und myself wanting to scream
> in the guy's face. "What is it about it being primarily a "Still" camera
> that you don't get?" This little article from Luminous Landscape makes
> covers most of my arguments, without the Pending assault charges, though I
ly of cameras
> where the reviewer took off points for clunky ways to get into video mode,
> (this was especially true of DPReview IIRC), I found myself wanting to
> scream in the guy's face. "What is it about it being primarily a "Still"
> camera that you don't
y a "Still" camera that you don't get?" This little article
from Luminous Landscape makes covers most of my arguments, without the
Pending assault charges, though I think his plea for simplicity of
control might go a bit too far in the other direction, and having a
third
I think it already is. Good enough always drives out better if there's
a price differential.
On 9/4/2012 7:58 PM, Darren Addy wrote:
I've always thought that the Foveon sensor was looking for a way to
win over other camera manufacturers to use their chip, but the price
was too high (and the al
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi
A Fovean sensor stacks three photosites in each pixel location on the
sensor, with a color filter between them. I don't know precisely how
they order the stack, but it would make sense to order it blue, green,
red since short wavelengths are more easily absorbed than longe
I think there is some good info on the answers on this page (be sure
to click the "4 more answers" link:
http://photo.stackexchange.com/questions/22758/how-do-digital-sensors-that-capture-one-color-at-each-photosite-compare-to-senso
I think the most interesting comment on the above page is the fol
The Sigma site does say 12 bit and it's supposed to be the same
sensor. I got my number from the LL article.
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 11:02 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> On 9/5/12 8:54, John Francis wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:26:07PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
>>>
>>> I really like the
On 9/5/12 8:54, John Francis wrote:
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:26:07PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
I really like the concept behind the Foveon sensor - every
photo-site captures all 3 colors like film did& no need for the
anti-aliasing, but what's the deal with the poor image quality above
ISO 4
On 9/5/12 16:10, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
I thought one the main premises was that each sensor would absorb all
the light for a certain range of wavelenghts, and not at all respond
light outside that range, so that it would continue without any
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Mark Roberts
> wrote:
>> Anyone know if the Foveon sensor outputs 8 bits-per-color or 16?
>
> My understanding is that the quantization space is 12 bit per component.
Ah, on the Sigma site for the SD1,
htt
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 6:38 AM, Toralf Lund wrote:
> I thought one the main premises was that each sensor would absorb all
> the light for a certain range of wavelenghts, and not at all respond
> light outside that range, so that it would continue without any loss of
> energy to the next layer(s)
On Wed, Sep 5, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Mark Roberts wrote:
> Anyone know if the Foveon sensor outputs 8 bits-per-color or 16?
My understanding is that the quantization space is 12 bit per component.
--
Godfrey
godfreydigiorgi.posterous.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml
On 05/09/12 08:01, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
>> You could do a better job with many aspects of this camera. Maybe low
>> light is a sensor problem?
> A standard Bayer mosaic sensor is a planar surface with a filter array
> on top of it. Thi
Anyone know if the Foveon sensor outputs 8 bits-per-color or 16?
--
Mark Roberts - Photography & Multimedia
www.robertstech.com
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above a
On Sep 4, 2012, at 11:54 PM, John Francis wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:26:07PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
>>
>> I really like the concept behind the Foveon sensor - every
>> photo-site captures all 3 colors like film did & no need for the
>> anti-aliasing, but what's the deal with the poo
On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 10:26:07PM -0400, John Sessoms wrote:
>
> I really like the concept behind the Foveon sensor - every
> photo-site captures all 3 colors like film did & no need for the
> anti-aliasing, but what's the deal with the poor image quality above
> ISO 400?
Physics. If you don't
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> You could do a better job with many aspects of this camera. Maybe low
> light is a sensor problem?
A standard Bayer mosaic sensor is a planar surface with a filter array
on top of it. This means that the light at each of the photosites f
From: Darren Addy
I've always thought that the Foveon sensor was looking for a way to
win over other camera manufacturers to use their chip, but the price
was too high (and the alternative technology more than good enough) so
that no one wanted to pay the piper. Sigma bought the entire company
(
You could do a better job with many aspects of this camera. Maybe low
light is a sensor problem?
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 10:26 PM, John Sessoms wrote:
> From: Steven Desjardins
>
>
>> That's the real frustration here. The IQ is wonderful and everything
>> else is a mess. Even though I would get
From: Steven Desjardins
That's the real frustration here. The IQ is wonderful and everything
else is a mess. Even though I would get various degrees of results, I
wouldn't hesitate to take any of my cameras out on a photographic
mission. Not this one.
