Transformer: http://tinyurl.com/2sthe4
I wish there was a larger version so I could identify all the cameras used,
but this will have to do.
Cliffhanger: http://tinyurl.com/2vednb
Something I would never do, but I'm sure it provided a hell of an image.
John
--
http://www.neovenator.com
On 9/23/07, John Celio [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Transformer: http://tinyurl.com/2sthe4
I wish there was a larger version so I could identify all the cameras used,
but this will have to do.
Reminds me of this guy's stuff (I've posted to these before):
Transformer: http://tinyurl.com/2sthe4
I wish there was a larger version so I could identify all the cameras
used,
but this will have to do.
Reminds me of this guy's stuff (I've posted to these before):
http://photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=6177877
Midwest has a Brooks-Veriwide with a 47mm Schneider.
Neat looking. 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 (6x10 format), Graflok back, ground-glass viewing.
Anyone know about these? Experience?
CRB
Midwest has a Brooks-Veriwide with a 47mm Schneider.
Neat looking. 2 1/4 x 3 1/4 (6x10 format), Graflok back,
ground-glass viewing.
Anyone know about these? Experience?
CRB
A friend of mine has one. To use this camera you really need to get
a center-filter to screw on the lens. Expensive...
Knowledge, but no experience. If I recall correctly they were the first of the
superwide angle cameras, it was considered a panoramic camera in its day. Good
optics, reliable, well built. However, today it would not be considered much of
a panoramic camera at all.
--
Collin R Brendemuehl
WW Penned
The last time I judged a contest, the digital thing was a PITA. I am no
longer a member in good standing of any camera club, but were I, the club
would treat any digitized image , no matter if the original was a negative
or a tiff, separately
The last time I judged a contest, the digital thing was a PITA. I am no
longer a member in good standing of any camera club, but were I, the
club
would treat any digitized image , no matter if the original was a
negative
or a tiff, separately from an optically produced image.
My feeling
You're absolutely right, Dag,
That's why I said that in many cases, digital is easier to manipulate than
film. But, no doubt about it, one can do lots of surprising with film, as
the shots you posted well show.
Very cool, BTW! Thanks.
cheers,
frank
The optimist thinks this is the best of
. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Bill D. Casselberry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: interesting camera club debate
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 16:34:52 -0800
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
And what's to prevent the photographer using film to make
several
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
But subjects
move, light changes, and a good photog knows if he's got the
shot.
A point I made earlier. But...
You would know why. I have often taken a 35mm film Camera out and taken
pictures which I knew would come out right. I have often taken some which I
felt
We had a debate at our photography club the other night about digital vs.
film photography and whether they should be judged separately. One member
was adamant that digital prints should be separated from film prints because
digital shooters have an unfair advantage. It didn't take long to realize
this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true. -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Tom Reese [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: interesting camera club debate
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 14:42:19 -0500
We had a debate at our photography
From: frank theriault [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: interesting camera club debate
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2003 17:52:34 -0500
As to whether digital and film should be judged separately, I really don't
care. It's up to the club or those holding
The only photo club that I've belonged to (http://www.groupf56.com)
didn't allow conversations about gear or equipment at the official
meetings (people did talk about it afterwords). Photographs were
evaluated on the final results, not what means were used to take them.
It is an interesting
frank theriault wrote:
As to whether digital and film should be judged separately, I
really don't care.
Hmm! I think I do; with digital you can review immediately what you have
taken - if you don't like it on some occasions the moment may not have
passed and you can take the shot again. With
And what's to prevent the photographer using film to make several exposures of
the same subject, bracketing the exposure, shooting from different points of
view, even using different cameras with different films.
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Hmm! I think I do; with digital you can review immediately
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
And what's to prevent the photographer using film to make
several exposures of the same subject, bracketing the
exposure, shooting from different points of view, even using
different cameras with different films.
Whoo! Another advantage to the digital user, he won't
Well, then, color me crazy ... LOL
One continually reads how the LCD and histogram of the digital camera
allows the photographer to immediately see the results of the exposure,
and, if need be, make another, and that's a valid point ... as far as it
goes. But subjects move, light changes, and a
This is just something of interest I saw on the web (pentax
related)delete this if you're not interested...
-
Was browsing (what appears to be) a japanese site, and saw this interesting
setup (just scroll down):
http://www.hidekazu-azuma.com/html/photo999menu.html
I can't
Hi,
I'm off for Easter but here's something for those big boys of
the bruvverhood to slobber over...
http://digilander.iol.it/clabo/flexpen/
Have fun,
mike
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget
O! HHH!
Pat White
-
This message is from the Pentax-Discuss Mail List. To unsubscribe,
go to http://www.pdml.net and follow the directions. Don't forget to
visit the Pentax Users' Gallery at http://pug.komkon.org .
- Original Message -
From: mike wilson
Subject: Interesting camera
Hi,
I'm off for Easter but here's something for those big boys of
the bruvverhood to slobber over...
Thats all very well and good, but the amount of movements will
be very limited by the flange to focal plane tunnel
23 matches
Mail list logo
