:35 PM
Subject: Re: Hot Pixels - T
On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:52, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Ed Keeney wrote:
>> I have a K100D that is now 4 1/2 years old with about 14000 images
>> taken. I've noticed more and more hot pixels being recorded on my
>> shots, requiring more and more post processing detai
On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 7:07 AM, Ed Keeney wrote:
> I have a K100D that is now 4 1/2 years old with about 14000 images
> taken. I've noticed more and more hot pixels being recorded on my
> shots, requiring more and more post processing detail work.
>
> At what point do you say it is time to suck
I have a K100D that is now 4 1/2 years old with about 14000 images
taken. I've noticed more and more hot pixels being recorded on my
shots, requiring more and more post processing detail work.
At what point do you say it is time to suck it up and get a new camera?
I should have started saving a
11 matches
Mail list logo