I really like the concept behind the Fo
I've always thought that the Foveon sensor was looking for a way to
win over other camera manufacturers to use their chip, but the price
was too high (and the alternative technology more than good enough) so
that no one wanted to pay the piper. Sigma bought the entire company
(all shares) and I thi
That's the real frustration here. The IQ is wonderful and everything
else is a mess. Even though I would get various degrees of results, I
wouldn't hesitate to take any of my cameras out on a photographic
mission. Not this one.
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:24 PM, Bruce Walker wrote:
> That's what
That's what I thought, but that's about the only thing boggling in a
positive way about this camera. It amounts to a one-trick boat-anchor
for me.
And did our very own Dave write this article? I saw so many spellos I
started to collect them:
catagory
homogenious
competative
pubish
creaping
supris
On Sep 4, 2012, at 7:25 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sigma_dp2m_review.shtml
>
> Incredible IQ from a P&S, everything else is a problem. If I had a
> $1000 to spend I'd think about it (but probably end up with a K5).
> Good article, nice compa
I have to say those image-quality comparisons are mind-boggling. -T
On Tue, Sep 4, 2012 at 7:25 AM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sigma_dp2m_review.shtml
>
> Incredible IQ from a P&S, everything else is a problem. If I had a
> $1000 to spend I'd th
Interesting camera. Brilliant on one or two points, mediocre on most
others. I dislike the push button control layout as it is presented,
but it might seem quite different when the camera is in your hands.
The article cocks up the whole discussion of pixels, spatial
resolution, antialiasing filter
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sigma_dp2m_review.shtml
Incredible IQ from a P&S, everything else is a problem. If I had a
$1000 to spend I'd think about it (but probably end up with a K5).
Good article, nice comparison images.
--
Steve Desjardins
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Oly is chic, Pentax is not. After the scandal, Oly even has a darkside ;-)
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 1:05 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:15 PM, P. J. Alling
> wrote:
>> Very positive. I just like to point out a bit of hypocrisy, the reviewer
>> glosses over the fact that
On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 7:15 PM, P. J. Alling
wrote:
> Very positive. I just like to point out a bit of hypocrisy, the reviewer
> glosses over the fact that Olympus m43 lenses are thin on the ground by
> pointing out the lenses from other manufactures and huge number of legacy
> lenses usable /wi
Very positive. I just like to point out a bit of hypocrisy, the
reviewer glosses over the fact that Olympus m43 lenses are thin on the
ground by pointing out the lenses from other manufactures and huge
number of legacy lenses usable /with/ /an/ /adapter/. On the other hand
pointing out the hu
The NEX-5n has better high ISO performance (it uses the same sensor as
the K-5); that has annoyed some Sonystas. I find the rest of the
camera a big win and like it a lot, at least in theory, as I haven't
handled one yet.
That said, I will never buy into the NEX system due to the gargantuan
lenses
From: "Ken Waller"
I'd say the vast majority of potential camera buyers are not near enough to
a trade show like this to attend, so from that standpoint this issue is a
non starter.
It's Pentax's availability at retail outlets that should be a concern for
Pentax.
Their trade show presence is a
hotogallery.com/kennethwaller
- Original Message -
From: "John Sessoms"
Subject: RE: Luminous Landscape mentions Pentax in their Photoplus show
roundup
From: "P. J. Alling"
Unfortunately not in a really good way.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays
Christine Nielsen wrote:
>Ouch. That's disappointing. But sums up nicely my nagging concerns
>about Pentax as a brand... And I have a beautiful new k-5 in my camera
>bag, so I'm not *that* concerned... But as someone invested in the
>product, I find this lack of participation aggravating.
This
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 12:56 PM, Ken Waller wrote:
> I'd say the vast majority of potential camera buyers are not near enough to
> a trade show like this to attend, so from that standpoint this issue is a
> non starter.
> It's Pentax's availability at retail outlets that should be a concern for
>
On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 12:56:22PM -0400, Ken Waller wrote:
> I'd say the vast majority of potential camera buyers are not near
> enough to a trade show like this to attend, so from that standpoint
> this issue is a non starter.
> It's Pentax's availability at retail outlets that should be a
> conc
From: "P. J. Alling"
Unfortunately not in a really good way.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/pdn_photoplus_roundup_.shtml
Last paragraph.
