I've been reading again.
This time it's an article ("What's New With Zooms") in the Dec '05
issue of Outdoor Photographer.
Five categories of zooms are grouped and, among other stats, identifies
which have at least on element of "Aspherical/Special Glass." An
article foot note explains that "specia
On Nov 18, 2005, at 5:29 PM, Jack Davis wrote:
I've been reading again.
This time it's an article ("What's New With Zooms") in the Dec '05
issue of Outdoor Photographer.
Five categories of zooms are grouped and, among other stats,
identifies
which have at least on element of "Aspherical/Spec
N/A could very well mirror the delivery status, at least for
FA*80-200/2.8
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:29 PM
Subject: LD Elements
I've been reading again.
This time it's an
Pentax's' Marketing Dept (I'm making a bold assumption here) must
become somewhat exercised at the publishing of such mis-information.
To my other question, appears obvious to me that the lens is taking on
a lessening role in effecting the outcome of a print? The layers of
technology and operator a
ge -
> From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:29 PM
> Subject: LD Elements
>
>
> > I've been reading again.
> > This time it's an article ("What's New With Zooms") in the Dec &#
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: LD Elements
Pentax's' Marketing Dept (I'm making a bold assumption here) must
become somewhat exercised at the publishing of such mis-information.
To my other question, appears obvious to me that the lens
that only says the research ability of the author is not very competent.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 5:29 PM
Subject: LD Elements
I won't set down the complete article here, but in ea
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 7:41 PM
Subject: Re: LD Elements
To my other question, appears obvious to me that the lens is taking on
a lessening role in effecting the outcome of a print? The layers of
te
To my other question, appears obvious to me that the lens is taking on a
lessening role in effecting the outcome of a print? The layers of
technology and operator ability seem to trump all else. In the optical dark
room, everything works off of the initial careful focus.
--
Hmmm. As I'
omeone shooting color negatives, but they aren't a lot either,
> mostly
> having to do with color correction. better get used to it.
>
> Herb
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005
On Nov 19, 2005, at 1:46 PM, William Robb wrote:
In absolute qualitative terms, small format digital is not up to
the standard that film is capable of, especially larger than 35mm
formats.
Small format film isn't quite up to the standard of larger than 35mm
formats either ;)
- Dave
quality work, taking
the time to postprocess is an essential part of the production of a print.
Herb
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:24 PM
Subject: Re: LD Elements
Herb,
Forgive me, but I can'
ential part of the production of a
> print.
>
> Herb
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 11:24 PM
> Subject: Re: LD Elements
>
>
> > Herb,
> > Forgive me, but I
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 19, 2005 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: LD Elements
Reads as though you understand exactly what I'm contending, thus
confirms our total agreement.
14 matches
Mail list logo