I hope their lackluster performance at this trade show was just due to
bad timing because of the Ricoh acquisition.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail
Ouch. That's disappointing. But sums up nicely my nagging concerns
about Pentax as a brand... And I have a beautiful new k-5 in my camera
bag, so I'm not *that* concerned... But as someone invested in the
product, I find this lack of participation aggravating.
-c
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 1:51 AM,
On Friday, November 04, 2011 12:51 AM, "P. J. Alling"
wrote:
> Unfortunately not in a really good way.
>
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/pdn_photoplus_roundup_.shtml
>
> Last paragraph.
Well, at least they liked the cameras
Cheers
Brian
++
Bri
Unfortunately not in a really good way.
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/essays/pdn_photoplus_roundup_.shtml
Last paragraph.
--
Don't lose heart! They might want to cut it out, and they'll want to avoid a
lengthily search.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mai
On 9/21/2011 4:22 PM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Tom C wrote:
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sony_nex_7_first_impressions.shtml
Among other things (pre-production model):
...
"... if ones expectations are realistic this new 24MP sensor really
sa
On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 2:51 PM, Tom C wrote:
> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sony_nex_7_first_impressions.shtml
>
> Among other things (pre-production model):
> ...
> "... if ones expectations are realistic this new 24MP sensor really
> satisfies. At ISO 100 to 400 its noise c
"if ones expectations are realistic this new 24MP sensor really
satisfies."
Very similar to what I told my wife before we married (32 yrs ago).
: )
Darren Addy
Kearney, Nebraska
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/sony_nex_7_first_impressions.shtml
Among other things (pre-production model):
"... I can say that in photographic terms this camera certainly gives
the impression of a compact fighting machine that sacrifices little
for its diminutive size."
"...
From: Alastair Robertson
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pentax-645d-first.shtml
Here's a hands-on first look report and video about a pre-production
645D from Nick Devlin for the online magazine Luminous Landscapes
which is usually a pretty reliable source for sensible reviews
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 8:49 PM, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> I just feel funny saying "inexpensive" for a 10K camera. Not my
> world. For all of our musings on this camera, this might be a good
> move for Pentax. MF cameras aren't held to the same cutting edge
> electronic standards as the high e
And 645D is marginally bigger sensor then Leica S2.
2010/9/6 Adam Maas :
> It's not significantly more expensive than a 1DsmIII or D3x while
> delivering about 75% more pixels and is far less expensive than a
> Leica S2 (and you can get more than 4 lenses for it), and those really
> are the only h
I just feel funny saying "inexpensive" for a 10K camera. Not my
world. For all of our musings on this camera, this might be a good
move for Pentax. MF cameras aren't held to the same cutting edge
electronic standards as the high end FF and Dx bodies. It might be a
healthy niche market that lead
It's not significantly more expensive than a 1DsmIII or D3x while
delivering about 75% more pixels and is far less expensive than a
Leica S2 (and you can get more than 4 lenses for it), and those really
are the only high-MP options with weather sealing.
-Adam
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 8:38 PM, Steve
Lots of nature photographers (and their websites and mags) are really
eager about this. Its a big sensor, lots of lenses, and weather
sealing. And, as odd as it is to say this, its all relatively
inexpensive. Especially with the old 645 A lenses out there.
On Sun, Sep 5, 2010 at 5:44 PM, Alasta
I think people are going to hold on to their 645Ds for a long, long
time. Think an order of magnitude longer than Nikon D700's :-D
--M.
On 05/09/2010, Steven Desjardins wrote:
> S. . . . How long will this 10K camera last? Even replacing
> this every five years could get pricey. I w
S. . . . How long will this 10K camera last? Even replacing
this every five years could get pricey. I wonder how fast Pentax will
update it? If it uses the K-7 electronics and they come up with a
better set, do they upgrade it?
My rather convoluted thinking is that I wonder what the USED
http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pentax-645d-first.shtml
Here's a hands-on first look report and video about a pre-production
645D from Nick Devlin for the online magazine Luminous Landscapes
which is usually a pretty reliable source for sensible reviews.
I, of course want one, b
when that's available again), and I'm looking forward
to using it.
On Dec 18, 2006, at 10:59 AM, dick graham wrote:
>
> All of you who are disappointed in the k10d because of the dpreview
> report
> should check popphoto.com's report or reread the luminous landsca
dick graham wrote:
> All of you who are disappointed in the k10d because of the dpreview report
I'd say to any and all of these who are disappointed in *camera* because
of its very subjective *review* : there are plenty of JPEGs around -
look at them, judge for yourself, trust your good photogr
All of you who are disappointed in the k10d because of the dpreview report
should check popphoto.com's report or reread the luminous landscape
report. Pop Photo has long complained about the soft jpeg image quality of
the ist d series. They said that the k10d not only proves Pentax belon
On 17/12/06, John Forbes, discombobulated, unleashed:
>When were you last in Scotland?
It was appalling - got married there!!
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
On 12/17/06, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 17/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > There was a thread about this a year or two ago. Someone made the
> > > comment that this sort of reaction was along the lines of eating a good
> > > meal and complementing t
t; DSLR with a cheap kit lens on it all the time. To each his
> own I guess
> jco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Adam Maas
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 8:15 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
&g
--Original Message-
>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
>> Mark Cassino
>> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 12:56 AM
>> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
>> Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
>>
>>
>> I h
On 17/12/06, David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > There was a thread about this a year or two ago. Someone made the
> > comment that this sort of reaction was along the lines of eating a good
> > meal and complementing the chef on their pots and pans. :-)
>
> Har!
I seem to recall that it
On 12/17/06, Doug Franklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David Savage wrote:
>
> > I show my photos now and again to people with no interest in
> > photography, and the most common comment I get is, "WOW, you must have
> > a really good camera". That makes me want to scream "I had something
> > to d
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 22:15:10 -, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16/12/06, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>> You'd be shocked how often I get asked if I'm a pro, just because of my
>> (rather small) K100D and 16-45 DA zoom which is my standard carry
>> config.
>
> Yeah but Ada
fuckface
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Norm Baugher" Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a
> K10D
>
>
>
>> Bill - this is an argument and you don't know shit. Get over it. Now,
>> let me tell you ho
Jens Bladt wrote:
>
> However, I believe the renaissance in fact started 2-3 years ago - with the
> *ist series DSLRs.
> If it hadn't been for the *ist D - I ,for one, would have considered leaving
> Pentax. Now I'm looking foreward to getting the K10D.
I'd peg the Renaissance back to the Zx/Mz l
A monopod and/or second body has the same effect here :-)
Markus
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of
Cotty
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 11:15 PM
To: pentax list
Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
On 16/12/06, Adam
On 16/12/06, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You'd be shocked how often I get asked if I'm a pro, just because of my
>(rather small) K100D and 16-45 DA zoom which is my standard carry config.
Yeah but Adam, when I'm out working I carry a video camera the size of
Scotland and I get asked
On 16/12/06, J. C. O'Connell, discombobulated, unleashed:
[re Norm Baugher]
>huh? What's YOUR malfunction?
He's got the measure of you, Norm.
--
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
PDML
ax-Discuss Mail List
Emne: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
Digital Image Studio wrote:
>On 14/12/06, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Very enthusiastic user report:
>> http://www.luminous-landscape.com/reviews/cameras/pentax-10D.shtml
>
>It&#x
> Tourette's syndrome
And then some.
LMAO !
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "David Savage" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
> Tourette's syndrome
>
> Dave
>
> On 12/17/06, J. C.
David Savage wrote:
> I show my photos now and again to people with no interest in
> photography, and the most common comment I get is, "WOW, you must have
> a really good camera". That makes me want to scream "I had something
> to do with it too you know", but I just nod and say "It's alright"
T
- Original Message -
From: "Norm Baugher" Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a
K10D
> Bill - this is an argument and you don't know shit. Get over it. Now,
> let me tell you how flawed you are...
Hey moron boy, you forgotto use ALL CAPS.
Get wi
2006 10:00 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
>
>
> fuckface
>
> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
>
>
> --
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
mber 16, 2006 8:15 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
>
>
> Same reason they drive a SUV, but never go off-road. It's more
> impressive.
>
> -Adam
>
>
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
he 18-55mm but it seems like a
> > reasonably
> > > > good
> > > > lens. Noticeable light fall off and softness in the in the
> > corners
> > > > wide
> > > > open, but not bad stopped down to f8 or 11. But that's jus
> > observation.
> > >
> > > - MCC
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Gonz wrote:
> > > > Just as I suspected. I'll bet its the same pretty much
> everywhere.
> > > I
> > > > k
Bill - this is an argument and you don't know shit. Get over it. Now,
let me tell you how flawed you are...
Norm
William Robb wrote:
>
> Its not an arguement, it's a discussion.
>
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
huh? What's YOUR malfunction?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Norm Baugher
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 10:00 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
fuckface
J. C. O&#x
fuckface
J. C. O'Connell wrote:
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
> know of at least 7 people personally in my area with DSLRs, only 1
> > of
> > > them has more than two lenses and one has two. The rest all have 1
> >
> > > lens. The person with more than two is a pdml subscriber so I met
> > him
> > > through the list,
> > lens. The person with more than two is a pdml subscriber so I met
> him
> > through the list, therefore he almost doesnt count in this quick
> survey.
> >
> > Most of these people I know bought the camera with a kit lens or
> bought
> > their own higher
On 12/16/06 8:38 AM, "J. C. O'Connell", <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Who would they be impressing? Certainly not
> anyone who knows anything about cameras. I
> would be more impressed seeing a true high end
> point and shoot then I would seeing an entry level
> DSLR with a cheap kit lens on it all
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Adam Maas
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 8:15 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
Same reason they drive a SUV, but never go off-road. It's more
impressive.
-Adam
J. C. O&#x
John your argument below, while valid, is from the photographers perspective.
I know lots of people who own D/SLR's and only have one lens. They
simply got caught up in the "Pro's use SLR's, ergo SLR's must take
better pictures" mindset, bought one with a cheap Sigma zoom & use it
like a P&S camer
nd faster than supernormal zooms of the same range.
> jco
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Mark Cassino
> Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 12:56 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Luminous Landsc
EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Saturday, December 16, 2006 1:47 AM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
Fuckface, this is where you get off the train.
Piss off now.
William Robb
- Original Mess
cuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
I have a good selection of lenses on hand, even after i sold off the
ones I bought as 'collectables' a few year ago. In reality, many go
unused for months at a time (or longer.) I last used my A* 300 f4 on
vacatio
> WRONG
>
> It's approximately 83.73257169%
> Dave
You obviosuly know NOTHING about professional pohotography, to anyone with
half-a-clue, its obviously 83.73257168%. What were you thinking, man.
- Peter
> On 12/16/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> OK, make that 85%.
>>
>> J
WRONG
It's approximately 83.73257169%
Dave
On 12/16/06, P. J. Alling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> OK, make that 85%.
>
> J. C. O'Connell wrote:
> > Do you really think that 90% of DSLR buyers
> > will never buy another lens? That's crazy!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
ht
d capability and buying
>>> SLR/DSLRS is about capabilities. I have
>>> a pet peeve about when people always claim
>>> "somebody else" or "90% of the people"
>>> does this or that, when they don't.
>>> jco
>>>
&g
mber 15, 2006 9:57 AM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
>
>
>
>>>> ROTFL Great slip :-))
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Still looking for the slip, but it sure was a buggered up
>>&
Fuckface, this is where you get off the train.
Piss off now.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell" Subject: RE: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out
a K10D
> WRONG- I just disagreed with the absurd IMHO "90%
> of DSLR buyers will neve
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks" Subject: RE: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out
a K10D
> Albera and Sakatchewan have GST but no DBST
>
I wish. We have a thing called the E&H tax, which gets lowered a bit before
an election campaign,then raise
almost doesnt count in this quick survey.
>
> Most of these people I know bought the camera with a kit lens or bought
> their own higher end zoom.
>
> rg
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> - Original Message -
>> From: "Adam Maas"
>> Sub
] On Behalf Of
David J Brooks
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 7:11 PM
To: pdml@pdml.net
Subject: RE: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
Quoting "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
I suppose
> you pay sales tax at +0.5 dB on the dollar? INSANITY
> ALERT!
On 12/16/06, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
> Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
>
>
> > And more than half of what I took were taken with the DA21...
>
>
Behalf Of
William Robb
Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 5:31 PM
To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
- Original Message -
From: "J. C. O'Connell"
Subject: RE: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
> This whole ar
I was going to buy the 21 with the K10D, but ordered it early when I
figured there might be a run on Pentax lenses when the K10D appeared.
I'm happy I did so. :-)
G
On Dec 15, 2006, at 4:07 PM, David J Brooks wrote:
> I almost added the 21 to the purchase of the K10 last night.
>
> May be in
2006 2:03 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
>
>
> Canon offers FF (1Ds series, 5D), 1.3x crop (the 1D series high fps
> bodies) and 1.6x crop (Digital Rebels, 30D and antescendants). EF-S
> lenses are for the 1.6x cropp
Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
> Cory Papenfuss
> Sent: Friday, December 15, 2006 2:09 PM
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: RE: Luminous Landscape: Reichmann tries out a K10D
>
>
> On Fri, 15 Dec 2006,
101 - 200 of 293 matches
Mail list logo
